Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Psychiatry
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 8073572, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8073572
Case Report

Foreign Accent Syndrome, a Rare Presentation of Schizophrenia in a 34-Year-Old African American Female: A Case Report and Literature Review

1Richmond University Medical Center, 355 Bard Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10310, USA
2University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Received 17 October 2015; Revised 14 December 2015; Accepted 29 December 2015

Academic Editor: Erik Jönsson

Copyright © 2016 Kenneth Asogwa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Foreign Accent Syndrome (FAS) is a rare phenomenon where speech is characterized by a new accent to the patient’s native language. More than 100 cases with the syndrome have been published, the majority of which were associated with observed insults of the speech center. Some other cases have been described without identifiable organic brain injury, especially in patients with psychiatric illness. This paper presents a patient with schizophrenia and FAS, without any evidence of organic brain injury. FAS recurred during psychotic exacerbation and did not reverse before transfer to a long-term psychiatric facility. The case is discussed in the context of a brief review of the syndrome.

1. Introduction

Foreign Accent Syndrome (FAS) is a rare condition where speech is characterized by a new accent to the patient’s native language. This new accent is foreign to both the speaker and the listener [14]. It is important to note that the affected patient may never have lived in the country of origin of the new accent [14]. There is evidence from the medical literature to suggest that there are three main types of FAS: neurogenic, psychogenic, and mixed. Each of these variants has unique characteristics [5, 6]. There has been an increase in the number of reported FAS cases especially of the neurogenic variety [5]. The patient presented here had a known schizophrenia and psychogenic FAS, a combination for which only few cases have been reported to date in the medical literature.

2. Case Report

The patient was a 34-year-old African American US-born single female. At the time of the investigation she was unemployed and lived temporarily with her mother, who had a history of paranoid schizophrenia. The patient was brought to the psychiatry emergency room by ambulance for evaluation of aggression. Upon presentation, the patient described an altercation with her mother’s landlady, hitting her numerous times in the face with a closed fist. The patient started the altercation because she felt that the landlady practiced voodoo and had cursed her, causing her hair to fall off. She described an overwhelming rage prior to the physical assault. The patient did not show any remorse for her actions: “I hate her,” “I did the right things,” and “She is evil” are examples of statements made by the patient. Collateral information from the patient’s mother revealed that the patient had not been compliant with her medications. She refused to follow up with outpatient care after the last inpatient admission ten months previously. The patient denied auditory hallucinations but appeared to be internally preoccupied. She denied visual and tactile hallucinations, thought insertion, and thought broadcasting. She reported an unchanged pattern of sleep and appetite, which she described to be “good.” Prior to this episode, the patient had been under economic and emotional stress. She lost her job as a nurse aide five months earlier and had not been able to secure another job since then. The patient broke up with her fiancée ten months previously after cutting her fiancée’s stepfather’s face following verbal altercation. There was no symptom suggestive of mania, seizure disorder, head trauma, loss of consciousness, cerebrovascular accident, Parkinson’s disease, anxiety, or other organic brain disorder. The patient denied use of nicotine, alcohol, and other psychoactive substances currently or in the past. The patient had her first inpatient psychiatry admission for acute exacerbation of paranoid schizophrenia and FAS ten months earlier. She was then treated with risperidone tablets with improvement including change in accent on discharge, when she was less psychotic. The patient had a family history of sickle cell disease (brother had sickle cell disease) and schizophrenia (brother, mother, and uncle had schizophrenia). Birth and developmental history were unremarkable. There were no reported behavioral or learning disabilities, and the patient denied being a victim of emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. She had some college education and worked as a nurse aide up till five months prior to presentation to the hospital.

Mental status examination showed a middle-aged, well-groomed, dark-haired woman with poor eye contact and in no apparent distress. The patient was tangential and preoccupied with “voodoo” and was deeply paranoid of her neighbors and her mother’s landlady. Auditory hallucinations were not elicited, and she denied suicidal ideation at the time of evaluation. The patient continued to endorse homicidal ideation towards her mother’s landlady. She was awake, alert, orientated in time, place, and person, and attentive and had good concentration but had poor impulse control. Her insight and judgment were impaired. Immediate recall and short- and long-term memory were intact.

The physical examination of the patient showed no significant pathological findings. Laboratory investigations were unremarkable. Electroencephalogram showed no seizure activity. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR angiography of the head were both unremarkable.

The patient presented with a British-like accent, despite never having lived in Britain, and was therefore investigated by a speech therapist. There was no phonetic problem or grammatical errors, but there was a problem with prosody, including prominence of the pitch of the words and syllables. The patient’s pitch range was narrow, as she sparingly expressed any emotions during speech. Her speech was monotonous, hesitant, and of low volume. She substituted “th” for “f” and “w” for “wh” as well as “t” for “d” and “ai” for “ei.”

The patient was diagnosed according to DSM-V criteria with paranoid schizophrenia, chronic condition with acute exacerbation, and in addition FAS. The diagnosis of schizophrenia was made based on disorganized speech, specifically tangentiality, paranoid delusions, and grossly disorganized behavior, which lasted for more than ten months and affected the level of functioning, specifically with regard to interpersonal relations and occupation. This was determined not to be due to illicit drug use or known medical illness.

The patient was discharged from the previous hospitalization ten months earlier with a prescription of disintegrating tablets of risperidone. However, she was not compliant with this compound after discharge and also refused to take it during the second hospital admission described here. The patient agreed to take olanzapine tablets to address her psychosis. She was offered a readily dissolvable formula, as we had concern she was “checking” her medications to spit out after administration. However, the patient refused to take any other medication than conventional olanzapine tablets. The olanzapine serum concentration could not be controlled, because the patient became more delusional and refused further blood work. The patient continued to have psychotic symptoms and her foreign accent remained unchanged. She refused augmentation with any other antipsychotic medication because of paranoia. In the course of treatment, the patient continued to endorse homicidal ideation, paranoid ideation towards her mother’s landlady, and still spoke in a British accent. In view of unremitting psychotic symptoms, she was transferred to a long-term psychiatric inpatient facility.

3. Discussion

Foreign Accent Syndrome (FAS) is a rare speech pathology that presents with an accent perceived to be different from the native accent by the listener and speaker [16]. The first reported case, a patient who had a stroke in the left hemisphere, was published in 1907 by the French neurologist Pierre Marie [7]. Since then more than one hundred reports of this syndrome have been published. There are three main variants of FAS reported in the literature: neurogenic, psychogenic, and mixed [5, 6]. For all the types of FAS, the listener’s perception is important and ruling out pareidolia is imperative. The characteristics of FAS may involve changes in the pronunciation of words, syntax, and vocabulary as well as changes in the length of the vowels and tenseness, which in phonology is a particular vowel and/or consonant quality that is phonemically contrastive in many languages including English [2, 3, 8]. Other changes include inappropriate stresses of sentences and words. Accents from different parts of the world have been reported and examples include French, English, German, Swedish, Welsh, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, and Irish accents [2, 3, 9, 10]. While there have been many cases of neurogenic FAS, few cases of psychogenic FAS have been reported [5, 6].

In neurogenic FAS, although the exact mechanism is unclear, there is damage observed using neuroimaging techniques to the central nervous system from a stroke or traumatic brain injury [1120]. Vascular lesions usually involve the middle cerebral artery and motor speech areas such as precentral and middle frontal gyrus, anterior insular, inferior parietal, and adjacent subcortical regions as well as the cerebellum [1120]. The internal capsule and basal ganglia may also be affected. It has been shown that prosodic function is controlled bilaterally, with the linguistic aspect being controlled by the cortical area of the left hemisphere [2123].

Until recently it has been assumed that FAS was not psychogenic. In the psychogenic variant of FAS, there may be an underlying psychological or psychiatric disorder such as psychosis, conversion disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia with ongoing episodes but without identifiable organic brain lesion deficits in the areas connected with language production and speech articulation, suggesting that various other factors and lesions are implicated [26, 9, 2427]. In the cases of psychosis, the new accent persists throughout the entire episode and may disappear after the psychotic episode subsides. The more severe the psychosis is, the more likely the syndrome remains. Many hypotheses have been postulated for FAS in conjunction with psychoses, which include the activation of positive psychotic symptoms, which may also be the provocateur of the accent, and neural circuitry suppression, which may show intermittent prominence [2, 3].

Finally, in the mixed variant, there may be features of both neurogenic and psychogenic characteristics [5, 6]. In these cases, the cause may primarily be neurogenic and then develop to be psychogenic. Researchers have described a loss of identity and the effort of the patient to improve the veracity of the accent as the patient evolves into a new identity [5, 6]. The distinction between neurogenic and psychogenic in phonetic or linguistic terms is important, because it may be the case that these FAS patients have different pronunciation characteristics. The former could result from dysarthria or apraxia, while the latter is somehow “put on” or taken on [5, 6].

When considering linguistics in FAS phonetically, it is important to consider segmental or prosodic characteristics. For segmental characteristics, consonants and vowels are affected and are either reduced, made simpler than usual, missing, unarticulated, or broken [2832]. Many models of prosody exist and there is no consensus theory [29, 30]. Prosody has two main functions, which include linguistics and paralinguistics. Prosody has many auditory variables, including voice pitch, sound length, loudness, and timbre and acoustic variables, which include frequency, duration, and intensity. These play a role in the functions (intonation and stress) and features (rhythm, tempo, and loudness) of prosody [2833]. However, it is imperative to mention that the consideration of change in accent as related to FAS is either segmental (articulation, phonation, and speech coordination) or suprasegmental (speech rhythm, duration, and intonation) [28, 31]. Speakers tend to have distinctive speech rhythms [29]. Specifically our patient had a problem with the intonation component; however other aspects of speech may also give similar effects of communication as those achieved by prosody.

According to an autosegmental-metrical framework four levels of intonation exist: inventory, distribution, realization, and function [29]. FAS speakers differ in all of the levels except for inventory. Changes in intonation may be explained by a deficit in the intonation and speech support systems [29, 30]. Problems in intonation include higher mean pitch, reduced pitch range, inappropriately large and sharp pitch excursions on prominent syllables, unusual terminal falls, and inappropriate use of intonation in conversations, for example, when making statements or asking questions [29]. It remains unanswered whether the levels of intonation are a consequence of a diagnosed speech impediment or an adaptive coping strategy for the impediment in another aspect of speech. However, it has been proven that FAS speakers are knowledgeable about intonation and have the ability to use or alter them if required in circumstances of impairment [2931]. Our patient took on a British accent. British speakers have an average lower pitch as well as precipitous rise and fall in pitch of vowels [2, 3, 34]. The British pronounce the last syllable quickly for consonants, which is different from Americans. The t//d in US English and r linkage for British English apply as an example [34].

Medical literature has described dysfunction of language in terms of form and structure in schizophrenia. It has been suggested that patients with schizophrenia have lower expressivity and complexity even with the same lexicon. The determination of the clinical position of these patients is based on circumstances associated with angry or happy experiences [35]. It has also been determined that differences in lexicon for happiness and anger, in contrast to other types of emotionality, do exist in patients with schizophrenia when compared to patients without this disorder [35].

It has been argued that, following a neurological insult to the language processing regions of the left hemisphere, there is transmigration of certain language functions from the left to the right hemisphere in patients with schizophrenia, which could cause the right hemisphere to dysfunction [36, 37]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the right middle temporal gyrus is associated with the comprehension of emotional prosody in external speech, and patients with schizophrenia are well known to have difficulty with language function in the right hemisphere [37, 38]. Reports have shown that dysprosody associated with Broca’s aphasia needs revision since it is associated with the perception of listeners [39]. Since it has been determined that dysprosody is due to lack of continuity in speech of Broca’s aphasics, it makes speech appear more melodic to listeners [39]. FAS is also associated with agrammatism, a deficit in sentence production, which is a symptom of Broca’s aphasia. The medical literature is replete with studies presenting patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with difficulties in semantic verbal fluency and word finding when compared to controls [40]. There is a deficit of emotional prosody in patients with schizophrenia and these patients perform poorly compared to controls when asked to repeat words or phrases in a specific emotional tone of voice [40]. This deficit has no relationship with medication or years of formal education [36]. Taken together this may give an explanation to the relationship between schizophrenia, suggested to involve a dysfunction of the left hemisphere, and FAS, a highly selective speech problem, yet leaving the language mainly preserved.

There have been a few schools of thought that do not believe that FAS really is a syndrome of foreign accents. One such school believes that this syndrome depends on the listener and not the patient (speaker); that is, rhythm and pronunciation may have been altered but not the accent [8]. However, this phenomenon is not in line with our patient because she was examined thoroughly by a speech therapist and many physicians and family members opined that the patient did have a change of accent from American to British English.

Reversibility of FAS is an uncommon phenomenon. Most of the cases with FAS persist, but there are a few cases where reversal has occurred following right cerebellar hemorrhage, seizure disorder, and acute episodes of psychosis [1, 17]. In the patient described in this report, there was a history of reversibility of the foreign accent after the index episode of psychosis. Our search of the literature showed that including the case presented here there are currently four case reports on psychosis and FAS published (Table 1) [2, 3]. Among the previously reported cases of FAS, one is notable as episodes of FAS occurred with psychotic exacerbation and disappeared with functional and symptomatic improvement [2, 3]. In our patient functional MRI or positron emission tomography (PET) scanning was not performed. Hence, neurological insult as a cause of the FAS could not totally be ruled out. Our patient spoke with a British accent during psychotic exacerbation, and, with risperidone titration, the psychosis and FAS got better, resembling the first reported case of FAS during psychotic exacerbation [3]. In the previous hospitalization, risperidone was effective in controlling the psychosis with FAS in our patient. In the hospitalization episode described here, patient accepted to take conventional olanzapine tablets after she vehemently refused to take any form of risperidone and oral disintegrating olanzapine. The choice to offer olanzapine to the patient was based on a comparative study of risperidone and olanzapine, which showed that both medications were equally effective for the improvement of positive symptoms and insight; however olanzapine showed superior efficacy with respect to negative symptoms, along with lesser extrapyramidal side effects [41]. Our patient did not show any significant psychiatric improvement while on olanzapine. However, adherence to the medication could not be ascertained, as the patient was found repeatedly pretending to swallow her medications but, in actuality, was hiding the pills in her cheek or mouth.

Table 1: Case reports of combined foreign accent syndrome and schizophrenia.

4. Conclusion

Foreign Accent Syndrome (FAS) is still a rare and poorly understood condition, especially the psychogenic variety. While there is substantial literature discussing neurogenic FAS, research is still required to better understand the mechanisms of psychogenic FAS and the relationship between FAS and schizophrenia. Prosody with emphasis on intonation was the major FAS problem with our patient. We will follow up with the psychiatric long-term facility on the reversibility of the patient’s accent from British back to American in this admission.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests in the publication of this paper.

References

  1. H. S. Bhandari, “Transient foreign accent syndrome,” BMJ Case Reports, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. R. Reeves, R. S. Burke, and J. D. Parker, “Characteristics of psychotic patients with foreign accent syndrome,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. R. Reeves and J. W. Norton, “Foreign accent-like syndrome during psychotic exacerbations,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Poulin, J. Macoir, N. Paquet, M. Fossard, and L. Gagnon, “Psychogenic or neurogenic origin of agrammatism and foreign accent syndrome in a bipolar patient: a case report,” Annals of General Psychiatry, vol. 6, article 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Verhoeven and P. Mariën, “Neurogenic foreign accent syndrome: articulatory setting, segments and prosody in a Dutch speaker,” Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 599–614, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Verhoeven, G. De Pauw, M. Pettinato, A. Hirson, J. Van Borsel, and P. Mariën, “Accent attribution in speakers with foreign accent syndrome,” Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 156–168, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. E. Aronson, Clinical Voice Disorders: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Thieme Medical Publishers, 3rd edition, 1999.
  8. S. Muston, Unusual illnesses: curiouser and curiouser|Features|Lifestyle|The Independent UK, September 2010.
  9. J. Verhoeven, P. Mariën, S. Engelborghs, H. D'Haenen, and P. De Deyn, “A foreign speech accent in a case of conversion disorder,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 225–232, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. E. Blumstein and K. Kurowski, “The foreign accent syndrome: a perspective,” Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 346–355, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. J. Edwards, N. K. Patel, and I. K. Pople, “Foreign accent following brain injury: syndrome or epiphenomenon?” European Neurology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 87–91, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. K. Scott, F. Clegg, P. Rudge, and P. Burgess, “Foreign accent syndrome, speech rhythm and the functional neuronatomy of speech production,” Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 370–384, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. A. Coelho and M. P. Robb, “Acoustic analysis of foreign accent syndrome: an examination of three explanatory models,” Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 227–242, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. J. Abel, A. O. Hebb, and D. L. Silbergeld, “Cortical stimulation mapping in a patient with foreign accent syndrome: case report,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 97–101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Lippert-Gruener, U. Weinert, T. Greisbach, and C. Wedekind, “Foreign accent syndrome following traumatic brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 955–958, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. B. Chanson, S. Kremer, F. Blanc, C. Marescaux, I. J. Namer, and J. de Seze, “Foreign accent syndrome as a first sign of multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1123–1125, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Moonis, J. M. Swearer, S. E. Blumstein et al., “Foreign accent syndrome following a closed head injury: perfusion deficit on single photon emission tomography with normal MRI,” Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 272–279, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Samuel, A. Louis-Dreyfus, J. Couillet et al., “Dysprosody after severe closed head injury: an acoustic analysis,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 482–485, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. I. Bakker, S. Apeldoorn, and L. M. Metz, “Foreign accent syndrome in a patient with multiple sclerosis,” Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 271–272, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Villaverde-González, E. Fernández-Villalba, A. Moreno-Escribano, E. Alías-Linares, and J. M. García-Santos, “Foreign language syndrome as a first sign of multiple sclerosis,” Revista de Neurologia, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1035–1039, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Pietrosemoli and E. Mora, “Dysprosody in three patients with vascular cerebral damage,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 571–574, ISCA Archive, Aix-en-Provence, France, April 2002.
  22. V. Fromkin, “The state of brain/language research,” in Language, Communication and the Brain, Raven, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. D. Ross, “The aprosodias: functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 561–569, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. N. Jones, T. J. Story, T. A. Collins, D. DeJoy, and C. L. Edwards, “Multidisciplinary assessment and diagnosis of conversion disorder in a patient with foreign accent syndrome,” Behavioural Neurology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 245–255, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. L. Haley, H. L. Roth, N. Helm-Estabrooks, and A. Thiessen, “Foreign accent syndrome due to conversion disorder: phonetic analyses and clinical course,” Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28–43, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Van Borsel, L. Janssens, and P. Santens, “Foreign accent syndrome: an organic disorder?” Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 421–429, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Mariën, J. Verhoeven, P. Wackenier, S. Engelborghs, and P. P. DeDeyn, “Foreign accent syndrome as a developmental motor speech disorder,” Cortex, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 870–878, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. S. Rhys, C. Ulbrich, and M. Ordin, “Adaptation to aphasia: grammar, prosody and interaction,” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 46–71, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Kuschmann, A. Lowit, N. Miller, and I. Mennen, “Intonation in neurogenic foreign accent syndrome,” Journal of Communication Disorders, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. J. E. Peppé, “Why is prosody in speech-language pathology so difficult,” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 258–271, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. J. Hoyte, H. Brownell, and A. Wingfield, “Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults,” Experimental Aging Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 129–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. D. Garrett, C. Lee, C. McMillan et al., “Comprehension of emotional prosody in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 139, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  33. D. H. Christoph, G. R. De Freitas, D. P. Dos Santos, M. A. S. D. Lima, A. Q. C. Araújo, and A. Carota, “Different perceived foreign accents in one patient after prerolandic hematoma,” European Neurology, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 198–201, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Q. Yan and S. Vaseghi, “A comparative analysis of UK and US English accents in recognition and synthesis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), vol. 1, pp. I-413–I-416, IEEE, Orlando, Fla, USA, May 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Hong, A. Nenkova, M. E. March, A. P. Parker, R. Verma, and C. G. Kohler, “Lexical use in emotional autobiographical narratives of persons with schizophrenia and healthy controls,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 225, no. 1-2, pp. 40–49, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. L. C. Mitchell and T. J. Crow, “Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere?” Brain, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 963–978, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. L. C. Mitchell, R. Elliott, M. Barry, A. Cruttenden, and P. W. R. Woodruff, “The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1410–1421, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. E. Shapiro and M. Danly, “The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts,” Brain and Language, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Danly and B. Shapiro, “Speech prosody in Broca's aphasia,” Brain and Language, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–190, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. F. Dickerson, J. J. Boronow, C. Stallings, A. E. Origoni, S. K. Cole, and R. H. Yolken, “Cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: comparison of performance on the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. S. Shafti and M. Gilanipoor, “A comparative study between olanzapine and risperidone in the management of schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, vol. 2014, Article ID 307202, 5 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar