Case Report
Optical, Spectroscopic, and Doppler Evaluation of “Normal” and “Abnormal” Reflexology Areas in Lumbar Vertebral Pathology: A Case Study
Table 1
Multimodal evaluation of “normal” and “abnormal” reflexology areas for lumbar vertebrae.
| Technique | Feature | Reflexology areas | P-value/remarks | “Normal” | “Abnormal” |
| Clinical photography | Grey scale luminosity | 158.1 ± 12.0 | 105.9 ± 13.9 | <0.001 |
| VAS scoring of tenderness under defined finger pressure (~35 N/cm2) | Tenderness (VAS score) | 1 | 6 | Increased tenderness in “abnormal” RA |
| SS-OCT | Viable epidermis thickness (μm) mean ± SD | 329.9 ± 13.5 | 200.0 ± 35.8 | <0.001 | Viable epidermis luminosity | 59.8 ± 28.2 | 84.0 ± 28.9 | <0.001 |
| IR-thermography | Temperature (°C) mean ± SD | 34.58 ± 0.16 | 35.44 ± 0.05 | <0.001 |
| | Blood perfusion unit at base line | 9 | 25 | 177.7% blood perfusion enhanced in “abnormal” RA | Combined microcirculation and transcutaneous oxygen monitor system | Blood perfusion unit under heat provocation | 76 | 119 | 51.0% blood perfusion elevated in “abnormal” RA | | Oxygen partial pressure (mm of Hg) under stable condition | 76 | 50 | 34.0% oxygen partial pressure reduced in “abnormal” RA |
|
|