Case Reports in Surgery

Case Reports in Surgery / 2018 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2494069 |

Kyle Szymanski, Estrellita Ontiveros, James S. Burdick, Daniel Davis, Steven G. Leeds, "Endolumenal Vacuum Therapy and Fistulojejunostomy in the Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple Line Leaks", Case Reports in Surgery, vol. 2018, Article ID 2494069, 3 pages, 2018.

Endolumenal Vacuum Therapy and Fistulojejunostomy in the Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple Line Leaks

Academic Editor: Gabriel Sandblom
Received22 Dec 2017
Revised31 Jan 2018
Accepted11 Feb 2018
Published04 Mar 2018


Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric surgery performed for morbid obesity. Leaks of the vertical staple line can occur in up to 7% of cases and are difficult to manage. Endolumenal vacuum (EVAC) therapy and fistulojejunostomy (FJ) have separate documented uses to heal these complicated leaks. We aim to show the benefit of using EVAC with FJ in the treatment of LSG staple line leaks. The patient presented with an LSG chronic leak. EVAC therapy was initiated but failed to close the fistula after 101 days. EVAC therapy was abandoned, and FJ was performed to resolve the leak. Postoperatively, no leak was encountered requiring any additional procedures. Based on our findings, we conclude that EVAC therapy facilitates in resolving leaks that restore gastrointestinal continuity and maintain source control. It promotes healing and causes reperfusion of ischemic tissue and fistula cavity debridement.

1. Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is used in the treatment of morbid obesity due to its perceived surgical simplicity and excellent outcomes [1]. A feared complication is a leak along the surgical staple line. These leaks have been reported in up to 7% of cases [2, 3]. Some current surgical interventions have been used to treat these leaks including Roux-en-Y fistulojejunostomy (FJ) [2, 3]. Our group has used endolumenal vacuum (EVAC) therapy to successfully heal leaks from sleeve gastrectomies [4]. We plan to discuss a case where FJ was used to treat a sleeve gastrectomy leak in conjunction with EVAC.

2. Case Presentation

We received Institutional Review Board approval for one patient that had a prolonged EVAC course for a chronic staple line fistula from SG, and EVAC was abandoned for surgical intervention with FJ. The EVAC therapy procedure used is described in depth in our previous publication [4]. In short, a nasogastric tube is used to deliver the negative pressure through the endosponge.

A 33-year-old female underwent an adjustable gastric band resulting in erosion, and three months later, she underwent SG. No endoscopic evaluation was done prior to proceeding with SG. She had a staple line leak (Figure 1(a)) on postoperative day 5 with associated septic shock. Laparotomy was performed for washout, omental patch, and a feeding jejunostomy tube. A stent was attempted, but migration resulted in stent removal, and EVAC therapy was initiated. The time from leak diagnosis to EVAC initiation was 84 days. Serial esophagogastroduodenoscopies with Endo-SPONGE removal failed to show resolution of the leak (Figure 1(b)). Laparoscopic FJ was performed 101 days following the initiation of EVAC (Figure 1(c)). She was discharged home 23 days after her surgery on a soft diet.

3. Discussion

The case presented here is an introduction to EVAC therapy and its effects on contaminated tissue during a gastrointestinal leak following bariatric surgery. The patient that underwent EVAC therapy for 101 days and was taken for FJ after being considered an EVAC failure revealed some interesting characteristics about EVAC therapy. Following that procedure, the patient had an upper gastrointestinal exam that demonstrated no leak and was started on a diet. We are proposing that the use of EVAC therapy can be used in conjunction with FJ creation and facilitate healing.

We are projecting that the chronic nature of the fistula [1] in this patient would have had a poorer outcome if EVAC was not used. We compare this to our experience using FJ without EVAC therapy. We have had similar patients that have undergone FJ without EVAC and had a postoperative leak requiring further intervention with a stent to resolve the leak.

A chronic leak of greater than 90 days will undoubtedly have a lining to the fistula tract and cavity, making it difficult to resolve with endoscopic stent placement alone and needing some surgical intervention. In a separate study, we have shown that EVAC therapy alone can heal fistulas in our own case series of nine patients [4], but with a prolonged hospital course of mean time of healing being 50 days. If EVAC and FJ are used together, as described here, we can likely avoid prolonged healing times and hospital stays. EVAC therapy can debride the fistula cavity and tract and prepare the tissue for definitive surgical therapy with FJ, while maintaining source control. We are proposing that using these two techniques together in a chronic fistula, existing greater than 90 days, can assist in healing, disposition, and return to a diet faster than when EVAC is used alone.

There are five published reports describing FJ usage in 48 patients (Table 1) [2, 59]. The largest series by Chouillard et al. showed 27 patients with complete resolution of the chronic fistula; 3 patients were lost to follow-up. Vilallonga et al. showed 18 patients with chronic fistulas and a mean time of total hospital length of stay at 18.4 days [8]. The other three publications had one patient in each report, all demonstrating the feasibility and usage of FJ. Duration of healing of the fistula after FJ is reported only in the Vilallonga et al. series with a mean duration of healing after FJ at 13.5 days and a standard deviation of 10.3 days [8].

NTime to FJOpen versus Lap FJResolution with FJHospital LOSDays to resolution after FJFail endotherapy

Baltasar et al. [7]17 weeksOpenYesNRNRYes
Zachariah et al. [6]120 daysNRNRNRNRNR
Safadi et al. [5]1NRNRYesNRNRYes
Vilallonga et al. [8]18NRNRYes18.4 days13.5 daysYes
Chouillard et al. [2]27NR27 Lap versus 3 openYesNRNRYes
P11190 daysLapYes161 days23 daysYes
P21509 daysLapNo34 days74 daysYes

Interval report of midterm results for the cohort. Three patients lost to follow-up following their surgery; Lap FJ, laparoscopic fistulojejunostomy; LOS, length of stay; NR, not reported.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.


  1. R. J. Rosenthal, A. A. Diaz, D. Arvidsson, R. S. Baker, and N. Basso, “International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. Chouillard, E. Chahine, N. Schoucair et al., “Roux-En-Y fistulo-jejunostomy as a salvage procedure in patients with post-sleeve gastrectomy fistula,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1954–1960, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. R. Smallwood, J. W. Fleshman, S. G. Leeds, and J. S. Burdick, “The use of endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy in the management of upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2473–2480, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. G. Leeds and J. S. Burdick, “Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Disease, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1278–1285, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Y. Safadi, G. Shamseddine, E. Elias, and R. S. Alami, “Definitive surgical management of staple line leak after sleeve gastrectomy,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1037–1043, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. J. Zachariah, W. J. Lee, K. H. Ser, J. C. Chen, and J. J. Tsou, “Laparo-endoscopic gastrostomy (LEG) decompression: a novel one-time method of management of gastric leaks following sleeve gastrectomy,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2213–2218, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Baltasar, R. Bou, M. Bengochea, C. Serra, and L. Cipagauta, “Use of a Roux limb to correct esophagogastric junction fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1408–1410, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Vilallonga, J. Himpens, and S. van de Vrande, “Laparoscopic Roux limb placement for the management of chronic proximal fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy: technical aspects,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 414–416, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Elie, Y. Antoine, A. Mubarak et al., “Roux-en-Y fistulo-jejunostomy as a salvage procedure in patients with post-sleeve gastrectomy fistula: mid-term results,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 4200–4204, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Kyle Szymanski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles