Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2015, Article ID 402197, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/402197
Case Report

Essure Microinsert Abdominal Migration after Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization of an Appropriately Placed Essure Device: Dual Case Reports and Review of the Literature

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY 10451, USA
2School of Medicine, St. George’s University, St. George’s, Grenada

Received 8 September 2015; Accepted 2 November 2015

Academic Editor: Erich Cosmi

Copyright © 2015 Shadi Rezai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Paladini, A. Di Spiezio Sardo, C. Coppola, B. Zizolfi, G. Pastore, and C. Nappi, “Ultrasound assessment of the essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Legendre, J.-M. Levaillant, E. Faivre, X. Deffieux, A. Gervaise, and H. Fernandez, “3D ultrasound to assess the position of tubal sterilization microinserts,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2683–2689, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. Shah, N. Panay, R. Williamson, and A. Hemingway, “Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following essure hysteroscopic sterilisation,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 84, no. 1005, pp. 805–812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Litta, E. Cosmi, G. Sacco, C. Saccardi, A. Ciavattini, and G. Ambrosini, “Hysteroscopic permanent tubal sterilization using a nitinol-dacron intratubal device without anaesthesia in the outpatient setting: procedure feasibility and effectiveness,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 3419–3422, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. F. Kerin, J. M. Cooper, T. Price et al., “Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre phase II study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1223–1230, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. H. T. J. Mantel, J. Wijma, and A. P. M. Stael, “Small bowel obstruction and perforation after Essure sterilization: a case report,” Contraception, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 121–123, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H.-C. Hur, S. M. Mansuria, B. A. Chen, and T. T. Lee, “Laparoscopic management of hysteroscopic Essure sterilization complications: report of 3 cases,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 362–365, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Sonigo, P. Collinet, C. Rubod, and S. Catteau-Jonard, “Current position of Essure (®) micro-insert in the management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization,” Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Ricci, S. Restaino, G. Di Lorenzo, F. Fanfani, F. Scrimin, and F. P. Mangino, “Risk of essure microinsert abdominal migration: case report and review of literature,” Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, vol. 10, pp. 963–968, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Conceptus, Essure Permanent Birth Control System, Instructions for Use, L2133, Conceptus, 2002, http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/02/briefing/3881b1_03.DOC.
  11. J. Deardorff, “New study: essure less effective than tubal ligation at preventing pregnancy, Chicago Tribune,” 2014, http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-04-21/health/chi-essure-less-effective-than-tubal-ligation-20140421_1_sterilization-fallopian-tubes-ligation, http://limaohio.com/archive/13869/news-lifestyle-1283074-new-study-essure-less-effective-than-tubal-ligation-at-preventing-pregnancy.
  12. J. Belotte, V. I. Shavell, A. O. Awonuga, M. P. Diamond, J. M. Berman, and A. F. Yancy, “Small bowel obstruction subsequent to Essure microinsert sterilization: a case report,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. e4–e6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. B. E. Gerritse, S. Veersema, A. Timmermans, and H. A. M. Brölmann, “Incorrect position of Essure microinserts 3 months after successful bilateral placement,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 930.e1–930.e5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Essure Permanent Birth Control, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2015, http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/implantsandprosthetics/ucm371014.htm.
  15. S. S. Dhruva, J. S. Ross, and A. M. Gariepy, “Revisiting essure—toward safe and effective sterilization,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 15, article e17, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar