- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Case Reports in Neurological Medicine
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 141953, 4 pages
Congenital Insensitivity to Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
1The Neuro-Genetics Institute, 501 Elmwood Avenue, Sharon Hill, PA 19079, USA
2Neuroscience Institute, Saint Francis Medical Center, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University, Saint Francis Medical Center, 601 Hamilton Avenue, Trenton, NJ 08629, USA
Received 4 June 2014; Revised 5 September 2014; Accepted 5 September 2014; Published 18 September 2014
Academic Editor: Pablo Mir
Copyright © 2014 Leema Reddy Peddareddygari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Congenital insensitivity to pain (CIP) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by mutations in the SCN9A gene. We report a patient with the clinical features consistent with CIP in whom we detected a novel homozygous G2755T mutation in exon 15 of this gene. Routine electrophysiological studies are typically normal in patients with CIP. In our patient, these studies were abnormal and could represent the consequences of secondary complications of cervical and lumbosacral spine disease and associated severe Charcot’s joints.
Autosomal recessive congenital insensitivity to pain (CIP) is a rare condition, affecting very few individuals, but with a worldwide distribution. CIP is clinically characterized by the ability to feel a given stimulus but also the inability to perceive pain. This is in contrast to congenital “indifference” to pain which implies a lack of concern to a painful stimulus that is received through normal sensory pathways and may be associated with central nervous system disorders such as schizophrenia or pervasive development disorder .
CIP is genetically and clinically heterogeneous caused by mutations in several different genes. For example, mutations in the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1 gene (NTRK1) and nerve growth factor-β (NGFB) result in CIP with an anhidrosis phenotype [2, 3]. In contrast, homozygous loss of function mutations in sodium channel voltage-gated type IX, alpha subunit (SCN9A) gene has been reported to result in the CIP with an anosmia phenotype . Although this condition is rare, genotype phenotype studies of such patients are important.
We report the results of our analysis of a patient who we encountered in our neurology clinic with a history of insensitivity to pain.
2. Case Report
This 58-year-old woman presented with a long history of insensitivity to pain since childhood and increased numbness in her legs for several years. As a child, she recalled developing cuts on her feet that she could not feel. She could distinguish between hot and cold temperature although there was no uncomfortable sensation associated with extremes of either one. Since the age of 15 years she started to develop frequent fractures involving multiple bones which were also painless. In addition, she has two children and suffered no pain during childbirth. She also had anosmia. Over the ten years prior to evaluation, she had started to develop sensory loss in her legs. She had previously been diagnosed with cervical and lumbar spine disease and had undergone surgical treatment of both of these regions of her spine. She is of Caucasian English descent and the product of a nonconsanguineous marriage. She has a healthy brother and two healthy children. There is no indication that either her parents or any other relative was affected by symptoms suggestive of CIP suggesting an autosomal recessive form of inheritance. The remainder of the general medical history was significant for absence of diabetes, cancer, or rheumatologic disease. Neurological examination revealed normal mental status and cranial nerve examination except for anosmia. She was diffusely areflexic with flexor plantar responses. She had multiple joint deformities involving both ankles, elbows, and knees (Charcot’s joints) which limited the testing of power. When she could provide a good effort, she had good strength. She had decreased sensation to pin prick, proprioception, and vibration distally in her feet. She could not perform a tandem walk and had a positive Romberg’s test.
An electromyogram (EMG) was performed; the motor nerve conduction parameters were normal in the right tibial nerve but showed a markedly reduced response amplitude in the right peroneal nerve recording the extensor digitorum brevis muscle (this was severely atrophied). No evoked response could be elicited with stimulation of the peroneal nerve at the fibular head. No evoked sensory nerve action potentials were obtained in the right ulnar, sural, and superficial peroneal nerves. Needle electromyogram showed no abnormal spontaneous activity in any muscle sampled and the presence of high amplitude polyphasic units in the distal muscles of the right arm and legs associated with a mildly reduced interference pattern with maximal effort. Overall the study was interpreted as showing chronic neurogenic changes with a superimposed entrapment neuropathy of the right ulnar nerve. The other abnormalities noted in the nerve conductions were interpreted as partly secondary to Charcot’s joints and technical factors such as increased subcutaneous tissues.
3. Genetic Analysis
Following IRB approved policies and procedures, a blood sample was obtained and DNA was extracted. Whole exome sequencing was performed by commercial sequencing company. Exome capture was performed by HiSeq2000 using a paired-end (2 × 100) protocol, Illumina raw data processing, and Agilent SureSelect exome kit for exome enrichment. The sequences were aligned to human genome reference (UCSC version hg 19). Nucleotide-level variation analysis of the exome sequence data was performed using the DNA nexus platform (https://dnanexus.com/). The variants obtained with this platform were further annotated using Ensembl variant effect predictor tool (Ensembl release 75, February 2014) (http://useast.ensembl.org/info/docs/tools/vep/index.html) . Since CIP is a rare disorder, the minor allele frequency was assigned at less than 1%. These results were further filtered for homozygous, nonsynonymous variants with deleterious, possible damaging and unknown effect using SIFT and Polyphen analysis. This narrowed down the list of variants to 584.
Those single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involving genes known to cause insensitivity to pain were then analyzed. A potentially significant variant was identified on chromosome 2 at position 167133579, a homozygous A/A variant (Figure 1(a)). This homozygous c. G2755T mutation in exon 15 of SCN9A gene results in a stop mutation, causing premature truncation of the protein p. E919X. This SNP was reconfirmed by amplification and Sanger’s sequencing (Figure 1(b)).
The SCN9A gene is expressed in all sensory neurons and is a key molecule in the processing of peripheral pain. This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav 1.7) which plays a significant role in nociceptive signaling and both gain and loss of function mutations have been reported. Interestingly, depending upon the specific mutation, there is a marked diversity of resulting phenotype. For example, gain of function mutations causes inherited erythromelalgia and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder which follow an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance [6, 7]. More recently there have been reports of mutations causing seizures or a small fiber neuropathy [8, 9].
Studies in individuals with CIP from seven different populations identified homozygous mutations in SCN9A gene . Loss of function mutations in SCN9A gene causes truncation of the encoded sodium channel Nav 1.7 protein, resulting in channelopathy-associated autosomal recessive congenital insensitivity to pain. Twenty-seven different SCN9A gene mutations have been reported in CIP patients so far (Table 1). Given the predicted consequences of the novel change in the SCN9A gene in our patient, it is likely to be a disease producing mutation and brings the total number of mutations to twenty-eight.
Although the primary consequence of the homozygous SCN9A mutation is the absence of pain sensation, there are associated conditions including anosmia, self-mutilation resulting in oral and digit lesions, multiple injuries due to repeated trauma, burn-related injuries, orthopedic complications that include bone deformities from untreated fractures, osteomyelitis, and neuropathic joints later in life [4, 8, 9, 11–14]. Although Charcot’s joints are commonly reported in patients with CIP, bony involvement of the spine as seen in our patient is rare; however, anosmia and Charcot’s joints noted in our patient are comorbidities that were previously reported associated with CIP [4, 8, 9, 14].
Routine EMG studies of patients with CIP are typically normal. In our patient, it is likely that the abnormalities detected on both the nerve conduction studies and needle examination are secondary to cervical and lumbosacral spine disease, joint deformities, and muscle wasting associated with Charcot’s joints. However, a sensory motor peripheral neuropathy is not excluded by this examination. It is possible that the patient has an associated large fiber neuropathy which may be related to the G2755T mutation or alternatively to another unrelated etiology. A possible relationship between mutations in the SCN9A and a large fiber neuropathy could be supported by genotype/phenotype analysis in further patients with CIP.
The study of our patient expands the spectrum of mutations that have been reported to cause this disorder. In addition, our analysis demonstrates the power of next generation sequencing that can enable genetic confirmation of a suspected diagnosis of a rare disorder.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
- P. J. Dyck, J. F. Mellinger, T. J. Reagan et al., “Not “indifference to pain” but varieties of hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy,” Brain, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 373–390, 1983.
- Y. Miura, S. Mardy, Y. Awaya et al., “Mutation and polymorphism analysis of the TRKA (NTRK1) gene encoding a high-affinity receptor for nerve growth factor in congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) families,” Human Genetics, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2000.
- O. P. Carvalho, G. K. Thornton, J. Hertecant et al., “A novel NGF mutation clarifies the molecular mechanism and extends the phenotypic spectrum of the HSAN5 neuropathy,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 131–135, 2011.
- J. J. Cox, F. Reimann, A. K. Nicholas et al., “An SCN9A channelopathy causes congenital inability to experience pain,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7121, pp. 894–898, 2006.
- P. Flicek, M. R. Amode, D. Barrell et al., “Ensembl 2014,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. D749–D755, 2014.
- Y. Yang, Y. Wang, S. Li et al., “Mutations in SCN9A, encoding a sodium channel alpha subunit, in patients with primary erythermalgia,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 171–174, 2004.
- J. J. Michiels, R. H. M. Te Morsche, J. B. M. J. Jansen, and J. P. H. Drenth, “Autosomal dominant erythermalgia associated with a novel mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel α subunit Nav1.7,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1587–1590, 2005.
- M. R. Piazza, G. S. Bassett, and W. P. Bunnell, “Neuropathic spinal arthropathy in congenital insensitivity to pain,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 236, pp. 175–179, 1988.
- K. B. Nilsen, A. K. Nicholas, C. G. Woods, S. I. Mellgren, M. Nebuchennykh, and J. Aasly, “Two novel SCN9A mutations causing insensitivity to pain,” Pain, vol. 143, no. 1-2, pp. 155–158, 2009.
- Y. P. Goldberg, J. Macfarlane, M. L. Macdonald et al., “Loss-of-function mutations in the Nav1.7 gene underlie congenital indifference to pain in multiple human populations,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 311–319, 2007.
- J. Weiss, M. Pyrski, E. Jacobi et al., “Loss-of-function mutations in sodium channel Na v 1.7 cause anosmia,” Nature, vol. 472, no. 7342, pp. 186–190, 2011.
- E. Hirsch, D. Moye, and J. H. Dimon III, “Congenital indifference to pain: Long-term follow-up of two cases,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 851–857, 1995.
- R. C. Cassidy and W. O. Shaffer, “Charcot arthropathy because of congenital insensitivity to pain in an adult,” Spine Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 691–695, 2008.
- Z. Shorer, E. Wajsbrot, T.-H. Liran, J. Levy, and R. Parvari, “A novel mutation in SCN9A in a child with congenital insensitivity to pain,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73–76, 2014.
- S. Ahmad, L. Dahllund, A. B. Eriksson et al., “A stop codon mutation in SCN9A causes lack of pain sensation,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 2114–2121, 2007.
- J. J. Cox, J. Sheynin, Z. Shorer et al., “Congenital insensitivity to pain: novel SCN9A missense and in-frame deletion mutations,” Human Mutation, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. E1670–E1686, 2010.
- M. Kurban, M. Wajid, Y. Shimomura, and A. M. Christiano, “A nonsense mutation in the SCN9A gene in congenital insensitivity to pain,” Dermatology, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 179–183, 2010.
- R. Yuan, X. Zhang, Q. Deng et al., “Two novel SCN9A gene heterozygous mutations may cause partial deletion of pain perception,” Pain Medicine, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1510–1514, 2011.
- R. Staud, D. D. Price, D. Janicke et al., “Two novel mutations of SCN9A (Nav1.7) are associated with partial congenital insensitivity to pain,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 223–230, 2011.
- C. J. Klein, Y. Wu, D. H. Kilfoyle et al., “Infrequent SCN9A mutations in congenital insensitivity to pain and erythromelalgia,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 386–391, 2013.