Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Otolaryngology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 325048, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/325048
Case Report

Not Always Asthma: Clinical and Legal Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis of Laryngotracheal Stenosis

1Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
2The Neutral Corner Ltd, Clavering House, Clavering Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3NG, UK
3Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College Hospital, Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
4Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK
5Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery, The Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK

Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 2 November 2014; Published 18 December 2014

Academic Editor: Hsing-Won Wang

Copyright © 2014 Adam C. Nunn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is a rare condition that occurs most commonly as a result of instrumentation of the airway but may also occur as a result of inflammatory conditions or idiopathically. Here, we present the case of a patient who developed LTS as a complication of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), which was misdiagnosed as asthma for 6 years. After an admission with respiratory symptoms that worsened to the extent that she required intubation, a previously well 14-year-old girl was diagnosed with GPA. Following immunosuppressive therapy, she made a good recovery and was discharged after 22 days. Over subsequent years, she developed dyspnoea and “wheeze” and a diagnosis of asthma was made. When she became pregnant, she was admitted to hospital with worsening respiratory symptoms, whereupon her “wheeze” was correctly identified as “stridor,” and subsequent investigations revealed a significant subglottic stenosis. The delay in diagnosis precluded the use of minimally invasive therapies, with the result that intermittent laser resection and open laryngotracheal reconstructive surgery were the only available treatment options. There were numerous points at which the correct diagnosis might have been made, either by proper interpretation of flow-volume loops or by calculation of the Empey or Expiratory Disproportion Indices from spirometry data.