Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Endocrinology
Volume 2015, Article ID 570293, 6 pages
Case Report

Anticytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen-4 Induced Autoimmune Hypophysitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3B, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 9 January 2015

Academic Editor: Suat Simsek

Copyright © 2015 Deborah Majchel and Mary T. Korytkowski. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Objective. We describe a case of autoimmune hypophysitis induced by the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agent, ipilimumab. Methods. Case presentation and review of the literature. Results. Autoimmune hypophysitis, a previously described rare disorder, is being recognized more frequently as a side effect of novel immunomodulatory agents used in the treatment of malignancies such as melanoma. CTLA-4 agents are associated with immune-related adverse effects (irAE) which occur as a result of activation (or lack of inactivation) of the immune response. This impacts not only malignant cells but also different host organ-systems. Autoimmune hypophysitis is one of several endocrinopathies associated with these agents. Conclusion. It is important that endocrinologists become familiar with the endocrinopathies, such as autoimmune hypophysitis, associated with new immunomodulator agents which are being used with increasing frequency to treat a variety of malignancies.

1. Introduction

New human monoclonal antibodies that target the T cell receptor, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), are associated with immune mediated adverse events (irAE). Classic lymphocytic hypophysitis is an uncommon disorder which is autoimmune in nature. This novel class of immunomodulators being used for the treatment of certain malignancies, such as melanoma, has led to an increase in the diagnosis of hypophysitis, which is part of its side effect profile.

We describe a case of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis.

2. Case Presentation

A 31 year-old female who had undergone excision of a stage IIIB melanoma of the right heel with inguinal node dissection at an outside hospital presented to the emergency department with a 9-day history of intermittent temporal headaches. Postoperatively, she had been enrolled in an open label research protocol for which she was randomized to high dose ipilimumab (10 mg/kg). At time of presentation she had received 3 doses of this agent at 3 week intervals. Her most recent dose was administered 2 weeks prior to her ER presentation. Her only side effect with the first two doses was pruritus.

In the emergency department, she described her headaches as nonradiating and initially relieved by nonsteroidal agents. Two days prior to presentation, the headaches became more severe (described as 8/10 in intensity), constant, and unrelieved by nonsteroidal agents. Her review of systems was positive for weight gain of 15 pounds over nine weeks and previous history of sore throat and palpitations. She denied changes in vision, galactorrhoea, temperature intolerance, anxiety, or depression. Her only other medication was a Mirena intrauterine device (IUD). On physical exam, she was afebrile with a normal blood pressure (126/83 mmHg), pulse of 92 beats/minute, and respiratory rate of 16 breaths/minute. She was alert and in no distress. Visual field testing by confrontation was normal. Aside from right inguinal and right heel scars from her recent surgery, her exam was normal.

With the exception of a mild leukocytosis (12.9 K), initial laboratory findings demonstrated normal chemistry and hematology panels. Hormonal studies were pending, although she was noted to have a suppressed TSH and elevated free T4 2 weeks prior to admission (Table 1). Given the severity of her symptoms as well as awareness of possible hypophyseal involvement with anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the decision was made to obtain an MRI of the pituitary. This demonstrated a gland size at the upper limit of normal, with a measured increase in size from 3 × 15 mm to 9 × 21 mm when compared to a study done 2 months earlier as part of restaging workup (Figure 1). Based on these findings, a presumptive diagnosis of hypophysitis was made and therapy with high dose intravenous methylprednisolone was initiated.

Table 1: Laboratory findings.
Figure 1: Case MR images. Sagittal (a) and coronal (b) unenhanced images of the pituitary, revealing a slightly atrophic pituitary gland. Two months later, at presentation, sagittal (c) and coronal (d) postcontrast images reveal an enlarged pituitary size with diffuse enhancement of the pituitary and infundibulum without focal lesion.

3. Discussion

Ipilimumab and tremelimumab are human monoclonal antibodies that act by inhibiting the binding of B7 to CTLA-4, thus preventing inactivation of the immune response. T cell activation begins when the T cell receptor (TCR) binds to an antigen presented by the antigen presenting cell (APC) via the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) (Figure 2). B7, a ligand found on the APC, binds to its receptor on the T cell (CD28), which is the second signal needed for T cell activation and induction of the immune response. After a period of 48–72 hours, the CTLA-4 receptor is upregulated and migrates to the T cell surface. B7 binds preferentially to the CTLA-4 receptor, leading to T cell inactivation and downregulation of the immune response. In the presence of CTLA-4 inhibitors, the net effect is continued proliferation of activated T cells, increased antitumor activity, and possible irAE.

Figure 2: APC: antigen presenting cell. MHC: major compatibility complex. TCR: T cell receptor. Adapted from Kähler and Hauschild [1].

Persistent T cell activation and propagation of the immune response leads to targeting not only tumor cells but also normal host organ-systems, a term referred to as irAE. These occur in a sequential manner, with the most commonly affected systems being the skin at 3-4 weeks, gastrointestinal (GI) tract and liver at 6-7 weeks, and endocrine system at 9 weeks [1]. The described endocrinopathies include hypophysitis with an incidence of ~5%, thyroid dysfunction (hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism) with an incidence of 0–4%, and primary adrenal insufficiency with an incidence of 0.3–1.5% [3]. These toxicities can be graded according to severity on a scale from 1–5 (Table 2). Most irAE occur during the 12-week induction phase but can also happen weeks to even months after stopping therapy [4]. Pooled analysis from phase I–III trials demonstrates that up to 72% of patients develop an irAE at the higher dosing range which the patient in this case was receiving [1, 3, 5] (Table 3).

Table 2: Toxicity grading and endocrine adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) of National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute) [2].
Table 3: Frequency of adverse events with 10 mg/kg dose of ipilimumab.

Patients who develop anti-CTLA-4 associated endocrinopathies may present with nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, weakness, headache, nausea, behavioral changes, visual impairments, memory loss, decreased libido, anorexia, insomnia, and cold or heat intolerance. A high index of suspicion is required to prompt endocrine evaluation and therapeutic intervention in patients who present with any of these symptoms, with particular urgency in the setting of pituitary or adrenal insufficiency [1, 3, 57].

Evaluation should include assessment of pituitary function with morning (8 am) cortisol (if possible), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cosyntropin stimulation testing. Testing of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroidal axis includes measurement of free T4, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), with a free T3 in some situations. Testing of the gonadal axis is indicated in the presence of hypogonadal symptoms or amenorrhea with measures of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin, testosterone (in men), and estradiol in women. The described sequence of pituitary dysfunction is impaired secretion of ACTH, then TSH, followed by loss of FSH, LH, and growth hormone (GH). Prolactin can be low or high. Diabetes insipidus rarely develops and, when present, raises suspicion for infiltration of the pituitary stalk by tumor [3, 6].

The patient in this case had hormonal evidence of both thyroiditis and hypophysitis, despite the absence of symptoms of hyperthyroidism or hypopituitarism. The presentation of a severe headache prompted evaluation of pituitary hormonal function and imaging. Hormonal testing revealed a detectable but low cortisol level (drawn at 4 pm) with a normal ACTH. It would be expected that a patient presenting with a headache severe enough to prompt an ER visit would have a higher cortisol. Unfortunately, treatment with steroids was started prior to obtaining a cosyntropin stimulation test. Her repeat TSH remained low with a now normal free T4, suggesting the possibility of resolving thyroiditis. Her report of occasional palpitations at the time of the elevated free T4 lends support to this hypothesis.

MRI findings of suspected hypophysitis are often nonspecific. These include diffuse enlargement of the pituitary, which can be missed unless earlier imaging studies are available for comparison. Other imaging characteristics can include a homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement of the gland with or without an extension of the inflammatory process towards the stalk [1, 7, 8]. It is important to note that a normal appearing gland on MRI does not exclude hypophysitis [7].

As the number and types of cancers treated with these newer immunomodulatory agents increase, there is an associated rise in reported cases of hypophysitis (Table 4). Given the frequency and consistency with which these autoimmune adverse effects appear, many physicians advocate screening all patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 agents for endocrinopathies with measurements of morning serum cortisol level, electrolytes (to detect hyponatremia or hyperkalemia as indicators of adrenalitis), TSH, and free T4 levels. One study described the incidental finding of hypophysitis on an 18F-FDG PET-CT done as part of the evaluation of metastatic lesions in a 77-year-old man with nodular malignant melanoma, prior to any clinical or laboratory abnormalities. However, the use of this imaging technique is not validated for the purpose of screening [9].

Table 4: Cases of anti-CTLA4 induced hypophysitis reported in the literature.

Classic lymphocytic hypophysitis histologically appears to be autoimmune in nature. This has not been consistently demonstrated with anti-CTLA-4 hypophysitis as many if not most of these patients will not have a biopsy performed. However, most of the clinical and radiological features of ipilimumab associated hypophysitis are consistent with the classical form, including its response to glucocorticoids, which is the standard treatment of both [10].

Once anti-CTLA4 hypophysitis is diagnosed, treatment with steroids is recommended. Suggested regimens include methylprednisolone or prednisone at 1-2 mg/kg/day or dexamethasone 4 mg q6h for 1 week, tapered over a course of 4 weeks. High dose glucocorticoid treatment does not appear to decrease the antitumor effect of CTLA blockade; in fact, a trend between the development of immune-related adverse effects and successful treatment with CTLA-4 antibodies has been suggested [1, 3, 5].

Patients may also require thyroid or gonadal hormone replacement with close followup to determine if there has been resolution of any hormonal deficiencies. The time that is required for symptoms to resolve and the need for continuous hydrocortisone replacement therapy is approximately 20 weeks but can be longer and in some cases it is even lifelong [5].

Treatment with ipilimumab should be held for grades 1-2 hypophysitis and then can be safely resumed at a later date. It is recommended that treatment with these agents be discontinued for grades 3-4 irAE. In the case presented, a repeat MRI done one week after initiating steroid treatment in our patient demonstrated a reduction in the size of her pituitary, allowing ipilimumab to be resumed.

4. Conclusion

Lymphocytic hypophysitis was previously considered a rare cause of pituitary dysfunction. However, the incidence of this disorder has increased with the introduction of immunomodulating chemotherapeutic agents. The anti-CTLA4 class of immune modulators (ipilimumab) has a mechanism of action that predisposes patients to immune-related endocrinopathies. Autoimmune hypophysitis is one of several endocrinopathies described with use of these agents. It is important that endocrinologists become familiar with this possible range of side effects as a way of allowing early diagnosis and prompt initiation of therapy, which in some cases could be lifesaving.


There have been no prior publications of the material in this paper.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Dr. Mary T. Korytkowski has received research grant support from and has served as a consultant for Sanofi Aventis.


  1. K. C. Kähler and A. Hauschild, “Treatment and side effect management of CTLA-4 antibody therapy in metastatic melanoma,” Journal of the German Society of Dermatology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 277–286, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. January 2014,
  3. S. M. Corsello, A. Barnabei, P. Marchetti, L. de Vecchis, R. Salvatori, and F. Torino, “Endocrine side effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1361–1375, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Andrews and R. Holden, “Characteristics and management of immune-related adverse effects associated with ipilimumab, a new immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 299–307, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. S. Weber, K. C. Kähler, and A. Hauschild, “Management of immune-related adverse events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 30, no. 21, pp. 2691–2697, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Dillard, C. G. Yedinak, J. Alumkal, and M. Fleseriu, “Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy associated autoimmune hypophysitis: serious immune related adverse events across a spectrum of cancer subtypes,” Pituitary, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Lammert, H. J. Schneider, T. Bergmann et al., “Hypophysitis caused by ipilimumab in cancer patients: hormone replacement or immunosuppressive therapy,” Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 581–587, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. J. Carpenter, R. D. Murtagh, H. Lilienfeld, J. Weber, and F. R. Murtagh, “Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: MR imaging findings,” The American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1751–1753, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Van der Hiel, C. U. Blank, J. B. Haanen, and M. P. Stokkel, “Detection of early onset of hypophysitis by 18F-FDG PET-CT in a patient with advanced stage melanoma treated with ipilimumab,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, pp. e182–e184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Z. R. Barnard, B. P. Walcott, K. T. Kahle, B. V. Nahed, and J. V. Coumans, “Hyponatremia associated with Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis,” Medical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 374–377, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Min, F. S. Hodi, A. Giobbie-Hurder et al., “Systemic high dose corticosteroid treatment does not improve the outcome of ipilimumab-related hypophysitis: a retrospective cohort study,” Clinical Cancer Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. F. Albarel, C. Gaudy, F. Castinetti et al., “Long-term follow-up of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis, a common adverse event of the anti-CTLA-4 antibody in melanoma,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. Y. Chodakiewitz, S. Brown, J. L. Boxerman, J. M. Brody, and J. M. Rogg, “Ipilimumab treatment associated pituitary hypophysitis: clinical presentation and imaging diagnosis,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 125, pp. 125–130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. N. N. Nallapaneni, R. Mourya, V. R. Bhatt, S. Malhotra, A. K. Ganti, and K. K. Tendulkar, “Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis and uveitis in a patient with metastatic melanoma and a history of ipilimumab-induced skin rash,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1077–1081, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  15. A. T. Faje, R. Sullivan, D. Lawrence et al., “Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: a detailed longitudinal analysis in a large cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 4078–4085, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Ryder, M. Callahan, M. A. Postow, J. Wolchok, and J. A. Fagin, “Endocrine-related adverse events following ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: a comprehensive retrospective review from a single institution,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 371–381, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Marlier, V. Cocquyt, L. Brochez, S. van Belle, and V. Kruse, “Ipilimumab, not just another anti-cancer therapy: hypophysitis as side effect illustrated by four case-reports,” Endocrine, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 878–883, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Anderson and V. Bhatia, “Ipilimumab immune-related adverse reactions: a case report,” South Dakota Medicine, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 315–317, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Lotem, S. Merims, S. Frank, I. Ospovat, and T. Peretz, “Ctla-4 blockade: a new hope for the immunotherapy of malignant melanoma,” Harefuah, vol. 151, no. 10, pp. 585–604, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. H. Thomsen, “Lymphocytic hypophysitis due to ipilimumap therapy,” Ugeskr Laeger, vol. 174, no. 26, pp. 1829–1830, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. Juszczak, A. Gupta, N. Karavitaki, M. R. Middleton, and A. B. Grossman, “Ipilimumab: a novel immunomodulating therapy causing autoimmune hypophysitis: a case report and review,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Torino, A. Barnabei, L. de Vecchis, R. Salvatori, and S. M. Corsello, “Hypophysitis induced by monoclonal antibodies to cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4: challenges from a new cause of a rare disease,” Oncologist, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 525–535, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Bronstein, C. S. Ng, P. Hwu, and W.-J. Hwu, “Radiologic manifestations of immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 197, no. 6, pp. W992–W1000, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Boasberg, O. Hamid, and S. O'Day, “Ipilimumab: unleashing the power of the immune system through CTLA-4 blockade,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 440–449, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. C. Kaehler, F. Egberts, P. Lorigan, and A. Hauschilda, “Anti-CTLA-4 therapy-related autoimmune hypophysitis in a melanoma patient,” Melanoma Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 333–334, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. C. Yang, M. Hughes, U. Kammula et al., “Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4 antibody) causes regression of metastatic renal cell cancer associated with enteritis and hypophysitis,” Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 825–830, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus