Case Reports in Radiology

Case Reports in Radiology / 2018 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 6921020 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6921020

Extraosseous Intradural Chondrosarcoma of the Cervical Spine: A Case Report with Brief Review of Literature

Academic Editor: Ruben Dammers
Received09 Oct 2017
Accepted30 Jan 2018
Published28 Feb 2018

Abstract

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a malignant cancer of the cartilage that accounts for less than 1% of all chondrosarcomas and typically occurs within the bone. One-third of all mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are extraosseous soft tissue sarcomas, rendering this as an uncommon entity. We report a rare case of an extraosseous chondrosarcoma with the cervical spinal canal in a 21-year-old male. The purpose of this case report is to discuss the imaging characteristics of this pathology proven diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Extraosseous mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is an aggressive, high-grade malignant tumor predominantly of the bone and also of the soft tissue that demonstrates a biphasic pattern of small cells with islands of atypical cartilage. It represents 1% or less of all chondrosarcomas, in which one-third are extraosseous [1]. Most cases of MCS originate in the head and neck region, followed by trunk and extremities. Craniofacial, spine, and ribs are most commonly affected [2]. MCS affects all ages, with a peak incidence in the second decade of life and a slight predilection for women. Overall survival rate is poor with a 10-year survival of less than 30% [3, 4].

Extramedullary, intradural location of MCS is exceedingly rare with a limited number of cases reported in the United States [57]. Herein, we report a case of extraosseous mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in a young male involving the cervical spinal canal.

2. Case Presentation

A 21-year-old white male presented to his primary care provider with a 3-month history of neck pain with stiffness, tingling, and paresthesias in his right arm at the C6–C8 dermatomal distribution. He also complained of loss of dexterity, loss of grip strength, and some gait instabilities. His exam was positive for Babinski’s sign on the right and some vision loss. An initial brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was normal. Contrast enhanced cervical spine MRI demonstrated an enhancing intradural extramedullary T1 isointense and T2 hypointense mass at the level of C2-C3, anterior to cervical spinal cord and resulting in severe spinal canal stenosis. There is mass effect with posterior displacement of the cord, cord compression, and cord edema (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

Subsequently, decompression with bilateral posterior cervical C2-C3 laminectomies and tumor resection was attempted by neurosurgery. However, full resection of the mass was not achieved after significant loss of motor signals was evoked. As a result, the patient only received posterior decompression at this level. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged with plan to attend occupational and physical rehabilitation. On pathology, gross section demonstrated fragments of tissue ranging from 0.1 to 0.4 cm. Microscopy revealed tightly packed small blue cells with greatly increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratios and some areas of cartilage. Pathology was sent to an outside institution for further evaluation. It was determined to show biphasic pattern with densely cellular regions of small anaplastic cells and other areas of chondroid differentiation, consistent with diagnosis of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (Figures 24).

The patient subsequently underwent definitive radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with an Ewing sarcoma protocol for a total of one year. Nonenhanced CT (NECT) of cervical spine was performed at an outside institution for radiotherapy planning (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Most current follow-up at two years demonstrates stable findings on MRI with no new abnormalities. The patient has persistent weakness in the left arm but denies any new neurologic symptoms.

3. Discussion

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a rare malignant tumor that is classified as chondrosarcoma due to its focal appearance of cartilage with alternating undifferentiated stroma. The first two examples of MCS were described by Lichtenstein and Bernstein in 1959 [8]. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma represents a rare subset of chondrosarcoma, only few of which are extraskeletal in nature [9]. Shapeero et al. reported that only 7 of 224 cases of MCS were extraosseous in origin [10]. It tends to grow rapidly, predominantly affects teens and young adults, and usually involves bone and somatic soft tissue [4].

Given the extraosseous presentation of our case, MCS was not initially suggested. Extraskeletal MCS is exceedingly rare, representing about 0.33% of all chondrosarcomas [2]. Chondrosarcomas generally occur in the pelvis, shoulder, or proximal femur and present in the 4th or 5th decade of life [11]. Despite the mesenchymal type often in the head and neck region, the rarity of the disease and unlikeliness to occur in the soft tissue resulted in its nonconsideration made for initial differential diagnosis. Initial preoperative imaging differential diagnoses instead included meningioma and schwannoma. Meningioma typically presents on MRI as well-defined, extra-axial dural-based mass that is isointense to hypointense to gray matter on T1 demonstrating avid, homogenous contrast enhancement after gadolinium administration, similar to the imaging findings in our case (Figures 6 and 7) [12]. Given the symptoms of sensory loss and weakness, a peripheral nerve tumor such as schwannoma was also considered [12]. Classic enhancement patterns on MRI have been described for extracranial schwannomas. Characteristically, schwannomas present with findings such as the target sign, fascicular appearance, and hypointense rim on T2-weighted images (Figure 8) [13, 14]. Furthermore, vestibular schwannomas may be differentiated from a cerebellopontine angle meningioma by the predilection of schwannomas to demonstrate microhemorrhages on T2-weighted imaging [15].

MRI is the preferred imaging modality for intraspinal tumors, but there is no pathognomonic description for extraosseous MCS. Chondrosarcomas share similar findings with chordomas, making the differential diagnosis challenging [16]. On imaging, extraosseous MCS can present as calcified area of low intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI images, whereas the noncalcified areas present as low and high intensity on T1-weighted (T1WIs) and T2-weighted images (T2WIs), respectively. Therefore, the two components typically show clear demarcation on T2WIs and can be used in differentiation. However, Bae et al. reported a case of intraspinal MCS with no evidence of calcification, which elucidates the variation and difficulty in diagnosis by imaging. They described findings of isointensity to the spinal cord on T1WIs and high intensity or isointensity on T2WIs [16]. An additional study of imaging in 10 extraskeletal MSC patients found that, on gadolinium-enhanced MRI, MCS is expected to show heterogeneous enhancement in both calcified and uncalcified areas, although sensitivity and specificity of this finding are unknown [17]. Harsh IV and Wilson reviewed 16 MCS in the primary central nervous system, of which 5 occurred indurally. These tumors typically occur at an extramedullary, extradural site, but majority occur with dural attachment making this case of extramedullary, intradural MCS even more rare [18].

4. Management

Due to the rarity of the disease, no universal management protocol has been established. Total resection with wide margins is typically suggested and surgery has shown to be essential for a positive outcome. Adjunctive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may be considered; however, little evidence for their utility has been demonstrated so far. Careful, long-term follow-up and monitoring should last at least 10 years due to the tendency toward recurrence and metastasis in >70% of cases [9, 18].

5. Conclusion

Our case demonstrated an unusual and rare extraskeletal location of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: extramedullary, intradural within the cervical spine. We suggest the importance of considering the diagnosis of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma when aforementioned diagnostic imaging features are witnessed.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. W. Nussbeck, D. Neureiter, S. Söder, C. Inwards, and T. Aigner, “Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: An immunohistochemical study of 10 cases examining prognostic significance of proliferative activity and cellular differentiation,” Pathology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 230–233, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Xu, M. Shao, H. Sun, and S. Li, “Primary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the kidney with synchronous implant and infiltrating urothelial carcinoma of the ureter,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 7, no. 1, article no. 125, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. G. Huvos, G. Rosen, M. Dabska, and R. C. Marcove, “Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. A clinicopathologic analysis of 35 patients with emphasis on treatment,” Cancer, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1230–1237, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Y. Nakashima, K. K. Unni, T. C. Shives, R. G. Swee, and D. C. Dahlin, “Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of bone and soft tissue. A review of 111 cases,” Cancer, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 2444–2453, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Borof, I. Kowalina, W. Wesołowski, W. Kloc, E. Iżycka-Świeszewska, and M. Derenda, “Primary spinal intradural mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with several local regrowths treated with osteoplastic laminotomies: a case report,” The Surgery Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  6. P. Rao, R. R. Colen, J. M. Bruner, and J. M. Meis, “Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma presenting as an intradural spinal mass: Report of a rare clinical presentation with an emphasis on differential diagnostic considerations,” Rare Tumors, vol. 6, no. 4, article no. 5586, pp. 150–153, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K.-F. Huang, W.-C. Tzaan, and C.-Y. Lin, “Primary intraspinal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: A case report and literature review,” Chang Gung Medical Journal, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 370–376, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. Lichtenstein and D. Bernstein, “Unusual benign and malignant chondroid tumors of bone. A survey of some mesenchymal cartilage tumors and malignant chondroblastic tumors, including a few multicentric ones, as well as many atypical benign chondroblastomas and chondromyxoid fibromas,” Cancer, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1142–1157, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. H. Salvador, J. W. Beabout, and D. C. Dahlin, “Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma—observations on 30 new cases,” Cancer, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 605–615, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. G. Shapeero, D. Vanel, D. Couanet, G. Contesso, and L. V. Ackerman, “Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma,” Radiology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 819–826, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. R. Wheeless, J. A. Nunley, and J. R. Urbaniak, “Chondrosarcoma,” in Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics, Duke University. Medical Center, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  12. I. R. Whittle, C. Smith, P. Navoo, and D. Collie, “Meningiomas,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9420, pp. 1535–1543, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. D. Murphey, W. S. Smith, S. E. Smith, M. J. Kransdorf, and H. T. Temple, “From the archives of the AFIP. Imaging of musculoskeletal neurogenic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation,” RadioGraphics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1253–1280, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Pilavaki, D. Chourmouzi, A. Kiziridou, A. Skordalaki, T. Zarampoukas, and A. Drevelengas, “Imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors with pathologic correlation: pictorial review,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 229–239, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Thamburaj, V. V. Radhakrishnan, B. Thomas, S. Nair, and G. Menon, “Intratumoral microhemorrhages on T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging helps differentiate vestibular schwannoma from meningioma,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 552–557, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G.-S. Bae, S.-W. Choi, J.-Y. Youm, and S.-H. Kim, “Primary spinal dumbbell-shaped mesenchymal chondrosarcoma located intradurally and extradurally,” Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 468–471, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. N. Hashimoto, T. Ueda, S. Joyama et al., “Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: An imaging review of ten new patients,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 785–792, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. R. Harsh IV and C. B. Wilson, “Central nervous system mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Case report,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 375–381, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Elizabeth Presutto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

766 Views | 307 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.