Case Reports in Genetics

Case Reports in Genetics / 2015 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 876348 |

Ana Belén de la Hoz, Hiart Maortua, Ainhoa García-Rives, María Jesús Martínez-González, Maitane Ezquerra, María-Isabel Tejada, "3p14 De Novo Interstitial Microdeletion in a Patient with Intellectual Disability and Autistic Features with Language Impairment: A Comparison with Similar Cases", Case Reports in Genetics, vol. 2015, Article ID 876348, 7 pages, 2015.

3p14 De Novo Interstitial Microdeletion in a Patient with Intellectual Disability and Autistic Features with Language Impairment: A Comparison with Similar Cases

Academic Editor: Anton M. Jetten
Received10 Oct 2014
Revised22 Jan 2015
Accepted30 Mar 2015
Published14 May 2015


To date, few cases of 3p proximal interstitial deletions have been reported and the phenotype and genotype correlation is not well understood. Here, we report a new case of a 3p proximal interstitial deletion. The patient is an 11-year-old female with speech and social interaction difficulties, learning disability, and slight facial dysmorphism, but no other major malformations. An 8 Mb de novo interstitial deletion at 3p14.2-p14.1, from position 60.461.316 to 68.515.453, was revealed by means of array comparative genomic hybridization and confirmed using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. This region includes six genes: FEZF2, CADPS, SYNPR, ATXN7, PRICKLE, and MAGI1, that are known to have a role in neurodevelopment. These genes are located on the proximal side of the deletion. We compare our case with previously well-defined patients reported in the literature and databases.

1. Introduction

It has previously been reported that interstitial deletions of chromosome 3p are rather rare and there are no well-defined breakpoints. However, since the first report of this condition in 1979 by Kogame and Kudo [1], various heterozygous overlapping deletions involving the short arm of chromosome 3 have been found in patients with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, language impairment, and autistic features, but without any other major malformations [26]. Some other features have also been correlated with this alteration, namely, defective lymphopoiesis [7] and defective cardiac development [8]. All of the aforementioned authors believed that FOXP1 was responsible for these features.

Recently, various authors [911] have published studies in which they characterized proximal deletions in 3p in a total of six patients, accurately defining their phenotypical features. None of those overlapping deletions affected the FOXP1 gene. All of the patients had intellectual disabilities, gross motor delay, slight facial dysmorphism, nonexpressive language, and autistic features. After comparing their patients with four individuals with 3p14-deletions reported with full clinical descriptions in the Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans using Ensembl Resources (DECIPHER) database, they concluded that all these deletions in 3p14 were associated with very similar features, namely, intellectual disability, autistic features, developmental delay, and often speech impairment but only mild facial dysmorphism. The lack of external features characteristic in these patients makes it difficult to reach a correct diagnosis without array CGH analysis. In addition, the shortage of cases in the literature makes it difficult to identify the gene or the core region responsible for these phenotypes. Here, we report a new case of 3p14 deletion, because we consider it extremely important to share information on cases of deletions that involve this genomic region in order to identify the gene or genes associated with these disorders.

2. Case Presentation

The child is a female first-born of healthy nonconsanguineous parents. There is no family history of congenital abnormalities or intellectual disability and the pregnancy was unremarkable. She was born at term (39 weeks of gestation) by normal delivery, with a weight of 2400 g (<p3) and head circumference of 33.5 cm (<p25). Her Apgar score was 7/10 at 1 and 5 minutes and there were no remarkable observations in the perinatal period. She was first evaluated by our neuropediatric team at the age of 6 months because of poor response to stimuli and lack of a social smile. Clinical examination revealed significant motor developmental delay; a cranial ultrasound, an electroencephalogram, and auditory evoked potentials testing were requested, with results being normal in all cases.

During the first year of life, moderate psychomotor impairment became evident and, therefore, from the age of 12 months, she has received cognitive stimulation therapy. At 20 months, despite motor clumsiness, the patient was able to walk without support but had speech difficulties with a marked expressive language disorder and global learning problems. She had some autistic features including stereotypic movements and difficulties with eye contact. In a psychometric assessment at 7 years of age, she obtained an intelligence quotient of 40. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging, at 9 years of age, did not reveal any abnormalities. On recent assessment, at 11 years of age, her motor skills had improved significantly but she still had speech and social interaction difficulties, as well as learning disability. From the point of view of phenotype, she has been growing proportionately with age without any strong phenotypic features. As can be observed in Figure 1, she presents only slight facial dysmorphism, having a long face with a prominent chin, broad forehead, and a broad, large mouth with widely spaced upper front teeth and slightly large and detached ears.

2.1. Genetic Analysis

With written informed consent from the parents, we carried out initial genetic studies, including karyotyping and molecular analysis of MECP2 by means of MLPAs and Sanger sequencing. After that, we decided to perform array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) in samples from the patient and her parents, and results were confirmed with quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays, using applied biosystems real-time PCR instruments and software.

Firstly, DNA was purified from peripheral blood according to standard protocols and a Perkin Elmer CGX Oligo Array 8x60K was used to perform genome-wide copy number analysis. This microarray covers over 245 cytogenetically relevant regions, as well as genes involved in development, pericentromeric regions, and subtelomeres. The Agilent SureScan microarray scanner and Agilent Feature Extraction software were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were analyzed with CytoGenomics v.2.7 (Agilent) and Genoglyphix (Signature Genomics) software.

To validate the results, qRT-PCR was performed in a final volume of 20.0 μL using SYBR Green real-time PCR Master Mix Kit and the 7900HT fast real-time PCR System (both from Life Technologies), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Three pairs of primers were designed using Primer 3 Plus software.

2.2. Genetic Results

The karyotype was normal, as was the MECP2 gene. However, array CGH analysis revealed an 8 Mb proximal deletion at 3p14.2-p14.1, from position 60.461.316 to 68.515.453 (Figure 2) (GRCh37/hg19). Among the genes mapped to this region, six are known or believed to have a role in neurodevelopment: FEZF2 (OMIM# 607414), CADPS (OMIM# 604667), SYNPR (no OMIM entry), TXN7 (OMM# 607640), PRICKLE2 (OMIM# 608501), and MAGI1 (OMIM# 602625). The deletion was confirmed to be de novo, on the basis of a comparative study with the parental DNA by qRT-PCR (Table 1).



ΔΔCt = (Cttarget − CtRef)DNAtest − (Cttarget − CtRef)DNARef.
= (sd12 + sd22)1/2.

3. Discussion

Several microdeletions and microduplications mapped to 3p have been identified in patients with developmental disorders, autistic features, and/or global developmental delay. However, the lack of characteristic facial dysmorphisms or other distinct external features in these patients makes it very difficult to diagnose without array CGH technology. Nevertheless, it is known that a correct diagnosis is important to estimate recurrence risk for genetic counseling and may also play an essential role in improving the clinical management of these patients. Here, we have reported a case of a de novo 8 Mb microdeletion of 3p14 in an 11-year-old girl with speech and social interaction difficulties, as well as mild facial dysmorphisms.

Table 2 summarizes the clinical features of patients reported previously [911], as well as seven other 3p14 carriers listed with full clinical descriptions in DECIPHER. The DNA sequence between 60.461.316 and 68.515.453 points in chromosome 3 (Figure 3) contains 19 genes, 6 of which encode proteins that could be responsible for the phenotypes observed in these patients. These candidate genes are FEZF2, CADPS, SYNPR, ATXN7, PRICKLE2, and MAGI1. The FEZF2 gene encodes a transcription factor that is required for the specification of corticospinal neuron identity and connectivity [12, 13], and the SYNPR gene encodes a protein that is an integral membrane component of synaptic vesicles [14]. The CADPS gene is expressed in the fetal and adult brain and it is an essential regulator of synaptic vesicle and large dense core vesicle priming in mammalian neurons and neuroendocrine cells [15]. Expansions in ATXN7 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 7, but the role of other kinds of mutations (nonsynonymous substitutions or deletions) in this gene in nervous system disorders is not yet well understood [9]. The fifth gene is PRICKLE2, which encodes a postsynaptic Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway component required for the normal development of synapses [16] and whose disruption in mouse hippocampal neurons leads to reductions in dendrite branching, synapse number, and postsynaptic density. It has recently been shown that disruption in PRICKLE2 is associated with behavioral abnormalities including altered social interaction, learning abnormalities, and behavioral inflexibility [17]. On the other hand, though Okumura et al. [9] propose PRICKLE2 as the most likely causative gene of autistic features observed in their cases, this is not consistent with earlier findings by other authors [11, 18]. Finally, MAGI1 is a protein of membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) complexes that act as key scaffolds in surface complexes containing receptors, adhesion proteins, and various signaling molecules, playing key roles in cell-to-cell communication. MAGUK proteins are present in neuronal synapses and they help to organize the postsynaptic structure via associations with other scaffolding proteins [19]. Previous studies have demonstrated an association of MAGI1 copy number variation with bipolar affective disorder [20].

PatientDeletion breakpointsDevelopmental delay/IDSpeech impairmentAutistic featuresEar anomaliesFacial dysmorphismsLimb anomaliesOther distinctive features

Present Study 60.461.316–68.515.453SevereYesYes, lack of a social smile, difficulties with eye contact, stereotypic movements Slightly large and detached earsLong face, prominent chin, broad forehead, wide mouth, widely spaced upper front teethNonemotor developmental delay

Okumura et al., [9]
Twins A/B
60.472.496–67.385.119SevereNo expressive language until the last follow-up at 49 months of age.YesLow-set, posterior rotatedArched down-slanting eyebrow, prominent forehead, epicanthic folds, micrognathia, hypertelorism, broad nasal brige, short philtrumCamptodactylyTwin 2: intestinal malrotation, ventriculomegaly

Schwaibold et al., [10]
Twins 1/2
58.224.794–64.571.699Extend no specifiedUndirected double syllables at 2 10/12 years of ageYes (stereotypic movements)Low-set, slightly posterior rotatedArched, downslanting eyebrows, positional plagiocephaly, Twin B: cowlicksTwin B: Thick left thumb with sites for two nailsSevere feeding problems, small stature, Twin B: hydrocephalus, hypoplasia of corpus callosum

Schwaibold et al., [10]
Patient 3
59.443.171–64.162.112Extend no specifiedNo active speech, he follows simple orders at 18 years of ageYes, in his adolescence he started to develop eye contactNoneBroad mouth, prominent chin, widely spaced teeth, deep-set eyes, long slender face, flat occiputHigh tonicity in lower limbsBrain anomalies in MRI

Tao et al., [11]
Patient 6

D225054.452.525–65.609.348Extend no specifiedNoneN/MExtend no specifiedWide mouth, high palate, broad forehead, epicanthus, thick eyebrowsCamptodactyly, talipes equinovalgus, valgus, ulnar deviation of handsHigh palate, strabismus

D25045358.717.185–61.696.115Extend no specifiedExtend no specifiedN/MLow-set, posterior rotated, abnormality of the pinnaLow anterior hairline, mandibular prognathism, widely spaced teethN/MNevi, lentigines

D25591862.749.576–63.021.934Extend no specifiedN/MN/MN/MPlagiocephaly2-3 toe syndactylyScrotal hypoplasia

D26000459.813.606–65.296.648Extend no specifiedSevereN/MLow-set, posterior rotatedProminent forehead/fontal bossingClinodactylyNone

nssv160503257.416.265–64.870197Extend no specifiedN/MN/MN/MN/MN/MMuscular hypotonia

nssv57790461.956.521–68.514.983Extend no specifiedN/MN/MN/MN/MN/MN/M

nssv57790254.079.045–66.046.136Extend no specifiedN/MN/MN/MN/MN/MFailure to thrive, microcephaly

N/M: Not mentioned.

Regarding the study conducted by Schwaibold et al. [10], the deletion found in monozygotic twins was around 6.32 Mb long, with breakpoints between 3p14.1 and 3p14.3 (58.244.794–64.571.699), and in the adult patient, the deletion was approximately 4.76 Mb long, with breakpoints between 3p14.1 and 3p14.2 (59.443.171–64.162.112). The three patients had very similar features, namely, intellectual disabilities, gross-motor delay, slight facial dysmorphism, nonexpressive language, and autistic features, although the adult started to show friendly behavior in adolescence. The phenotypes of the cases reported by Tao et al. [11] with microdeletions from 62.665.527 to 64.890.116 and by Okumura et al. [9] with breakpoints between 60.472.496 and 67.385.119 were also quite similar.

Although the deletion found in our patient is considerably longer and extends further toward the centromere, especially compared to deletions described by Schwaibold et al. [10] and Tao et al. [11], respectively, the phenotypic features are quite similar to those in the previously described patients with deletions in 3p14. Moreover, none of the additional genes deleted in our patient seems to play an important role in brain development; with the exception of MAGI1, which was also deleted in Okumura et al.’s twins [9] (Figure 3). Therefore, we believe that our findings support the conclusions of previous authors who have indicated that the candidate gene(s) for these common features may well be among those located in the region distal to the centromere, between breakpoints 62.3 and 64.5 Mb (the left part of the deletion in Figure 3), and a combination of genes in this region involved in brain or cognitive development might be responsible. Apart from the patients reported in the literature [911, 18] and the cases mentioned by Schwaibold et al. [10] which are reported in the DECIPHER database, we are aware of another three patients, reported in the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays (ISCA) Consortium database with their phenotypes, that have overlapping deletions in 3p14 (Figure 3). All these patients have similar features and also showed global developmental delay.

4. Conclusion

Our results support the hypothesis that a novel 3p14.2 core region in 3p proximal deletions is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. We were not able to identify a single gene responsible for the phenotypes associated with microdeletions in 3p14, but we rather believe that several candidate genes located in this region could be the cause of these disorders. In consequence, we consider it very important to report new cases with overlapping deletions in the 3p segment to more precisely identify the genotype-phenotype correlation.

The characteristic lack of external features in these patients makes it difficult to reach a correct diagnosis without high-resolution molecular cytogenetic techniques such as array CGH.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to thank the patient and her family for agreeing to the publication of this study. This work was financially supported by grants 2007111045 and 2011111090 from the Department of Health of the Government of the Basque Country and a grant from the Jesús Gangoiti Barrera Foundation. Data discussed in this paper were obtained from the ISCA Consortium database (, with this information having been generated using NCBI’s database of genomic structural variation (dbVar,, study nstd37. Samples and associated phenotype data were provided by ISCA Consortium member laboratories.


  1. K. Kogame and H. Kudo, “Interstitial deletion 3p associated with t(3p−;18q+) translocation,” The Japanese Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 245–252, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. W. Carr, D. Moreno-De-Luca, C. Parker et al., “Chiari i malformation, delayed gross motor skills, severe speech delay, and epileptiform discharges in a child with FOXP1 haploinsufficiency,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1216–1220, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. F. Hamdan, H. Daoud, D. Rochefort et al., “De novo mutations in FOXP1 in cases with intellectual disability, autism, and language impairment,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 671–678, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Horn, J. Kapeller, N. Rivera-Brugués et al., “Identification of FOXP1 deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits,” Human Mutation, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. E1851–E1860, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. O. Palumbo, L. D'Agruma, A. F. Minenna et al., “3p14.1 de novo microdeletion involving the FOXP1 gene in an adult patient with autism, severe speech delay and deficit of motor coordination,” Gene, vol. 516, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. J. Pariani, A. Spencer, J. M. Graham Jr., and D. L. Rimoin, “A 785 kb deletion of 3p14.1p13, including the FOXP1 gene, associated with speech delay, contractures, hypertonia and blepharophimosis,” European Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 52, no. 2-3, pp. 123–127, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Hu, B. Wang, M. Borde et al., “Foxp1 is an essential transcriptional regulator of B cell development,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 819–826, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. Wang, J. Weidenfeld, M. M. Lu et al., “Foxp1 regulates cardiac outflow tract, endocardial cushion morphogenesis and myocyte proliferation and maturation,” Development, vol. 131, no. 18, pp. 4477–4487, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Okumura, T. Yamamoto, M. Miyajima et al., “3p interstitial deletion including PRICKLE2 in identical twins with autistic features,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 730–733, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Schwaibold, B. Zoll, P. Burfeind et al., “A 3p interstitial deletion in two monozygotic twin brothers and an 18-year-old man: further characterization and review,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 161, no. 10, pp. 2634–2640, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Tao, J. R. Manak, L. Sowers et al., “Mutations in prickle orthologs cause seizures in flies, mice, and humans,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 138–149, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Kmet, C. Guo, C. Edmondson, and B. Chen, “Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into corticofugal neurons uncovers heterogeneous Fezf2-expressing subpopulations,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e67292, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Shim, K. Y. Kwan, M. Li, V. Lefebvre, and N. Šestan, “Cis-regulatory control of corticospinal system development and evolution,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7401, pp. 74–79, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. T. Sun, H. S. Xiao, P.-B. Zhou, Y. J. Lu, L. Bao, and X. Zhang, “Differential expression of synaptoporin and synaptophysin in primary sensory neurons and up-regulation of synaptoporin after peripheral nerve injury,” Neuroscience, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 1233–1245, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. I. Brunk, C. Blex, D. Speidel, N. Brose, and G. Ahnert-Hilger, “Ca2+-dependent activator proteins of secretion promote vesicular monoamine uptake,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 1050–1056, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Nagaoka, R. Ohashi, A. Inutsuka et al., “The Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway component Vangl2 induces synapse formation through direct control of N-cadherin,” Cell Reports, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 916–927, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. P. Sowers, L. Loo, Y. Wu et al., “Disruption of the non-canonical Wnt gene PRICKLE2 leads to autism-like behaviors with evidence for hippocampal synaptic dysfunction,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1077–1089, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. C. Ţuţulan-Cunită, S. M. Papuc, A. Arghir et al., “3p interstitial deletion: novel case report and review,” Journal of Child Neurology, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1062–1066, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C.-Y. Zheng, G. K. Seabold, M. Horak, and R. S. Petralia, “MAGUKs, synaptic development, and synaptic plasticity,” Neuroscientist, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 493–512, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Karlsson, L. Graae, M. Lekman et al., “MAGI1 copy number variation in bipolar affective disorder and schizophrenia,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 922–930, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Ana Belén de la Hoz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.