Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Respiratory Journal
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 157-162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/104834
Review

Transition from Intravenous Epoprostenol to Oral or Subcutaneous Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Retrospective Case Series and Systematic Literature Review

Kirily Park, David Ostrow, Robert D Levy, and John Swiston

The Lung Centre, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Copyright © 2011 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous epoprostenol, a prostaglandin analogue, has been a mainstay of therapy for patients with advanced pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) since the early 1990s. This medication has multiple side effects, and sudden discontinuation is potentially associated with severe sequelae. Several recent case series have described the transition from intravenous to newer oral or subcutaneous therapies. A case series detailing the authors’ experience with such transitions, and a systematic lierature review is presented.

METHODS: All consecutive PAH patients seen at the Vancouver Pulmonary Hypertension Clinic (Vancouver, British Columbia) between June 1995 and July 2009 were reviewed for cases in which weaning or transition from intravenous epoprostenol was attempted. The Cochrane Collaboration, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Journals@Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Papers First were searched using predefined key words for publications describing transition of PAH patients from parenteral prostanoids to oral or subcutaneous agents.

RESULTS: Of the six patients who attempted, all transitioned successfully to oral or subcutaneous agents, having been on intravenous epoprostenol for a mean of 3.8 years (range 1.8 to 9.75 years). Five are living, surviving a mean of 5.5 years after transition. The literature search yielded nine studies and, of 127 patients described, 82 transitioned successfully. The length of pretransition prostanoid treatment (range 1.7 to 7.6 years) and the post-transition follow-up period (range two months to 70 months) were shorter than for patients described in the present study.

CONCLUSIONS: Given the rarity of PAH, the absolute numbers of patients transitioned from intravenous epoprostenol are still low. With the advent of new therapies, these numbers will hopefully increase; continued study is necessary to identify factors that are predictive of success.