Case Reports in Hepatology

Case Reports in Hepatology / 2021 / Article

Case Series | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6654229 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654229

Brandon Swed, Omar Gandarilla, Kenrry Chiu, Karim H. Halazun, Benjamin Samstein, Rhonda Yantiss, Gagandeep Brar, "Rare Histological Variants of Liver Cancer and Their Management: A Single-Institution Experience", Case Reports in Hepatology, vol. 2021, Article ID 6654229, 7 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6654229

Rare Histological Variants of Liver Cancer and Their Management: A Single-Institution Experience

Academic Editor: Haruki Komatsu
Received23 Dec 2020
Revised23 Mar 2021
Accepted15 Apr 2021
Published21 Apr 2021

Abstract

Primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma, are a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are several histologically and biologically distinct subtypes of liver cancer that have previously been reported. However, literature regarding the nonsurgical management of these patients upon disease recurrence remains limited. These variants include combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC), Epstein–Barr virus- (EBV-) associated carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, and clear cell or thyroid-like variants of HCC. Here, we aim to highlight the pathologic features, clinical course, and outcomes of five patients with these unusual hepatic tumors and explain the rationale behind the choice of their systemic therapies upon disease recurrence. All patients underwent surgical resection as the standard of care for localized disease, and upon relapse, they were treated with either chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or active surveillance based on the clinical context and tumor histology. These rare variants are important to recognize as they have prognostic and therapeutic implications, and there are currently insufficient data in the literature to guide further therapy.

1. Introduction

Primary liver cancers are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer in adults, is ranked as the sixth most prevalent solid tumor malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally [1]. Despite several recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, prognosis generally remains poor, with a five-year relative survival rate of 18% observed in the United States [2]. Hepatic resection and liver transplantation are the standard of care for localized disease and are among the only treatment options with curative intent, as conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy are generally ineffective [3]. Cholangiocarcinoma, the next most common primary liver cancer, is also associated with a high mortality that is generally attributed to advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Several prognostic factors for liver cancers have been proposed, including tumor size, vascular invasion, elevated serum tumor markers (e.g., alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9)), resection margin status, and tumor histology [4].

Histologic analysis remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and classification of primary liver carcinomas, although the diagnosis of HCC can usually be made radiographically in the appropriate clinical context, and thus, many tumors are treated prior to histologic evaluation. However, there are some relatively rare variants that may be important to recognize because they either have prognostic and therapeutic implications or simulate features of other malignancies [5, 6]. These include combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC), Epstein–Barr virus- (EBV-) associated carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, and clear cell or thyroid-like variants of HCC. Here, we report on the clinical course and outcomes of five patients with unusual hepatic tumors and describe their clinical and pathologic features.

2. Case Reports

2.1. Case 1: cHCC/CCA

A 67-year-old Caucasian male with a history of combined hepatitis C and alcoholic cirrhosis was found to have a small hepatic lesion in segment V on a screening ultrasound in November 2019. Follow-up abdominal MRI revealed a 1.5 cm Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 4 lesion which was again confirmed on PET/CT (SUV 7.8) without evidence of distant metastases.

Given radiographic evidence of HCC and elevated AFP to 1017 ng/mL, he underwent a partial left hepatectomy the following month. The cirrhotic liver contained a 1.5 cm firm white tumor that showed morphologic and immunohistochemical features of a combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (Figure 1). The adenocarcinomatous component showed CK7-positivity and was negative for arginase, whereas areas of hepatocellular differentiation were positive for arginase and negative for CK7. The tumor demonstrated extensive venous and lymphovascular invasion. Notably, his presurgical CA 19-9 was within normal limits.

Given pathology findings of positive margins and therefore high risk of recurrence, the decision was made to proceed with adjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). His AFP declined to 9.8 ng/mL in the postoperative setting. He was started on systemic therapy with capecitabine in February 2020, with the intention of treating the more aggressive of the dual histologic subtypes, the cholangiocarcinoma. His AFP subsequently began to rise, and repeat imaging two months later unfortunately confirmed recurrence confined to the liver parenchyma. He had a repeat liver biopsy that demonstrated adenocarcinoma consistent with pancreaticobiliary origin. Further testing revealed PD-L1 positivity of 5% without targetable molecular alterations identified on next-generation Sequencing. He received local therapy with Y90 radioembolization and was started on nivolumab monotherapy which he is currently tolerating well. AFP has since downtrended.

2.2. Case 2: HCC/Undifferentiated Carcinoma

A 48-year-old Asian male was incidentally diagnosed with hepatitis B in June 2019 and started on antiviral therapy at that time. He developed focal right upper quadrant pain several months later prompting an abdominal ultrasound that revealed a region of heterogeneity in the right hepatic lobe, and follow-up abdominal MRI demonstrated a 14.7 × 10.1 cm LI-RADS TIV (tumor in vein) infiltrative hepatic mass consistent with HCC with extensive tumor thrombus. AFP level was elevated to 64.6 ng/mL, and staging CT scans and skeletal scintigraphy showed no evidence of distant metastatic disease.

The patient underwent a right hepatectomy in December 2019 with complete resection of a 14.2 cm heterogeneous tumor accompanied by satellite nodules with extensive venous invasion. The carcinoma showed hepatocellular differentiation as well as undifferentiated components (Figure 2). The latter consisted of broad trabeculae and sheets of high-grade tumor cells with extensive necrosis and readily apparent mitotic figures. These areas lacked convincing staining for Hepar-1 and arginase but had stronger, more diffuse CK7 staining. The tumor was negative for synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CK19.

He had a repeat MRI two months postresection in the setting of recurrent abdominal pain and rising AFP that demonstrated diffuse infiltrative tumor in the left hepatic lobe and suspected right lower lobe pulmonary metastases. He was started on palliative chemotherapy, and after one cycle, succumbed to his disease.

2.3. Case 3: HCC, Clear Cell Variant

A 59-year-old Asian male with a history of hepatitis B diagnosed in 2011 on antiviral therapy since that time was noted to have an elevated AFP to 21.8 ng/mL and liver mass on screening abdominal ultrasound in March 2019. Abdominal MRI, which was delayed due to lack of short-term follow-up, showed a dominant 5.5 cm segment V LI-RADS M (probably or definitely malignant, not necessarily HCC) hepatic mass. Notably, on staging PET/CT, there was no evidence of FDG-avid disease in the kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, or other sites where clear cell carcinoma is known to originate.

He underwent a right partial hepatectomy in October 2019 with complete resection of a 6.1 cm variegated tumor surrounded by multiple satellite nodules. Portal vein invasion was identified. Most (>80%) of the tumor cells contained abundant clear cytoplasm with some higher grade areas (Figure 3). The background liver showed chronic hepatitis with mild activity and thin septal fibrosis consistent with regressed cirrhosis.

Postoperatively, he was noted to have a rising AFP to 154 ng/mL and underwent SBRT to the resection cavity. Repeat imaging in April 2020 showed multifocal progressive liver lesions with suspected pulmonary and osseous metastatic disease, and AFP rapidly increased to 2728 ng/mL. He was subsequently started on palliative systemic therapy with lenvatinib, followed by second-line nivolumab for further disease progression.

2.4. Case 4: CCA, Thyroid-Like Variant

A 60-year-old Caucasian female with a history of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis was incidentally noted to have a liver mass on CT imaging in 2009 performed as part of a workup for abdominal pain. Follow-up MRI demonstrated radiographic findings consistent with a hepatic adenoma. On surveillance imaging, this lesion was noted to be enlarging in size with associated hemorrhage, and she ultimately underwent a left hepatectomy ten years later in October 2019.

The resection specimen contained an 11.0 cm tan, variegated hemorrhagic tumor with cystic degeneration arising in a noncirrhotic liver. Resection margins were negative, and no lymphovascular invasion was identified. Sheets of tumor cells were arranged in large, cystically dilated glands filled with eosinophilic material reminiscent of colloid seen in thyroid follicles (Figure 4). The entirety of the tumor demonstrated low-grade nuclear features without evidence of biliary dysplasia in the nonneoplastic parenchyma. The tumor cells were CK-7-positive and showed patchy synaptophysin staining, but were negative for arginase, TTF-1, and chromogranin. The tumor was classified as a thyroid-like variant of an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

A subsequent neck ultrasound showed no focal abnormalities to suggest metastatic disease from a primary thyroid malignancy. Given prior definitive surgical resection and the indolent nature of her neoplasm, the decision was made to defer adjuvant chemotherapy and instead pursue active radiographic surveillance. She has no evidence of recurrence nine months postresection.

2.5. Case 5: EBV-Associated CCA (Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma Variant of CCA)

A 28-year-old Caucasian female with a history of ulcerative colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis diagnosed at ages 16 and 23, respectively, was found to have a 6 cm mass adjacent to the caudate lobe on a screening abdominal MRI in October 2017. Tumor markers were notable for an elevated CA 19-9 to 2,733 U/mL, while AFP and CEA were within normal limits. She underwent endoscopic biopsy of the subhepatic lesion, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) revealed adenocarcinoma, with a tumor profile that favored an upper gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary primary. Staging PET/CT showed a peripancreatic/portacaval hypermetabolic mass likely representing the primary disease with suspected metastatic aortocaval lymphadenopathy but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The following month, she had an excisional portal lymph node biopsy confirming metastatic adenocarcinoma.

She ultimately underwent a left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy and hilar lymphadenectomy in March 2018. Surgical pathology revealed a 2.2 cm ill-defined, perihilar bile duct tumor centered at the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts. The background liver showed features of primary sclerosing cholangitis with portal-based fibrosis. Microscopic examination of the tumor showed adenocarcinoma confined to the bile duct wall. The malignant glands were associated with a dense lymphoid infiltrate and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (Figure 5). In situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNAs (EBER) demonstrated strong, diffuse labeling of tumor cells. One regional lymph node showed metastatic carcinoma. The findings were compatible with EBV-associated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

She experienced multiple postoperative complications including a hepatic abscess, severe gastroparesis, and malnutrition that precluded adjuvant systemic therapy. Her CA 19-9 normalized in the postoperative period, and surveillance scans to date have shown no evidence of recurrent disease.

3. Discussion

Despite its overall high morbidity and mortality, primary liver cancer is a disease with a remarkably variable clinical course. A timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for optimal management of these patients, as they generally have a poor response to systemic therapy [3]. This is, at least in part, explained by the several histologically and biologically distinct subtypes of liver cancer that have been reported.

Such heterogeneity of clinical findings, imaging characteristics, and histopathologic features can often obscure the precise diagnosis in these patients. [4] For example, cHCC/CCA described in case 1 displays phenotypic features suggestive of both hepatic and biliary differentiation, making the preoperative diagnosis exceptionally challenging. This is true of the other tumor subtypes as well. As described in case 3, it is important to distinguish the atypical clear cell variant of HCC from metastatic clear cell carcinomas that arise from various other primary sites, including the kidneys, ovaries, lungs, and other organs [13, 14]. Similarly, the thyroid-like variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma discussed in case 4 can be misconstrued as metastatic disease or ectopic normal thyroid tissue. However, the absence of a primary thyroid neoplasm and a lack of thyroid markers like TTF-1 in the liver tumor can be useful in distinguishing these two entities [15, 16].

The histologically distinct tumor features highlighted in this case series have important prognostic and therapeutic implications. However, literature regarding nonsurgical management in these rare subtypes is scarce and mainly limited to case reports, as outlined in Table 1. We report five patients with unique variants of liver cancer, all of whom underwent surgical resection as the standard of care for localized disease. These are among some of the first reports of using systemic therapy to treat these rare variants. Although data to support this is lacking, one of the five patients (case 1, cHCC/CCA) received adjuvant systemic therapy based on his anticipated poor clinical trajectory in the context of positive resection margins and high risk of recurrence. His treatment was targeted toward the more aggressive cholangiocarcinoma subtype. [6] This is in contrast to the patient in case 4, for instance, with a slow-growing thyroid variant that appears to behave more like a low-grade carcinoma. The exceedingly rare prior reports of this subtype suggest predominance in young females with a late presentation and large tumor burden, without apparent underlying liver parenchymal disease. Two of the patients (case 2 with undifferentiated carcinoma and case 3 with clear cell variant) received systemic therapy at the time of disease recurrence or metastases, and all three of the patients who received systemic therapy had further progression of disease. Clear cell carcinoma of the liver has traditionally been associated with a more favorable outcome than conventional HCC. However, the patient presented in case 3 had an unusually aggressive course, possibly attributed to a subpopulation of cells with higher grade cytology.


ReferencePatient demographicsHistological variantHBV/HCV statusTumor size (cm)Solitary or multipleTreatmentVital status

Sakhuja et al. [13]32, FClear cell−/−18SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Albores-Saavedra et al. [14]63, MClear cell−/−0.9SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Albores-Saavedra et al. [14]25, FClear cell−/−1.1SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Albores-Saavedra et al. [14]64, MClear cell−/−6SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Pecorella et al. [17]35, FClear cell−/−NRNRTotal hepatectomy, liver transplantationAlive
Toriyama et al. [18]56, MClear cell+/−2.2SolitarySurgical resection, adjuvant chemotherapyAlive
Kothadia et al. [19]51, FClear cell−/−20.7MultipleTransarterial chemoembolizationAlive
Chable-Montero et al. [15]26, FFollicular thyroid-like−/−NRSolitaryHepatic resection, adjuvant chemotherapyDead
Fornelli et al. [16]52, MFollicular thyroid-like−/−18SolitaryNoneAlive
Mittal et al. [20]23, FFollicular thyroid-like−/−12.1SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Chen et al. [21]59, FFollicular thyroid-like+/−3SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Hiraki et al. [22]45, MUndifferentiated+/−11.5SolitaryHepatic resectionAlive
Maeda et al. [23]56, MUndifferentiated−/−Very smallMultipleNoneDead

HBV = hepatitis B virus; HCV = hepatitis C virus; M = male; F = female; NR = not reported. EBV = Epstein–Barr virus; cHCC/CCA = combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.

As we learn more about the subtleties of these uncommon liver cancers, diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas remain. Treatment for these patients has generally been directed toward their dominant histologic subtype, as there are insufficient data in the literature to guide further therapy. This case series highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the biology of these tumors in order to select the most appropriate treatment options to improve patient outcomes. Although no clinically useful genomic alterations were detected by next-generation sequencing assays performed for each of the patients described, it is important to recognize that correlation of histology with molecular data remains a powerful tool in the understanding of the pathogenesis and behavior of liver cancers. More studies are needed to explore this, as greater awareness of these distinct entities can lead to improved treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. A. Forner, M. Reig, and J. Bruix, “Hepatocellular carcinoma,” The Lancet, vol. 391, no. 10127, pp. 1301–1314, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2020, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020.
  3. M. M. Kirstein and T. C. Wirth, “Multimodale therapie des hepatozellulären karzinoms,” Der Internist, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Zimmerman, Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions of the Hepatobiliary Tract: General and Surgical Pathology, , Springer International Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland, 1st edition, 2017.
  5. C. Stavraka, H. Rush, and P. Ross, “Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC): an update of genetics, molecular biology, and therapeutic interventions,” Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, vol. 6, pp. 11–21, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. O’Connor, J. C. Walsh, and D. F. Schaeffer, “Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC): a distinct entity,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 317–322, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Nakasuka, S. Okada, T. Okusaka et al., “Undifferentiated carcinoma of the liver with neuroendocrine features: a case report,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 401–404, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. W. H. Chan, J. H. M. Tong, M. Y. M. Sung, P. B. S. Lai, and K.-F. To, “Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma: a rare variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with favourable outcome,” Histopathology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 674–683, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. W. Si, J. A. Thorson, G. Y. Lauwers, P. Dalcin, and J. Furman, “Hepatocellular lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma associated with Epstein barr virus,” Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 183–189, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T.-C. Liao, C. A. Liu, N. C. Chiu, Y. C. Yeh, and Y. Y. Chiou, “Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma: a mimic of hepatocellular carcinoma on imaging features,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 4089–4095, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Futsukaichi, K. Tajiri, S. Kobayashi et al., “Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma successfully treated with sorafenib: case report and review of the literature,” Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Singh, S. Chakraborty, N. Bonthu, S. Radio, S. M. Hussain, and A. Sasson, “Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2114–2123, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. Sakhuja, P. K. Mishra, R. Rajesh, A. K. Sharma, R. Gondal, and M. Singh, “Clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma: back to the basics for diagnosis,” Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 656, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Albores-Saavedra, M. P. Hoang, L. A. Murakata, P. Sinkre, and H. Yaziji, “Atypical bile duct adenoma, clear cell type,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 956–960, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Chablé-Montero, A. Shah BS, D. Montante-Montes de Oca, A. Ángeles-Ángeles, D. E. Henson, and J. Albores-Saavedra, “Thyroid-like cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: an unusual morphologic variant with follicular, trabecular and insular patterns,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 961–965, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Fornelli, A. Bondi, E. Jovine, and V. Eusebi, “Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma resembling a thyroid follicular neoplasm,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 456, no. 3, pp. 339–342, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. I. Pecorella, A. Ciardi, E. Aiello, M. R. Piras, C. Farci, and U. Di Tondo, “Clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma treated with liver transplantation,” Pathologica, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 307–310, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. E. Toriyama, A. Nanashina, H. Hayashi et al., “A case of intrahepatic clear cell cholangiocarcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 20, pp. 2571–2576, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. P. Kothadia, N. Kaur, R. Arju, M. Dakhel, and S. Giashuddin, “Primary clear cell carcinoma of the non-cirrhotic liver presenting as an acute abdomen: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. Mittal, M. Bal, M. Ramadwar, S. Patkar, and M. Goel, “Pathologic doppelgänger: thyroid? like intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with synchronous primary thyroid carcinoma in a young woman,” Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S.-H. Chen, Z.-Y. Zheng, H. L. Wang et al., “Thyroid-like intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature,” International Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 649–654, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Hiraki, K. Kitahara, A. Miyoshi et al., “A long-term survivor of undifferentiated carcinoma of the liver successfully treated with surgical treatments: a case report and literature review,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 51, pp. 45–49, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Maeda, H. Kayashima, and D. Imai, “Undifferentiated carcinoma of the liver: a case report with immunohistochemical analysis,” Surgical Case Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Brandon Swed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views655
Downloads727
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.