Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 963454, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/963454
Case Report

Retained Intra-Abdominal Surgical Clamp Complicating Emergency Laparotomy: Incidental Finding on Hysterosalpingogram for Evaluation of Tubal Infertility

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 204, Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria

Received 29 July 2014; Accepted 15 September 2014; Published 9 November 2014

Academic Editor: Stefan P. Renner

Copyright © 2014 Adebiyi Gbadebo Adesiyun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Flores-Suarez and J. R.-D. Valle, “A foreign body,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 18, article 1748, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. National Quality Forum, 2010, http://www.qualityforum.org/Home.aspx.
  3. National Patient Safety Agency Website, 2010, http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/.
  4. V. C. Gibbs, “Retained surgical items and minimally invasive surgery,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1532–1539, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Kiernan, M. Joyce, C. K. Byrnes, H. O'Grady, F. B. V. Keane, and P. Neary, “Gossypiboma: a case report and review of the literature,” Irish Journal of Medical Science, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 389–391, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. A. Gawande, D. M. Studdert, E. J. Orav, T. A. Brennan, and M. J. Zinner, “Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 3, pp. 229–235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. E. Lincourt, A. Harrell, J. Cristiano, C. Sechrist, K. Kercher, and B. T. Heniford, “Retained foreign bodies after surgery,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 170–174, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Possover, “Gossypiboma in the pouch of Douglas,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 8, p. e9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses, “Recommended practices for prevention of retained surgical items,” Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices, AORN, Denver, Colo, USA, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. H. Sturdy, R. M. Baird, and A. N. Gerein, “Surgical sponges: a cause of granuloma and adhesion formation,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Rappaport and K. Haynes, “The retained surgical sponge following intra-abdominal surgery: a continuing problem,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 405–407, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Stoll, “Retained surgical sponge 40 years after laminectomy. Case report,” Surgical Neurology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 235–236, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Kokubo, Y. Itai, K. Ohtomo, K. Yoshikawa, M. Iio, and Y. Atomi, “Retained surgical sponges: CT and US appearance,” Radiology, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 415–418, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. A. Popoola, J. O. Bello, G. G. Ezeoke, K. T. Adeshina, and A. Fadimu, “Concealed enterovesical fistula associated with forgotten intra-abdominal haemostat and intravesical towel,” Case Reports in Urology, vol. 2014, Article ID 723592, 4 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. NoThing Left Behind, 2010, http://www.nothingleftbehind.org/.