Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine

Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine / 2020 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3780763 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3780763

Samar Said, Rondell P. Graham, Tsung-Teh Wu, Saba Yasir, Lizhi Zhang, Andrew L. Folpe, "Colonic Angiosarcoma Arising in Association with Amyloid Deposits", Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 3780763, 6 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3780763

Colonic Angiosarcoma Arising in Association with Amyloid Deposits

Academic Editor: Chia-Tung Shun
Received05 Dec 2019
Revised29 Apr 2020
Accepted02 May 2020
Published16 May 2020

Abstract

Angiosarcoma of the colon is rare, as is colonic amyloidosis. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of angiosarcoma arising in association with amyloid deposition. Herein, we described a case of 77-year-old man who presented with hematochezia, and a sigmoid mass was found on colonoscopy. Histologic examination of the resected specimen showed extensive nodular deposition of AL-lambda amyloid material in the colonic wall, as well as high-grade angiosarcoma which was closely intermingled with the amyloid deposits. While the occurrence of both colonic amyloidosis and angiosarcoma in this patient may represent pure coincidence, given the intimate association of the angiosarcoma and the amyloid deposition and the rarity of both of these lesions, we hypothesize that angiosarcoma could be secondary to amyloid deposition.

1. Introduction

Angiosarcoma is a rare malignant vascular neoplasm that involves mainly skin and superficial soft tissue and is extremely rare in the gastrointestinal tract. Most sporadic cutaneous angiosarcomas arise in the setting of significant sun damage and are thought to be related to long-term UV radiation damage [1]. Another important subset of cutaneous angiosarcomas arises following therapeutic radiation or lymphedema, most often in the setting of breast carcinoma [2]. A small number of angiosarcomas have been reported to arise in association with foreign materials, including shrapnel, Dacron vascular grafts, orthopedic prosthetic hardware, and tophaceous gout. Colonic amyloidosis is also rare, and most cases are immunoglobulin light chain-related. It is well known that some types of amyloidosis can be caused by malignancies. For example, calcitonin type amyloid deposits are caused by medullary thyroid carcinoma, and immunoglobulin type amyloidosis can be secondary to plasma cell dyscrasia or lymphoma. The association between sarcoma and amyloidosis was described in only few case reports. However, to our knowledge, there are no reported cases of angiosarcoma arising in association with amyloid deposition. Herein, we report an extremely rare example of colonic angiosarcoma arising in association with nodular amyloid deposits.

2. Case Presentation

A 77-year-old man with history of dementia, chronic kidney disease, gout, malignant melanoma of the skin, osteoarthritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease presented with hematochezia. A nearly completely obstructing mass lesion in the sigmoid colon was found on colonoscopy. Follow-up staging CT scan of chest, abdomen, and pelvis showed a discrete mass in the distal sigmoid colon measuring approximately 10 cm in length, severe colonic wall thickening involving the distal colon and extending through the rectum, and a 2.5 cm right upper pole renal mass with heterogeneous enhancement worrisome for renal cell carcinoma. The patient underwent open sigmoidectomy. Grossly, there was a 3.4 × 2.0 × 0.5 cm ulcerated mass with raised borders. Sections submitted from the mass demonstrated extensive deposition of amorphous, pale eosinophilic material involving the lamina propria, muscularis mucosa, submucosa, muscularis propria, and subserosa with prominent involvement of vessels (Figure 1(a)). The material was positive with a Congo red stain (Figure 1(b)) and showed apple-green birefringence under polarized light, characteristic of amyloid. Closely intermingled with and diffusely infiltrating the amyloid deposits, there were sheets of highly atypical, plump spindled cells with amphophilic cytoplasm, oval large nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitotic figures (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Intracytoplasmic vacuoles containing red blood cells were identified in some of the tumor cells. There were also areas of hemorrhage and blood lakes. The tumor cells were positive for endothelial markers including CD31 (patchy), ERG, and FLI1, confirming the diagnosis of angiosarcoma (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)) and negative for keratins (AE1/AE3), SOX10, S100 protein, and KIT (Figures 3(a)–3(d)). Strong expression of MYC protein by immunohistochemistry was present (Figure 2(e)). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed no evidence of MYC gene amplification.

Amyloid typing by laser microdissection (LMD) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) confirmed the presence of amyloid and was consistent with AL (lambda)-type. No infiltration of plasma cells in the vicinity of amyloid deposits was seen. Due to the patient’s advanced dementia, the family decided not to pursue aggressive therapy and opted for palliative care.

3. Discussion

Angiosarcoma is a rare malignant vascular neoplasm that involves mainly skin and superficial soft tissue but may occur in large vessels, deep soft tissue, and parenchymal organs such as the liver, spleen, bone, breast, and heart. It can be primary or secondary. Long-term sun exposure, radiation, chronic lymphedema, and exposure to Thorotrast, polyvinylchloride, and arsenic are known risk factors [15]. Angiosarcoma has also reported in association with arteriovenous fistulas in patients with renal failure [612], arthroplasty [13, 14], and injection sites [15] and in association with foreign materials that can be introduced to the body during trauma, surgery, and injection or formed in situ. Foreign materials reported to cause angiosarcoma include metals (such as bullets, shrapnel, cardiac defibrillator implants, and orthopedic joint prostheses) [1620], Dacron graft [18, 21], silicone breast implants [2224], retained surgical material such as sponge [2527], and a gouty tophus (where it was hypothesized that the angiosarcoma was induced by the gouty tophus in a mechanism similar to that of foreign body-associated sarcoma) [28]. While development of sarcoma in association with foreign material occurs only rarely in humans, it is a well-documented phenomenon in rodents in which investigators have demonstrated the development of sarcoma after insertion of foreign material [29]. Different types of sarcoma have been reported in this setting including undifferentiated sarcoma, angiosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. There is usually a prolonged latency period between the initial exposure to the foreign material and development of sarcoma [30]. The physical properties of the material seem to play a role in tumorogenesis, as the tumorigenic effect is reduced or lost when the foreign materials are inserted in pulverized or shredded forms, when their surface is rough or when they contain large pores. Formation of thick fibrous capsule around the foreign material is thought to play a role in tumorgenesis as tumorigenic material developed more fibrosis than the nontumorigenic material [30, 31]. MYC amplification, and strong MYC protein expression, initially thought to be limited to secondary angiosarcoma (such as postradiation and lymphedema-associated angiosarcoma) [32], is now known to occur in primary angiosarcoma as well [33].

Colonic angiosarcoma is extremely rare. Wang et al. reported a case of colonic angiosarcoma and summarized the results of 33 previously reported cases [34]. The mean age was 56 years (range 16 to 85 years), and the mean tumor size was 5 cm (range 1.5–12 cm). In more than two thirds of the cases, the tumor was in the left colon (36% in the sigmoid colon and 33% in the anorectal region), whereas 21% were in the cecum, 9% in the ascending colon, and 3% in the transverse and descending colon. Four of the 33 patients had a history of radiation exposure, and in one patient the tumor was associated with retained surgical gauze. An association with renal transplantation, long-term hemodialysis, and chronic colorectal ulcers were also reported (one case each). Clinical symptoms included gastrointestinal bleeding (67%), abdominal/anal pain (46%), intestinal obstruction (24%), diarrhea (50%), and weight loss (18%). Anemia was present in 42% of patients. Prognosis was poor with a median survival of 4.5 months. Tumor size less than 5 cm and younger age were associated with better prognosis. In general, colonic angiosarcomas are treated surgically, although there may also be a role for adjuvant therapies, including radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Gastrointestinal amyloidosis is also rare. Cowan et al. [35] reported 76 patients with gastrointestinal amyloidosis (accounted for 3.2% of patients with amyloidosis), most of which (80%) were due to immunoglobulin light chain. The median age was 61 years (range 34 to 79 years). The stomach was the most affected site involved in 49% of cases followed by the colorectal region (46%), small bowel (42%), and esophagus (8%). Clinical symptoms included weight loss (43%), gastrointestinal bleeding (37%), heartburn (33%), early satiety (33%), diarrhea (29%), and abdominal pain (28%). The amyloidosis was systemic in 79% of cases and localized (i.e., without evidence of an underlying plasma cell dyscrasia or other organ involvement) in 21%. Supportive care was the main treatment for localized gastrointestinal amyloidosis with all patients alive at a median follow-up of 36 months. Patients with systemic AL amyloidosis were treated with anti-plasma cell chemotherapy with 72% survival rate at 4 years.

Amyloid has multiple precursor proteins and can occur in different settings including chronic inflammatory conditions, certain neoplasms, genetic/inherited, and age-related. Hematologic malignancies and medullary thyroid carcinoma are two neoplasms that are known to cause amyloid deposition where medullary thyroid carcinoma causes calcitonin type amyloid and plasma cell dyscrasia and some types of lymphoma can cause immunoglobulin related amyloidosis [36]. Amyloid deposition has also been reported in association with other epithelial neoplasms including urothelial carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, pituitary adenoma, gastric carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, breast carcinoma, and endometrioid carcinoma and rarely in association with sarcomas including Kaposi’s sarcoma, follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and pleomorphic sarcoma [3756]. The relationship between the amyloid and most of the previously mentioned neoplasms, however, is largely unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first case of angiosarcoma arising in association with amyloid deposition. This may represent a purely coincidental occurrence. However, given the intimate association of the angiosarcoma and the amyloid deposition and the rarity of both colonic angiosarcoma and colonic amyloidosis, angiosarcoma could be secondary to the amyloid deposition. It is unlikely that the amyloidosis was secondary to the angiosarcoma, as the area of amyloid deposition was considerably larger than the area involved by angiosarcoma, angiosarcoma was present only within areas of the colon also involved by amyloid, and amyloid deposition has never been previously reported in association with this tumor type. Furthermore, angiosarcomas are rapidly growing, aggressive tumors that usually come quickly to clinical attention. Perhaps most importantly, the amyloidosis type was AL (lambda)-type, which is not known to arise from solid malignancies but rather results from production of amyloidogenic light chains from a clonal plasma cell population. Other factors such as chronic illness or genetic predisposition might have contributed to this exceptional occurrence. AL amyloidosis is the most common type of both systemic and localized amyloidosis. In localized AL amyloidosis, the amyloidogenic light chain is thought to arise from local plasma cell populations, but histologic evidence of monoclonal plasma cell infiltration or lymphoma adjacent to amyloid deposits is not always present [57] (as in this case). Unfortunately, the patient’s family decided against further workup, and thus we do not know if his amyloidosis was systemic or localized.

In summary, we report an extremely rare occurrence of a high-grade colonic angiosarcoma arising in close association with colonic amyloidosis. Although the exact relationship between the tumor and amyloid is obscure, it is tempting to speculate that the amyloid deposits may have served as the inciting tumorigenic event, although pure coincident cannot be completely excluded.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. E. Shustef, V. Kazlouskaya, V. G. Prieto, D. Ivan, and P. P. Aung, “Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a current update,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 917–925, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Co, A. Lee, and A. Kwong, “Cutaneous angiosarcoma secondary to lymphoedema or radiation therapy - a systematic review,” Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 225–231, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. S. Lipshutz, T. V. Brennan, and R. S. Warren, “Thorotrast-induced liver neoplasia: a collective review,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 195, no. 5, pp. 713–718, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. A. Mundt, L. D. Dell, L. Crawford, and A. E. Gallagher, “Quantitative estimated exposure to vinyl chloride and risk of angiosarcoma of the liver and hepatocellular cancer in the US industry-wide vinyl chloride cohort: mortality update through 2013,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 709–716, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Salgado, M. Sans, X. Forns et al., “Hepatic angiosarcoma: a report of a case associated with treatment with arsenic salts and a review of the literature,” Gastroenterol Hepatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 132–135, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. D. Kakisis, C. Antonopoulos, K. Moulakakis et al., “Angiosarcoma of a thrombosed arteriovenous fistula in a renal transplant recipient,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, pp. e1–e4, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. Heining, J. Senior, A. Prasad, M. Thomas, A. Bentall, and P. J. Yates, “Multi-system bleeding risk with a cutaneous angiosarcoma at an arteriovenous fistula site,” Oxford Medical Case Reports, vol. 2018, no. 10, Article ID omy063, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. F. Roy, F. M. Ghazawi, A. Alsarheed, K. D. Lach, K. Watters, and E. O’Brien, “Angiosarcoma arising within a nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1513–1515, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. N. L. Costa, C. F. Rivera, M. C. Rodriguez et al., “Angiosarcoma developing in an arteriovenous fistula after kidney transplantation,” Case Reports in Transplantation, vol. 2017, Article ID 2426859, 3 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. A. Aldaabil, A. M. Alkhunaizi, N. A. Al-Dawsari, M. F. Dawamneh, and R. Rabah, “Angiosarcoma at the site of nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula in a kidney transplant recipient,” Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 53–55, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Oskrochi, K. Razi, J. Stebbing, and J. Crane, “Angiosarcoma and dialysis-related arteriovenous fistulae: a comprehensive review,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. L. Gale, R. A. W. Marco, S. R. Liberman, D. Zavlin, and A. Echo, “Case report: angiosarcoma in the upper extremity related to a nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula,” Hand, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. NP132–NP135, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Terrando, A. Sambri, G. Bianchi et al., “Angiosarcoma around total hip arthroplasty: case series and review of the literature,” Musculoskelet Surgery, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Mallick, S. Jain, A. Proctor, and R. Pandey, “Angiosarcoma around a revision total hip arthroplasty and review of literature,” Journal of Arthroplasty, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 323–20, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Cheng and P. W. Allen, “Selected case from the Arkadi M. Rywlin International Pathology Slide Seminar,” Advances in Anatomic Pathology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 329–332, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Schneider, J. Renney, and J. Hayman, “Angiosarcoma occurring with chronic osteomyelitis and residual foreign material: case report of a late World War II wound complication,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 576–578, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Hayman and H. Huygens, “Angiosarcoma developing around a foreign body,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 515–518, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Agaimy, O. Ben-Izhak, T. Lorey, M. Scharpf, and B. P. Rubin, “Angiosarcoma arising in association with vascular Dacron grafts and orthopedic joint prostheses: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study,” Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 21, pp. 21–28, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. C. Smith, K. D. Bernacki, J. W. Haft, and J. B. McHugh, “Internal cardiac defibrillator implant-associated angiosarcoma presenting as suspected implant pouch infection,” Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 105–108, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. J. McDonald, W. F. Enneking, and M. Sundaram, “Metal-associated angiosarcoma of bone: report of two cases and review of the literature,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 396, pp. 206–214, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. O. Ben-Izhak, E. Vlodavsky, A. Ofer, A. Engel, S. Nitecky, and A. Hoffman, “Epithelioid angiosarcoma associated with a Dacron vascular graft,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1418–1422, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. R. Smoll, R. D. Farhadieh, R. Ferguson, M. W. Findlay, and D. J. Hunter-Smith, “High-grade angiosarcoma associated with ruptured breast implants,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Takenaka, M. Tanaka, M. Isobe, R. Yamaguchi, M. Kojiro, and K. Shirouzu, “Angiosarcoma of the breast with silicone granuloma: a case report,” The Kurume Medical Journal, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 33–37, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. D. Saunders, J. S. Marshall, and R. C. Anderson, “A case of chest wall angiosarcoma associated with breast implants,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 1076-1077, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Cokelaere, J. Vanvuchelen, P. Michielsen, and R. Sciot, “Epithelioid angiosarcoma of the splenic capsule,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 438, no. 4, pp. 398–403, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. O. Ben-Izhak, H. Kerner, B. Brenner, and C. Lichtig, “Angiosarcoma of the colon developing in a capsule of a foreign body: report of a case with associated hemorrhagic diathesis,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 416–420, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y.-T. Joo, C.-Y. Jeong, E.-J. Jung et al., “Intra-abdominal angiosarcoma developing in a capsule of a foreign body: report of a case with associated hemorrhagic diathesis,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 60, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. L. Folpe, C. A. Johnston, and S. W. Weiss, “Cutaneous angiosarcoma arising in a gouty tophus,” The American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 418–421, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. G. Brand, K. H. Johnson, L. C. Buoen, and L. Golberg, “Foreign body tumorigenesis,” CRC Critical Reviews in Toxicology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 353–394, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. A. Jennings, L. Peterson, C. A. Axiotis, G. E. Friedlaender, R. A. Cooke, and J. Rosai, “Angiosarcoma associated with foreign body material: a report of three cases,” Cancer, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2436–2444, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  31. F. Bischoff and G. Bryson, “Carcinogenesis through solid state surfaces,” Progress in Experimental Tumor Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 85–133, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Manner, B. Radlwimmer, P. Hohenberger et al., “MYC high level gene amplification is a distinctive feature of angiosarcomas after irradiation or chronic lymphedema,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. W. Shon, W. R. Sukov, S. M. Jenkins, and A. L. Folpe, “MYC amplification and overexpression in primary cutaneous angiosarcoma: a fluorescence in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemical study,” Modern Pathology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 509–515, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Q. Wang, T. Zhao, B.-T. Mi et al., “Primary colonic angiosarcoma seen in a patient on calcium channel blocker: a case report with summary analysis of 32 other cases from the literature,” American Journal of Case Reports, vol. 19, pp. 254–261, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. J. Cowan, M. Skinner, D. C. Seldin et al., “Amyloidosis of the gastrointestinal tract: a 13-year, single-center, referral experience,” Haematologica, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 141–146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. D. Williams, C. L. Brown, and I. Doniach, “Pathological and clinical findings in a series of 67 cases of medullary carcinoma of the thyroid,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 103–113, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Sirohi, J. Gandhi, M. B. Amin, and D. J. Luthringer, “Amyloidosis of the bladder and association with urothelial carcinoma: report of 29 cases,” Human Pathology, vol. 93, pp. 48–53, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. R. Vanga, S. Dhingra, and K. Patel, “Insulin expressing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor associated with intratumor amyloidosis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. A35–A36, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. O. Brannan, N. G. Lessan, P. Hiscott, and B. Damato, “A choroidal amyloid-rich neuroendocrine tumor,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 1081–1083, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Al-Kaisi, F. W. Abdul-Karim, G. Mendelsohn, and G. Jacobs, “Bronchial carcinoid tumor with amyloid stroma,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 211–214, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. Faruqi, K. Gumparthy, and Z. Wahbi, “Elevated CA 19-9 levels observed in association with a pulmonary neuroendocrine tumour and amyloid,” Internal Medicine, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 105–109, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Samad, R. Attam, J. Jessurun, and S. E. Pambuccian, “Psammoma bodies and abundant stromal amyloid in an endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspirate (EUS-FNA) of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a potential pitfall,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 766–771, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Shintaku, H. Tado, K. Inayama, T. Murakami, and T. Suzuki, “Ductulo-insular pancreatic endocrine tumor with amyloid deposition: report of a case,” Pathology International, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 197–201, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. N. Levine, S. Ishaq, A. Nanda, J. D. Wilson, and E. Gonzalez-Toledo, “Occurrence of extensive spherical amyloid deposits in a prolactin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma: a radiologic-pathologic correlation,” Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 361–366, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. O. Sung, Y.-L. Suh, and D. K. Lee, “Extensive spherical amyloid deposition of pituitary adenoma presenting as pituitary apoplexy,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 424-425, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Iwase, S. Nishizawa, S. Baba et al., “Intrasellar neuronal choristoma associated with growth hormone-producing pituitary adenoma containing amyloid deposits,” Human Pathology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 925–928, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. Aoyagi, K. Koufuji, S. Yano et al., “Early gastric carcinoma associated with amyloidosis: a case report,” The Kurume Medical Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 153–156, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Munichor, H. Cohen, H. Kerner, S. Szvalb, and T. C. Iancu, “Localized amyloidosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration and electron microscopy,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 673–678, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. M. Sabate, M. Clotet, S. Torrubia et al., “Localized amyloidosis of the breast associated with invasive lobular carcinoma,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 970, pp. e252–e254, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Kotru, H. Chandra, N. Singh, and A. Bhatia, “Localized amyloidosis in endometrioid carcinoma of the uterus: a rare association,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 276, no. 4, pp. 383-384, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. I. Agha, R. Mahoney, M. Beardslee, H. Liapis, R. G. Cowart, and I. Juknevicius, “Systemic amyloidosis associated with pleomorphic sarcoma of the spleen and remission of nephrotic syndrome after removal of the tumor,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 411–415, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. F. Chiaramonte, D. Lee, L. V. Abruzzo, M. Heyman, and B. L. Bass, “Retroperitoneal follicular dendritic cell sarcoma presenting as secondary amyloidosis,” Surgery, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 109–111, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Onishi, N. Hojo, I. Sakai et al., “Secondary amyloidosis and eosinophilia in a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 617–621, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. I. Kudrina, E. A. Markina, V. V. Sura, and A. A. Vorob’eva, “Secondary amyloidosis in patient with Kaposi’s sarcoma,” Ter Arkh, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 53–56, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  55. D. S. Shimm, G. L. Logue, M. B. Rohlfing, and J. T. Gaede, “Primary amyloidosis, pure red cell aplasia, and Kaposi’s sarcoma in a single patient,” Cancer, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1501–1503, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  56. J. Favreau, L. P. Legresley, and C. Beaudry, “Kaposi’s sarcoma associated with primary amylosis, with chronic renal insufficiency,” Canadian Medical Association, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 1683–1687, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  57. S. M. Said, C. Reynolds, R. E. Jimenez et al., “Amyloidosis of the breast: predominantly AL type and over half have concurrent breast hematologic disorders,” Modern Pathology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 232–238, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Samar Said et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views131
Downloads132
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.