Case Reports in Infectious Diseases

Case Reports in Infectious Diseases / 2021 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6699046 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699046

Bashar Khiatah, Kalpan Shah, Anna Belikova, Musab Saeed, "Sepsis due to Actinomyces odontolyticus as a Rare Complication of Neobladder", Case Reports in Infectious Diseases, vol. 2021, Article ID 6699046, 3 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699046

Sepsis due to Actinomyces odontolyticus as a Rare Complication of Neobladder

Academic Editor: Mohd Adnan
Received10 Dec 2020
Revised25 Feb 2021
Accepted27 Feb 2021
Published02 Mar 2021

Abstract

Sepsis due to Actinomyces odontolyticus (A. odontolyticus) is an extremely rare condition that has been reported only a handful of times. In this report, we showcase an 83-year-old male who had a complication of neobladder procedure and developed sepsis due to A. odontolyticus that was successfully treated with a prolonged course of doxycycline.

1. Introduction

Actinomyces species are filamentous Gram-positive bacilli, a main component of the oropharynx, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital tract flora. Colonization is omnipresent in healthy individuals, and suppurative infections usually tend to happen in individuals who are immunosuppressed with poor oral hygiene and after disruption of local tissue. More than 30 species of Actinomyces have been identified. The most common clinical form of actinomycosis is cervicofacial invasive infection [1] A. odontolyticus is one of these species that has been first found in the dentine and later on reported to form rust-brown or red-colored colonies in laboratory studies where it is further characterized by facultative capnophilic, nonsporulating, nonacid fast, nonmotile, and irregularly staining bacteria [2] A. odontolyticus, besides A. meyeri and A. israelii, has been reported to have an extremely rare kind of Actinomyces that is hematogenously disseminated [3]. Few cases so far have been reported of bacteremia with A. odontolyticus [4, 5]. In this report, we showcase an 83-year-old male who had a complication of a cystoprostatectomy with the creation of neobladder and developed acute bacteremia with A. odontolyticus.

2. Clinical Case

An 83-year-old male presents to the Emergency Room (ER) for abdominal pain, fever, and rigors for one day. His past medical history is notable for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) on outpatient labs, with subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate revealing 12-millimeter (mm) lesion at the left lateral transitional zone and enlarged prostate which was assessed with the following cystoscopy that revealed bladder cancer throughout the bladder wall, which for the patient underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Final pathology revealed high-grade urothelial carcinoma with lamina propria and deep muscularis propria invasion. The patient underwent uncomplicated cystoprostatectomy 2 weeks before presenting to our ER, with the subsequent creation of an ileal neobladder and placement of a Foley catheter and double-J ureteral stents.

His current symptoms began one day before presentation after he stepped on his Foley catheter, causing it to dislodge into the urethra. He was febrile on admission (temperature 101.1 F), and his clinical exam was remarkable for a soft abdomen without peritoneal signs (no voluntary guarding and no rebound tenderness). Initial computed tomography (CT) abdomen/pelvis without contrast showed an inflated Foley catheter balloon in the urethra with no signs of soft tissue infection found that would suggest a soft tissue. Attempts to reposition the catheter by ER nurse were unsuccessful, and repeated CT abdomen/pelvis continued to show the Foley catheter in the urethra. The urology team was consulted, who deflated the balloon and appropriately placed the catheter in the bladder with resultant spontaneous voiding of bloody urine. A follow-up cystogram showed a negligible amount of urine at the level of anastomosis from a traumatized balloon, with an intact bladder and appropriate position of the catheter in the bladder. His initial admission laboratory tests are listed in Table 1. The patient was admitted for severe urosepsis (fever, elevated white blood cell count in immunocompromised state, lactic acidosis, and leukocyte esterase and nitrites seen on urinalysis), had blood cultures and urine culture collected, and was empirically started on intravenous (IV) ciprofloxacin. His blood cultures subsequently came back positive for A. odontolyticus in 2 out of 2 sets of culture bottles, and the infectious disease team was consulted. His ciprofloxacin was switched to ceftriaxone and doxycycline due to remote history of allergy. The patient remained asymptomatic without fever and chills throughout the rest of the hospitalization. His repeated blood cultures and urine cultures did not show any growth. His ureteral stents and Foley catheter were removed during the hospitalization, and he was able to void appropriately without any catheter. He was discharged with a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line in place, to continue ceftriaxone 2 g intravenously every 24 hours and doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 4 weeks. He was also given a prescription to obtain weekly complete blood counts (CBCs) and chemistry panel (CMP) and was scheduled for an outpatient follow-up with our infectious disease clinic and with our urology clinic.


Lab testValueUnits

White blood count11.9K/uL
Hemoglobin9.3G/DL
Hematocrit28.2%
Platelets298K/ul
Sodium134MEQ/L
Potassium4.4MEQ/L
Chloride109MEQ/L
Carbon dioxide19MEQ/L
Blood urea nitrogen24MG/DL
Creatinine0.98MG/DL
Troponin<0.03NG/ML
Sed rate33MM/HR
Lactic acid, venous2.3MMOL/L
C-reactive protein5.5MG/DL

On follow-up appointment, the patient recovered well and completed the full course of IV and oral antibiotics without any complications. He was placed on oral doxycycline for an extended period that is intended to be for at least 6 months.

3. Discussion

While multiple forms of A. odontolyticus culture-positive invasive infections have been reported, the incidence of A. odontolyticus bacteremia remains extremely rare. Immunosuppression is essential or having a significant risk factor for infection, including poor oral hygiene, intravenous drug use, and previous mucosal manipulation to develop bacteremia with A. odontolyticus [46]. Gram staining and pathology of infected tissue is usually more sensitive than the culture since it is often difficult to identify in the lab and can be culture-negative and might remain sterile in more than 50% of cases, but when combined with immunofluorescence technique, they provide a highly specific diagnosis [7]. Beta-lactams and especially penicillin G or amoxicillin are treatments of choice for Actinomyces spp. Hence, they are extremely susceptible to this spectrum of antibiotics. In case of allergies to these antibiotics, doxycycline, clindamycin, ceftriaxone, and macrolides have been successfully used to treat actinomycosis [1]. The duration recommendation of IV antibiotic therapy is 2 to 6 weeks followed by oral antibiotics for 6 to 12 months in certain individuals which are warranted for complicated and invasive cases, immunocompromised patients, and patients with HIV infection. While shorter courses have been successful in treating actinomycosis, this extended therapy is recommended due to the infection tends to recur [810]. Also, another argument supporting prolonged antibiotic treatment is the tendency of Actinomyces species to form fistulas that have been reported in many case reports [11, 12]. In our case, the patient is immunocompromised and had an invasive surgery (neobladder), which was probably colonized with A. odontolyticus, which has introduced A. odontolyticus to his bloodstream causing sepsis. The current literature provides guideline therapy for a severe localized infection rather than sepsis due to A. odontolyticus. Thus, given the patient’s case, we have determined to proceed with 4 weeks of oral and IV antibiotics (doxycycline and ceftriaxone) followed by 6 months of oral antibiotics (doxycycline) with periodic monitoring of his progress. It might have been worth culturing the patient’s urine before the neobladder procedure to detect and prevent this infection, especially considering a subsequent immunosuppressant therapy. Although given the incidence rate, it might not be feasible to culture every single patient undergoing a bladder procedure which might raise an already high medical expense in the US. More research is required to maybe develop a sensitive, rapid, and cheap test to detect A. odontolyticus which will help to prevent infection and force early specific treatment.

In conclusion, a high suspicion for A. odontolyticus is a cause of sepsis in a patient with high-risk factors. A. odontolyticus could cause an endogenous infection arising from the colonized oral (most common) or urogenital (rare) mucosal membranes when an individual becomes immunocompromised or has a surgical intervention or injury to the mucosal membrane serving as an entrance to the bloodstream. Extended treatment is recommended in most cases given recurrence rate and tendency to cause a fistula especially in immunocompromised patients.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the main manuscript.

Patient consent was taken for this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. V. K. Wong, T. D. Turmezei, and V. C. Weston, “Actinomycosis,” BMJ, vol. 343, p. d6099, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. Batty, “Actinomyces odontolyticus, a new species of actinomycete regularly isolated from deep carious dentine,” The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 455–459, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. W. Felz and M. R. Smith, “Disseminated actinomycosis: multisystem mimicry in primary care,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 294–299, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. A. Cone, M. M. Leung, and J. Hirschberg, “Actinomyces OdontolyticusBacteremia,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1629–1632, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Weiand and G. Barlow, “The rising tide of bloodstream infections with Actinomyces species: bimicrobial infection with Actinomyces odontolyticus and Escherichia coli in an intravenous drug user,” Oxford Medical Case Reports, vol. 2014, no. 9, pp. 156–158, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Clyde, J. McAllister, A. Obeidallah, and I. Ahmad, “Actinomyces odontolyticus infection 3 months post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 12, no. 4, Article ID e228184, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Valour, A. Sénéchal, C Dupieux et al., “Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 7, pp. 183–197, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Choi, W.-J. Koh, T. S. Kim et al., “Optimal duration of IV and oral antibiotics in the treatment of thoracic actinomycosis,” Chest, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 2211–2217, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Rolfe, L. L. Steed, C. Salgado, and J. M. Kilby, “Actinomyces meyeri, a common agent of actinomycosis,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Moghimi, E. Salentijn, Y. Debets-Ossenkop, K. Karagozoglu, and T. Forouzanfar, “Treatment of cervicofacial actinomycosis: a report of 19 cases and review of literature,” Medicina Oral Patología Oral Y Cirugia Bucal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. e627–e632, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Coremans, V. Margaritis, H. P. Van Poppel et al., “Actinomycosis, a rare and unsuspected cause of anal fistulous abscess: report of three cases and review of the literature,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 575–581, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. D. Fry, E. H. Birnbaum, and D. L. Lacey, “Actinomyces as a cause of recurrent perianal fistula in the immunocompromised patient,” Surgery, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 591–594, 1992. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Bashar Khiatah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views155
Downloads129
Citations

Related articles