Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 1909056, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1909056
Case Report

Another Case of De Novo 3q26.33q27.3 Microdeletion and Its Medicolegal Sequel

1Complex Operative Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Alto Tevere” Hospital of Città di Castello, ASL 1 Umbria, Via Luigi Angelini 10, 06012 Città di Castello, Italy
2Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical, and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via del Policlinico 155, 00161 Roma, Italy
3School of Law, Legal Medicine Section, University of Camerino, Via A. D’Accorso 16, 62032 Camerino, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Ugo Indraccolo

Received 18 October 2017; Revised 3 January 2018; Accepted 9 January 2018; Published 7 February 2018

Academic Editor: Irene Hoesli

Copyright © 2018 Ugo Indraccolo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Bouman, M. Weiss, S. Jansen et al., “An interstitial de-novo microdeletion of 3q26.33q27.3 causing severe intrauterine growth retardation,” Clinical Dysmorphology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 68–74, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. C. Alvarez Arratia, H. Rivera, M. Möller et al., “De novo del(3)(q2800),” Annales De Genetique, vol. 27, pp. 109–111, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  3. sieog.it. Roma, Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Metodologie Biofisiche [©2014. Cited 2017 Aug 15]. Available from http://www.sieog.it/sieog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Linee-Guida-2015-x-sito1.pdf.
  4. Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Metodologie Biofisiche. Linee Guida SIEOG. Edizione 2010: Cento (FE): EDITEAM s.p.a. 2010: 1–116.
  5. Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Metodologie Biofisiche. Linee Guida SIEOG. Edizione 2002: Cento (FE): EDITEAM s.p.a. 2002: 1–85.
  6. M. Iaccarino, D. Paladini, and V. Ventruto, “Ecografia in Ostetricia fisiologia e patologia,” in Ecografia in Ostetricia fisiologia e patologia, pp. 113–199, Verduci Editore, Roma, Italy, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  7. N. Anderson, O. Boswell, and G. Duff, “Prenatal sonography for the detection of fetal anomalies: Results of a prospective study and comparison with prior series,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 943–950, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Bernaschek, I. Stuempflen, and J. Deutinger, “The value of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations: Different results between indication‐based and screening‐based investigations,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 807–812, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. E. Chambers, R. T. Geirsson, R. J. Stewart, C. Wannapirak, and B. B. Muir, “Audit of a screening service for fetal abnormalities using early ultrasound scanning and maternal serum α‐fetoprotein estimation combined with selective detailed scanning,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 168–173, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Grandjean, D. Larroque, and S. Levi, “The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 446–454, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Queisser-Luft, H. Stopfkuchen, G. Stolz, K. Schlaefer, and E. Merz, “Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: Quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 567–576, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Stoll, B. Dott, Y. Alembik, and M. P. Roth, “Evaluation of routine prenatal diagnosis by a registry of congenital anomalies,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 791–800, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Bower, E. Rudy, A. Callaghan, J. Quick, and N. Nassar, “Age at diagnosis of birth defects,” Birth Defects Research Part A - Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 251–255, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Levi, “Ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis: Polemics around routine ultrasound screening for second trimester fetal malformations,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 285–295, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus