Effectiveness of Clavicula Pro Humero Reconstruction for Elderly Patients: Report of Two Cases

Table 1

Complication rate and MSTS score after reconstruction of proximal humerus.

Authors	Reconstruction method	Number of patients	Complication rate	MSTS score (%)
Cannon et al. [1]	Prosthesis	83	27%	63
Wafa et al. [4]	Prosthesis	34	38%	83
Sulamaa [3]	Arthrodesis	5	40%	58.3–85.0
Wada et al. [5]	Vascularized fibula graft	8	75%	79
Getty and Peabody [6]	Allograft	16	69%	70
Potter et al. [7]	Allograft	17	65%	71
	Prosthesis	16	44%	69
Kitagawa et al. [8]	Arthrodesis	4	25%	(87/1 case)
	Prosthesis	10	30%	(68/5 cases)
	Clavicula pro humero	7	14%	(71.5/2 cases)
Nishida et al. [2]	Clavicula pro humero	2	50%	80
Tsukushi et al. [9]	Clavicula pro humero	7	14%	69
Current authors	Clavicula pro humero	2	0%	68.5