Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2011, Article ID 172109, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/172109
Case Report

Dilatation of the Great Arteries in an Infant with Marfan Syndrome and Ventricular Septal Defect

1Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Willem Alexander Children and Youth Center, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
2Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

Received 18 March 2011; Accepted 18 May 2011

Academic Editor: Ron Rabinowitz

Copyright © 2011 L. Rozendaal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We describe an infant presenting with contractures of the fingers, a large ventricular septal defect (VSD), and severe pulmonary artery dilatation. He had clinical and echocardiographic features of both neonatal or infantile Marfan syndrome (MFS) and congenital contractural arachnodactyly. After surgical VSD closure, the aortic root developed progressive dilatation while the size of pulmonary artery returned to normal limits. Eventually the diagnosis of MFS was confirmed by DNA analysis.

1. Introduction

In infancy the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome may be difficult, and clinical presentation and prognosis are variable. We present a special case of infantile Marfan syndrome with a congenital heart disease.

2. Clinical Presentation

Our patient is a boy born to healthy parents (father is 37 years old, mother is 29 years old), who lives in Surinam. The pregnancy was uneventful, and he was born at a normal term. He had two healthy sisters of 6 and 9 years old. Family history was noncontributory. At the age of 4 months he developed heart failure and echocardiographic examination showed a large ventricular septal defect (VSD) and atrial septal defect (ASD) secundum type. The patient was sent to our institution for cardiac surgery at the age of 8 months. Physical examination showed a tall and dystrophic boy with a height of 75.0 cm (+1.5 SDS), weight of 5.5 kg (<−2.5 SDS), and an arm span of 72.0 cm (ratio arm span/height is 0.96). His target height is 187 cm (+0.4 SDS). He had no distinguished facial anomalies with a normal palate and normal ears. He had a pectus carinatum, arachnodactyly, and contractures of both proximal interphalanges of the third and fourth digits. He was dyspnoeic and tachypnoeic, and cardiac examination showed a hyperdynamic precordium, fixed splitting of the second heart sound, and no cardiac murmurs. Echocardiography showed a secundum-type ASD and a 17 mm muscular inlet VSD with a large left- to-right shunt causing pulmonary flow hypertension. The right atrium and right ventricle were dilated. Both mitral valve (MV) and tricuspid valve (TV) had a mild prolapse with a normal function. The pulmonary valve (PV), trunk, and branches were severely dilated with the diameter of the main pulmonary artery of 27.5 mm (Table 1 and Figure 1). The tricuspid aortic valve (AoV) showed normal function, and the aortic root diameter was dilated (Table 1). Surgical correction included primary closure of the ASD and closure of the VSD with a Gore-Tex patch. The postoperative course was uneventful with prompt recovery. Based on the clinical and echocardiographic features the differential diagnosis consisted of congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA) and neonatal or infantile Marfan syndrome (MFS). At that time no further gene testing was performed. After recovery the patient went home to Surinam, where the followup continued up to an age of 6 years.

tab1
Table 1: Aortic root diameters and pulmonary artery diameters during followup.
fig1
Figure 1: Parasternal short-axis view of the pulmonary valve (PV) and main pulmonary artery (MPA) of the patient preoperatively (a) and directly postoperatively (b). The severe dilatation of the PV (diameter 22 mm) and MPA (diameter 27 mm) diminished directly postoperatively, almost to normal limits (17.4 mm and 21.2 mm, resp.). RA: right atrium; RVOT: right ventricle outflow tract; Ao: aorta.

During followup his height was excessive (SDS > 2.5), the contractures of the fingers were progressive, and he was wearing glasses because of myopia. Psychomotor development was normal. Interestingly, echocardiographic examinations showed significant decrease of diameters of the pulmonary valve and main pulmonary artery directly after operation which remained within normal limits during followup (Table 1, Figure 1). However, the diameter of the aortic root increased from 22 to 23.4 mm directly after operation and with progressive dilatation to 38.7 mm during followup (Table 1, Figure 2). Thus far, aortic valve function remained normal. The mild prolapse of the mitral valve remained stable with trivial mitral regurgitation. Because of progressive aortic root dilatation beta-blocking therapy was started at the age of 5 years.

172109.fig.002
Figure 2: Parasternal long-axis view of left ventricle (LV) shows severe dilatation of the aortic root at the age of almost 4 years. Diameter of the aortic root is 32.2 mm. LA: left atrium; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle; Ao: aorta.

At that time-gene testing was performed to further differentiate between infantile MFS and CCA. Using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA kit P065/P066 v3), and DNA sequence-analysis in 2008, we found a frameshift mutation encoding a stop-mutation in the FBN1 gene c.3396delA (p.Glu1133ArgfsX29) confirming the diagnosis of infantile Marfan syndrome.

3. Discussion

In infancy, the diagnosis of MFS can be differentiated in neonatal MFS, severe infantile MFS or early-onset form of MFS, and infants with a positive family mutation without major features at that moment. Differentiation is important because treatment and prognosis will be different, but this may be difficult [26]. Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder of connective tissue in which ocular, skeletal, cardiovascular, integumentary, pulmonary, and neurological features may be present in a highly variable degree [79]. The diagnosis is still a clinical one, based on fulfillment of diagnostic criteria [10]. It is caused by missense mutations in FBN1 gene [11] on chromosome 15q21.1, the gene encoding fibrillin-1, a principle component of extracellular matrix microfibrils. A Marfan-like phenotype can be caused by mutations in the TGFBR2 gene on chromosome 3, encoding TGF-beta receptor 2 [12]. In the classic form of Marfan syndrome, isolated occurrence is in 25–35% of the patients. Fibrillin indirectly controls TGF-beta activation, and dysregulation of TGF-beta may play a role in the pathophysiology of Marfan syndrome [1323]. Main cardiovascular features are aortic root dilatation and/or aorta dissection and MV prolapse. Prognosis is mainly determined by progressive aortic root dilatation, potentially resulting in dissection and rupture. Prophylactic aortic root repair has raised the life expectancy by 30 years or more [24, 25].

Neonatal Marfan syndrome is a different group of patients with 50% mortality before the first year of life caused by heart failure. The definition of neonatal Marfan syndrome is an estimated diagnosis before 3 months of age, congenital pulmonary emphysema, severe atrioventricular valve (TV and MV) regurgitation in combination with congenital arachnodactyly, contractures, megalocornea, iridodonesis, rocker bottom feet, crumpled ears, and loose skin [3, 26, 27]. Especially congenital pulmonary emphysema and MV and/or TV insufficiency are very common (specific) in neonatal Marfan syndrome [3, 28]. The mutations are located in the central region of the FBN1 gene (exons 24–32) and all are de novo mutations. However, mutations of patients with the classic form of Marfan syndrome have also been found in this region [4, 6, 26, 2836].

Clinically our patient had severe infantile Marfan syndrome, early diagnosed because of the symptoms of a large ASD and VSD. We found a severely dilated pulmonary artery before operation, due to a large left-to-right shunt and pulmonary flow hypertension. Although pulmonary artery dilatation is a common finding in patients of all ages with MFS [37, 38], this case illustrates that the main pulmonary artery can dilate extremely due to increased pulmonary artery pressure and flow which appeared to be reversible after normalization of pulmonary artery pressure. In contrast, the aortic root showed progressive dilatation after shunt closure and improvement of left ventricular cardiac output. Congenital heart disease in MFS is rare and only a few cases have been described in literature [2, 4, 3952]. Patent ductus arteriosus and atrial septal defect have been described in 4–6% of the patients [2, 4, 39, 41, 44, 47, 51] and may need surgical or interventional closure. The use of septal occluders should be considered with caution in the Marfan syndrome, because of risk of penetration [47]. An isolated VSD, without complex heart defect, as in our patient, has been reported in only 5 cases (infants and adults) in literature over the last 40 years [3941, 46, 50, 52]. Coarctation of the aorta was reported once in a 10-year-old girl [45]. Three cases with complex congenital heart disease were described [42, 48, 49]. Congenital heart disease appears to be more common in Beals-Hecht syndrome or congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA), a dominantly inherited disorder of connective tissue characterized by multiple contractures, arachnodactyly, dolichostenomelia, scoliosis, and external ear anomalies, with mutations in FBN2 gene [53, 54]. Skeletal features are almost the same as in Marfan syndrome, and dilatation of the aortic root and mitral valve prolapse, although less common, can also occur in CCA. The congenital heart defects described in CCA are very similar to those in MFS, including ASD, VSD, patent ductus arteriosus, coarctation, or interruption of the aorta [55, 56].

4. Conclusion

This special case of infantile MFS with congenital heart disease demonstrates severe dilatation of both great arteries with reversibility of pulmonary artery dilatation after normalization of the pulmonary artery pressure. It further illustrates that the clinical phenotypes of MFS and CCA show significant overlap and that genetic testing was required for final differentiation.

Abbreviations

AoV:Aortic valve
ASD:Atrial septal defect
CCA:Congenital contractural arachnodactyly
FBN1:Fibrillin-1
FBN2:Fibrillin-2
MFS:Marfan syndrome
MPA:Main pulmonary artery
MV:Mitral valve
PV:Pulmonary valve
SDS:Standard deviation score
TV:Tricuspid valve
TGFBR2:TGF-beta receptor 2
TGF:Tissue growth factor
VSD:Ventricular septal defect.

References

  1. P. E. Daubeney, E. H. Blackstone, R. G. Weintraub, Z. Slavik, J. Scanlon, and S. A. Webber, “Relationship of the dimension of cardiac structures to body size: an echocardiographic study in normal infants and children,” Cardiology in the Young, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 402–410, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Geva, S. P. Sanders, M. S. Diogenes, S. Rockenmacher, and R. Van Praagh, “Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic and pathologic characteristics of the infantile Marfan syndrome,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 65, no. 18, pp. 1230–1237, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. C. Hennekam, “Severe infantile Marfan syndrome versus neonatal Marfan syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. P. Morse, S. Rockenmacher, R. E. Pyeritz et al., “Diagnosis and management of infantile Marfan syndrome,” Pediatrics, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 888–895, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Tiecke, S. Katzke, P. Booms et al., “Classic, atypically severe and neonatal Marfan syndrome: twelve mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in FBN1 exons 24–40,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Wang, J. Y. Wang, J. Cisler et al., “Three novel fibrillin mutations in exons 25 and 27: classic versus neonatal Marfan syndrome,” Human Mutation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 359–362, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. A. Mckusick, “The cardiovascular aspects of Marfan's syndrome: a heritable disorder of connective tissue,” Circulation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–342, 1955. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. E. Pyeritz, “The Marfan syndrome,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 481–510, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. E. Pyeritz and V. A. Mckusick, “The Marfan syndrome: diagnosis and management,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 300, no. 14, pp. 772–777, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. De Paepe, R. B. Devereux, H. C. Dietz, R. C. M. Hennekam, and R. E. Pyeritz, “Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 417–426, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Lee, M. Godfrey, E. Vitale et al., “Linkage of Marfan syndrome and a phenotypically related disorder to two different fibrillin genes,” Nature, vol. 352, no. 6333, pp. 330–334, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Mizuguchi, G. Collod-Beroud, T. Akiyama et al., “Heterozygous TGFBR2 mutations in Marfan syndrome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 855–860, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. H. Byers, “Determination of the molecular basis of Marfan syndrome: a growth industry,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 161–163, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. L. Dallas, D. R. Keene, S. P. Bruder et al., “Role of the latent transforming growth factor beta binding protein 1 in fibrillin-containing microfibrils in bone cells in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 68–81, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. De Crescenzo, S. Grothe, J. Zwaagstra, M. Tsang, and M. D. O'Connor-McCourt, “Real-time monitoring of the interactions of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) isoforms with latency-associated protein and the ectodomains of the TGF-beta Type II and III receptors reveals different kinetic models and stoichiometries of binding,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 32, pp. 29632–29643, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Isogai, R. N. Ono, S. Ushiro et al., “Latent transforming growth factor beta-binding protein 1 interacts with fibrillin and is a microfibril-associated protein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 4, pp. 2750–2757, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Kaartinen and D. Warburton, “Fibrillin controls TGF-beta activation,” Nature Genetics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 331–332, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Kanzaki, A. Olofsson, A. Moren et al., “TGF-beta 1 binding protein: a component of the large latent complex of TGF-beta 1 with multiple repeat sequences,” Cell, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1051–1061, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Miyazono, A. Olofsson, P. Colosetti, and C. H. Heldin, “A role of the latent TGF-beta 1-binding protein in the assembly and secretion of TGF-beta 1,” EMBO Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1091–1101, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. R. Neptune, P. A. Frischmeyer, D. E. Arking et al., “Dysregulation of TGF-beta activation contributes to pathogenesis in Marfan syndrome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 407–411, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Saharinen, M. Hyytiainen, J. Taipale, and J. Keski-Oja, “Latent transforming growth factor-beta binding proteins (LTBPs)—sructural extracellular matrix proteins for targeting TGF-beta action,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 99–117, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Saharinen and J. Keski-Oja, “Specific sequence motif of 8-Cys repeats of TGF-beta binding proteins, LTBPs, creates a hydrophobic interaction surface for binding of small latent TGF-beta,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2691–2704, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Saharinen, J. Taipale, and J. Keski-Oja, “Association of the small latent transforming growth factor-beta with an eight cysteine repeat of its binding protein LTBP-1,” EMBO Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. E. Pyeritz, “Marfan syndrome: 30 years of research equals 30 years of additional life expectancy,” Heart, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 173–175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. I. Silverman, K. J. Burton, J. Gray et al., “Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 157–160, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Booms, J. Cisler, K. R. Mathews et al., “Novel exon skipping mutation in the fibrillin-1 gene: two ‘hot spots’ for the neonatal Marfan syndrome,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 110–117, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Revencu, G. Quenum, T. Detaille, G. Verellen, A. De Paepe, and C. Verellen-Dumoulin, “Congenital diaphragmatic eventration and bilateral uretero-hydronephrosis in a patient with neonatal Marfan syndrome caused by a mutation in exon 25 of the FBN1 gene and review of the literature,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. T. Heide, C. T. Schrander-Stumpel, G. Pals, and T. Delhaas, “Neonatal Marfan syndrome: clinical report and review of the literature,” Clinical Dysmorphology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 81–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Abdel-Massih, A. Goldenberg, P. Vouhe et al., “Marfan syndrome in the newborn and infant less than 4 months: a series of 9 patients,” Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 469–472, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. I. M. Buntinx, P. J. Willems, S. E. Spitaels, P. J. Van Reempst, A. M. De Paepe, and J. E. Dumon, “Neonatal Marfan syndrome with congenital arachnodactyly, flexion contractures, and severe cardiac valve insufficiency,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 267–273, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. H. Elcioglu, F. Akalin, M. Elcioglu, P. Comeglio, and A. H. Child, “Neonatal Marfan syndrome caused by an exon 25 mutation of the Fibrillin-1 gene,” Genetic Counseling, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 219–225, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. A. Gruber, T. P. Graham Jr., E. Engel, and C. Smith, “Marfan syndrome with contractural arachnodactyly and severe mitral regurgitation in a premature infant,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 80–82, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. M. Jacobs, I. Toudjarska, A. Racine, P. Tsipouras, M. W. Kilpatrick, and A. Shanske, “A recurring FBN1 gene mutation in neonatal Marfan syndrome,” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 156, no. 11, pp. 1081–1085, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Ramaswamy, I. D. Lytrivi, K. Nguyen, and B. D. Gelb, “Neonatal Marfan syndrome: in utero presentation with aortic and pulmonary artery dilatation and successful repair of an acute flail mitral valve leaflet in infancy,” Pediatric Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 763–765, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Tekin, F. B. Cengiz, E. Ayberkin et al., “Familial neonatal Marfan syndrome due to parental mosaicism of a missense mutation in the FBN1 gene,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 143, no. 8, pp. 875–880, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Wang, P. Kishnani, M. Decker-Phillips, S. G. Kahler, Y. T. Chen, and M. Godfrey, “Double mutant fibrillin-1 (FBN1) allele in a patient with neonatal Marfan syndrome,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 760–763, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. B. J. De, B. Loeys, D. Devos, H. Dietz, S. J. De, and P. A. De, “A critical analysis of minor cardiovascular criteria in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with Marfan syndrome,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 401–408, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. J. Nollen, K. E. van Schijndel, J. Timmermans et al., “Pulmonary artery root dilatation in Marfan syndrome: quantitative assessment of an unknown criterion,” Heart, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 470–471, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Bauer, H. Siniawski, U. Bauer et al., “Ventricular septal aneurysm in a patient with Marfan syndrome,” Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 702–705, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  40. N. L. Bilgrami, S. G. Tewari, M. Aslam, and Z. A. Khan, “Marfan syndrome with microcornea, aphakia and ventricular septal defect. Case report,” Indian Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 78–80, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. P. Bolande and A. S. Tucker, “Pulmonary emphysema and other cardiorespiratory lesions as part of the Marfan abiotrophy,” Pediatrics, vol. 33, pp. 356–366, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. W. Childers and P. C. McCrea, “Absence of the pulmonary valve. A case occuring in the Marfan syndrome,” Circulation, vol. 29, pp. 598–603, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. C. C. Cronin and A. M. Harris, “Atrial fibrillation and interatrial septal aneurysm in a patient with Marfan's syndrome,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 115–117, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Figueiredo, E. Martins, M. R. Lima, and S. Alvares, “Cardiovascular manifestations in Marfan syndrome,” Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1203–1218, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. N. Headley, H. M. Carpenter, and C. G. Sawyer, “Unusual features of Marfan's syndrome including two postmortem studies,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 259–266, 1963. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Karoly, B. Gyorgy, and B. Kornél, “Isolated ventricular septal defect in Marfan's syndrome,” Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 110, no. 23, pp. 1325–1328, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  47. F. Loeffelbein, C. Schlensak, and S. Dittrich, “Penetration of left and right atrial wall and aortic root by an Amplatzer atrial septal occluder in a nine year old boy with Marfan syndrome: case report,” Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, vol. 3, article 25, no. 1, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. Metelka, J. Dusek, and J. Vomacka, “Dextrocardia and Marfan's syndrome,” Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Facultatis Medicae, vol. 133, pp. 43–45, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  49. D. Nathan, J. Kraus, V. Deutsch, and H. N. Neufeld, “Dilatation of the aorta and pulmonary artery with aortic and pulmonary insufficiency in the presence of a ventricular septal defect and infundibular pulmonic stenosis. Report of a case of forme fruste of the Marfan syndrome,” Diseases of the Chest, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 199–205, 1966. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. C. Roberts and H. S. Honig, “The spectrum of cardiovascular disease in the Marfan syndrome: a clinico-morphologic study of 18 necropsy patients and comparison to 151 previously reported necropsy patients,” American Heart Journal, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. G. Stuart and A. Williams, “Marfan's syndrome and the heart,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 351–356, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. V. H. Yajnik, P. K. Kshatriya, M. H. Vaidya, and N. T. Vassa, “Marfan's syndrome, ventricular septal defect and basilar impression in one patient,” Journal of the Indian Medical Association, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 242–244, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. K. Beals and F. Hecht, “Congenital contractural arachnodactyly. A heritable disorder of connective tissue,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 987–993, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. L. Callewaert, B. L. Loeys, A. Ficcadenti et al., “Comprehensive clinical and molecular assessment of 32 probands with congenital contractural arachnodactyly: report of 14 novel mutations and review of the literature,” Human Mutation, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 334–341, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. R. A. Anderson, S. Koch, and R. D. Camerini-Otero, “Cardiovascular findings in congenital contraction arachnodactyly: report of an affected kindred,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. J. Macnab, L. D'Orsogna, D. E. Cole, P. E. Baguley, R. J. Adderley, and M. W. Patterson, “Cardiac anomalies complicating congenital contractural arachnodactyly,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1143–1146, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus