Case Reports in Dentistry

Case Reports in Dentistry / 2014 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 723130 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/723130

Neha Bhargava, Prateek Agarwal, Nitin Sharma, Mayank Agrawal, Mohsin Sidiq, Pooja Narain, "An Unusual Presentation of Oral Mucocele in Infant and Its Review", Case Reports in Dentistry, vol. 2014, Article ID 723130, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/723130

An Unusual Presentation of Oral Mucocele in Infant and Its Review

Academic Editor: Yuk-Kwan Chen
Received11 Jun 2014
Accepted12 Aug 2014
Published26 Aug 2014

Abstract

Mucocele is a benign lesion characterized by an extravasation or retention of mucous in submucosal tissue from minor salivary glands. Mucoceles are known to occur most commonly on the lower lip, followed by the floor of mouth and buccal mucosa being the next most frequent sites. Trauma and lip biting habits are the main cause for these types of lesions. Mucocele is a common oral mucosal lesion but it is rarely observed in the infant. This paper highlights the successful management of a rare case of mucocele in an 11-month-old child. Diagnosis and management of mucocele are challenging. For this reason we felt it would be interesting to review the clinical characteristics, histological features, differential diagnosis, and their treatment and evolution in order to aid decision-making in daily clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Oral mucocele represents one of the most common benign lesion of the oral mucosa that means a cavity filled with mucus (muco means mucus and coele means cavity), which is the secretory product of salivary glands. The mechanisms for the development of these lesions are two, mucus extravasation, generally regarded as being of traumatic origin, and mucus retention, resulting from obstruction of the duct of a minor or accessory gland. When located on the floor of the mouth these lesions are called ranulas because the inflammation resembles the cheeks of a frog [1]. The most common site of occurrence of mucocele is the lower lip, the lesion has no sex predilection, and all age groups are susceptible, with the peak frequency reported to be in the second and third decades and rarely observed in infants making the diagnosis and management of mucocele challenging [2]. Mucocele has clinical resemblance with many other swellings and ulcerative lesions of oral cavity and hence needs to be differentiated carefully. Here we report an interesting unusual case of mucocele of the lower lip in an infant, along with emphasis given on its etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation, and various treatment modalities.

2. Case Report

An 11-month-old male patient was referred to our department with the chief complaint of a “little ball” in the lower lip and that he had difficulty in sucking for more than 3 months. The baby was in good general health and no other symptoms were reported. Oral habits or a local trauma was not reported. The clinical examination revealed the presence of a soft tissue nodule on the lower lip mucosa (Figure 1) which was similar in color to the oral mucosa measuring approximately 5 cm at its widest diameter with a sessile base, flaccid consistency, clearly defined limits, and a smooth surface. Based on detailed history and clinical examination a provisional diagnosis of mucocele was made. After medical evaluation, and signed informed consent from the parents, an excisional biopsy was performed under local anesthesia. Due to the lack of baby’s contribution, considering his little age, and as the procedure was simple, a decision was taken in favor of the physical containment (protective stabilization) with consent and aid of the parents: laying the baby on the chair, the mother laying over him holding the hands, and the assistant holding the baby’s head. As the baby was crying continuously, it helped in keeping the mouth open. A local infiltrative anesthesia (2% lignocaine with epinephrine 1 : 80,000; one cartridge) was infiltrated around the lesion. Before infiltration, a topical anesthetic gel for 2 minutes was applied. The lip was then everted with digital pressure to increase the lesion’s prominence. A thick silk thread was passed through the lesion at its largest diameter and a surgical knot was made followed by excisional biopsy using electrocautery (Figures 2 and 3), hence minimizing the chances of pain and postoperative bleeding. An analgesic was prescribed on the first postoperatory day to prevent any possible pain that could result in stress for the baby. The specimen was sent for histopathologic analysis which identified a large central mucous pooled area consisting of mucinophages, mucin containing cells, surrounded by compressed connective tissue wall, and forming granulation tissue (Figure 4) and confirmed the diagnosis as mucocele. After 2 hours, the patient recovered normal breastfeeding. The child reported uneventful recovery and an improved dietary habit one week postoperatively.

The baby was reexamined after 15 days and 6 and 12 months. No recurrence was observed after 12 months (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Yamasoba et al. [3] highlighted two crucial etiological factors in mucoceles as follows:(I)trauma,(II)obstruction of salivary gland duct.Mainly physical trauma causes a spillage of salivary secretion into surrounding submucosal tissue. Later inflammation may become obvious due to stagnant mucous. Habit of lip biting and tongue thrusting are also one of the aggravating factors [4].

The extravasation type will undergo three evolutionary phases [5].(I)In the first phase there will be spillage of mucus from salivary duct into the surrounding tissue in which some leucocytes and histiocytes are seen.(II)In second phase, granulomas will appear due to the presence of histiocytes, macrophages, and giant multinucleated cells associated with foreign body reaction. This second phase is called as resorption phase.(III)Later in the third phase there will be a formation of pseudocapsule without epithelium around the mucosa due to connective cells.The retention type of mucocele is commonly seen in major salivary glands. It is due to the dilatation of duct due to block caused by a sialolith or dense mucosa [5]. It depends upon the obstruction of salivary flow from secretory apparatus of the gland.

3.1. Clinical Characteristics

Clinically they are characterized by single or multiple, spherical, fluctuant nodules, ranging from normal pink to deep blue in color, and are generally asymptomatic. The tissue cyanosis and vascular congestion associated with stretched overlying tissue and the translucency of the accumulated fluid beneath result in the deep blue color. At times it may rupture leaving slightly painful erosions that usually heal within few days. Para functional habits such as lip biting and Lip sucking and trauma explain the lower lip being the most commonly described location of extravasation mucoceles [6]. They are mainly found in children and young patients with equal incidences in both sexes and rarely seen among children less than one year of age.

3.2. Diagnosis

The history and clinical findings lead to the diagnosis of a superficial mucocele. The appearance of mucocele is pathognomonic and the following data are crucial: lesion location, history of trauma, rapid appearance, variations in size, bluish color, and the consistency [7]. Usually mucoceles are mobile lesions with soft and elastic consistency depending on how much tissue is present over the lesion. Despite this fluctuation, a drained mucocele would not fluctuate and a chronic mucocele with a developed fibrosis would have less fluctuation. In retention type mucoceles, cystic cavity with well-defined epithelial wall lined with cuboidal cells is present. This type shows less inflammatory reaction. The extravasation type is a pseudocyst without epithelial wall and shows inflammatory cells and granulation tissues. Even though there is no epithelial covering around the mucosa, this is well encapsulated [4].

Radiographs are the contributing factors in diagnosis of ranulas. Localization of these lesions is done by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. High amylase and protein content can be revealed by the chemical analysis [8]. A histopathologic study is crucial to confirm the diagnosis which shows the presence of ductal epithelium, granulation tissue, pooling of mucin, and inflammatory cells.

Mucocele has clinical resemblance with many other swellings and ulcerative lesions of oral cavity and hence needs to be differentiated carefully. Palpation can be helpful for a correct differential diagnosis. Lipomas and tumors of minor salivary glands present no fluctuation while cysts, mucoceles, abscess, and hemangiomas do. A simple technique known as fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is very helpful, especially when differential diagnosis of angiomatous lesions is involved [5]. Here we have attempted to list the probable differential diagnosis of mucocele occurring at most common site, that is, lower lip, along with all the clinical features that helps in their differentiation (Table 1).


LesionAgeSexSiteClinical appearanceConsistencyProgression

FibromaCommon in 3rd, 4th, and 5th
decade
M : F = 1 : 2Common on labial mucosaElevated, smooth surfaced, sessile, or pedunculated nodule of normal pink color. Usually small to rarely several cm in sizeFirmSlowly growing

LipomaUsually in
4th decade
M : F = 1 : 1Less common
on lower lip
Smooth surfaced, yellowish, sessile or pedunculated, asymptomatic, nodular mass. Usually less than 3 cm in sizeSoft and freely
movable
Slowly growing

HemangiomaInfancyM : F = 1 : 3Lip is a common
site
Flat or raised, deep red or bluish red, and seldom well circumscribedReadily
compressible, blanch and filling slowly when
released
Rapidly growing for initial 6–10
months and then slowing in growth and involute

VarixOlder adultsLip is a common
site
Asymptomatic, nontender, bluish-purple noduleFirm

Traumatic neuromaMiddle aged adultsSlightly more
common in
females
Lower lip is a
common site
Smooth surfaced, nonulcerated nodule of normal
color with history of trauma. Usually less than 1 cm
Digital pressure may cause considerable
pain
Slowly growing

Salivary duct cystAdultsLip is a common
site
Smooth surfaced, bluish
swelling
Soft and fluctuantSlowly growing

Epidermoid cyst3rd and 4th
decade
M : F = 2 : 1Lip is a fairly common sitePainless, round, flesh colored to yellowish-white nodule present midlineFirm and mobileSlowly growing

Mucoepidermoid
carcinoma
2nd to 7th
decade
Slight female
predilection
Lower lip is a
common site
Low grade tumor appears as a painless mass seldom
exceeding 5 cms in diameter. High grade tumor produces pain, numbness, and ulceration. Minor salivary gland tumors have blue or red color
Low grade is usually soft and fluctuant, while high grade
tumor is firm
Low grade tumor slowly enlarging,
while high grade
tumor rapidly
enlarging

Amelanotic or blue neviUsually in
younger
patients
Predominant in womenLabial mucosa
is a fairly
common site
Asymptomatic, round or oval, raised or slightly raised, and sessile growth of normal or blue-black colorSoft to firmSlowly growing

Granular cell tumor4th to 6th
decade of life
M : F = 1 : 2Lip is a less
common site
Asymptomatic, sessile, pink or yellowish nodular massFirm and immovable

LymphangiomaUsually
present at
birth
M : F = 1 : 1Lip is a less
common site
Asymptomatic tumor mass of pink or purple color with pebbled surfaceSoft

Pyogenic granulomaMostly in
children
and young
adults
Female
predilection
Lip is a fairly
common site
Smooth, pedunculated or sessile, pink to red to purple colored, few mms to several cm in size, and painless swellingSoftMay exhibit rapid growth

3.3. Treatment

Conventional surgical removal is the most common method used to treat this lesion. Other treatment options include laser ablation, cryosurgery, intralesional corticosteroid injection, micromarsupialization, marsupialization, and electrocautery [9].

There is no difference in the treatment of retention and extravasation mucocele. Small sized mucoceles are removed with marginal glandular tissue and in case of large lesions marsupialization will help to avoid damage to vital structures and decrease the risk of damaging the labial branch of mental nerve [9]. Lacrimal catheters are used to dilate the duct to remove the obstruction of retention type mucoceles. While removing the mucocele surgically, remove the surrounding glandular acini, remove the lesion down to the muscle layer, and avoid damage to the adjacent gland and duct while placing the suture, as these are some strategies to reduce recurrence. If the fibrous wall of the mucocele is thick, then the removed tissue must be sent for histopathological examination to rule out any salivary gland neoplasms [10]. The micromarsupialization can be considered as an alternative treatment in case of pediatric patient because this technique is simple, relatively painless, and of less chances of recurrence. This technique (after disinfection and anaesthesia) consists of passing thick silk thread through the lesion at its largest diameter and then making a surgical knot. The suture is removed after 7–10 days, enough time for the mucocele to disappear [5]. The advantage in laser is that it minimizes the recurrences and complications and allows rapid, simple mucocele ablation. It is also indicated for the patients who cannot tolerate long procedures [9]. Other therapies that are of less well-proved efficacy include intralesional corticosteroid injections and gamma-linolenic acid. These therapies are of importance particularly in cases of multiple mucoceles, where surgical dissection of each lesion becomes difficult [6].

4. Conclusion

Mucocele is the most common benign self-limiting condition. Since these lesions are painless, it is the dentists, who usually pick up these lesions when the patient comes for a routine oral check or an unrelated dental problem. Management of mucocele becomes challenging because of their high chances of recurrence. However, surgical excision with dissection of surrounding and contributing minor salivary glands proved to be successful with least recurrence.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. H. D. Baurmash, “Mucoceles and ranulas,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 369–378, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Aldrigui, P. E. Silva, F. C. A. Xavier, F. D. Nunes, S. K. Bussadori, and M. T. Wanderley, “Mucocele of the lower lip in a 1 year old child,” Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 95–98, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  3. T. Yamasoba, N. Tayama, M. Syoji, and M. Fukuta, “Clinicostatistical study of lower lip mucoceles,” Head and Neck, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 316–320, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. K. Rao, D. Hegde, S. R. Shetty, and L. Chatra, “Oral mucocele—diagnosis and management,” Journal of Dentistry, Medicine and Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 26–30, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. Ata-Ali, C. Carrillo, C. Bonet, J. Balaguer, and M. Pe, “Oral mucocele: review of the literature,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 2, pp. e18–e21, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. Khanna, N. N. Singh, G. Sreedhar, A. Purwar, and S. Gupta, “Oral mucous extravasation cyst: case series with comprehensive and systematic review on differential diagnosis,” International Journal of Dental Case Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. S. Guimarães, J. Hebling, V. A. P. Filho, L. L. Santos, T. M. Vita, and C. A. S. Costa, “Extravasation mucocele involving the ventral surface of the tongue (glands of Blandin-Nuhn),” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 435–439, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Gupta, R. Anegundi, P. Sudha, and M. Gupta, “Mucocele: two case reports,” Journal of Oral Health & Community Dentistry, vol. 1, pp. 56–58, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Y. García, A. J. E. Tost, L. B. Aytés, and C. G. Escoda, “Treatment of oral mucocele—scalpel versus CO2 laser,” Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 14, pp. e469–e474, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  10. I.-Y. Huang, C. Chen, Y. Kao, and P. Worthington, “Treatment of mucocele of the lower lip with carbon dioxide laser,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 855–858, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Neha Bhargava et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

18211 Views | 1012 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.