Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2012, Article ID 971213, 2 pages
Case Report

Postvaginal Delivery Caecal Volvulus and Perforation

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough SL2 4HL, UK

Received 10 October 2011; Accepted 15 November 2011

Academic Editors: P. De Franciscis, S.-Y. Ku, and L. Nilas

Copyright © 2012 M. M. Abdullah Agha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. W. Perdue, H. W. Johnson, and P. W. Stafford, “Intestinal obstruction complicating pregnancy,” American Journal of Surgery, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 384–388, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. J. Damore II, T. H. W. Damore, W. E. Longo, and T. A. Miller, “Congenital intestinal malrotation causing gestational intestinal obstruction: a case report,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 805–808, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Pal, E. Corbett, and N. Mahadevan, “Caecal volvulus secondary to malrotation presenting after caesarean section,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 805–806, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Fanning and C. B. Cross, “Post-cesarean section cecal volvulus,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1200–1202, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. O. Lawaetz and H. Kalund Jensen, “Survey radiography of abdomen following caesarean section, with particular reference to caecal diameter and the presence of free subdiaphragmatic gas,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 311–314, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. M. Lowman and L. Davis, “An evaluation of cecal size in impending perforation of the cecum,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 711–718, 1956. View at Google Scholar