Unilateral Upper Cervical Posterior Spinal Cord Infarction after a Neuroendovascular Intervention: A Case Report
Context. We describe a case of unilateral posterior upper cervical spinal cord infarction and propose a pathophysiologic mechanism causing this lesion after vertebral artery endovascular intervention. Findings. A 70-year-old male presented with subacute onset of left hemibody sensory changes and gait instability following a left vertebral angioplasty procedure. MRI cervical spine revealed upper posterior cervical spinal cord infarction (PSCI). After 3 months patient had substantial improvement of his symptoms. Conclusion. PSCI is rare but can present as a complication from vertebral artery angioplasty procedure. Early diagnosis of PSCI can be achieved with adequate understanding of its clinical signs and the blood supply of the spinal cord.
Spinal cord infarction commonly involves the anterior spinal artery (ASA) territory resulting in motor deficits, sensory disturbances, and urinary incontinence [1, 2]. Posterior spinal cord infarctions (PSCI) are less common, and their diagnosis might be challenging because their presenting symptoms are less characteristic . We describe a rare case of unilateral upper cervical posterior spinal cord infarction following a left vertebral artery (VA) angioplasty and discuss a possible mechanism that lead to this injury.
2. Case Report
A 70-year-old male with medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, strokes, initially presented to the Neurology clinic with new transient episodes of gait disturbance, left-sided dysmetria, intermittent diplopia, and vertigo. His symptoms were attributed to recurrent transient ischemic attacks involving the posterior circulation. Computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the neck showed moderate left vertebral artery (VA) V4 and origin stenoses. His symptoms persisted despite being on aspirin, clopidogrel, and atorvastatin. After 4 months, a repeat CTA neck showed progression of left VA stenoses with development of a V4 segment intraluminal thrombus (Figure 1). He was started on oral anticoagulation for 2 weeks without symptoms improvement; therefore, a decision was made to proceed with elective cerebral angiogram with the intent to treat the left VA origin.
Cerebral angiogram one week later showed 90% left VA origin stenosis and distal V4 segment occlusion. Final angiography following left VA angioplasty revealed markedly improved VA flow, and 50% remaining stenosis of the proximal left VA.
A few hours postoperatively, the patient developed new onset left upper extremity dysmetria and paresthesia that resolved after 10 minutes. He was discharged from the hospital after 2 days without needing physiotherapy. On the following day, he returned to the emergency room with left hemibody paresthesia and gait unsteadiness. MRI brain showed acute posterior upper cervical cord infarction, confirmed with a dedicated MRI cervical spine (Figure 2). CTA neck showed no restenosis of the left VA origin and patent V4 segment with resolution of previously seen thrombus (Figure 1). His physical examination revealed decreased vibration and proprioception and dysmetria on the left upper and lower extremities, with positive Babinski sign ipsilaterally, and no loss of temperature or pain sensations. He was discharged home the following day with the plan to continue aspirin and clopidogrel and outpatient physiotherapy.
Three months later, the patient reported resolution of left hemibody paresthesia, with mild residual left-hand coordination difficulties and gait imbalance.
Posterior spinal cord infarction is rare  and less common than anterior spinal cord infarction (ASCI). This is probably due to the dual posterior spinal arteries (PSA) and the frequent anastomotic networks supplying the dorsal part of the spinal cord. The anterior two-thirds of the spinal cord are supplied by the anterior spinal artery (ASA) which originates from both vertebral arteries at the level of the cervical segment. The ASA also provides blood supply to the central portion of the spinal cord via the sulcal arteries [2, 3].
The paired PSA originate from the vertebral arteries or PICAs and then descend medial to the dorsal roots forming an anastomotic network dorsally that supplies the posterior third of the cord [2, 4]. The ASA and PSA are connected through the pial arterial plexus that supplies the spinal cord periphery . Additionally, the radicular arteries contribute to the blood supply of the spinal cord in different segments after dividing into posterior and anterior branches .
The ischemia of vertebrobasilar circulation can present with variety of symptoms such as dizziness, vertigo, headaches, vomit, diplopia, blindness, ataxia, imbalance, and weakness in both sides of the body [6, 7]. Patients with anterior spinal cord ischemia presents with para- or tetraparesis, bladder dysfunction, and bilateral loss of temperature and pain below the level of infarction with preserved vibration and proprioception sensations .
In PSCI the dorsal columns, dorsal horns, and posterior portion of lateral columns are affected ; however patients can have selective clinical presentations including loss of vibration and proprioception, segmental deep tendon areflexia, and weakness below the level of the lesion .
Several causes of PSCIs have been described in previous reports such as syphilitic arteritis , cholesterol emboli from atheromatous aortic plaques , intrathecal injection of phenol , and plasmocytoma . A review of 16 cases of cervical PSCIs showed that the most common causes of cervical PSCI were atherosclerosis and dissection of VA .
Few cases of SCIs have been reported as a complication from coronary angiography, resulting in lower extremity weakness and numbness [15, 16]. The proposed mechanism in these previously reported cases were mechanical trauma due to catheter manipulation resulting in plaque rupture with subsequent embolization. Two cases of ASCI after an endovascular coil embolization of basilar tip aneurysm have been described . It was speculated that wedging of a guiding catheter in the VA caused thromboemboli or insufficient perfusion of the radiculomedullary artery and finally spinal cord infarction.
The patient underwent cerebral angiography with improved blood flow in distal VA. However, the remaining proximal segment stenosis might have led to reduction in the flow pressure distally, causing a flow reversal in the VA. We hypothesize that the counteracting stagnant flows of the VA resulted in its gradual occlusion with subsequent hypoperfusion and thromboembolization in the PSA region.
Posterior cervical spinal cord infarction is a rare complication of VA angioplasty procedure. As symptoms are not characteristic, spinal imaging with diffusion weighted sequences is of great help in making a timely diagnosis.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest
W. P. Cheshire, C. C. Santos, E. W. Massey, and J. F. Howard Jr., “Spinal cord infarction: etiology and outcome,” Neurology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 321–330, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Weidauer, M. Nichtweiss, H. Lanfermann, and F. E. Zanella, “Spinal cord infarction: MR imaging and clinical features in 16 cases,” Neuroradiology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 851–857, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Richard, C. Abdallah, A. Chanson, S. Foscolo, P.-A. Baillot, and X. Ducrocq, “Unilateral posterior cervical spinal cord infarction due to spontaneous vertebral artery dissection,” The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 233–236, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mull and A. Thron, “Spinal infarcts,” in Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ischemic Stroke, Medical Radiology, pp. 251–267, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Matsubara, S. Miyachi, T. Okamaoto et al., “Spinal cord infarction is an unusual complication of intracranial neuroendovascular intervention,” Interventional Neuroradiology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 500–505, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. L. Neto, R. Bittar, G. S. Gattas et al., “Pathophysiology and diagnosis of vertebrobasilar insufficiency: a review of the literature,” International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 302–307, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Savitz and L. R. Caplan, “Current concepts: vertebrobasilar disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 25, pp. 2618–2626, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Berenstein and P. Lasjaunias, “Spinal and spinal cord arteries and veins,” in Surgical Neuroangiography, vol. 3, pp. 15–83, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mascalchi, M. Cosottini, G. Ferrito, F. Salvi, P. Nencini, and N. Quilici, “Posterior spinal artery infarct,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 361–363, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
U. Hinrichs, Myelodegeneration non specifica bei Luikern. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd, 10, 1–12, 1928.
O. Perier, JC. Demanet, J. Henneaux, and A. N. Vincente, “Existe-t-il un syndrome des arteres spinales posterieures?” in Rev Neurol, pp. 103–396, 103, 396–409, 1960.View at: Google Scholar
J. T. Hughes, “Thrombosis of the posterior spinal arteries: a complication of an intrathecal injection of phenol,” Neurology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 659–664, 1970.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Schott, L. Cotte, and M. Tommasi, “Rammollissement spinal posterieur en D7-D8 par myelome osseux plasmocytaire D11-L1,” in Rev Neurol, pp. 101–16, 101, 16–27, 1959.View at: Google Scholar
T. Sakurai, K. Wakida, and H. Nishida, “Cervical posterior spinal artery syndrome: a case report and literature review,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1552–1556, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Blankenship and S. Mickel, “Spinal cord infarction resulting from cardiac catheterization,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 87, no. C, pp. 239-240, 1989.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Vatankulu, M. Kayrak, Y. Alihanoglu, A. Salli, and M. S. Ulgen, “A rare but serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention: spinal cord embolism,” The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 85–89, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar