Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Hematology
Volume 2014, Article ID 120714, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/120714
Case Report

A Double Hit CD10-Negative B-Cell Lymphoma with t(3;8)(q27;q24) Leading to Juxtaposition of the BCL6 and MYC Loci Associated with Good Clinical Outcome

1Department of Haematology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
2Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute and Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
3Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold Heller Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany
4Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute and Department of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK

Received 8 August 2014; Accepted 15 September 2014; Published 1 October 2014

Academic Editor: Takashi Sonoki

Copyright © 2014 Lucinda Sanders et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The WHO classification of lymphomas allows for a group of diseases that have features intermediate between those of Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These are a diverse group of diseases whose genetics and clinical course are yet to be fully described. We report an unusual case of high grade B-cell lymphoma, intermediate between DLBCL and BL, lacking CD10 expression in which the chromosomal translocation t(3;8)(q27;q24) was found to be the sole chromosomal abnormality. FISH analysis demonstrated juxtaposition of the BCL6 and MYC loci without obvious involvement of the IGH locus, suggesting constitutive MYC expression due to promoter substitution. The patient responded to intensive chemotherapy and remains in remission two years after finishing therapy.

1. Introduction

Making a correct diagnosis of high grade B-cell lymphoma is critically important because Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly curable with intensive chemotherapy treatment regimens [1, 2] but not with the standard regimens employed for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). BL can occur in various clinical settings (endemic/sporadic and as a consequence of immunodeficiency) and can present with either nodal or extranodal disease. Morphologically, BL (L3) blasts characteristically have deeply basophilic, vacuolated cytoplasm; typically histological sections show a “starry sky” appearance, due to tingible body macrophages [3]. Immunophenotypically, virtually all BL blasts express Ki67, indicative of a high proliferation rate, and lack BCL2 expression, possibly reflecting their origin from germinal centre B-cells. Only rarely do cases fail to express the germinal centre surface marker, CD10 [4]. Most cases coexpress TP53 protein, arising due to a variety of mechanisms, not only TP53 mutation [5]. Cytogenetically, BL are characterized by a “simple” karyotype and specifically with chromosomal translocations involving the MYC locus on chromosome 8q24 with either the IGH locus on chromosome 14q32 or the IGK or IGL loci on chromosomes 2p12 and 22q11, respectively [68]. DLBCL has distinctive morphological features but is heterogeneous with respect to immunohistochemistry and gene expression [9, 10]. Histological separation of DLBCL and BL can be difficult although gene expression profiling permits the accurate classification of these two diseases [6]. However, gene expression profiling is not yet widely used for this purpose and the principle means of diagnosis is immunohistochemistry combined with FISH interphase cytogenetics.

FISH cytogenetics has revealed translocations involving the MYC locus which are sometimes accompanied by recurrent breaks at other loci, particularly the BCL2 gene on chromosome 18 or the BCL6 gene on chromosome 3. MYC+/BCL2+ cases account for 62% of double hit lymphomas, whereas MYC+/BCL6+ cases are much more rare at 8%. Morphologically double hit lymphomas can have the appearance of BL, DLBCL, or follicular lymphoma whilst immunohistochemical studies suggest that the majority coexpress CD10, BCL6, and BCL2 and have a proliferation index between 50 and 100% as assessed by Ki67 staining [11]. Double hit lymphomas tend to have high LDH and extranodal involvement at presentation and a poor response to treatment. These considerations caused the WHO to introduce a novel category of B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between BL and DLBCL. Double hit lymphomas involving the BCL6 locus have been reported to be particularly aggressive [8, 12].

There are many uncertainties with respect to diagnosis and management of double hit lymphomas. Here we present a case of double hit lymphoma with unusual immunophenotypic and cytogenetic features with a good response to intensive chemotherapy.

2. Methods

Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed as previously described [1315]. Probes were employed as indicated in the text.

3. Case

A previously well 37-year-old female of southern Asian origin presented in July 2011 with a one-month history of malaise, intermittent fever, weight loss of over 5 kg, and back pain, which was sufficiently severe for initial referral to the orthopedic surgeons. On examination she was tender over the L4/5 vertebrae but with no neurological deficit. There was no palpable lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly. An MRI scan of the thoracolumbar spine showed increased signal consistent with diffuse marrow replacement. Diagnostic blood tests showed hemoglobin of 112, white cell count of /L (differential: neutrophils 6.03; lymphocytes, 1.7), and platelets of /L. Renal and liver function tests were normal but lactate dehydrogenase was markedly raised at 2029 (upper limit of normal 255). HIV and hepatitis screens were negative. Serum immunoglobulins were within the normal range and there was no detectable paraprotein. CT scan of thorax, abdomen, and pelvis was normal.

Bone marrow aspirate and trephine showed complete replacement of the normal bone marrow by blasts with L3 morphology, with basophilic cytoplasm and vacuolation (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Analysis of the bone marrow blasts by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry showed a composite immunophenotype of strong expression of CD19, CD20, and CD79A but without detectable CD10. Ki67 was seen in all cells indicative of a proliferation rate of 100%. Immunohistochemistry showed that TdT was absent as was BCL2 protein, whereas TP53 protein was detected in all cells.

fig1
Figure 1: Morphology, karyotype, and FISH analysis of the case. (a) Blast cells demonstrating basophilic cytoplasm and high nuclear cytoplasm ratio. (b) Bone marrow morphology showing diffuse infiltration. (c) Analysis of bone marrow metaphase using FISH probes. A Vysis LSI MYC dual colour break-apart rearrangement probe was employed to show a MYC fusion on the normal chromosome 8, with the other MYC allele split between the der(3) and der(8). (d) G-banding karyogram showing t(3;8)(q27;q24). ((e), (f), and (g)) Interphase FISH analyses (false colour display derived from the ISIS/MetaSystems FISH system). (e) FISH analysis of the t(3;8) translocation. (e) MYC break-apart probe showing one red/green colocalised signal from the unrearranged locus and two separate red and green signals from the rearranged locus. (f) BCL6 break-apart probe showing one red/green colocalised signal from the unrearranged locus and two separate red and green signals. (g) IGH break-apart probe showing a signal of two colocalised red/green signals indicating no breaks at the IGH locus. (h) MYC/IGH/CEP 8 tricolor dual-fusion probe. IGH (green) does not colocalise with MYC (red). The 8p11.1-q11.1 CEP8 alpha satellite probe gives a blue signal. (i) Colocalisation of BCL6 (green) and MYC (red) without fusion of IGH signals (blue).

Metaphase cytogenetics showed a single chromosomal translocation involving the long arms of chromosomes 3 and 8 in seven of ten metaphases; the final karyotype was 46,XX,t(3;8)(q27;q24)[7]/46,XX[3] (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). Specific fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) investigations were also undertaken on this sample: the Vysis LSI MYC dual colour break-apart rearrangement probe, which detects the majority of MYC breakpoints at 8q24, showed rearrangement in 39 of 100 (39%) interphase nuclei examined (Figure 1(c)).

Interphase molecular cytogenetic analysis with BCL6, MYC, and IGH break-apart probes (Figures 1(e), 1(f), and 1(g)) showed a signal constellation indicating a break at the BCL6 and MYC loci in 12 and 11% of interphase cells, respectively, but two nonrearranged IGH alleles (Figures 1(e), 1(f), and 1(g)). Hybridization with a IGH-MYC-CEP8 tricolor dual-fusion probe which detects the typical t(8;14)(q24;q32) showed no evidence of t(8;14)(q24;q32) (Figure 1(h)). Importantly, hybridization with probes spanning the MYC (red), IGH (blue), and BCL6 (green) loci probes showed MYC-BCL6 fusion without any detectable colocalisation or insertion of IGH signals in 14% of examined cells (Figure 1(i)) [13].

The patient was treated initially with combination chemotherapy according to the R-CHOP protocol, but when the additional FISH data became available this was followed by two cycles of R-CODOXM-IVAC as used in the UK LY10 study [2]. The latter chemotherapy was poorly tolerated and required several prolonged in-patient admissions with severe neutropenic sepsis and mucositis, but a posttreatment bone marrow in December 2011 demonstrated complete remission. She continues well off all specific therapy 33 months later.

4. Discussion

The FISH studies performed on this case showed that the t(3;8)(q27;q24) translocation resulted from the juxtaposition of upstream (telomeric) BCL6 sequences on chromosome 3q27 with MYC on chromosome 8q24. This case is, therefore, best classified as B-cell lymphoma with features intermediate between DLBCL and BL [16] or highly proliferative “regular” DLBCL. The present case demonstrates that Burkitt lymphoma morphology can be associated with MYC translocations that do not involve the immunoglobulin loci. We suggest that the t(3;8)(q27;q24) resulted in promoter substitution with sequences on chromosome 3q27 driving deregulated MYC expression. This appears to have occurred as a single event without prior generation of a t(8;14)(q24;q32) translocation, although without the benefit of DNA sequence analysis we cannot exclude a small amount of IGH sequences inserted at the breakpoint junction.

Similar chromosomal translocations involving BCL6 and MYC have been described previously, but usually in the context of more complex karyotypic abnormalities and usually in other subtypes of B-cell malignancy. To our knowledge, the first cytogenetic description of t(3;8)(q27;q24) was in an 11-year-old girl with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia arising on a background of ataxia-telangiectasia [17]; in this case, the BCL6/MYC “fusion” was subsequently translocated to other chromosome arms including 1q, 6q, 12p, 18q, and Xp as the malignancy evolved. Subsequent cytogenetic and molecular descriptions of t(3;8)(q27;q24) have been in DLBCL cases with more complex karyotypes including t(14;18)(q32;q23) “triple hit” cases [1822]; DNA sequence analysis has shown direct juxtaposition of sequences from chromosome 3q27 with those from chromosome 8q24 with no intervening IG sequences; the BCL6 breakpoints fell outside the BCL6 major translocation cluster (MTC). It is likely that the consequences of the translocation included deregulated expression of both BCL6 and MYC. Recent reports suggest that MYC-BCL6 rearrangements occurring in DLBCL are associated with an aggressive clinical course [8, 12] although similar results have not been obtained in all series [23].

Germinal centre derived DLBCL often express CD10, whereas activated B-cell type does not [24, 25]. Recent reports show that double hit lymphomas involving the BCL6 locus often lack CD10 expression but are GCB-like by immunohistochemistry according the Hans' algorithm [12, 26], although ABC-like cases have been reported by gene expression profiling [8].

In summary, we present a case of CD10 negative but otherwise typical BL with an unusual MYC translocation involving BCL6 as the sole cytogenetic abnormality; treatment with BL-type therapy has resulted in a durable remission.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Karen Marshall and Lara Cresswell, Department of Cytogenetics, University Hospitals of Leicester, for carrying out the metaphase FISH cytogenetics and Dr. Linda Barton, Department of Haematology, University Hospitals of Leicester, for bone marrow analysis. Sietse M. Aukema is supported by the Nijbakker-Morra, Hippocrates, de Drie Lichten, and René Vogels Foundations. This work has been supported, in part, by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) through the MMML-MYC-SYS Project (0316166B).

References

  1. J. A. Barnes, A. S. LaCasce, Y. Feng et al., “Evaluation of the addition of rituximab to CODOX-M/IVAC for Burkitt's lymphoma: a retrospective analysis,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1859–1864, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. M. Mead, M. R. Sydes, J. Walewski et al., “An international evaluation of CODOX-M and CODOX-M alternating with IVAC in adult Burkitt's lymphoma: results of United Kingdom Lymphoma Group LY06 study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1264–1274, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. S. Jaffe, N. L. Harris, H. Stein, and J. W. Vardiman, World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2001.
  4. K. Kelemen, R. M. Braziel, K. Gatter, T. C. Bakke, S. Olson, and G. Fan, “Immunophenotypic variations of Burkitt lymphoma,” The American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Leventaki, V. Rodic, S. R. Tripp et al., “TP53 pathway analysis in paediatric Burkitt lymphoma reveals increased MDM4 expression as the only TP53 pathway abnormality detected in a subset of cases,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 763–771, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. S. Dave, K. Fu, G. W. Wright et al., “Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 23, pp. 2431–42, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Richter, M. Schlesner, S. Hoffmann et al., “Recurrent mutation of the ID3 gene in Burkitt lymphoma identified by integrated genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1316–1320, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. M. Aukema, M. Kreuz, C. W. Kohler et al., “Biological characterization of adult MYC-translocation-positive mature B-cell lymphomas other than molecular Burkitt lymphoma,” Haematologica, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 726–735, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. A. Alizadeh, M. B. Eisen, R. E. Davis et al., “Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling,” Nature, vol. 403, no. 6769, pp. 503–511, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. A. Shipp, K. N. Ross, P. Tamayo et al., “Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. M. Aukema, R. Siebert, E. Schuuring et al., “Double-hit B-cell lymphomas,” Blood, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 2319–2331, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. K. Pillai, M. Sathanoori, S. B. van Oss, and S. H. Swerdlow, “Double-hit B-cell lymphomas with BCL6 and MYC translocations are aggressive, frequently extranodal lymphomas distinct from BCL2 double-hit B-cell lymphomas,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 323–332, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Hummel, S. Bentink, H. Berger et al., “A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 23, pp. 2419–2430, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. W. Klapper, M. Kreuz, C. W. Kohler et al., “Patient age at diagnosis is associated with the molecular characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 1882–1887, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. A. Ventura, J. I. Martin-Subero, M. Jones et al., “FISH analysis for the detection of lymphoma-associated chromosomal abnormalities in routine paraffin-embedded tissue,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–151, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. M. Kluin, N. L. Harris, and H. Stein, “B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma,” in WHO Classification of Tumour of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, S. H. Swerdlow, E. Campo, N. L. Harris et al., Eds., IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. T. Sandlund, M. B. Kastan, W. Kennedy et al., “A subtle t(3;8) results in plausible juxtaposition of MYC and BCL6 in a child with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia and ataxia-telangiectasia,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 69–72, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Motlló, J. Grau, J. Juncà et al., “Translocation (3;8)(q27;q24) in two cases of triple hit lymphoma,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 328–332, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Bertrand, C. Bastard, C. Maingonnat et al., “Mapping of MYC breakpoints in 8q24 rearrangements involving non-immunoglobulin partners in B-cell lymphomas,” Leukemia, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 515–523, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H.-Y. Wang, A. D. Bossler, A. Schaffer et al., “A novel t(3;8)(q27;q24.1) simultaneously involving both the BCL6 and MYC genes in a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T. Sonoki, H. Tatetsu, A. Nagasaki, and H. Hata, “Molecular cloning of translocation breakpoint from der(8)t(3;8)(q27;q24) defines juxtaposition of downstream of C-MYC and upstream of BCL6,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 196–198, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. U. Bacher, T. Haferlach, T. Alpermann, W. Kern, S. Schnittger, and C. Haferlach, “Several lymphoma-specific genetic events in parallel can be found in mature B-cell neoplasms,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Tzankov, Z. Y. Xu-Monette, M. Gerhard et al., “Rearrangements of MYC gene facilitate risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-CHOP,” Modern Pathology, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. P. Hans, D. D. Weisenburger, T. C. Greiner et al., “Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray,” Blood, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 275–282, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. E. Culpin, M. Sieniawski, B. Angus et al., “Prognostic significance of immunohistochemistry-based markers and algorithms in immunochemotherapy-treated diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients,” Histopathology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 788–801, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. K. Turakhia, B. T. Hill, S. D. Dufresne et al., “Aggressive B-cell lymphomas with translocations involving BCL6 and MYC have distinct clinical-pathologic characteristics,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 339–346, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar