Research Article

EGFR Mutation Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Using an Improved PNA-LNA PCR Clamp Method

Table 1

Patients’ characteristics.

EGFR mutant (biopsy sample)EGFR mutant (biopsy sample)Wild-type EGFR (biopsy sample)
Plasma EGFR mut+Plasma EGFR mut−

Total, 241956
Age
 Median (range)67 (46–87)67 (46–87)68 (55–84)70 (64–79)
Gender
 Female16 (66.7)11 (57.9)5 (100)1 (16.7)
 Male8 (33.3)8 (42.1)0 (0.0)5 (83.3)
Smoking status
 Never18 (75%)14 (73.7)4 (80.0)2 (33.3)
 Former3 (12.5)2 (10.5)1 (20.0)1 (16.7)
 Current3 (12.5)3 (15.8)0 (0.0)3 (50.0)
ECOG PS
 08 (33.3)5 (26.3)3 (60.0)1 (16.7)
 114 (58.3)12 (63.2)2 (40.0)5 (83.3)
 22 (8.3)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Stage
 IIA0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (16.7)
 IIIA2 (8.3)1 (5.3)1 (20.0)1 (16.7)
 IV22 (91.7)18 (94.7)4 (80.0)4 (66.7)
  IV-M1a8 (36.4)4 (22.2)4 (100)1 (16.7)
  IV-M1b14 (63.6)14 (77.8)0 (0.0)3 (50.0)
Tumor EGFR mutation status
 Wild type0006 (100)
 del1915 (62.5)12 (63.2)3 (60.0)0
 L858R8 (33.3)7 (36.8)1 (20.0)0
 L861Q1 (4.2)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)0