Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Surgery
Volume 2017, Article ID 6135251, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6135251
Case Report

Enterocutaneous Fistula Secondary to Stump Appendicitis

Tamworth Rural Referral Hospital, General Surgery Department, Dean Street, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to Nelson Agostinho; moc.liamg@ohnitsoga.s.p.n

Received 2 January 2017; Revised 15 February 2017; Accepted 20 March 2017; Published 3 April 2017

Academic Editor: Boris Kirshtein

Copyright © 2017 Nelson Agostinho et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Shamim, S. A. Haider, and S. A. Iqbal, “Persistent appendiceal faecal fistula following a complicated open appendicectomy,” Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 181–183, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Hyett, “Appendicocutaneous fistula: a hazard of incomplete appendicectomy,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 144–145, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Mohamed, “Faecal fistula, the most unfortunate sequelae of appendectomy. Case report,” The Internet Journal of Surgery, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Koak, T. A. Jeddy, and A. E. B. Giddings, “Appendico-cutaneous fistula,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 639–640, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. R. Evenson and J. E. Fischer, “Current management of enterocutaneous fistula,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 455–464, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. J. Finlay and G. M. Doherty, “Acute abdominal pain and appendicitis,” in Washington Manual of Surgery. Washington University School of Medicine, p. 265, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. F. Baldwin, “The prevention of faecal fistula after appendectomy. Simple ligation vs. precarious purse-string,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 704–714, 1932. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. A. K. Watters, M. A. Walker, and B. C. Abernethy, “The appendix stump: should it be invaginated?” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 92–93, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. I. Lavonius, S. Liesjärvi, R. O. Niskanen, S. K. K. Ristkari, O. Korkala, and R. E. M. Mokka, “Simple ligation vs stump inversion in appendicectomy,” Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 222–224, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. B. Deaver, “Appendiceal fecal fistula,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 56–57, 1924. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar