Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2020 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8892273 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8892273

Michail Diakosavvas, Nikolaos Blontzos, Georgios Daskalakis, Athanasios Protopapas, Nikolaos Kathopoulis, Panagiotis Antsaklis, Grigorios Derdelis, Kyveli Angelou, Zacharias Fasoulakis, Dimitrios Loutradis, Marianna Theodora, "Vaginal Delivery at Term in a Woman with a Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy Treated with Laparoscopic Salpingectomy", Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2020, Article ID 8892273, 5 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8892273

Vaginal Delivery at Term in a Woman with a Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy Treated with Laparoscopic Salpingectomy

Academic Editor: Giovanni Monni
Received22 Jul 2020
Accepted26 Aug 2020
Published02 Sep 2020

Abstract

Background. The coexistence of an intrauterine pregnancy and an ectopic pregnancy (heterotopic pregnancy) is an extremely rare, yet major, complication during pregnancy. The early diagnosis of a heterotopic pregnancy is of great importance for fetal viability, maternal safety, and the progression of an uncomplicated intrauterine pregnancy. Case Presentation. We report a case of a naturally conceived heterotopic tubal pregnancy in a 37-year-old primigravida. The patient presented with continuous, dull, lower abdominal pain and a positive urine pregnancy test which was conducted a week prior to the start of the pain. The patient was hospitalized, and based on the clinical image and after strict monitoring, she was diagnosed with a heterotopic pregnancy. She was treated with laparoscopic salpingectomy after the rupture of the ectopic pregnancy while the desired intrauterine gestation continued without any complications. The pregnancy resulted in the birth of a healthy infant through vaginal delivery. Discussion. Strict monitoring with multiple sonographic evaluations should always be conducted in women with abnormal serum beta-hCG, adnexal abnormalities, or clinical symptoms, while heterotopic pregnancy should be in differential diagnosis and treatment should not be delayed since emerge management is important for the progression of the intrauterine pregnancy.

1. Introduction

The coexistence of an intrauterine gestation and an ectopic gestation is defined as heterotopic pregnancy, and it is a very rare condition with a frequency estimated to be less than 0.003% (1 in 30,000 cases) in natural conceived pregnancies [1]. Assisted Reproduction Technologies have increased the occurrence of coexisting intra- and extrauterine pregnancies, currently reported to be varied between 1 in 100 and 1 in 500 cycles [24]. Given that heterotopic pregnancy is considered a major complication of a pregnancy, the early diagnosis is of high importance for the therapeutic management of this condition and is directly associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality [5, 6].

Herein, we present a rare case of a naturally conceived heterotopic tubal pregnancy in a 37-year-old nulliparous woman that was treated with laparoscopic salpingectomy after the rupture of the ectopic pregnancy that resulted in the birth of a healthy infant through vaginal delivery at term.

2. Case Presentation

A 37-year-old, nulliparous patient was admitted to our Emergency Department complaining about continuous, dull, lower abdominal pain. She had a history of a positive urine pregnancy test a week ago, with her last menstrual period indicating a pregnancy of 5 weeks and 5 days. Her past medical and surgical history was uneventful. She had not been subjected to any fertility treatment modalities and reported no risk factors connected to ectopic pregnancy.

Clinical examination revealed a mild tenderness in deep palpation of the right lower quadrant without signs of peritoneal irritation. Pain was elicited during physical examination, located at the right adnexa, and no vaginal bleeding was recorded. The patient was hemodynamically stable. Her initial blood test results were within a normal range, except from an elevated serum beta-chorionic gonadotropin at 5436 mIU/mL. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed, and the findings suggested multiple, subserosal fibroids (with the greatest diameter: 41 mm), a single intrauterine gestational sac (mean diameter 7.3 mm), including a fetal pole with a crown-rump length of 1.7 mm and positive cardiac activity. In the right fallopian tube, a hypoechoic mass measuring  mm with minimal blood flow on the Doppler investigation was depicted, while the Douglass pouch was free of fluid. The ovaries appeared normal. Differential diagnosis included hydrosalpinx, hematosalpinx, ovarian torsion, and heterotopic pregnancy (Figure 1).

Due to persisting mild pain, the patient was hospitalized and monitored in our obstetrics department. The patient remained clinically stable and was subjected to additional transvaginal sonographic evaluation daily. On the 3rd day of hospitalization, the ultrasonographic evaluation revealed a viable intrauterine pregnancy and mild accumulation of free fluid in the lower abdomen, suggesting a possible rupture of a coexisting tubal pregnancy. At that time, the patient complained about pelvic pain more acute than usual alongside with nausea while the vital signs and hemoglobin level were within the normal range (Figure 2).

After extended counselling and written consent, an emergent exploratory laparoscopy was performed. Under general anesthesia, with the patient in a lithotomy position, trocars were placed in standard sites, with intention to avoid any injury of the uterus, with the least possible manipulations, in order for the intrauterine pregnancy to be preserved. A mild amount of blood and clots and an ectopic pregnancy with active bleeding in the ampulla of the right fallopian tube were visualized, and right salpingectomy and evacuation of hemoperitoneum were conducted. A single intravenous dose of antibiotics was administered intraoperatively, and immediate confirmation of fetal heartbeat of the intrauterine gestation was done postoperatively (Figure 3).

Oral progesterone was administered in a daily dose of 600 mg in order to prevent a miscarriage of the intrauterine pregnancy, due to possible lack of corpus luteum. After an uneventful recovery, the patient was discharged 2 days postoperatively with a viable ongoing pregnancy of 7 weeks. Recommendations concerning routine antenatal assessment were given. The final histopathological analysis of the specimen confirmed the diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy. After an uncomplicated full-term pregnancy (40 w and 1 day), a healthy, female newborn weighting 3295 g was born via a spontaneous vaginal delivery (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Until today, only a small number of naturally conceived heterotopic pregnancies have been reported, and even a smaller number of them have resulted in the delivery of a live-born infant [7]. The most common site of a heterotopic pregnancy is the fallopian tube, followed by the uterine cornua [5, 6].

The main risk factors of heterotopic pregnancy, reported in 70% of the patients, are fertility treatment techniques (such as ovulation induction or multiple embryo transfer), previous tubal surgical procedures (such as salpingotomy, salpingectomy, or tubal ligation), and tubal damage (such as hydrosalpinx and tubal adhesions as a result of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometriosis) [13, 69]. Nonetheless, as illustrated in our case, no predisposing factor was present, suggesting that other yet unknown types of tubal pathology may play a role in the genesis of an ectopic pregnancy.

Since the gestational sac is not present in the early stages of pregnancy, a great number of heterotopic pregnancies are diagnosed late, due to the fact that the pregnant woman may be asymptomatic or without specific symptoms such as diffuse abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding [2, 3]. Approximately 70% to 75% of the heterotopic pregnancies are discovered between the 5th and 8th weeks of gestation, and in only 10% of the cases, they are diagnosed past 10th week of gestation [47, 10]. In 60% to 75%, the ectopic pregnancy is discovered during an emergency situation right before the surgery which is required due to rupture and subsequent intra-abdominal bleeding hemoperitoneum or even hypovolemic shock and is found via ultrasound or computerized tomography [4, 5, 7, 11]. However, obstetricians should always perform examination for ectopic pregnancy, abortion, and ovarian torsion [12]. B-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) is of no value in order to differentiate cases of heterotopic pregnancies, since the pathologic hormone levels of the extrauterine pregnancy are masked by the beta-hCG produced by the intrauterine pregnancy [2, 5].

Transvaginal ultrasound represents the most useful diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of a heterotopic pregnancy, however with a sensitivity that remains low and varies between 26% and 92%, resulting in the diagnosis of about 26-41% of such cases [2, 7, 12, 13]. Moreover, multiple ultrasound scans might be required in order for the diagnosis to be undoubtedly established while all physicians should investigate the uterus and annexes as part of the first trimester ultrasound. The reason for this is the fact that although an intrauterine pregnancy does not exclude a synchronous ectopic gestation, it still remains highly infrequent; thus, the clinician should be very careful in order to subject the patient in a surgical treatment that could jeopardize a viable desired pregnancy.

Since the rupture of a tubal gestation has been reported to be as high as 20%, leading in an emergency operation, the management of a heterotopic pregnancy highly depends on several factors, which, among others, are the week of gestation, the site of the ectopic pregnancy, the experience of the physicians, and the desire of the patient to preserve the intrauterine pregnancy [6, 9, 13, 14]. In order to maintain the intrauterine pregnancy, surgical excision of the ectopic gestation through either laparoscopy or laparotomy should be performed right after diagnosis [2, 3]. The most common surgeries performed for the treatment of tubal heterotopic pregnancies are salpingectomy, salpingotomy, or even salpingo-oophorectomy [9]. In our case, after thorough consultation of the patient, due to the hemoperitoneum found in the sonographic evaluation and her hemodynamic stability, surgery through a minimally invasive route (laparoscopy) was employed. Based on the international literature, the viability of the intrauterine pregnancy resulting in the delivery of a live newborn after surgical treatment of the ectopic pregnancy can reach up to 70% [7, 10]. Conversely, the abortion rate of the intrauterine pregnancy after surgery ranges from 14% to 40%, while the preterm delivery rate has been reported to be 10% [13, 15].

4. Conclusions

The coexistence of an ectopic pregnancy should not automatically be ruled out in cases of intrauterine pregnancies, especially in women with a history of Assisted Reproduction Technologies. Obstetricians should always perform a meticulous ultrasound scan and suspect a tubal pregnancy, in all women with abnormal serum beta-hCG, adnexal abnormalities, or clinical symptoms. The early diagnosis and treatment of an ectopic pregnancy can be proven critical not only for maternal morbidity and mortality but also for the progression of an uncomplicated intrauterine pregnancy.

The patient’s consent to publish this case report has been obtained. There is no information permitting to identify the patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors of our manuscript have contributed sufficiently in this work to warrant authorship and take public responsibility for it. MD followed and managed the patient and wrote the manuscript. NB collected the data and drafted the manuscript. GD revised the manuscript. AP and NK performed the laparoscopic surgery and provided critical revision of the manuscript. PA and GD followed the patient, performed the ultrasound scans, and revised the manuscript. KA and ZF collected the data and prepared the figures. DL revised the manuscript. MT followed and managed the patient, supervised the project, and provided the final approval of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication.

References

  1. A. Habana, A. Dokras, J. L. Giraldo, and E. E. Jones, “Cornual heterotopic pregnancy: contemporary management options,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 182, no. 5, pp. 1264–1270, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. Anastasakis, A. Jetti, L. Macara, and G. Daskalakis, “A case of heterotopic pregnancy in the absence of risk factors,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 285–288, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Mihmanli, A. Kilickaya, N. Cetinkaya, G. Karahisar, and H. Uctas, “Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy presenting with hemoperitoneum,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 44–46, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Lyu, H. Ye, W. Wang et al., “Diagnosis and management of heterotopic pregnancy following embryo transfer: clinical analysis of 55 cases from a single institution,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Kratschla-Apochal, C. Nauer, and D. Bolla, “Heterotopic pregnancy after natural conception: a case report,” Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 639–642, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. U. Nabi, A. Yousaf, F. Ghaffar, S. Sajid, and M. M. H. Ahmed, “Heterotopic pregnancy - a diagnostic challenge. Six case reports and literature review,” Cureus, vol. 11, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Barrenetxea, L. Barinaga-Rementeria, A. Lopez de Larruzea, J. A. Agirregoikoa, M. Mandiola, and K. Carbonero, “Heterotopic pregnancy: two cases and a comparative review,” Fertil Steril, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 417.e9–417.e15, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Dendas, J. C. Schobbens, G. Mestdagh, L. Meylaerts, G. Verswijvel, and C. Van Holsbeke, “Management and outcome of heterotopic interstitial pregnancy: case report and review of literature,” Ultrasound, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 134–142, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Ciebiera, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland, A. Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak et al., “Heterotopic pregnancy – how easily you can go wrong in diagnosing? A case study,” Journal of Ultrasonography, vol. 18, no. 75, pp. 355–358, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Tal, S. Haddad, N. Gordon, and I. Timor-Tritsch, “Heterotopic pregnancy after ovulation induction and assisted reproductive technologies: a literature review from 1971 to 1993,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Anderson, C. Patterson, and A. Riley, “Heterotopic interstitial pregnancy: a case report,” Case Reports in Women's Health, vol. 17, pp. 8–10, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Chadee, S. Rezai, C. Kirby et al., “Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy: dual case report and review of literature,” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2016, 5 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. B. Li, L. Z. Kong, J. B. Yang et al., “Management of heterotopic pregnancy experience from 1 tertiary medical center,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 5, p. e2570, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Baxi, M. Kaushal, H. K. Karmalkar, P. Sahu, P. Kadhi, and B. Daval, “Successful expectant management of tubal heterotopic pregnancy,” J Hum Reprod Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 108–110, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Guan and C. Ma, “Clinical outcomes of patients with heterotopic pregnancy after surgical treatment,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1111–1115, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Michail Diakosavvas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views186
Downloads58
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.