Case Reports in Pathology

Case Reports in Pathology / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 375193 |

Aynur Albayrak, Umran Yildirim, Metin Aydin, "Dermoid Cyst of the Pancreas: A Report of an Unusual Case and a Review of the Literature", Case Reports in Pathology, vol. 2013, Article ID 375193, 5 pages, 2013.

Dermoid Cyst of the Pancreas: A Report of an Unusual Case and a Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: J. Kulka
Received28 Aug 2013
Accepted30 Sep 2013
Published14 Nov 2013


Pancreatic dermoid cysts are a rare entity. Preoperative diagnosis is difficult. The diagnosis is generally taking intraoperative. A 20-year-old female presented with epigastric pain without nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, jaundice, and weight loss of one-month duration. Ultrasonography and computed tomography showed a smooth borders, solid, hyperechoic tumor within midline abdomen, without any connection to the stomach or spleen. At surgery, the entire mass was excised off of the head and inferior part of pancreas. Histopathologic evaluation revealed the rare diagnosis of a dermoid cyst. The diagnosis is difficult preoperatively in evaluating cystic pancreatic lesions by imaging. Therefore, we want to summarize the literature on this rare entity knowledge.

1. Introduction

Dermoid cysts are congenital developmental abnormalities of germ cell origin derived from any of the three germinal layers, that is, ectoderm, entoderm, and mesoderm. Teratomas usually occur along the midline of the body, which is the route of germ cell migration during embryogenesis. These migrating germ cells may become “misplaced” en route to their appropriate organs, leading to the development of tumors later in life. The pancreas is extremely rare as a primary site. As true cysts, dermoid cysts are usually benign, well differentiated lesions. Pancreatic teratomas probably originate from aberrant germ cells arrested in migration to the gonads early in embryonic life. They are composed of tissue derived from any of the three germinal layers and may produce a wide variety of structures with different degrees of differentiation, including hair, teeth, cartilage, bone, and dermal appendages, such as hair follicles, sweat glands, and sebaceous material [1, 2]. They are an unusual entity with only 30 cases, to our knowledge, described in the world literature. We report the 31st case of a pancreatic cystic teratoma.

2. Case-Report

A case of a 20-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to vague epigastric pain without nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, jaundice, and weight loss of one-month duration. The patient had no significant medical history. A physical examination demonstrated mild tenderness in the epigastrium but no evidence of an acute abdomen. Laboratory studies including functional tests of the pancreas, and the liver and kidneys showed normal values. The levels of serum carbohydrate antigenic determinant (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were not elevated.

A CT scan revealed a lobular contoured solid mass with a 13 cm long axis, 6 cm transverse diameter, and 5 cm anterior to posterior diameter, localized between the head and inferior part of the pancreas, compressing the pancreas and surrounding tissues. Low density was dominant, but the lesion also included patchy high dense regions and an approximately  cm sized calcification. Ultrasonographic (USG) examination reveals that solid and hyperechoic mass lesion was observed in the midline of the abdomen. This mass is approximately  cm in size with smooth borders and does not invade the intra-abdominal organs (Figure 1). No definite adenopathy was noted at the celiac axis origin or in any peripancreatic area.

At surgery, the entire mass was excised off of the head and inferior part of pancreas and sent for histopathologic examinations.

Macroscopically, a gray-brown colored,  cm sized mass with irregular surface was found. There was a glazing compound and a 9 cm sized hair ball on the upper surface of this mass. The cross-section was yellow-white in color. In some regions, there was cystic lumination (multiloculation). The different parts of the lesion were observed in seven cassettes. On histological examination, it was revealed that the cyst wall was lined by mature stratified squamous epithelium and surrounded by lymphoid tissue containing germinal centers and sebaceous glands. In the lumen of the cyst, masses of keratinous debris were detected (Figure 2).

The patient died from postoperative complication, that is, massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage and hypovolemic shock.

3. Discussion

Teratomas are widely believed to arise from embryonic inclusions of skin at the time of neural groove closure, hence their characteristic midline localization. Two subtypes of teratomas have been described: mature and immature. Mature teratomas are further classified as either solid or cystic, with the latter also known as “dermoid cyst.” Although dermoid cysts most commonly develop within the ovaries, they have been shown to occur anywhere along the route of ectodermal cell migration, usually in the midline. Localizations in the testis, cranium, brain, mediastinum, omentum, retroperitoneum, and sacrococcygeal region have all been described. Pancreatic dermoid cysts are extremely rare [2, 3].

Following the description of a case of a mature cystic teratoma (MCT) of the pancreas by Kerr in 1918 [3, 4], the characteristics of these tumors have been identified in several case studies. Pancreatic MCTs usually develop at a young age, with a mean age at diagnosis of 34.7 years (range 2–74 years). There is also a slight male preponderance in reported cases (59% men, 41% women) [3, 4]. Although such teratomas have been shown to develop anywhere in the pancreas, most lesions are located in the body or the head (47% and 41%, resp.), while the tail of the pancreas is less frequently involved (12%) [4, 5]. In our patient, the lesion was situated on the inferior portion of the pancreatic head. A comparison of our case with other reported cases in the literature is provided in Table 1.


Kerr AA191855F Head/bodyGastritis? Dyspepsia?Marsupialization+ (after 2 months) resection
Dennis WA192333FHead Pain and palpable massMarsupialization
Decourcy JL19432FBodyEmesis, vomitingEnucleation
Iovchec II19728MBodyEmesis and painDrainage
Pomosov DV19736MTailPainSPG
Assawamatiyanont S197711F BodyAbdominal massEnucleation
Lazaro DaSilva A198421MBodyPainless mass and emesis, constipationResection after drainage
Mester M199025F HeadAbdominal painEnucleation
Jacobs JE199357F Bodypain and weight losingEnucleation
Markovsky V199353F Body Abdominal painEnucleation
Lacono C199326F HeadPain and feverDPC
Das PC19964 monthsF Body-tail Abdominal mass at palpationEnucleation
Lushpai VP1997
Fernandez-Cebrian JM199874M Body-tail Backache painSPG
Strasser G200244M HeadPain
Salimi J200421MHeadJaundice and weight lossEnucleation
Seki M200560F BodyİncidentalEnucleation
Seki M 200557M BodyİncidentalPM
Koomalsingh KJ200652M TailPainSPG
Rıvkıne E 200745F HeadAbdominal painResection
Tucci G200764M TailİncidentalPancreatectomy
Yoon WJ200857MHeadAbdominal pain
Zhang AY200867M Bodyİncidental Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy
Scheele J201040M Head-body Upper abdominal pain Partial duodenopancreatectomy
Badıa AC201043F BodyEpigastric pain and emesisPartial cystectomy
Ameur B201164M HeadEpigastric painPartial cystectomy
Urata T201258MTail Epigastric and dorsal pain
Degrate 201261MUncinateAsymptomaticDPC
Lane201263M BodyLower abdominal painResection
Albayrak A201320F Head-bodyEpigastric painEnucleation

SPG: splenopancreatectomic gauche, DPC: duedunopancreatectomy cephalic, PM: pancreatectomy mediane, —: nonspecific.

While most patients with pancreatic MCTs are asymptomatic, lesions are usually discovered incidentally. Patients may complain of nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, weight loss, anorexia, fatigue, abdominal pain, back pain, and fever [35]. Laboratory tests are usually unremarkable unless the lesion hinders the flow of biliary or pancreatic fluids. Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9, which have traditionally been used for the evaluation of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas, are considerably lower in dermoid cysts [2, 3], although this was not the case in our patient.

The radiologic appearance of pancreatic dermoid cysts, as with other MCTs, depends on their composition. A combination of radiologically detectable fat, fat-fluid levels, and calcium within the same lesion is considered to be highly suggestive of a mature teratoma [6, 7]. On ultrasonographic examination, an MCT may appear as a well-defined cystic mass with distinct margins but without septations. Areas of high fat content appear hyperechoic, whereas calcified tissues are seen as focal areas of high intensity with acoustic shadowing [2, 4, 7].

On computerized tomography scans, an MCT of the retroperitoneum manifests as a complex mass containing a well-circumscribed fluid component, adipose tissue, and calcifications. The presence of hypoattenuated fat areas within the cyst is considered highly suggestive of cystic teratoma, particularly if calcifications are detected in the cyst wall [8].

On further evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), T1-weighted images would show cystic lesions with distinct margins and fat-fluid levels of low intensity. Findings on both CT and MRI are highly specific, providing an accurate diagnosis in most cases [2, 4, 7].

A definite diagnosis needs to be made by excisional biopsy or fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). In 1991, Markovsky and Russin [9] described a case of a patient preoperatively diagnosed with cystic teratoma by FNAC. Authors reported on the presence of mature benign squamous cells, keratin debris, and inflammatory cells on cytological examination, which they considered diagnostic citing that other lesions of the pancreas such as pseudocysts, pancreatitis, and degenerated carcinomas would be expected to lack specific histological elements [9]. The current recommendation is to perform FNAC to confirm a preoperative diagnosis if radiological evidence is inconclusive for the evaluation of a cystic lesion of the pancreas [2]. Koomalsingh et al. reiterated that FNAC should be reserved to asymptomatic patients and individuals considered at high risk for surgery [2]. Despite the available modalities, a preoperative diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic lesions may be elusive, particularly for larger lesions (>3 cm). In a study by Volmar et al., the preoperative and postoperative diagnoses of 1000 patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas were compared. Investigators reported on a false positive rate of 0.3% and a false negative rate of 14.3% following preoperative evaluation with US, CT, or EUS guided FNAC [10].

Dermoid cysts of the pancreas are true cysts. The cyst wall, which surrounds the lesion, is lined by a single layer of keratinizing stratified squamous epithelium, and the underlying connective tissue may contain adnexal tissue, sebaceous glands, lymphoid tissue, and even inflammatory cells. Dermoid cysts often contain thick, pasty, doughy sebaceous secretions. Fully differentiated tissues from one or more germ cell layers, most commonly the ectoderm, including hair, teeth, calcium, cartilage, and dermal appendages, such as hair follicles, sweat glands, and sebaceous material, are also usually encountered [24, 11].

The differential diagnoses of pancreatic cystic lesions include pseudocyst, neoplastic cysts such as mucinous and serous cystadenoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and solid pseudopapillary tumor. Although US, CT, and MRI are undoubtedly helpful, findings are far from being pathognomonic [12, 13]. As opposed to true cysts, pseudocysts lack a true epithelial lining. Mucinous cystic neoplasms, on the other hand, are true cystic neoplasms lined by mucinous epithelium that develop separate from the ductal system. They often contain a cellular subepithelial stroma which may resemble ovarian stroma [14]. Serous cystadenomas, which can be either microcystic or macrocystic, are characterized by the presence of serous, cuboidal, clear cells with uniform, round hyperchromatic nuclei [15]. A cystic lesion with a mucinous epithelium lining that is connected to the native ducts is classified as IPMN [16]. Solid pseudopapillary tumors are a distinctive subtype of pancreatic lesions that are histopathologically characterized by the presence of degenerative pseudopapillae, loosely cohesive cells with grooved nuclei, and aggregates of large hyaline globules [17]. Lymphoepithelial cysts, which are also most commonly located in the pancreas (tail and body, followed by the head and neck), resemble dermoid cysts and may be distinguished by the absence of epidermal appendages such as hair follicles or sebaceous glands, which are more frequently associated with the latter [18]. Furthermore, mucinous epithelium, respiratory-type mucosa, sebaceous units, and hair follicles are more readily identifiable in dermoid cysts rather than in lymphoepithelial or epidermoid cysts. Another distinguishing feature is that suppurative infections occur more frequently in dermoid cysts than in other “squamous lined” pancreatic cysts [1, 3, 19, 20].

Although malignant degeneration of pancreatic dermoid cysts has yet to be described, it is essential that histopathological evaluation includes complete sampling of the cyst wall in order to exclude the presence of immature foci (most commonly neuroepithelial type), since 7–10% of other retroperitoneal teratomas have been reported to be malignant [21].

Despite their benign nature, ambiguity regarding a diagnosis often leads to surgical resection, which remains the gold standard treatment for MCTs. In a recent review, it was established that more than 70% of excised pancreatic cystic lesions reported were either malignant or premalignant, and based on these findings it is recommended that surgical excision be undertaken for any symptomatic cystic lesion as well as any lesion larger than 2-3 cm in size, particularly if discovered in an elderly patient [5]. Not only would excision of the lesion provide definitive diagnosis, it is also expected to lessen symptoms [1, 5]. External drainage should be avoided as it may be associated with a risk of developing a persistent fistula requiring surgical intervention. Simple excision (enucleation or cystectomy) of the lesion, preceded by intraoperative frozen section, usually suffices as recurrence or evidence of malignant degeneration, has not been reported [4, 5].

Intraoperative frozen examination is a useful tool that may help prevent overtreatment of pancreatic masses in young individuals.

Conflict of Interests

There is no conflict of interests.


  1. J. Scheele, T. F. E. Barth, J. Straburg, M. Juchems, M. Kornmann, and D. Henne-Bruns, “Dermoid cyst of the pancreas,” International Journal of Colorectal Disease, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 415–416, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. J. Koomalsingh, R. Fazylov, M. I. Chorost, and J. Horovitz, “Cystic teratoma of the pancreas: presentation, evaluation and management,” Journal of the Pancreas, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 643–646, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  3. G. Tucci, M. G. Muzi, C. Nigro et al., “Dermoid cyst of the pancreas: presentation and management,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 5, article 85, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. E. Jacobs and B. J. Dinsmore, “Mature cystic teratoma of the pancreas: sonographic and CT findings,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 523–524, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Y. Zhang, S. K. Thompson, P. A. Game, and J. J. Allin, “Cystic teratoma of the pancreas: a rare entity,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 1130–1131, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Mester, H. J. Trajber, C. C. Compton, H. S. A. De Camargo Jr., P. C. Cardoso de Almeida, and H. C. Hoover Jr., “Cystic teratomas of the pancreas,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 1215–1218, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. J. Davidson, D. S. Hartman, and S. M. Goldman, “Mature teratoma of the retroperitoneum: radiologic, pathologic, and clinical correlation,” Radiology, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 421–425, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  8. D. M. Yang, D. H. Jung, H. Kim et al., “Retroperitoneal cystic masses: CT, clinical, and pathologic findings and literature review,” Radiographics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1353–1365, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  9. V. Markovsky and V. L. Russin, “Fine-needle aspiration of dermoid cyst of the pancreas: a case report,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 66–69, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. E. Volmar, R. T. Vollmer, P. S. Jowell, R. C. Nelson, and H. B. Xie, “Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 854–861, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Seki, E. Ninomiya, A. Aruga et al., “Image-diagnostic features of mature cystic teratomas of the pancreas: report on two cases difficult to diagnose preoperatively,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 336–340, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Mishra and C. E. Forsmark, “Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas,” Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 355–362, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  13. N. V. Adsay, “Cystic neoplasia of the pancreas: pathology and biology,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 401–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Klöppel and M. Kosmahl, “Cystic lesions and neoplasms of the pancreas: the features are becoming clearer,” Pancreatology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 648–655, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Zamboni, A. Scarpa, G. Bogina et al., “Mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathological features, prognosis, and relationship to other mucinous cystic tumors,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 410–422, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. H. Hruban, K. Takaori, D. S. Klimstra et al., “An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 977–987, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. S. Klimstra, M. B. Pitman, and R. H. Hruban, “An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms,” Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 454–464, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  18. L. D. Truong, S. Rangdaeng, and P. H. Jordan Jr., “Lymphoepithelial cyst of the pancreas,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 899–903, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. R. Mandavilli, J. Port, and S. Z. Ali, “Lymphoepithelial cyst (LEC) of the pancreas: cytomorphology and differential diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration (FNA),” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 371–374, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. V. Adsay, “Cystic neoplasia of the pancreas: pathology and biology,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 401–404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Gonzales-Crussi, Extragonadal Teratomas, Atlas of Tumor Pathology, 1982.

Copyright © 2013 Aynur Albayrak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.