Case Reports in Surgery

Case Reports in Surgery / 2020 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8732781 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8732781

Yousef S. Abuzneid, Sadi A. Abukhalaf, Duha Rabi, Abdelrahman Rabee, Safwan Mashhour, Radwan Abukarsh, "Sutureless Approach for Gastroschisis Patients in Palestine", Case Reports in Surgery, vol. 2020, Article ID 8732781, 4 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8732781

Sutureless Approach for Gastroschisis Patients in Palestine

Academic Editor: Tahsin Colak
Received29 Jan 2020
Revised30 Jul 2020
Accepted12 Aug 2020
Published24 Aug 2020

Abstract

Gastroschisis is a ventral abdominal wall congenital defect with bowel herniation outside the abdominal cavity. Gastroschisis traditional management is the primary operative closure surgery (POCS), but the sutureless silo approach (SSA), a novel alternative, gains wide acceptance in the developed countries and across nations. This study describes the first-ever gastroschisis patient managed with the sutureless silo approach in Palestine. In addition, we shall use this case as the very first nucleus for the upcoming gastroschisis management in our referral hospital because the SSA yields a reduced hospital stay which is fundamental to our institution due to the limited number of beds and lower management costs to the hospital and families.

1. Introduction

Gastroschisis describes a birth defect of bowel evisceration outside the abdomen through a right-sided periumbilical abdominal wall defect [1]. The condition affects about 2 to 4 per 10,000 live births with male predominance, and its rate appears to be increasing [2]. Management typically involves fascia and skin closure. The conventional primary operative closure surgery (POCS) is performed immediately after birth by closure of the defect with sutures due to the provided evidence of the favorable outcomes [3].

In case of large defects with a small abdominal cavity or increased abdominal hypertension, the exposed organs may be contained with an artificial pouch or silo and slowly get moved back into the abdominal cavity followed by a sutured closure—delayed primary surgery or staged silo closure [4, 5]. However, these approaches have the disadvantages of requiring prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation, narcotic analgesic use, ileus formation, prolonged hospital stay, and subsequently significant financial burden on both hospitals and families [6, 7].

In 2004, Sandler et al. proposed a novel gastroschisis management alternative—the sutureless silo approach (SSA). SSA involves covering the abdominal wall defect with the umbilical cord or a silo to allow sutureless closure with the secondary intention [8]. SSA is also known as the plastic closure and the nonoperative management of gastroschisis. Given that SSA is safe and comparable to the POCS and has potential advantages of better esthetic results, the procedure being transferred from the operative room (OR) to the bedside, and lower costs, SSA has gained wide acceptance in the developed countries and across nations [4, 6, 7, 911]. Undoubtedly, the preferred method for the management of gastroschisis has changed fundamentally over time [7]. However, SSA was never performed in Palestine despite its safety and simplicity and the availability of the inexpensive materials. Herein, we report our first-ever case managed with staged abdominal closure using a modified SSA.

2. Case Presentation

A currently 18-month-old boy, a product of a full-term vaginal delivery following an uneventful pregnancy with a birth weight of 3000 g, was referred to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) due to a ventral abdominal wall defect in the periumbilical region—gastroschisis (Figure 1) at the age of one day. The neonate had an immediate orogastric tube placed and was given intravenous fluid (IVF) expansion with subsequent IVF with antibiotics. Gauzes soaked with warm normal saline were applied around the bowel.

The neonate was transferred to the OR for POCS under general anesthesia. The stomach, transverse and descending colon, and terminal ileum were all outside of the abdominal cavity and dilated without membranous covering. Bowels were warmed using gauzes soaked with warm normal saline with a trial of reduction and primary closure. PCOS failed because the abdominal cavity was too small and the bowels were too swelled. The alternative management was to put the bowels into a silo bag filled with saline and suture the bag to the fascial edges for future repair. Since we did not have the standard silo bag, we used an IV normal saline bag to make a silo.

The neonate was connected to mechanical ventilation (MV) and kept nill per os (NPO) postoperatively. An echocardiogram showed a patent foramen ovale, mitral regurgitation, and an evidence of increased pulmonary pressure. Due to the congenital cardiac issues, the infant remained in the NICU for three months. During this time and on subsequent stages, we moved the bowels slowly inside the abdominal cavity and put clamps onto the silo bag to keep bowels in place (Figures 2 and 3).

Once the bowels were inside, we chose not to close the defect by the delayed primary closure with sutures due to the ongoing cardiac issues. We left the defect opened and covered it with nonadherent dressings for further closure by secondary intention. For the very first time, we saw that the normal skin was adhering to the granulation tissue forming a protective new layer. Therefore, we did not close the defect with sutures. The results of this technique were better than we expected. It made a more cosmetic appearance with a minimally visible scar (Figure 4). When we searched the literature, we discovered this sutureless technique and learned that it is gaining wide acceptance across nations.

After 3 months managing the coexisted congenital cardiac disease, the infant was able to be disconnected from the MV and reached full feeding capacity. The infant did very well and was discharged home. At routine follow-ups, the infant was gaining weight and doing well. At the age of 18 months, a follow-up showed a normal-appearing child with appropriate length and weight, although with a speech delay. There were no abdominal hernias (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

The exact gastroschisis pathogenesis is currently unknown. Several theories have been postulated such as failure of the mesoderm to form the body wall, rupture of the amnion around the umbilical ring, abnormal involution of the right umbilical vein and disruption of the right vitelline artery or yolk sac artery, abnormal body wall folding, gene polymorphisms, and maternal immune response to new paternal antigens [1]. Gastroschisis potential risk factors include young maternal age, cigarette smoking, aspirin use, use of vasoconstrictive and recreational drugs, and maternal genitourinary infections [12]. Gastroschisis incidence rates increased from 0.06–0.8 per 10,000 to 4.5–5.13 per 10,000 in the previous few decades [13].

Gastroschisis is usually detected prenatally on ultrasound by visualizing a paraumbilical abdominal wall defect lacking membranous covering. Otherwise, the diagnosis is made at birth [14].

The immediate management of gastroschisis starts with broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluids to compensate for the large amount of the insensible losses due to the exposed bowels. The bowels should be wrapped with sterile saline dressings covered with a plastic wrap to minimize fluid losses and to preserve body heat. In addition, respiratory support should be provided if needed.

Although many techniques were described for gastroschisis abdominal wall defect repair, all approaches are aimed at getting the bowel back to the abdominal cavity and repairing the fascia and skin. In 1943, Watkins reported the first successful surgical repair: the primary operative closure (POCS) [15]. In 1967, the first staged reduction of the viscera was reported using the Teflon sheets as a silo [16].

PCOS and delayed primary surgery or staged silo closure have remained the mainstay management of gastroschisis. However, these approaches have disadvantages of requiring prolonged intubation and MV, narcotic analgesic use, ileus formation, prolonged hospital stay, and subsequently significant financial burden on both hospitals and families [6, 7].

Therefore, in 2004, a novel management approach known as the sutureless silo approach (SSA) was described [8]. SSA has some reported advantages over the traditional surgery of gastroschisis management. SSA is reported to be safe and comparable to the POCS [4, 6].

SSA provides excellent esthetic results with minimal scar formation [17]. SSA transfers the procedure from the OR to the bedside, thus lowering the financial burden on both hospitals and families [6, 7]. Therefore, it gained a wide acceptance in developed countries and across nations [4, 911]. The umbilical cord closure type of SSA without endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia is found to be more successful in smaller, more premature neonates [18]. A study reported that SSA was associated with reduced time needed for extubation, which probably was due to the minimal effect of the sutureless approach on intraabdominal pressure, and the reduced need for narcotics and sedatives. The decreased time needed to extubate gastroschisis patients lowers mechanical ventilation complications [19]. However, a randomized controlled trial showed that SSA is not associated with a significant difference in the length of intubation compared to POCS [6].

Despite the abovementioned advantages of SSA, its safety and simplicity, and the availability of inexpensive materials, SSA was never performed in Palestine. We have managed our first SSA-like case without any knowledge of the presence of such reported and described gastroschisis management approach in the literature. Expectedly, the technique we have used was not identical to the reported technique in the literature. We believe that it is very promising to adopt the SSA in our institution since SSA evidences many advantages and provides reduced hospital stay which is fundamental to our institution due to the limited number of beds and lower management costs to both hospital and families.

A few SSA drawbacks and disadvantages were reported. A study reported an increased incidence of umbilical hernia development in patients with SSA [4]. A randomized controlled trial showed that SSA is associated with a significant increase in time to full feeds and time to discharge [6]; this study may explain why our patient took a long time to reach his full feeds and time to discharge.

4. Conclusion

The preferred method for the management of gastroschisis has changed fundamentally over time. The sutureless silo approach (SSA) is a novel approach for gastroschisis management. SSA has advantages over the traditional management options of excellent esthetic results, the procedure being transferred from the OR to the bedside, and the low financial burden on both the hospitals and families. SSA can gain acceptance in the developing countries as it has in developed ones.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

The study design was conceived by Dr. Abukarsh, Dr. Abuzneid, and Dr. Abukhalaf. Data collection was performed by Dr. Abuzneid and Dr. Rabee. Data interpretation was conducted by Dr. Rabi, Dr. Mashhour, and Dr. Abukarsh. The manuscript was prepared by Dr. Abuzneid, Dr. Abukhalaf, and Dr. Mashhour. The literature search was carried out by Dr. Rabee and Dr. Rabi. Yousef S. Abuzneid and Sadi A. Abukhalaf have contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very thankful and grateful to Madi Williamson for her kind help in editing the manuscript. In addition, we thank the patient and his family.

References

  1. R. V. O'Connell, S. K. Dotters-Katz, J. A. Kuller, and R. A. Strauss, “Gastroschisis: a review of management and outcomes,” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 537–544, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. K. Minkes, “Abdominal wall defects,” Principles and Practice of Pediatric Surgery, pp. 1103–1119, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  3. B. S. R. Allin, W. H. W. Tse, S. Marven, P. R. V. Johnson, and M. Knight, “Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 1, article e0116908, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Bonnard, M. Zamakhshary, N. de Silva, and J. T. Gerstle, “Non-operative management of gastroschisis: a case-matched study,” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 767–771, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. W. Davies, R. M. Kimble, and P. G. Woodgate, “Ward reduction without general anaesthesia versus reduction and repair under general anaesthesia for gastroschisis in newborn infants,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Bruzoni, J. D. Jaramillo, J. L. Dunlap et al., “Sutureless vs sutured gastroschisis closure: a prospective randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 1091–1096.e1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. X. Wu, S. L. Lee, and D. A. DeUgarte, “Cost modeling for management strategies of uncomplicated gastroschisis,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 136–141, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Sandler, J. Lawrence, J. Meehan, L. Phearman, and R. Soper, “A “plastic” sutureless abdominal wall closure in gastroschisis,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 738–741, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Allotey, M. Davenport, I. Njere et al., “Benefit of preformed silos in the management of gastroschisis,” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1065–1069, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. L. Weinsheimer, N. L. Yanchar, S. B. Bouchard et al., “Gastroschisis closure—does method really matter?” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 874–878, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. Chiengkriwate, S. Sangkhathat, S. Patrapinyokul et al., “Sutureless elastic ring silo for the gastroschisis,” Asian Biomedicine, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 747–755, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Mastroiacovo, “Risk factors for gastroschisis,” BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7658, pp. 1386-1387, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Melov, I. Tsang, R. Cohen et al., “Complexity of gastroschisis predicts outcome: epidemiology and experience in an Australian tertiary centre,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 222, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. B. Giulian and D. T. Alvear, “Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal gastroschisis,” Radiology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 473–475, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. D. E. Watkins, “Gastroschisis,” Virginia Medical, vol. 70, pp. 42–45, 1943. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. R. Schuster, “A new method for the staged repair of large omphaloceles,” Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 837–850, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Zajac, B. Bogusz, P. Soltysiak et al., “Cosmetic outcomes of sutureless closure in gastroschisis,” European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 537–541, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. G. E. Pet, R. A. Stark, J. J. Meehan, and P. J. Javid, “Outcomes of bedside sutureless umbilical closure without endotracheal intubation for gastroschisis repair in surgical infants,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 213, no. 5, pp. 958–962, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Riboh, C. T. Abrajano, K. Garber et al., “Outcomes of sutureless gastroschisis closure,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1947–1951, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Yousef S. Abuzneid et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views831
Downloads304
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.