Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Dentistry

Volume 2014, Article ID 792615, 4 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/792615
Case Report

CTCFL (BORIS) mRNA Expression in a Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma of the Oral Cavity

1Laboratory of Molecular Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Juárez de Estado de Durango, Predio Canoas Street, 34067 Durango, Mexico

2Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Nutrition, Universidad Juárez de Estado del Durango, Universidad Avenue, 34000 Durango, Mexico

3Laboratory of Pathology and Bucal Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Predio Canoas Street, 34067 Durango, Mexico

4Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Begonias Street, Guadalupe, 98600 Zacatecas, Mexico

Received 1 May 2014; Accepted 23 June 2014; Published 10 July 2014

Academic Editor: Tommaso Lombardi

Copyright © 2014 Graciela Zambrano-Galván et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) is a relatively common benign reactive lesion of the oral cavity which can occur at any age. CTCFL/BORIS (CTCF like/Brother of the Regulator of Imprinted Sites) and CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) are paralogous genes with an important role in the regulation of gene expression, genomic imprinting, and nuclear chromatin insulators regulation. BORIS expression promotes cell immortalization and growth while CTCF has tumor suppressor activity; the expression pattern may reflect the reverse transcription silencing of BORIS. The aim of this work was to describe a histopathological and molecular approach of an 8-year-old pediatric male patient with PGCG diagnosis. It was observed that the PGCG under study expressed CTCF as well as BORIS mRNAs alongside with the housekeeping gene GAPDH, which may be related to possible genetic and epigenetic changes in normal cells of oral cavity.

1. Introduction

Peripheral giant cell granuloma (PGCG) is a relatively common benign reactive lesion of the oral cavity which can occur at any age; it consists of a soft tissue injury mainly originating from the periosteum or periodontal membrane following local irritation or chronic trauma. The main clinical feature of PGCG is a red-purple nodule located in the region of the gums or the alveolar edentulous, mainly in the lower jaw [1, 2].

PGCC is of osteoclastic nature and is not considered a true neoplasm. It has been termed as PGCG “abnormal reparative”; however, this function has not been fully established, and its osteoclastic activity seems doubtful [3]. Although the presence of calcitonin membrane receptors, as well as osteoclastic activity, has been demonstrated by immunohistochemistry [4, 5], some authors report that the lesion is formed by cells of the fagocito mononuclear system [6]. In this respect, some authors propose that PGCG is a process in which the fibroblasts overexpress cytokines and growth factors, which induce or activate macrophages to become giant cells [7].

CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is an essential protein encoded by the gene of the same name, which is ubiquitously expressed and plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression; the multiple activities of CTCF in mammalians include transcriptional activation and repression, gene silencing, constitutive chromatin insulation, and functional reading of imprinted states, reasons for which it has been named the master weaver of the genome [8]. CTCF has been proposed as a novel tumor suppressor gene because the CTCF expression suppresses tumor cell proliferation [9]. Some mutations in the CTCF gene have been localized and characterized in various types of cancer, including breast [10].

Recently was identified a paralogue of the CTCF gene that was called CTCFL (CTCF like) and also BORIS (Brother of the Regulator of Imprinted Sites, name that will be used in this paper), which encodes a protein of the same name [11]. CTCF and BORIS are zinc-finger proteins sharing the same 11 zinc fingers and interact with similar DNA sequences, although they have different amino and carboxyl ends. Normally CTCF and BORIS are expressed in a mutually exclusive pattern that correlates with the reestablishment of methylation marks during male germ cell differentiation [11, 12].

Apart of male germ cells, scarce or null expression of BORIS has been reported in normal human tissues and cells. Thus, it has been suggested that BORIS expression is controlled at epigenetic level by promoter DNA methylation, and their activation requires demethylation [13]. In cancer patients, high expression of BORIS is correlated with the size and grade of the tumor, especially in breast, endometrium, prostate, and colon [14]. An inhibitor of DNA methylation, 5-aza-2′deoxy-cytidine (5-azadC), as well as histone deacetylase inhibitors, induces or enhances the BORIS gene expression in various carcinoma cell lines [15].

2. Case Report

An 8-year-old pediatric male patient, referred from private practice to the Department of Clinical Pathology of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Juarez University of the State of Durango, Mexico, presented a lobular nodular lesion at the level of dental organs 31 and 32, similar in color to the mucosa, with a pediculated base in the gingival region, with an evolution time of approximately 6 months. The patient underwent excisional biopsy; the specimen was grayish-white, irregularly shaped, and had a firm consistency. The measures of the specimen were 1.1 × 0.6 × 0.7 cm. The sample was formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) for histopathological and molecular analysis.

Microscopic Description. H&E staining was performed and analyzed with a Leica DMD108 Optic Microscopic. By H&E staining a stratified squamous parakeratinized epithelium, with the presence of elongated epithelial anastomosing nails and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, was observed. Epithelial atrophic areas presenting a continuum with the stroma, dense fibrous hyalinized connective tissue, heavy hemorrhagic areas, blood vessels, and the presence of multinucleated giant cells, some of which with vesicular nuclei and abundant mitotic figures, were also observed. Furthermore, a lymphoplasmocitary inflammatory response dominated by positive surgical margins was present (Figure 1).

fig1
Figure 1: Two photomicrography images of the peripheric giant cell granuloma showing numerous giant cells with mitotic nuclei (H&E staining, ×65).

Molecular Description. A descriptive study of a FFPE sample with histopathologic diagnosis of PGCG was conducted. Total RNA was obtained with the QuickExtract FFPE RNA Extraction Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and cDNA was synthesized with the cDNA Synthesis Kit iScript (BIO-RAD). BORIS, CTCF, and GAPDH (used as housekeeping gene) mRNA expression was carried out by real-time PCR using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit system and Quantitect Primers (Qiagen Germantown, MD. Catalogue numbers: BORIS, QT00023191, amplicon size 125 bp; CTCF, QT00045437, amplicon size 119 bp; GAPDH, QT01192646, amplicon size 119 bp).

The amplification conditions consisted of incubation at 50°C for 30 min, followed by polymerase activation at 95°C for 15 min and 45 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 15 s, and annealing and extension at 60°C for 1 min. Amplification, acquisition, and data analysis were performed with an Eco Illumina Real-Time PCR System and Eco Version 0.17.53.9 Software.

The specificity of the reaction was verified by melting analysis of the amplified products; the size of the amplicons was analyzed by electrophoresis in agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, because we use a SYBR Green as intercalating dye chemistry instead of allele-specific probes.

It was observed that the peripheral giant cell granuloma under study expressed CTCF as well as BORIS mRNAs alongside with the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The cycle threshold (Ct) value in the linear part of the amplification was 31.14 for GAPDH, 32.06 for CTCF, and 35.34 for BORIS; this means that CTCF had 0.52 and BORIS had 0.05 times the expression value of GAPDH used as housekeeping gene. Thus, the CTCF/BORIS expression ratio was 10.4. The amplification kinetics and the end products of real-time PCR are presented in Figure 2.

792615.fig.002
Figure 2: Amplification curves for BORIS, CTCF, and GAPDH genes in blue, yellow, and red, respectively, as obtained with Quantitect (Qiagen) primers. The insert shows the PCR products resolved by gel electrophoresis; from left to right, 50 bp ladder, BORIS (125 bp), CTCF (119 bp), and GAPDH (119 bp).

3. Discussion

BORIS expression has been reported in various types of carcinoma such as breast, ovary, colon, and prostate, but to date there are no data regarding its expression in benign or malignant oral cancer.

PGCG is a benign lesion of the oral cavity which has a recurrent behavior. There are no data regarding CTCF and BORIS expression in this kind of lesion. In this work, it was found that in a case of PGCG there existed coexpression at transcriptional level of both genes. Although the role of BORIS in cancer has not been elucidated to date, divergent roles have been proposed. On one hand, it is believed that BORIS could participate in the molecular mechanisms driving cancer behaving as oncogene [16]; on the other hand, an ancillary role when CTCF is mutated and the encoded protein is dysfunctional has been proposed in a recent report [9]. PGCG is a benign lesion in which both scenarios are possible, but deeper genetic and epigenetic studies are necessary to shed light on this matter.

This is the first report showing BORIS expression in a benign lesion of the oral cavity and, as a starting point, the issue merits further studies.

4. Conclusion

The coexpression of BORIS and CTCF genes in PGCG may be associated with the alteration of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in the normal function of the cells in the oral cavity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interest with respect to the publication of this paper.

References

  1. A. V. Chaparro-Avendaño, L. Berini-Aytés, and C. Gay-Escoda, “Peripheral giant cell granuloma. A report of five cases and review of the literature.,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–67, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. K. Adlakha, P. Chandna, U. Rehani, V. Rana, and P. Malik, “Peripheral giant cell granuloma,” Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 293–296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Bonetti, G. Pelosi, G. Martignoni et al., “Peripheral giant cell granuloma: evidence for osteoclastic differentiation,” Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 471–475, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Lim and J. R. Gibbins, “Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural evidence of a modified microvasculature in the giant cell granuloma of the jaws,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. R. Carvalho, A. M. Loyola, R. S. Gomez, and V. C. Araújo, “Peripheral giant cell granuloma. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.,” Oral Diseases, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. N. Tandon, S. K. Gupta, D. S. Gupta, S. K. Jurel, and A. Saraswat, “Peripheral giant cell granuloma,” Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 118–121, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Gándara, J. L. Pacheco, P. Gándara et al., “Granuloma periférico de células gigantes. Revisión de 13 casos clínicos,” Medicina Oral, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 254–259, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Phillips and V. G. Corces, “CTCF: master weaver of the genome,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 7, pp. 1194–1211, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. E. J. Rasko, E. M. Klenova, J. Leon et al., “Cell growth inhibition by the multifunctional multivalent zinc-finger factor CTCF,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 6002–6007, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. N. Filippova, C. F. Qi, J. E. Ulmer et al., “Tumor-associated zinc finger mutations in the CTCF transcription factor selectively alter its DNA-binding specificity,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. I. Loukinov, E. Pugacheva, S. Vatolin et al., “BORIS, a novel male germ-line-specific protein associated with epigenetic reprogramming events, shares the same 11-zinc-finger domain with CTCF, the insulator protein involved in reading imprinting marks in the soma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 6806–6811, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. M. Klenova, H. C. Morse 3rd., R. Ohlsson, and V. V. Lobanenkov, “The novel BORIS+CTCF gene family is uniquely involved in the epigenetics of normal biology and cancer,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 399–414, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. A. Link, W. Zhang, K. Odunsi, and A. R. Karpf, “BORIS/CTCFL mRNA isoform expression and epigenetic regulation in epithelial ovarian cancer,” Cancer Immunity, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1–9, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Martin-Kleiner, “BORIS in human cancers: a review,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 929–935, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. C. Tiffen, C. G. Bailey, A. D. Marshall et al., “The cancer-testis antigen BORIS phenocopies the tumor suppressor CTCF in normal and neoplastic cells,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 1603–1613, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. de Necochea-Campion, A. Ghochikyan, S. F. Josephs et al., “Expression of the Epigenetic factor BORIS (CTCFL) in the Human Genome,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, article 213, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus