Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Orthopedics
Volume 2015, Article ID 217842, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/217842
Case Report

Meniscal Bearing Dislocation of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Faint Symptom

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital, Kaminaka 839, Kashiba, Nara 639-0265, Japan
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kita-ward, Sakai, Osaka 591-8025, Japan
3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Shijo-cho 840, Kashihara, Nara 634-0813, Japan
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanwa Daini Senboku Hospital, Toyoda 1588-1, Minami-ward, Sakai, Osaka 590-0106, Japan

Received 11 January 2015; Revised 30 May 2015; Accepted 30 May 2015

Academic Editor: Christian W. Müller

Copyright © 2015 Tadashi Fujii et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Hasegawa, A. Sudo, A. Fukuda, and A. Uchida, “Dislocation of posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis. A case report,” Knee, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 478–482, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Bhan, R. Malhotra, E. K. Kiran, S. Shukla, and M. Bijjawara, “A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 2290–2296, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. J. O'Connor and J. W. Goodfellow, “Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 210, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. W. Murray, J. W. Goodfellow, and J. J. O'Connor, “The oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 983–989, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Cool, J. Victor, and T. de Baets, “Does a minimally invasive approach affect positioning of components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? Early results with survivorship analysis,” Acta Orthopædica Belgica, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 709–715, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. L. Luscombe, J. Lim, P. W. Jones, and S. H. White, “Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A note of caution!,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 321–324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. U. C. G. Svärd and A. J. Price, “Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 191–194, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. Pandit, C. Jenkins, H. S. Gill, K. Barker, C. A. F. Dodd, and D. W. Murray, “Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—British Volume, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 198–204, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus