Case Reports in Hematology

Case Reports in Hematology / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 1259759 |

Pankit Vachhani, Jason H. Mendler, Andrew Evans, George Deeb, Petr Starostik, Paul K. Wallace, Eunice S. Wang, "Spontaneous Remission in an Older Patient with Relapsed FLT3 ITD Mutant AML", Case Reports in Hematology, vol. 2016, Article ID 1259759, 7 pages, 2016.

Spontaneous Remission in an Older Patient with Relapsed FLT3 ITD Mutant AML

Academic Editor: Stephen Langabeer
Received11 Oct 2016
Revised04 Dec 2016
Accepted13 Dec 2016
Published29 Dec 2016


Spontaneous remission (SR) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a very rare phenomenon. AML characterized by FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3 ITD) is typically associated with an aggressive clinical course with rapid progression, relapse, and short overall survival in the absence of transplantation. We report here the first case of SR of FLT3 ITD mutant AML in the literature. Our patient was an elderly woman with relapsed NPM1 and FLT3 ITD mutant AML whose disease underwent SR for a brief duration without precipitating cause. We review the potential immune mechanisms underlying SR in AML and discuss the implications for novel immunotherapeutic approaches for FLT3 mutant AML.

1. Introduction

Spontaneous remission (SR) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a very rare clinical phenomenon that was first described in 1878 by Eisenlohr [1]. It denotes either partial or complete morphologic disappearance of AML without administration of antileukemic therapy [2, 3]. About 100 cases were reported up to 1955 while less than 10 reports were published between 1955 and 1985 [47]. Overall, 46 eligible cases were found in the modern English literature between 1950 and 2014 [4]. Here, we present the first reported case of a 73 year-old woman with relapsed FLT3 ITD mutant AML whose disease underwent spontaneous complete remission without interim therapy.

AML is a biologically heterogeneous myeloid malignancy with diverse disease subsets defined by distinct cytogenetic and molecular features. Nearly 30% of AML cases are characterized by molecular abnormalities in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) gene, known as FLT3 mutant AML [8, 9]. The majority of these mutations involve internal tandem duplications (ITD) of the juxtamembrane domain-coding sequence of FLT3, leading to constitutive activation of FLT3 receptors and triggering of multiple downstream signaling pathways (such as JAK/STAT, Raf/MEK/ERK, and PI3K/Akt), which promote tumor growth [1012]. In general, the presence of FLT3 ITD mutation in AML connotes worse outcomes [13, 14]. Indeed, despite achieving complete remission following induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients with normal cytogenetics and FLT3 ITD mutant AML experience significantly shortened remission duration, lower salvage rate in first remission, and decreased overall survival [1417]. While the advent of FLT3 inhibitors may change these outcomes for the better, the only current curative modality for FLT3 ITD mutant AML patients remains allogeneic stem cell transplantation [11, 13, 14].

In this context, our case presents a fascinating account of a rare phenomenon of SR in an otherwise aggressive molecular subset of AML.

2. Case Presentation

The patient was a 73-year-old woman with a prior medical history of hypertension who presented with three weeks of dyspnea, nausea, loose stools, and fatigue. Examination was unremarkable. However, complete blood count (CBC) revealed leukocytes of 240,000/μL, hemoglobin of 6.2 g/dL, and platelets of 119,000/μL (Table 1). Peripheral smear showed many promonocytes and a few immature blasts containing rare Auer rods consistent with a diagnosis of AML. Emergent leukopheresis and treatment with hydroxyurea were initiated. Bone marrow biopsy and aspirate showed 73% myeloblasts and immature promonocytes expressing CD13, CD15, CD33, CD45, CD64, CD123, and HLA-DR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry (FC). Cytogenetic analysis showed a normal karyotype. FLT-3 ITD and exon 12 mutation of the nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) gene were detected (data not shown). Findings were consistent with NPM1-mutated AML of FAB M5 subtype.

Day 1
Day 38
Day 270 (BM-1)
First SR
Day 277
Second SR
Day 284
Second relapse
Day 312

WBC (× 109/L)2408.73.33.514.7229.9
Hgb (g/dL)
Platelets (× 109/L)11948311515017163
PB blasts (%)74%NoneNoneNoneNone16%
BM blasts (%)73%None64%3%2%84%
Flow cytometryAbnormalNo AMLAbnormalNo AMLNo AMLAbnormal
NormalN.A.del (15q) in 19/20 cellsdel (15q)
in 1/20 cells
del (15q)
in 6/20 cells
del (15q) in 20/20 cells and del (16q) in 1/20 cells
NPM1 mutation+ BM+ BM+ BM+ PB/+ BM+ BM+ BM
FLT3 ITD mutation
+ BM
(AR N.A.)
− BM+ BM
AR 0.36
− BM/+ PB
AR 0.005
+ BM
AR 0.01
AR 1.99

Induction chemotherapy with standard-dose cytarabine (100 mg/m2 once daily × 7 days) and daunorubicin (45 mg/m2 once daily × 3 days) was initiated. The patient achieved a complete remission (CR) based on count recovery and repeat bone marrow aspirate showing no blasts or promonocytes. At the time of morphologic CR, no FLT3 mutation was identified by quantitative PCR in the marrow; however, exon 12 mutation of NPM1 was identified in a very small fraction of the cells (signal was below the 10% sensitivity control). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was offered given the high risk for disease progression, but patient declined. She subsequently received two cycles of high-dose cytarabine (1.5 g/m2 once daily × 6 days), which she tolerated well with complete count recovery.

Six months after completion of consolidation therapy and eight months from her diagnosis, the patient was noted on routine follow-up to have mild leukopenia of 3,300/μL and thrombocytopenia of 115,000/μL. Repeat bone marrow biopsy and aspirate (Figure 1(a)) showed 64% myeloblasts which expressed a slightly different immunophenotype than originally (CD13, CD33, CD15, CD58, CD117, and HLA-DR). Cytogenetics revealed a new abnormality in the form of del (15q) in 19/20 analyzed cells. Both NPM1 and FLT3 ITD mutations were identified with a FLT3 ITD allele/wild-type ratio of 0.36.

The patient was referred to a clinical trial of an experimental FLT3 inhibitor. She underwent screening bone marrow biopsy and aspirate (Figure 1(b)) on the contralateral side from BM-1 approximately one week apart. Surprisingly, this demonstrated cellular marrow with 3% blasts without Auer rods and no evidence of AML by marrow IHC and FC. Cytogenetics revealed del (15q) in 1/20 analyzed cells. Molecular analyses detected the presence of a very small amount of NPM1 mutation in the blood and marrow and a minimal amount of FLT3 with an allelic ratio of 0.005 in the peripheral blood only. The patient reported no interim known or suspected infections or administration of blood products between BM-1 and BM-2. Given these incongruent marrow findings, another bone marrow biopsy and aspirate procedure (Figure 1(c)) was performed on the ipsilateral side as BM-1 another week later. This specimen also showed no evidence of AML by morphology or FC with 2% blasts. Cytogenetics revealed del (15q) in 6/20 analyzed cells. Molecular analyses on marrow aspirate showed detectable NPM1 and FLT3 mutations with a FLT3 ITD allele/wild-type ratio of 0.01. To confirm that these marrow samples were indeed from the same patient, genomic DNA was extracted from the BM-1, BM-2, and BM-3 marrow samples followed by amplification of nine short tandem repeat loci (D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D21S11, D18S51, D5S818, D13S317, and D7S820) using the AmpFLSTR® Profiler Plus® PCR Amplification Kit from Life Technologies. All of the samples had identical results at all nine loci, thus confirming that the specimens were from the same individual. Unfortunately the patient was not deemed a candidate for clinical trial of experimental FLT3 inhibitor due to the lack of overt morphological disease, which was an eligibility criterion. She elected to resume observant therapy.

Thirty-five days from first documented SR (BM-2), the patient presented with overt disease recurrence with leukocytes of 29,900/μL and 16% peripheral blasts. Marrow biopsy revealed 84% myeloblasts with del (15q) in all 20 analyzed cells and new del (16q) in 1 of 20 cells. Molecular analyses confirmed the same NPM1 and FLT3 ITD mutations with a high allelic ratio of 1.99. The patient decided to forego further treatment and died a few weeks later.

3. Discussion

Spontaneous remission of AML is a rare phenomenon documented in the medical literature. To our knowledge, we present here the first reported case of FLT3 ITD mutant AML undergoing SR. Given the overall prevalence of FLT3 ITD in AML patients, it is more than likely that some of the prior published cases of SR in AML patients contained other cases of FLT3 ITD mutant disease which were not discerned due to the lack of available testing. Additionally, the immediate use of chemotherapy after initial diagnosis and at relapse and the innately worse outcomes rendered by mutant FLT3 in AML would also have likely contributed to the lack of any prior report of SR. Despite the spontaneous morphologic CR in our patient, it is clear that she had cytogenetic and molecular evidence of AML disease throughout her entire disease course. It is possible that many of the prior reported cases of SR in the literature would not survive the test of today’s diagnostic standards. As an example, 21 of the 46 patients reported by Rashidi and Fisher as cases of SR did not even have baseline cytogenetic analysis [4]. While the current definition of complete (and hence spontaneous) remission in AML relies solely on morphologic criteria, there is growing consensus that identification of minimal residual disease (MRD), as assessed by highly sensitive molecular and multiparameter flow cytometry assays in marrow samples at the time of clinical remission, may be a more significant and accurate predictor for leukemic persistence and recurrence than pathology alone. In fact, various recent studies have investigated the role of mutant NPM1 as a tool for MRD assessment in AML [1825]. The presence of MRD as determined by quantitation of NPM1-mutated transcripts after two cycles of chemotherapy in standard-risk AML was shown to be a powerful independent prognostic factor for disease relapse and overall survival in one study [22]. In another study, reduction in postinduction MRD based on peripheral blood NPM1-mutated transcripts had strong prognostic significance and predicted benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplant [18]. In the subset of patients with FLT3 ITD, only age, white blood cell count, and 4-log reduction in peripheral blood MRD, but not FLT3 ITD allelic ratio, were significantly associated with a higher cumulative incidence of relapse. Indeed, MRD may eventually be incorporated into routine practice as an important determinant of therapy response, modification, and need for transplant, similar to our current usage of AML cytogenetics and mutation information [13, 26].

Our patient’s disease recurrence likely occurred from the AML founding clone or one of its subclones [27]. However, the lack of stored blood or marrow samples precludes confirmation of this aspect of clonal evolution. Nevertheless, the current definition of AML remission does not incorporate clonal evolution; rather, it relies heavily on morphology as discussed above. Notably, our patient experienced a significant spontaneous reduction in her overall leukemia disease burden lasting several weeks in the absence of any known therapy. While missed diagnosis due to patchy marrow involvement is a possibility, it should be noted that localized or patchy involvement is generally assumed to be very rare in AML unlike lymphoplasmacytic neoplasms or solid tumors [28]. A simultaneous improvement in hematologic parameters as well as FLT3 ITD allelic ratio and then a worsening of these findings corresponding with frank relapse are highly indicative of true SR in this patient by current criteria. SR in AML patients are hypothesized to result from activation of innate host immune responses exerting direct antileukemic effects. Two factors resulting in immune activation, specifically infections and blood transfusion, have been repeatedly associated with the majority of SR cases. Unequivocal infections have been documented in 32 out of 45 (71.1%) SR patients, while 32 out of 39 (82.1%) SR patients had antecedent blood transfusion [4]. Although pneumonia (54.5%), bacteremia (24.2%), and skin/soft tissue infections (12.1%) are the most commonly cited infections [4], even atypical infections such as pulmonary aspergillosis, tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and infectious mononucleosis have been described [2933]. Immune cell production of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-alpha) and interferon-γ (IFN-gamma) has been shown to directly inhibit myeloblast proliferation [34, 35]. Increased interleukin-2 (IL-2) levels also activate natural killer (NK) cell number and activity [3436]. Hypergammaglobulinemia, representing humoral immune response, can occur secondary to antibody generation against blast antigens, antibody generation triggered by cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte recognition of blasts, or antibody generation against infectious antigens with cross-reactivity to leukemic blasts [4, 36]. This may also contribute to increased antibody-mediated cytotoxicity via NK and cytotoxic T-cells and activate macrophages through better recognition, opsonization, or adhesion [37, 38]. In vitro experiments performed at 10-year follow-up of the longest sustained SR in AML containing the t (9; 11)(q22; q23) abnormality suggested that early immune effects were likely mediated by CD8 T-cell and humoral mechanisms while long-term remission was potentially mediated by NK-cells [38, 39].

Allogeneic blood product transfusion has also been linked to SR in AML. Because nonirradiated blood products contain potentially functional antileukemic lymphocytes, transfusion of such products can potentially induce antileukemic effects in a manner similar to graft-versus-leukemia [30, 40, 41]. The role of antileukemic antibodies or other factors in donor serum has also been speculated [42]. The current routine practice of using leukocyte depleted irradiated blood products in all patients with AML may have partly diminished the contribution of transfusions to SR and rendered SR an even rarer occurrence than in the past.

Cases of SR unrelated to transfusions or infections, as in our case, have also been noted previously [4, 43]. Potential other contributing factors including granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) administration and hormonal changes (both of which could also impact on innate immune function) have been reported [43]. There is also data suggesting that certain biological subsets of AML may be more likely to undergo SR, specifically FAB subtypes M4/M5 which constitute about half of all reported cases of SR in AML, and certain cytogenetics [3, 4]. Of note, patients with NPM1 mutant AML similar to our patient may also be predisposed towards SR [3, 44]. The presence of NPM1 mutation, found in approximately 35% of AML cases, is known to confer favorable prognosis [45, 46]. When coexistent with FLT3 ITD, the presence of NPM1 mutation may partly mitigate the poor prognostic effects of FLT3 ITD, particularly in patients with low FLT3 ITD mutant disease levels, for unknown reasons [14, 4750]. It is therefore of interest that, at the time of SR, our patient continued to have NPM1 mutant disease in the presence of very low levels of FLT3 ITD.

In conclusion, SR in AML is a rare but real and well-documented clinical phenomenon resulting in clinical complete remissions lasting for an average of 5–7 months and ranging from as short as 2 weeks to in excess of 100 months [4, 38, 5154]. Identification of such patients along with systematic and comprehensive correlative studies, if feasible, will help elucidate the mechanistic underpinnings of this phenomenon in an otherwise fatal disease. The fact that SR occurs even in patients with high disease burden, relapsed/refractory disease, and AML with complex/adverse genetic abnormalities is a testament to the power of the immune system to inhibit leukemia. Prior attempts to activate the immune system via mechanisms previously documented in SR cases have so far had only limited success, for example, IL-2 for consolidation and relapsed/refractory AML therapy [4, 55, 56]. However, the advent of modern immunotherapeutic approaches beyond allogeneic stem cell transplant such as T-cell engaging antibody constructs and adoptive transfer of autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for AML therapy remain highly promising [57]. Hopefully, the mechanisms driving SR in AML can one day be unraveled and harnessed in combination with other therapeutic options. Although our patient was not able to receive experimental FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for detectable FLT3 mutant disease in the setting of morphologic CR, the future use of FLT3 inhibitors for the treatment of minimal molecular residual disease and as a complementary approach to immunotherapy is also appealing.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant conflict of interests to report.


  1. C. Eisenlohr, “Leucaemia lienalis, lymphatica et medullaris mit multiplen Gehirnnervenlähmungen,” Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medizin (Virchows Arch), vol. 73, pp. 56–73, 1878. View at: Google Scholar
  2. W. H. Cole and T. C. Everson, “Spontaneous regression of cancer: preliminary report,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 366–383, 1956. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. Zeng, Y. Yuan, P. Li, and T. Chen, “Spontaneous remission in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) or cutaneous myeloid sarcoma: two case reports and a review of the literature,” Internal Medicine, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1227–1233, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Rashidi and S. I. Fisher, “Spontaneous remission of acute myeloid leukemia,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1727–1734, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. M. Southam, L. F. Craver, H. W. Dargeon, and J. H. Burchenal, “A study of the natural history of acute leukemia with special reference to the duration of the disease and the occurrence of remissions,” Cancer, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 1951. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Pelner, G. A. Fowler, and H. C. Nauts, “Effects of concurrent infections and their toxins on the course of leukemia,” Acta Medica Scandinavica, vol. 338, pp. 1–47, 1958. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Tivey, “The natural history of untreated acute leukemia,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 322–358, 1954. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. D. Kottaridis, R. E. Gale, M. E. Frew et al., “The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials,” Blood, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1752–1759, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. R. Grunwald and M. J. Levis, “FLT3 inhibitors for acute myeloid leukemia: a review of their efficacy and mechanisms of resistance,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 683–694, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Takahashi, “Downstream molecular pathways of FLT3 in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia: biology and therapeutic implications,” Journal of Hematology and Oncology, vol. 4, article 13, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Döhner, D. J. Weisdorf, and C. D. Bloomfield, “Acute myeloid leukemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 12, pp. 1136–1152, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. U. Bacher, C. Haferlach, W. Kern, T. Haferlach, and S. Schnittger, “Prognostic relevance of FLT3-TKD mutations in AML: the combination matters—an analysis of 3082 patients,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 2527–2537, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Kantarjian, “Acute myeloid leukemia—major progress over four decades and glimpses into the future,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 131–145, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Levis, “FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: what is the best approach in 2013?” Hematology. American Society of Hematology Education Program, vol. 2013, pp. 220–226, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. Fröhling, R. F. Schlenk, J. Breitruck et al., “Prognostic significance of activating FLT3 mutations in younger adults (16 to 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: a study of the AML study group Ulm,” Blood, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 4372–4380, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Wagner, F. Damm, F. Thol et al., “FLT3-internal tandem duplication and age are the major prognostic factors in patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype,” Haematologica, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 681–686, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. P. Whitman, K. J. Archer, L. Feng et al., “Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: a cancer and leukemia group B study,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 19, pp. 7233–7239, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Balsat, A. Renneville, X. Thomas et al., “Postinduction minimal residual disease predicts outcome and benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation: a study by the acute leukemia French Association Group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, In press. View at: Google Scholar
  19. W.-C. Chou, J.-L. Tang, S.-J. Wu et al., “Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients bearing nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations,” Leukemia, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 998–1004, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. Gorello, G. Cazzaniga, F. Alberti et al., “Quantitative assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia carrying nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene mutations,” Leukemia, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1103–1108, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Hubmann, T. Köhnke, E. Hoster et al., “Molecular response assessment by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction after induction therapy in NPM1-mutated patients identifies those at high risk of relapse,” Haematologica, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 1317–1325, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Ivey, R. K. Hills, M. A. Simpson et al., “Assessment of minimal residual disease in standard-risk AML,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, no. 5, pp. 422–433, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Krönke, R. F. Schlenk, K.-O. Jensen et al., “Monitoring of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the German-Austrian acute myeloid leukemia study group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 19, pp. 2709–2716, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Schnittger, W. Kern, C. Tschulik et al., “Minimal residual disease levels assessed by NPM1 mutation-specific RQ-PCR provide important prognostic information in AML,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 2220–2231, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. Shayegi, M. Kramer, M. Bornhäuser et al., “The level of residual disease based on mutant NPM1 is an independent prognostic factor for relapse and survival in AML,” Blood, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. F. Ravandi and J. L. Jorgensen, “Monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: ready for prime time?” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1029–1036, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. N. Wong, C. A. Miller, J. M. Klco et al., “Rapid expansion of preexisting nonleukemic hematopoietic clones frequently follows induction therapy for de novo AML,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 893–897, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. K. Brierley, E. A. Morgan, J. R. Sprague, O. O. Odejide, D. J. DeAngelo, and D. P. Steensma, “An extreme example of focal bone marrow involvement in acute myeloid leukemia,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 335–336, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. W. Taylor, “Effects of glandular fever infection in acute leukaemia,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 4810, pp. 589–593, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Tzankov, C. Ludescher, H.-C. Duba et al., “Spontaneous remission in a secondary acute myelogenous leukaemia following invasive pulmonary aspergillosis,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 423–425, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. N. Ifrah, J.-M. James, F. Viguie, J. P. Marie, and R. Zittoun, “Spontaneous remission in adult acute leukemia,” Cancer, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1187–1190, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  32. H. J. Kang, J. H. Yoon, H. I. Cho, B. K. Kim, and S. I. Kim, “Transient spontaneous remission in acute promyelocytic leukemia—two case reports,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 166–170, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Fassas, I. Sakellari, A. Anagnostopoulos, and R. Saloum, “Spontaneous remission of acute myeloid leukemia in a patient with concurrent Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia,” Nouvelle Revue Française d'Hématologie, vol. 33, pp. 363–364, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  34. P. Musto, G. D'Arena, L. Melillo et al., “Spontaneous remission in acute myeloid leukaemia: a role for endogenous production of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-2?” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 879–880, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. Jimemez, J. M. Ribera, E. Abad et al., “Increased serum tumour necrosis factor during transient remission in acute leukaemia,” The Lancet, vol. 341, no. 8860, p. 1600, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. Mitterbauer, M. Fritzer-Szekeres, G. Mitterbauer et al., “Spontaneous remission of acute myeloid leukemia after infection and blood transfusion associated with hypergammaglobulinaemia,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 189–193, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. J. Trof, A. Beishuizen, M. J. Wondergem, and R. J. M. Strack van Schijndel, “Spontaneous remission of acute myeloid leukaemia after recovery from sepsis,” Netherlands Journal of Medicine, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 259–262, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  38. C. Müller-Schmah, L. Solari, R. Weis et al., “Immune response as a possible mechanism of long-lasting disease control in spontaneous remission of MLL/AF9-positive acute myeloid leukemia,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. I. Müller, M. Trepel, R. Kunzmann, A. Lais, R. Engelhardt, and M. Lübbert, “Hematologic and molecular spontaneous remission following sepsis in acute monoblastic leukemia with translocation (9;11): a case report and review of the literature,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H.-J. Kolb, A. Schattenberg, J. M. Goldman et al., “Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients,” Blood, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 2041–2050, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  41. A. Spadea, R. Latagliata, E. Martinelli, and M. C. Petti, “Transient spontaneous remission in a case of adult acute myelogenous leukaemia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 76, no. 1, article 154, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. F. Dore, C. Guibout, J. Bertoglio, and A. Liabeuf, “Cytotoxic antibodies to human leukaemia cells in normal human sera,” Biomedicine, vol. 25, pp. 382–384, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  43. O. Maywald, D. Buchheidt, J. Bergmann et al., “Spontaneous remission in adult acute myeloid leukemia in association with systemic bacterial infection—case report and review of the literature,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 189–194, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. Camus, P. Etancelin, F. Jardin et al., “Spontaneous remission in three cases of AML M5 with NPM1 mutation,” Clinical Case Reports, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 955–959, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. G. W. Verhaak, C. S. Goudswaard, W. van Putten et al., “Mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): association with other gene abnormalities and previously established gene expression signatures and their favorable prognostic significance,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 3747–3754, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. Falini, C. Mecucci, E. Tiacci et al., “Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 254–266, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Y. Liu, P. He, F. Liu et al., “Prognostic significance of NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis,” Molecular and Clinical Oncology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. Falini, M. P. Martelli, N. Bolli et al., “Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated nucleophosmin (NPM1): is it a distinct entity?” Blood, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1109–1120, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. E. Gale, C. Green, C. Allen et al., “The impact of FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutant level, number, size, and interaction with NPM1 mutations in a large cohort of young adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 2776–2784, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Pratcorona, S. Brunet, J. Nomdedéu et al., “Favorable outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia harboring a low-allelic burden FLT3-ITD mutation and concomitant NPM1 mutation: relevance to post-remission therapy,” Blood, vol. 121, no. 14, pp. 2734–2738, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Paul, K. Remes, T. Lakkala, and T. T. Pelliniemi, “Spontaneous remission in acute myeloid leukaemia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 210–212, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. Fozza, S. Bellizzi, S. Bonfigli, P. M. Campus, F. Dore, and M. Longinotti, “Cytogenetic and hematological spontaneous remission in a case of acute myelogenous leukemia,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 219–222, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Daccache, T. Kizhakekuttu, J. Siebert, and M. Veeder, “Hematologic and cytogenetic spontaneous remission in acute monocytic leukemia (FAB M5b) with trisomy 8,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 344–346, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. E. Enck, “Spontaneous complete remission in acute promyelocytic leukemia,” New York State Journal of Medicine, vol. 85, no. 11, article 662, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  55. G. Meloni, M. Vignetti, C. Andrizzi, S. Capria, R. Foa, and F. Mandelli, “Interleukin-2 for the treatment of advanced acute myelogenous leukemia patients with limited disease: updated experience with 20 cases,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 21, no. 5-6, pp. 429–435, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Brune, S. Castaigne, J. Catalano et al., “Improved leukemia-free survival after postconsolidation immunotherapy with histamine dihydrochloride and interleukin-2 in acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized phase 3 trial,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. S. Lichtenegger, C. Krupka, T. Köhnke, and M. Subklewe, “Immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia,” Seminars in Hematology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Pankit Vachhani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.