Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 381015, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/381015
Case Report

Breast Angiosarcoma Metastatic to the Ovary

Department of Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Received 28 January 2009; Accepted 15 April 2009

Academic Editor: Simon Ching-Shun Kao

Copyright © 2009 Frederico F. Souza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Soloway, J. Latour, and M. Young, “Krukenberg tumors of the ovary,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 8, pp. 636–638, 1956. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Blamey, F. McDermott, E. Pihl, A. B. Price, B. J. Mine, and E. Hughes, “Ovarian involvement in adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum,” Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 42–44, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. T. Monroe, S. J. Feigenberg, and N. P. Mendenhall, “Angiosarcoma after breast-conserving therapy,” Cancer, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1832–1840, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. T. Shet, A. Malaviya, M. Nadkarni et al., “Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: observations in Asian Indian women,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 368–374, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Kikawa, Y. Konishi, Y. Nakamoto et al., “Angiosarcoma of the breast: specific findings of MRI,” Breast Cancer, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 369–373, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. W. C. Chang, M. D. Meux, B. M. Yeh et al., “CT and MRI of adnexal masses in patients with primary non-ovarian malignancy,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 186, pp. 1039–1045, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. L. Brown, P. M. Doubilet, F. H. Miller et al., “Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features,” Radiology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 103–110, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. D. L. Brown, K. H. Zou, C. M. C. Tempany et al., “Primary versus secondary ovarian malignancy: imaging findings of adnexal masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study,” Radiology, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 213–218, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. J. Megibow, D. H. Hulnick, M. A. Bosniak, and E. J. Balthazar, “Ovarian metastases: computed tomographic appearances,” Radiology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 161–164, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  10. R. H. Young and R. E. Scully, “Sarcomas metastatic to the ovary: a report of 21 cases,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 231–252, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. B. Kurtz, J. V. Tsimikas, C. M. C. Tempany et al., “Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis—report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group,” Radiology, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 1999. View at Google Scholar