Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine

Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine / 2014 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 768242 |

B. Sudhakara Reddy, K. Nalini Kumari, S. Sivajothi, R. Venkatasivakumar, "Dermatitis due to Mixed Demodex and Sarcoptes Mites in Dogs", Case Reports in Veterinary Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 768242, 4 pages, 2014.

Dermatitis due to Mixed Demodex and Sarcoptes Mites in Dogs

Academic Editor: Franco Mutinelli
Received15 May 2014
Revised03 Jul 2014
Accepted04 Jul 2014
Published14 Jul 2014


In dogs, dermatitis due to mixed mite infestation is rare. During the five-year period of study, two dogs were identified suffering from dermatitis due to mixed Demodex and Sarcoptes mites. Upon clinical examination dogs had primary and secondary skin lesions on face, around the ears, chin, neck, fore limbs and lateral abdomen. Microscopic examination of skin scrapings revealed Demodex and Sarcoptes mites. Both dogs were treated with daily oral ivermectin at 100 to 400 μg/kg body weight as incremental doses, external application of amitraz and supportive treatments with topical antimicrobial shampoo. After completion of forty-two days of therapy, dogs were recovered from the dermatitis.

1. Introduction

Canine demodicosis is a dermatologic disease that occurs when mites colonize the hair follicles and sebaceous glands [1]. Demodex canis was the main causative agent of canine demodicosis and it is characterized by the presence of large numbers of Demodex mites. The three recognized canine Demodex mites are Demodex canis, Demodex injai, and Demodex cornei [24]. Scabies is a transmissible and zoonotic ectoparasitic skin infection caused by tiny mites of the species Sarcoptes scabiei. It is transmitted readily among the animals, often even throughout an entire household, by skin to skin contact. The parasite commonly affects young dogs and dogs with poor nutrition but can affect healthy dogs that are exposed to the mites [5]. Literatures related to the individual types of mange mites in different animals were available from the last decade. There are no reports about the mixed infection of Demodex and Sarcoptes in dogs. This paper reports the rare occurrence of mixed demodectic and sarcoptic mange in dogs and their therapy.

2. Materials and Methods

Present case reports were recorded at College Hospital of College of Veterinary Science, Tirupati and Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Proddatur during the five-years period from January 2009 to January 2014 of clinical study on dermatological cases. Dogs with dermatological problems were regularly screened for the ectoparasites and underlying factors for development of dermatological illness at major Veterinary Hospitals in four different districts of Andhra Pradesh. Superficial and deep skin scrapings, tape impression smears and hair plucks were collected from the affected dogs for laboratory examination. Scrapings were collected with scalpel blade dipped in liquid paraffin and collection of scrapings was continued until there was slight ooze of blood from dermal capillaries. Material was suspended in a few drops of liquid paraffin on a microscopic slide, a coverslip was applied and the preparation was examined under low and high magnifications (10X, 40X) of microscope. The acetate tape impression smears were used to investigate superficial mites [6]. Out of 1200 dogs examined with dermatological problems during the study two dogs were found to be affected with mixed demodectic and sarcoptic mange mites. From the two dogs blood was collected in 10% EDTA coated vials. Blood was processed for packed cell volume (PCV), haemoglobin (Hb), total leucocyte count (TLC), total erythrocyte count (TEC) and stained peripheral blood smears were for differential count (DLC) to know about the haematological abnormalities and to screen for any other infections.

Case1. A three-month-old German Shepherd dog was presented with a history of skin lesions associated with pruritus from one month. Upon clinical examination, dog exhibited papules, pustules, erythema, alopecia, erosions on the face, around the eyes, ears, chin and neck regions (Figure 1).

Case2. A three-year-old mongrel (local breed) dog was brought with a history of skin lesions associated with pruritus from one week onwards. Dog was recently kept at dog care center for about two weeks. Mild lesions were detected on the ears, face, nasolabial area, chin, neck, flank, abdominal skin, elbow and legs. Upon clinical examination, dog exhibited papules, pustules, erythema, alopecia, hyperpigmentation, erosions, lichenification and cellulitis. Distribution of lesions was observed on face, around the ears and overall the body (Figure 2).

3. Results and Discussion

Skin scrapings collected from the two dogs revealed different stages of Demodex mites along with Sarcoptes mites (Figures 3 and 4). Hair pluck examination revealed 3 to 6 number of Demodex mites around the hair follicle. Based on the history, lesions and laboratory findings, the present condition was diagnosed as generalized dermatitis due to two different types of mites. Both the dogs were treated with oral ivermectin at 100 to 400 μg/kg body weight as incremental doses and they were kept on observation for any adverse symptoms [7]. Treatment was continued till two consequent negative skin scrapings were obtained at an interval of two weeks. External application was advised with amitraz (2 mL in 1 liter of water) twice a week as topical application followed by bath with benzyl peroxide shampoo up to the recovery period.

Both the dogs were subjected to scoring for relevant clinical signs of demodectic and sarcoptic mange (papules, pustules, erythema, pruritus, alopecia, hyperpigmentation and crusting). Clinical dermatological assessments (severity of the lesions and recovery degree) were made on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 after therapy. Parasitological examination was conducted to test the response to the therapy. The data were recorded on the presence or absence of live mites. Efficacy of therapy was assessed based on the reversal of symptoms and parasitological examination. Response to therapy was graded as excellent, good, fair, and poor by assessing the clinical symptoms and lesions [8].

Complete clinical response was recorded in Table 1. One week after therapy, scales had disappeared and dogs had mild pruritus. Two weeks after treatment, the number of mites gradually decreased and the dogs were free from pruritus, erythema, erosions, and ulcers. One month after treatment, the general skin condition was improved; absence of pruritus was noticed and number of mites was also decreased. Complete disappearance of mites and regrowth of hair were noticed after forty two days of therapy. Haematological abnormalities included reduced total erythrocyte count (/cumm), haemoglobin concentration (%), leukocytosis (/cumm), neutrophilia (/cumm), and eosinophilia (/cumm). Haematological abnormalities recorded in this study were in agreement with the previous studies on dogs with different types of mange [9, 10]. The anaemia due to loss of skin proteins and leukocytosis might be due to allergic reaction caused by mites or their products of inflammatory reactions [11].

Posttreatment evaluation daysCase 1Case 2
Demodex Sarcoptes Clinical responseDemodex Sarcoptes Clinical response
Live Dead Live Dead Live Dead Live Dead

0th day+++Nil+++Nil++++Nil++Nil
7th day++++++F++++++F
14th day+++Nil+F++++++++F
21st day++++NilNilG+++NilNilF
28th dayNil+NilNilENil+NilNilG
42nd dayNilNilNilNilENil NilNil NilE

Clinical response:
E: excellent, complete remission of clinical signs of dermatitis and point of recovery,
G: good, most primary lesions have resolved but mild secondary lesions such as erythema, crusts, and scales are still evident,
F: fair, some response to treatment but primary and secondary lesions are still evident.

In previous studies sarcoptic mange, mange due to two types of demodicosis, was reported in individual dogs [5, 12, 13]. Different types of mange mites were treated with oral ivermectin at different dose rates in dogs and cats [7, 11]. According to the authors’ knowledge this is the first attempt to report and treat the mixed infection in dogs. Life cycle of Sarcoptes scabiei presumes that development from egg to adult may require 9–13 days and maturation of the egg takes 3-4 days, following which the larva hatches from the egg [14]. It is also known that survival on the host is up to 10 days or lesser. Avermectin compounds have no ovicidal activity on the eggs of mites and repetition of the treatment was advised to dogs with sarcoptic mange to prevent recurrence of this condition [15]. Therapy continued till two consequent negative skin scrapings and showed the ability to kill adult mites, besides killing any larvae hatching from eggs, as well as to prevent reinfection of mites of the host. To control recurrence of infection, once a week house premises were also sprayed with amitraz (4 mL in 1 liter of water).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. D. W. Scott, W. M. Miller, and C. E. Griffin, “Chapter 6. Parasitic skin disease,” in Muller and Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology, C. di Berardino, Ed., pp. 423–516, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 6th edition, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. E. Desch and A. Hillier, “Demodex injai: a new species of hair follicle mite (Acari: Demodecidae) from the domestic dog (Canidae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 146–149, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. S. Reddy, K. N. Kumari, V. C. Rayulu, and S. Sivajothi, “Demodex cornei causing demodicosis in dogs,” Indian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 100–102, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. Sivajothi, B. S. Reddy, K. N. Kumari, and V. C. Rayulu, “Morphometry of demodex canis and demodex cornei in dogs with demodicosis in India,” International Journal of Veterinary Health Science & Research, vol. 1, article 301, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  5. B. S. Reddy and K. N. Kumari, “Canine scabies—its therapeutic management and zoonotic importance,” Intas Polivet, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 292–294, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  6. W. Rosenkrantz, “Cutaneous cytology—A quick review of an indispensable test,” Veterinary Medicine Supplement, pp. 20–21, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  7. B. S. Reddy and K. N. Kumari, “Demodicosis and its successful management in dogs,” Indian Journal of Field Veterinarians, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 48–50, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Reddy, K. N. Kumari, V. V. Rao, and V. C. Rayulu, “Efficacy of cefpodoxime with clavulanic acid in the treatment of recurrent pyoderma in dogs,” ISRN Veterinary Science, vol. 2014, Article ID 467010, 5 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. S. Reddy, K. N. Kumari, and S. Sivajothi, “Haemato-biochemical findings and thyroxin levels in canine demodicosis,” Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. S. Reddy, K. N. Kumari, and S. Sivajothi, “Thyroxin levels and haematological changes in dogs with sarcoptic mange,” Journal of Advances in Parasitology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 27–29, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. S. Reddy and S. Sivajothi, “Notoedric mange associated with Malassezia in Cats,” International Journal of Veterinary Health Science & Research, vol. 2, p. 101, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Sivajothi, B. S. Reddy, and V. C. Rayulu, “Management of Sarcoptic mange in rabbits,” International Research Journal of Life Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Sivajothi, B. S. Reddy, and V. C. Rayulu, “Demodicosis caused by Demodex canis and Demodex cornei in dogs,” Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Wall and D. Shearer, Veterinary Ectoparasites: Biology, Pathology and Control, Blackwells Science, Oxford, UK, 2nd edition, 2001.
  15. B. Pan, M. Wang, F. Xu, Y. Wang, Y. Dong, and Z. Pan, “Efficacy of an injectable formulation of eprinomectin against Psoroptes cuniculi, the ear mange mite in rabbits,” Veterinary Parasitology, vol. 137, no. 3-4, pp. 386–390, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 B. Sudhakara Reddy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles