Case Reports in Pediatrics

Case Reports in Pediatrics / 2021 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9905474 |

Guwani Liyanage, Madhusha Gonapaladeniya, Thushari Dissanayake, "Invasive Candidiasis Associated with Adenovirus Pneumonia", Case Reports in Pediatrics, vol. 2021, Article ID 9905474, 3 pages, 2021.

Invasive Candidiasis Associated with Adenovirus Pneumonia

Academic Editor: Nina L. Shapiro
Received23 Apr 2021
Accepted02 Jun 2021
Published05 Jun 2021


Invasive Candida infections in immunocompetent children lead to high morbidity and mortality despite available treatment. Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis are the most common pathogens; however, there are newly emerging pathogenic non-albicans species. Adenovirus accounts for at least 5–10% of respiratory infections in children, and specific serotypes are associated with severe pneumonia. To the best of our knowledge, invasive Candida infection complicating adenovirus-associated pneumonia in immunocompetent children has not been reported previously. Herein, we describe a preschool child with invasive candidiasis associated with adenovirus pneumonia.

1. Introduction

Candida is a commensal of the skin and mucosa of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tracts. They are true opportunistic pathogens that enter the circulation and deep tissues in high-risk individuals. Children with a critical illness are particularly vulnerable to invasive candidiasis [1]. Even though, Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis are known to be the most common isolates, other non-albicans species are increasingly found [1, 2].

Adenovirus accounts for at least 5–10% of respiratory infections in children [3]. Specific serotypes are associated with severe pneumonia and prolonged illness [4]. Secondary bacterial or fungal infections could be triggered by respiratory tract erosions and neutropenia caused by adenovirus infection [46]. We present a case of invasive candidiasis with a non-albicans species in a previously healthy child associated with community-acquired adenoviral pneumonia.

2. Case Report

A 3-year and 6-month-old girl presented in December 2019, with fever, cough, rhinorrhea, and watery stools (a few times) for four days. Two weeks before that, she had a brief hospital stay for acute viral gastroenteritis. She was healthy and had been immunized appropriately for her age, including with BCG. The parents were nonconsanguineous and healthy. She had a high temperature (40°C) and was tachypneic, with rales predominantly on the right lung field. In addition, she had moderate dehydration on admission. After initial stabilization, oral clarithromycin and intravenous co-amoxiclav were started empirically with a presumptive diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia.

Laboratory evaluation indicated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (white blood cells (WBCs) = 2.78 × 103/mm3, neutrophils = 0.83 × 103/mm3, and platelets = 76 × 103/mm3). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (CRP) were 56 mm/1st h and 7.4 mg/dL. Liver enzyme levels were elevated (aspartate transaminase = 472 U/L; alanine transaminase = 194 U/L). Renal function test results were within the normal range. Antidengue IgM and IgG were negative. Chest radiography revealed peribronchial thickening, mainly in the right upper and middle zones. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the nasopharyngeal aspirate was positive for adenovirus and negative for influenza and parainfluenza viruses.

Clinical improvement remained poor after 48 h of treatment. Tachypnea fluctuated between 48 and 60 breaths/min. The lowest oxygen saturation was 91%. Blood gas analysis revealed normal levels of carbon dioxide. Repeat investigations on day 8 of illness revealed reduced platelets (49 × 103/mm3) and neutrophils (0.65 × 103/mm3) and increased CRP levels (43 mg/dL). Repeat chest radiography revealed worsening lung condition, with interstitial infiltrates in both lung fields. No effusion was detected by ultrasound of the chest. The antibiotics were changed to intravenous cefotaxime and amikacin.

The blood culture (sampled on day 7 of illness) showed Candida infection. Two sputa (induced) cultures tested negative for bacteria and fungi. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed no cells and a protein concentration of 24.7 mg/dL. The CSF fungal culture was negative. Candida species were not isolated in urine and stool cultures. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was not detected in the induced sputum or gastric aspirate using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Echocardiography and eye assessments were normal. Abdominal ultrasound was normal.

Fluconazole was administered intravenously; however, blood cultures on illness days 9 and 11 remained positive for Candida. Fungal identification, which was performed using manual biochemical methods, revealed the presence of Candida famata. Molecular tests or gene sequencing for identification were not performed because of nonavailability of resources. With the sensitivity pattern, intravenous fluconazole was continued for an additional ten days after the first negative culture on day 13 of illness. Upon clinical recovery, complete blood count returned to normal (WBCs = 14.75 × 103/mm3, neutrophils = 5.16 × 103/mm3, and platelets = 896 × 103/mm3). The levels of liver enzymes had normalized, and chest radiography on day 18 indicated recovery. The subsequent immunological workup revealed parameters within the normal range (immunoglobulin levels, lymphocyte subsets, and neutrophil function tests). The serum tested negative for HIV antigen and antibody. The patient remained well, without signs of relapse during the subsequent follow-up.

3. Discussion

Invasive candidiasis has not been reported in immunocompetent children with adenoviral infection. Although it is difficult to establish a causal relationship between the adenoviral and Candida infections, it is tempting to speculate that adenovirus infection was a predisposing factor for candidemia in this patient for two reasons. First, invasive Candida infections associated with other respiratory viruses have been reported [7]. For example, candidemia has been observed in patients critically ill with COVID-19 [8, 9]. Second, the entry point of Candida into the bloodstream could have been through the respiratory tract erosions caused by severe adenoviral infection. As repeated sputa cultures were negative for Candida in our patient, alternatively, the pathogens may have invaded through sites other than the respiratory tract. Candida spp. have historically been considered commensals of normal human microbiota of the oral cavity, skin, and gastrointestinal tract [10]. This healthy microbiota is often altered in disease states [10]. Broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment and viral-induced neutropenia may have contributed to invasive candidiasis in our patient [11]. Viral infections frequently cause neutropenia owing to bone marrow suppression and peripheral destruction [12].

Candida is the third most common healthcare-associated bloodstream infection [13]. Colonization is the first step to invasive disease. They exploit host vulnerabilities to enter the circulation and deep tissues, thus behaving like a true opportunistic pathogen. Systemic candidiasis is divided into two primary syndromes: candidemia and disseminated candidiasis (defined as a Candida infection in sterile target organs, with or without positive blood culture results). We assumed that our patient had candidemia as we could not detect Candida infection in other organs.

Candida albicans are responsible for at least one-third of the isolates [2]. Candida parapsilosis is the second most common [2, 13, 14]. Opportunistic infection with Candida famata is rare [15]. A few previous case reports of Candida famata fungemia in immunocompetent adults and children had been described [15, 16]. However, most reported cases occurred in immunocompromised or burn patients [17, 18].

The absence of specific clinical features delays the diagnosis [5]. Conventionally, the diagnosis of candidemia is based on blood cultures. However, the sensitivity of blood culture is between 63% and 86% [19]. This is even worse in children due to low-volume samples. Moreover, it can take days to turn positive and even longer to identify the species. Nonculture-based methods such as DNA detection by PCR have been studied to assist early diagnosis [20]. Candida famata was identified in our patient using biochemical methods. However, misidentification of certain Candida species by biochemical methods has been reported [21, 22]. Although molecular techniques based on DNA or gene sequencing are helpful for accurate identification, these methods are less available in resource-poor settings. Accurate identification is important for species-oriented treatment as the newly emerging pathogens may differ significantly in their antifungal susceptibilities [22]. In vitro studies have demonstrated increased susceptibility of Candida famata to amphotericin B compared to fluconazole [17]. However, according to many reports, fluconazole monotherapy had been effective in Candida famata fungemia [16].

This report highlights that invasive candidiasis is a complication of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Active surveillance for invasive candidiasis in critically ill children is essential for the timely diagnosis of this severe opportunistic infection. Less expensive, rapid diagnostic methods should be further explored for early diagnosis and species-oriented treatment.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. W. Steinbach, “Pediatric invasive candidiasis: epidemiology and diagnosis in children,” Journal of Fungi, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 5, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Kothalawala, J. A. A. S. Jayaweera, S. Arunan, and A. Jayathilake, “The emergence of non-albicans candidemia and evaluation of HiChrome Candida differential agar and VITEK2 YST platform for differentiation of Candida bloodstream isolates in teaching hospital Kandy, Sri Lanka,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 136, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. O. Moura, A. F. Roberto, N. Hein et al., “Molecular epidemiology of human adenovirus isolated from children hospitalized with acute respiratory infection in São Paulo, Brazil,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 174–181, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Y. Park, B.-J. Kim, E. J. Lee et al., “Clinical features and courses of adenovirus pneumonia in healthy young adults during an outbreak among Korean military personnel,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 1, Article ID e0170592, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Delaloye and T. Calandra, “Invasive candidiasis as a cause of sepsis in the critically ill patient,” Virulence, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. J. Kim, K. Kim, S. B. Park, D. J. Hong, and B. W. Jhun, “Outcomes of early administration of cidofovir in non-immunocompromised patients with severe adenovirus pneumonia,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 4, Article ID e0122642, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. J. José, J. N. Periselneris, and J. S. Brown, “Opportunistic bacterial, viral and fungal infections of the lung,” Medicine, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 366–372, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Mastrangelo, B. N. Germinario, M. Ferrante et al., “Candidemia in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: incidence and characteristics in a prospective cohort compared with historical non-COVID-19 controls,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 30, Article ID ciaa1594, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Y. Rodriguez, P. Le Pape, O. Lopez, K. Esquea, A. L. Labiosa, and C. Alvarez-Moreno, “Candida auris: a latent threat to critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 93, Article ID ciaa1595, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. J. Limon, J. H. Skalski, and D. M. Underhill, “Commensal fungi in health and disease,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Mohammadi and E. Foroughifar, “Candida infections among neutropenic patients,” Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 71–77, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  12. H. G. Munshi and R. B. Montgomery, “Severe neutropenia: a diagnostic approach,” Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 248–252, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. Roilides, “Invasive candidiasis in neonates and children,” Early Human Development, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. S75–S76, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. Altuncu, H. Bilgen, A. Soysal, and E. Ozek, “Successful treatment of Candida parapsilosis fungemia in two preterms with voriconazole,” Case Reports in Pediatrics, vol. 2015, Article ID 402137, pp. 1–3, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Karapetsa, V. Tsolaki, M. Arabatzis, E. Petinaki, A. Velegraki, and E. Zakynthinos, “Septic shock due to Candida famata (Debaryomyces hansenii) candidemia in an ICU immunocompetent trauma-patient,” Journal of Infection and Public Health, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 594–597, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Raturi, S. Chandran, and R. Viswanathan, “A case of Candida famata sepsis in a very low birth weight infant successfully treated with fluconazole following antifungal susceptibility testing,” Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 528–530, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. D. Beyda, S. H. Chuang, M. J. Alam et al., “Treatment of Candida famata bloodstream infections: case series and review of the literature,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 438–443, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Arslan, “Yanik ünitesinde Candida famata fungemisi gelişen olgularin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi [Retrospective evaluation of the cases with Candida famata fungemia in a burn unit],” Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2009, in Turkish. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. J. Clancy and M. H. Nguyen, “Finding the “missing 50%” of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 56, pp. 1284–1292, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Terrero-Salcedo and M. V. Powers-Fletcher, “Updates in laboratory diagnostics for invasive fungal infections,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. e01487–19, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. H. Kim, J. H. Shin, J. H. Mok et al., “Misidentification of Candida guilliermondiias C. famata among strains isolated from blood cultures by the VITEK 2 system,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 250408, 6 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. R. Costa, F. Silva, M. Henriques, J. Azeredo, R. Oliveira, and A. Faustino, “Candida clinical species identification: molecular and biochemical methods,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Guwani Liyanage et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.