Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Hepatology
Volume 2019, Article ID 4734606, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4734606
Case Report

Endometrioma of the Liver: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

1Department of Internal Medicine, Los Angeles County Hospital/University of Southern California, USA
2Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Los Angeles County Hospital/University of Southern California, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Prachi Rana; ude.csu.dem@anar.ihcarp

Received 11 March 2019; Accepted 14 May 2019; Published 4 June 2019

Academic Editor: Melanie Deutsch

Copyright © 2019 Prachi Rana et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Hepatic endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis first described by Finkel in 1986. A thorough review of the literature revealed 28 cases of hepatic endometriosis. This unusual condition offers several diagnostic challenges due to its variable appearance on imaging and need for histologic analysis to establish a definitive diagnosis. We present a 42-year-old female initially treated for presumed hydatid cyst that was later found to be endometriosis in the liver. The case highlights the importance of considering endometriosis in the differential for a patient presenting with a solitary liver mass regardless of age and previous history of endometriosis.

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside of the uterine cavity. It is a benign condition most commonly noted in the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and local pelvic peritoneum. Atypical endometriosis, when the condition is found in extrapelvic regions, is rare [1]. While uncommon, atypical endometriosis has been described in remote sites including the GI tract, diaphragm, skin, lung, pleura, kidney, and pancreas. The only organ in the abdomen that is refractory to endometriosis is the spleen [2].

Hepatic endometriosis is one of the most rare forms of extrapelvic endometriosis, first described in 1986 [3]. Only 28 cases have been reported in the English literature. We herein present the 29th case of hepatic endometriosis, a 42-year-old female initially treated for presumed hydatid cyst that was later found to be endometriosis in the liver. This rare condition offers several diagnostic challenges. We offer an exhaustive review of the literature focusing on advances in the clinical manifestation, patient characteristics, pathogenesis, and diagnostic workup of the condition.

2. Case Presentation

A 42-year-old multiparous woman presented with episodic, severe right upper quadrant pain associated with nausea and vomiting. Her past surgical history included a hysterectomy and left oophorectomy for unclear reasons. Several months prior she presented to another hospital for similar symptoms and was diagnosed with a hepatic mass. Physical examination demonstrated right upper quadrant tenderness without any palpable masses. Liver function and viral serologies for hepatitis B and C were normal. Tumor markers demonstrated normal CA 19-9 and AFP, with mildly elevated CA-125 40 U/mL (normal <38U/mL).

Computed tomography with intravenous contrast showed a 3.2cm x 4cm x 1.8cm multiseptated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe and an ill-defined heterogeneous hyperdensity within the peripheral right hepatic lobe measuring 3cm x 1.3cm (Figure 1). Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of the left hepatic lesion were inconclusive.

Figure 1: Computed tomography showing 3.2 x 4.0 x 1.8 cm multiseptated cystic lesion in the left hepatic lobe.

Further workup revealed a positive Echinococcal IgG antibody and she was started on Albendazole for a presumed hydatid cyst. After completion of therapy, she was scheduled for complete left lateral hepatic resection. However, she presented again several weeks later with progressive right upper quadrant pain. At this time repeat computed tomography redemonstrated the left hepatic mass which was unchanged in size but did not show the right hepatic lesion. Imaging also revealed a new pericardial effusion that was not present on previous imaging (Figure 2). Her liver tests were the following: AST 485 U/L (normal 10-40 U/L), ALT 308 U/L (normal 5-40 U/L), ALP 50 U/L (normal 35-104 U/L), and total bilirubin 0.5 mg/dL (normal <1.0 mg/dL). Given the concern for pericardial involvement, she urgently underwent a laparoscopic left partial hepatectomy (segment II and partial segment III). The postoperative course was uneventful. Final pathology was consistent with hepatic endometriosis (Figures 3 and 4). After 2 months of follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and liver tests normalized. She was started on medroxyprogesterone acetate and remains well to date.

Figure 2: Computed tomography showing small pericardial effusion.
Figure 3: Low-power view of the interface between an endometriotic nodule and liver parenchyma. Notice the large endometrial type glands surrounded by endometrial type stroma in the superior portion of the image. These are separated from the liver parenchyma (lower right portion) by a band of fibrosis. The liver parenchyma displays macrovesicular steatosis. Hematoxylin & Eosin, 40x.
Figure 4: High-power view of an endometriotic nodule. Endometrioid type glands of varying shape and size show characteristic columnar lining, within a cellular endometrial type stroma. The inset shows a portal tract for comparison (from top to bottom: vein, artery, bile ducts); notice the small round shape of the bile ducts and lack of cellular stroma. Hematoxylin & Eosin, 200x.

3. Discussion

Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disease characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside of the uterus. It affects 5-15% of women of reproductive age. Pelvic endometriosis involves the ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterine ligaments, Pouch of Douglas, and surrounding peritoneum [4]. A more rare form of endometriosis, extrapelvic, includes involvement of gastrointestinal tract, urinary system, thoracic cavity, kidneys, and pancreas. The exact prevalence of extrapelvic endometriosis is unknown but is thought to present in an older population with a median age of 34-40 years [4].

There is no clear consensus or unifying theory of the exact pathophysiology of extrapelvic endometriosis. Several theories have been proposed; however no theory alone accounts for the development of extrapelvic endometriosis, suggesting a multifactorial nature to the disease.

The classic theory of retrograde menstruation proposes that reflux of endometrial fragments through the fallopian tubes during menstruation results in implantation of the peritoneal cavity. Though retrograde menstruation is a common phenomenon seen in up to 90% of healthy women, not all of these women develop extrapelvic endometriosis [5].

The coelomic metaplasia theory suggests that endometriosis develops from metaplasia of the peritoneal epithelium possibly due to environmental or genetic factors [5, 6]. The induction theory suggests that defects in embryogenesis give rise to endometrial like tissue. The Müllerian ducts give rise to the female genitourinary tract. In males, this structure dissolves under the influence of anti-Müllerian hormone. However remnants of this structure may persist and differentiate later in life into endometriotic like tissue due to the presence of excesses in endogenous or exogenous estrogen as is seen in men with chronic liver disease and prostate cancer [5, 7].

While these theories account for endometriosis within the peritoneal and pelvic cavity and provide some insight into its pathogenesis in men, they do not account for the cases of disseminated endometriosis seen in cases of lymph nodes, thoracic cavity, and liver involvement, as seen in our patient. Whether these original cells originate in the uterus or the peritoneal cavity, the theory that endometriotic tissue disseminates through lymphatic spread offers a plausible explanation for the manifestation of hepatic endometriosis [5].

A thorough review of the literature revealed 28 cases of hepatic endometriosis. Our report adds one case to this rare clinical finding; herein we present the twenty-ninth case of hepatic endometriosis. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the previously reported cases and ours, comparing the presentation, imaging, treatment, and pathologic features. In this review, the patient age ranged from 21 to 62 years, with a mean of 41.5 years. Of the 19 cases that reported parity, ten were nulligravid and nine were either uni- or multiparous, thus demonstrating that pregnancy and childbirth have no bearing on hepatic endometriosis. Six of 29 (21%) patients were postmenopausal, thus showing this condition is not limited to women of reproductive age and that the diagnosis should be considered in postmenopausal women. Twelve of 29 (41%) had a prior history of endometriosis; thus the diagnosis should not be limited only to patients with a known history of endometriosis. A significant portion of these patients had prior abdominopelvic surgery—at least half (51%) had prior pelvic surgery, and 41% had a hysterectomy, suggesting that endometrial tissue seeding during surgery later resulted in the development of hepatic endometriosis. The majority (90%) of patients described in the literature had epigastric or right upper quadrant pain; only two patients complained of characteristic cyclic pain related to menses. Only three patients were asymptomatic and their condition was diagnosed incidentally. In one peculiar case, however, the patient presented with flu-like symptoms and right shoulder pain, misdiagnosed as pneumonia initially [8].

Table 1: Patient characteristics, presentation, and treatment of case reports of hepatic endometriosis.
Table 2: Imaging features of case reports of hepatic endometriosis.

Abdominal US, CT, and MRI are the imaging modalities most frequently used. Typical US findings include well-defined cystic masses with solid components and septations. The majority of CT reports show low density, heterogenous cystic lesions that are either nonenhancing or poorly enhancing. Calcifications have been reported along with irregular soft tissue components but can be variable. Finally, MRI usually demonstrates signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, similar to that of normal endometrium. However, because endometrial implants can exhibit various degrees of hemorrhage due to hormonal stimulation, implants may demonstrate a spectrum of appearances depending on the age of the hemorrhage but can be variable [9].

Of the 19 cases that reported lab values, 79% had normal liver tests. Three cases exhibited mild transaminitis, and a fourth case, ours, had markedly elevated transaminases with AST 485 U/L and ALT 305 U/L.

Excluding two, all patients underwent surgery for treatment. The most common surgery was hepatectomy via laparotomy (59%). Other surgical techniques included ultrasonic cyst manipulation. In the two nonsurgical cases, those patients were treated with danazol alone [9, 10]. Tumor size ranged from 1 to 30cm, with mean tumor size 9.8 cm.

The final diagnosis can only be made by histopathologic analysis. The differential diagnosis includes both benign and malignant conditions, as echinococcal cyst, abscess, hematoma, cystadenoma, and malignant cystic neoplasm, such as cystadenocarcinoma or metastatic disease. Method of diagnosis was largely by histologic analysis after surgery in 90% of cases. Only four patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous biopsy prior to surgery, with only three yielding a diagnosis of endometriosis and one case, ours, yielding inconclusive results. Histopathologic examination of the tumors was consistent with endometriosis as evidenced largely by fibrous capsules with internal epithelial lining containing endometrial glands and stroma. Furthermore, although malignant transformation of endometriosis is a rare event, occurring commonly in the ovary, there were two cases of malignancy reported, one adenosarcoma and one low-grade endometrial stroma sarcoma [11, 12]. Of the eight cases that reported on immunostaining, all eight cases were positive for estrogen and progesterone receptor, consistent with endometriosis. Five cases reported on further immunohistochemistry markers that included CD10 (in endometrial tissue) and/or CK7 (in glandular tissue) [1317].

Hepatic endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis. This unusual condition offers several diagnostic challenges but should be considered in the differential in any female presenting with a solitary hepatic mass, regardless of age and previous history of endometriosis.

Consent

Verbal informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

Disclosure

Institutional Mailing Address: LAC + USC Medical Center, 1200 N. State St., CT A7D - GME, Los Angeles, CA 90033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Prachi Rana and Shida Haghighat equally contributed to the collection of the data and writing of the manuscript. Hyosun Han reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Yangling Ma and Dr. Esteban Gnass for the review and interpretation of the pathologic reports.

References

  1. S. K. Sonavane, K. P. Kantawala, and C. O. Menias, “Beyond the boundaries-endometriosis: typical and atypical locations,” Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 219–232, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. M. Markham, “Extrapelvic endometriosis,” Modern Approaches to Endometriosis, pp. 151–182, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. Finkel, A. Marchevsky, and B. Cohen, “Endometrial cyst of the liver,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 81, no. 7, pp. 576–578, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Charatsi, O. Koukoura, I. G. Ntavela et al., “Gastrointestinal and urinary tract endometriosis: a review on the commonest locations of extrapelvic endometriosis,” Advances in Medicine, vol. 2018, 11 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. O. Burney and L. C. Giudice, “Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 511–519, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. G. Signorile and A. Baldi, “Endometriosis: new concepts in the pathogenesis,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 778–780, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Rei, T. Williams, and M. Feloney, “Endometriosis in a man as a rare source of abdominal pain: a case report and review of the literature,” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2018, Article ID 2083121, 6 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Jelovsek, C. Winans, J. Brainard, and T. Falcone, “Endometriosis of the liver containing mullerian adenosarcoma: Case report,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 5, pp. 1725–1727, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Inal, K. Biçakçi, S. Soyupak et al., “Hepatic endometrioma: A case report and review of the literature,” European Radiology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 431–434, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Roesch-Dietlen, A. Jiménez-García, A. Pérez-Morales, P. Grube-Pagola, K. L. Ramírez-Cervantes, and J. M. Remes-Troche, “Hepatic endometriosis,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 347-348, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. W. Khan, M. Craig, M. Jarmulowicz, and B. R. Davidson, “Liver tumours due to endometriosis and endometrial stromal sarcoma,” HPB, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Nsenda, D. Wendum, P. Balladur, H. Dahan, J.-M. Tubiana, and L. Arrivé, “Adenosarcoma arising in hepatic endometriosis,” European Radiology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1287–1289, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Asran, A. Rashid, and J. Szklaruk, “Hepatic endometriosis mimicking metastatic disease: A case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Radiology Case Reports, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 26–31, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Fluegen, F. Jankowiak, L. Zacarias Foehrding, F. Kroepil, W. T. Knoefel, and S. A. Topp, “Intrahepatic endometriosis as differential diagnosis: Case report and literature review,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 19, no. 29, pp. 4818–4822, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Keramidaris, S. Gourgiotis, A. Koutela et al., “Rare case of hepatic endometriosis as an incidental finding: Difficult diagnosis of a diagnostic dilemma,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 884–887, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Liu, W. Zhang, S. Liu, B. Dong, and Y. Liu, “Hepatic endometriosis: A rare case and review of the literature,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 20, no. 1, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Rivkine, D. Jakubowicz, L. Marciano et al., “Hepatic endometrioma: A case report and review of the literature: Report of a case,” Surgery Today, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1188–1193, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus