Canadian Respiratory Journal

Canadian Respiratory Journal / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2397429 |

T. J. Marrie, G. J. Tyrrell, Sumit R. Majumdar, Dean T. Eurich, "Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: Still Lots to Learn and a Need for Standardized Data Collection Instruments", Canadian Respiratory Journal, vol. 2017, Article ID 2397429, 9 pages, 2017.

Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: Still Lots to Learn and a Need for Standardized Data Collection Instruments

Academic Editor: R. Andrew Mcivor
Received06 Jan 2017
Revised23 Feb 2017
Accepted05 Mar 2017
Published23 Mar 2017


Background. Large studies of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) are frequently lacking detailed clinical information. Methods. A population-based 15-year study of IPD in Northern Alberta. Results. 2435 patients with a mean age of 54.2 years formed the study group. Males outnumbered females and Aboriginal and homeless persons were overrepresented. High rates of smoking, excessive alcohol use, and illicit drug use were seen. Almost all (87%) had a major comorbidity and 15% had functional limitations prior to admission. Bacteremia, pneumonia, and meningitis were the most common major manifestations of IPD. Almost half of the patients had alteration of mental status at the time of admission and 22% required mechanical ventilation. Myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and new onset stroke occurred in 1.7, 1.3, and 1.1% of the patients, respectively; of those who had echocardiograms, 35% had impaired ventricular function. The overall in-hospital mortality was 15.6%. Conclusions. IPD remains a serious infection in adults. In addition to immunization, preventative measures need to consider the sociodemographic features more carefully. A standard set of data need to be collected so that comparisons can be made from study to study. Future investigations should target cardiac function and pulmonary embolism prevention in this population.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus pneumoniae from the time of its discovery by Louis Pasteur in 1881 to the present day has been an important human pathogen [1]. The capsule of the pneumococcus, composed of polysaccharides, helps it avoid host defenses and hence it is a major virulence factor [2]. Challenges in finding an effective vaccine have been the number of capsular types (of which there are currently 94) and the fact that polysaccharides are not very antigenic [3]. Fortunately most of the cases of pneumococcal disease are caused by a smaller number of capsular serotypes and conjugating the polysaccharide with a protein has led to more effective vaccines [3].

There have been numerous prior studies of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) ranging from those with small numbers that are rich in clinical detail to those that are very large and are focused on the intended and unintended consequences of vaccination but lack necessary clinical details [47]. We, however, took advantage of the fact that pneumococcal protein conjugate vaccine seven (PCV-7) was introduced in Alberta, Canada, in 2002 and PCV-13 in 2010 to conduct a study of “IPD” in Northern Alberta. We specifically undertook a comprehensive and population-based study from 2000 to 2014 to provide a detailed description of invasive pneumococcal disease in a modern era. We feel this is of utmost importance as it will serve as bench mark for other studies.

2. Methods

2.1. Definitions

Cases of IPD were defined as per the national case definition of isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site such as blood, CSF, pleural fluid, biopsy tissue, joint aspiration, pericardial fluid, or peritoneal fluid [8]. IPD is a provincially notifiable disease in Alberta; therefore all invasive pneumococcal isolates are submitted to the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (PLPH) for further characterization. This allowed us to prospectively identify all cases of IPD in Northern Alberta.

2.2. Clinical Data Collection

Research nurses collected sociodemographic, clinical, functional, and laboratory data using a standardized case report form (CRF). The research nurses received training on data collection prior to the start of the study. In addition to the CRF, standard operating procedures documents, definitions, drug classification, and underlying illness categorization were part of their working documents. With respect to underlying illnesses, if the attending physician recorded such an illness it was accepted as such. From September 2012 through the end of the study December 31, 2014, additional data were collected for a substudy examining cardiac events during the hospital stay. Our study received approval from the institutional research review committees of the Alberta Health Regions as well as the University of Alberta ethics review board.

2.3. Identification and Serotyping of S. pneumoniae Isolates

Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were received at the Provincial Laboratory of Public Health from diagnostic laboratories in Alberta as per requirements of provincial notifiable disease regulations. The isolates were confirmed as S. pneumoniae based on characteristic morphology and optochin susceptibility [9]. All pneumococcal isolates that exhibited a positive Quellung reaction using commercial type specific antisera obtained from Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, were assigned a serotype designation. Strains that were susceptible to optochin but which failed to serotype using the Quellung assay were assayed further using AccuProbe™ Streptococcus pneumoniae culture identification test, Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA, to confirm the species identification.

2.4. Comparison with Alberta Population

For comparison purposes some characteristics of the Alberta population were obtained from the Alberta Ministry of Health interactive website [10]. The representation of various occupations constituting the work force in Alberta was from [11].

3. Results

Two thousand four hundred and thirty-five patients with a mean age of 54.2 years had IPD over the 15 years of the study. Across all age groups, males were more likely to have IPD than females. Other sociodemographic features of the study population are given in Table 1. Noteworthy is that 7.5% were homeless and 15% had some functional limitations in the weeks prior to presentation. The occupations of those who were working are presented in Table 2. For the most part these are similar to the Alberta population. Construction work is overrepresented and 36% of this group were welders. Teachers and health care workers were not at greater risk than the general population.


Number studied2435100
Number of males138056.7
Mean age (SD)54.2 (17.8)
Aboriginal (first nations)31212.8
To hospital by ambulance109845.1
Admission status
Never seen at a hospital30.1
Outpatient only with visits for IV antibiotics100.4
Emergency Room only2299.4
Residence prior to admission
Homeless, no shelter984.0
Homeless, shelter863.5
Lodge/group home1194.9
Continuing care facility602.5
Subacute care70.3
Functional status in the week prior to admission
Fully functional207885.4
Walking with assistance30212.4
Smoker, current110445.3
Alcohol, excess use62025.5
Illicit drug use48219.8

OccupationIPDAlberta population, %

Accommodation, food services376.36.5
Finance, real estate7913.54.4
Forestry, mining, oil, and gas447.56.4
Health care203.411.7
Professional, science, teacher152.47.8

Comorbid illnesses were common, being present in 98.9% (Table 3). If all cardiovascular conditions are combined, then, fully 45% of the study population were affected prior to presentation. Individually and apart from hypertension, COPD, recent cancer, and hepatitis C were most common.


Any underlying disease240998.9
Selected underlying diseases
Alzheimer’s disease833.4
Heart failure1566.4
Previous myocardial infarction1686.9
Atrial fibrillation1285.3
Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus873.6
Hepatitis C30712.6
Rheumatoid arthritis562.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease44118.6
Cancer within thepast 5 years30712.6
Lung cancer532.1
Multiple myeloma421.7
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia190.7
Acute leukemia50.2
Solid organ transplant140.6
No underlying disease261.1
One underlying disease212187.1
Two underlying diseases25610.5
Three underlying diseases321.3

The manifestations of IPD are presented in Table 4. Bacteremia and pneumonia were most common and the pneumonia patients by definition were bacteremic. Otherwise, meningitis was the most common manifestation of IPD (4.9%) while endocarditis/pericarditis were least common (<1%).


Bacteremia source unknown31612.9
Septic arthritis401.6
Otitis media381.6

The complications and outcomes from IPD are shown in Table 5. Almost half the patients had altered mental status at the time of admission. Most (748/1039 [72%]) patients with altered mental status had a Glasgow Coma Score value recorded: only 7.5% had a score of 15 while 40.6% had a value of 10 or less with 200 having a score of 3. One-quarter of patients were admitted to ICU and 88.5% of these patients required mechanical ventilation. Most of the acute complications occurred on hospital day 1 including admission to ICU, 557/618 (90%); peritonitis, 33/39 (84%); cardiac arrest, 51/70 (73%); liver failure, 36/62 (58%); heart failure, 51/90 (57%); myocardial infarction, 44/78 (56%); renal failure requiring dialysis, 47/99 (47%).


Altered mental status103942.7
Intensive care admission61825.4
Respiratory failure requiring
Mechanical ventilation54722.5
Pleural effusion84634.7
Chest tube25510.5
Renal failure requiring dialysis994.1
Congestive heart failure903.7
Myocardial infarction783.2
Cardiac arrest702.8
New onset seizures672.8
Upper GI bleed642.6
Liver failure622.5
Lower GI bleed311.2
New onset stroke281.1
Pulmonary embolus111.3
Died (in hospital)37915.6
Transferred to another acute care facility after admission27511.6
Remained in acute care facility after infection cured1496.1
Discharged home on antibiotics137056.3
Home care following discharge28811.8

The substudy () related to cardiovascular complications is presented in Table 6. The most common complication was atrial fibrillation, which occurred in more than one in ten patients. What was surprising was that 24% had echocardiograms done, 87% of which were transthoracic, and 8.9% had severely impaired left ventricular function with ejection fractions <30–35%.

Event or investigationNumberPercent

Atrial fibrillation10912.5
Myocardial infarction151.7
Ventricular tachycardia > 30 sec50.5

Cardiology consultation606.8
Coronary angiogram91
 Tricuspid regurgitation11454.3
 Mitral regurgitation11253.3
 Aortic regurgitation2511.9
 Valve vegetation52.3
 Ejection fraction

Table 7 shows the serotypes in PCV-7, PCV-13, and PPV-23 vaccines. These accounted for 22.7%, 52.3%, and 82.9% of isolates, respectively. An additional five serotypes rounded out those that accounted for 1% or more of the isolates but were not present in the first 23 serotypes listed. Overall these 28 serotypes accounted for 90.3% of the isolates. An additional 31 serotypes were represented among the remaining 11.5% of the isolates.



The first 13 serotypes are in PCV-13 and first 23 in PPV-23.   denotes serotypes in PCV-7. The final four serotypes represent the remaining serotypes that accounted for ≥1% of the isolates beyond those in the 23-valent vaccine.

4. Discussion

The percentage of males with IPD at 56.7% was higher than the percentage of females. Despite the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines the rate of IPD among males remains higher than that among females especially in children and in adults aged 40–64 and >74 years [12]. Most of the patients with IPD had pneumonia and in studies of pneumonia in general males tend to be predominate [13].

People of Aboriginal descent were overrepresented in this study population at 12.8% whereas they constitute about 5.2% of the population of Alberta [10]. It has been noted that among resource poor populations a gap in rates of IPD remains compared with other populations in the same geographic area, a gap that will not be solved by vaccination alone [13, 14].

Almost half the patients with IPD required an ambulance to come to hospital. This is similar to what is observed at a tertiary care hospital in Halifax where 45% of the patients with all-cause pneumonia arrive by ambulance (Petrie D, personal communication). However 90% of our patients were admitted to hospital in sharp contrast to the rate of 47% admission rate for all-cause pneumonia in the Edmonton area but not surprising since most of these patients were bacteremic [15]. The 90% admission rate for patients with IPD is similar to that seen in the USA at 93% prior to introduction of PCV-13 and 95% afterwards [16] but is higher than the 66.9% admission rate among adults of 65 years of age and over with IPD in Ontario [17].

Residence at the time of admission may have implications for programs directed towards prevention of IPD in adults. Only 80% of our patients were living at home whereas 7.5% were homeless and 7.4% were in a group home setting. The rate of homelessness among patients with IPD is much higher than the 2.5% observed for patients with all-cause community-acquired pneumonia in the Edmonton area [18]. This overrepresentation of homeless persons among those with IPD is likely due to the very high rate of IPD in this population. Pleveneshi et al. found that the rate of IPD among homeless persons in Toronto was 273/100,000 per year compared with 9/100,000 per year in the general adult population [19]. One of the reasons for this high rate is crowding in homeless shelters resulting in high transmission rates of pneumococcal disease [20]. During the course of this study an outbreak of serotype 5 accounted for about a quarter of all cases and homelessness was a risk factor for transmission of serotype 5 in this outbreak [21]. The high rates of tobacco smoking and alcohol abuse in this population also contribute to the higher rates of IPD [19]. Further study is needed to determine what contribution each of these factors, homelessness, tobacco, and alcohol usage, makes to the increased risk of IPD in this population. Vaccination and other intervention programs should have a high benefit in this population.

In terms of common lifestyle risk factors for IPD, almost half of the patients in our cohort were tobacco smokers. This contrasts with 28.3% of those with all-cause pneumonia in Edmonton requiring hospitalization and with a 28% smoking rate in the general population of Alberta [18, 22]. Smoking is a well-known risk factor for IPD with odds ratio of 4.1 when compared with those without IPD [23]. There is a dose-response relationship with the number of cigarettes smoked per day and those exposed to second-hand smoke are also affected [23]. Furthermore, 25% of our patients self-reported abuse of alcohol, and alcohol abuse is well known to increase both the risk for and the severity of IPD [2427].

Occupation may also be a risk factor for acquisition of IPD. Previously we found that welders were at increased risk for IPD with a rate of 22.7/100,000 versus 8.7/100,000 in the general adult population [28]. These findings are extended in this study. There were 53 cases among welders, accounting for 36% of all construction workers. Exposure to welding fumes promotes lung inflammation and has been shown in animal models to predispose to pneumonia [28]. Several populations with increased exposure to pneumococcal disease such as health care workers and teachers were not overrepresented. Our classification of occupation was done without reference to the National Occupational Classification Statistics Canada 2011 so some of the occupations are likely misclassified. This applies mostly to business and construction categories.

The vast majority (98.9%) of our patients had one or more comorbid illnesses. Moore et al. found that 76% of the adults with IPD in the USA had an indication for pneumococcal vaccination [16]. While comorbidities that are risk factors for IPD are well recognized and are for the most part indications for vaccination what is not readily recognized is the concept of risk factor stacking [29]. For example, when smoking is added to diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, and chronic heart disease the odds ratio for acquisition of IPD increases from 8.5 to >40 [29]. The highest rates of IPD are seen among those who are immunocompromised either by underlying disease or by treatment. In a Toronto study of IPD, 27.8% of the patients were immunocompromised and those with multiple myeloma had a rate of IPD of 847/100,000, for those with acute leukemia it was 220/100,000, and immunosuppressive therapy led to a rate of 20/100,000 [30]. From 2000 to 2004 we used data on IPD Alberta-wide and cancer registry data and found that compared with a rate of 11/100,000 in the general population patients with multiple myeloma had a rate of IPD of 673/100,000 and rates for those with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myelogenous/acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma were 124; 129; 47; 63/100,000, respectively [31]. We also found a high rate of IPD disease in patients with lung cancer at 143.6/100,000 [31]. A finding unique to the current study is the overrepresentation of patients with hepatitis C. The implication is that hepatitis C should be added to the list of indications for pneumococcal vaccination [32].

From 1935 to present, pneumonia has remained the major manifestation of IPD [3335]. Meningitis has been the second most common manifestation [34, 35] and endocarditis has remained uncommon at about 1% [33, 35]. Although the clinical presentation of IPD has not changed much over time, the mortality rate from IPD has declined from 77.5% in the preantibiotic era to 24.7% in the early antibiotic era to 16.9% at the turn of the 21st century and in-hospital mortality remains too high at 15.6% in our study [3335]. Austrian and Gold noted in patients with IPD that deaths within the first 5 days seemed not to be influenced by antibiotic therapy [34] and Yu et al. in the modern era found that 64.5% of all deaths occurred in the first 3 days [35]. This is in keeping with our observation that most of the life threatening complications occurred on day 1, an indication that these patients were seriously ill on admission.

Almost half (43.7%) of the study population had alteration of mental status. This is much higher than the 11.5% rate among adults with all-cause pneumonia admitted to Edmonton hospitals [18]. It is also higher than the 23% value quoted in a review of sepsis associated encephalopathy [36]. The high rate of alteration of mental status in this study is likely accurate because 72% of the patients with this finding had a Glasgow Coma Score determined and it was abnormal in 92.5% with 40.6% having a score of 10 or less. Sepsis associated encephalopathy involves direct cellular damage to the brain [36] and is associated with abnormal electroencephalographic findings [37]. Mortality rates correlate with Glasgow Coma Score with a 63% mortality for those with a score of 3–8 [38]. This is an area which clearly needs further study.

Just over 1% of our patients had new onset stroke following admission to hospital. From 2.2 to 17% of all strokes have onset during hospitalization for a diagnosis or procedure other than stroke [39]. In a systematic review of trigger factors for ischemic stroke, Guiraud et al. found that infection within the previous week was such a trigger factor with odds ratio of 2.91 (1.41–6) and respiratory tract infection had odds ratio of 2.4 (1.2–4.8) [40]. Hospitalization for infection within 14 days was associated with an increased risk of stroke, OR 8 (1.6–77.3). In a cohort of 5639 patients followed for a median of 12.2 years, 889 developed a stroke within 14 days of hospitalization for some other illness. Twenty-nine of these patients had at least one hospitalization for infection during the preceding 90 days [41]. The infections were mainly of the respiratory or urinary tracts [41].

Pulmonary embolism occurred in 1.3% of our patients. Investigators from Taiwan found that patients with pneumococcal pneumonia were 1.97 times more likely to have a pulmonary embolus than age and sex matched controls without pneumonia [42]. There are likely several factors that predispose to pulmonary embolism in this population, namely, bed-ridden state for 3 or more days and procoagulant effect of infection [43, 44]. In a retrospective review of 1180 medical inpatients, 0.3% of those at low risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) developed a pulmonary embolus versus 7.5% for those at high risk [45]. Thus the overall population of adult patients with IPD is at intermediate risk and should be evaluated for known risk factors for VTE and if present receive prophylaxis [46]. Clearly this is another area in need of further study.

Several of the complications that occurred were pneumonia specific. Thus decortication was necessary because of late stage empyema. Bronchopleural fistula is an uncommon complication that occurs because cavitating pneumonia results in a pneumothorax [47]. Necrotizing pneumococcal pneumonia resulting in cavitation is more common than previously appreciated. With the widespread use of computed tomographic scanning in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia 15/136 (11%) were found to have such changes [48].

While necrotizing fasciitis is more commonly associated with Group A Streptococcus it does occur with S. pneumoniae [49]. Sixty-five (2.7%) of our patients had cellulitis of whom 2 had necrotizing fasciitis. Streptococcus pneumoniae is secondary only to the meningococcus as a cause of purpura fulminans [50]; however to 1997 only 43 such cases had been described [51]. In contrast to meningococcemia patients with pneumococcal induced purpura fulminans are often not hypotensive and 51% to 63% are asplenic [51]. The mortality rate was 60% [49]. Our experience of 1 such case among 2435 adult patients suggests that it is uncommon but may be more common than reported in the literature.

Because of a growing literature on the cardiovascular sequelae of sepsis in general [5257] and pneumococcal infection in particular [5256, 58], we undertook a substudy of cardiovascular complications and risk factors part way through the study (from 2012 to 2014). Acute myocardial infarction is not uncommon following pneumonia with rates ranging from 1.5% to 15% [52, 53, 58]. However the 15% rate was in patients with severe pneumonia [53]. Rhythm disorders are also common, with 12% having a new diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmia within 90 days of admission for pneumonia [54]. Atrial fibrillation is most common, but other dysrhythmias do occur as in this study where 1.5% of patients had one or more episodes of asystole and 0.5% had ventricular tachycardia. A striking finding from our study was that 35% of patients who had an echocardiogram performed had an ejection fraction of <50% indicating systolic dysfunction. Myocardial dysfunction in sepsis has been recognized for some time and this dysfunction may be systolic or diastolic [5961]. While several factors may play a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications during the course of IPD the pneumococcus does play a direct role. In both animal models and humans, translocation of S. pneumoniae into the myocardium has been observed during pneumococcal sepsis [55]. It has also been shown that pneumolysin causes microscopic lesions in the myocardium [55]. Some interventions may be beneficial; thus aspirin resulted in lower 30-day mortality following pneumonia in one study [56] and vaccination with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was associated with fewer acute coronary syndrome events in another [57].

Table 7 shows selected serotyping data. Fifty-two percent of the isolates had serotypes that are in the current PCV-13 formulation. While 59 serotypes were present overall, 28 accounted for 90.3% of all cases of IPD over the 14 years of the study. The serotype shifts over the course of the study are not shown but it is apparent that more effective control of IPD in adults will require new vaccine strategies. Indeed a 15-valent PCV which contains serotypes 22F and 33F in addition to the PCV-13 serotypes is currently undergoing clinical trials [62]. Serotype 22F accounted for 7.2% of the isolates in our study about the same as the 9.8% reported Canada-wide from 2011 to 2014 [63]. Serotype 33F accounted for 3% of isolates in Canada and 1.8% in our study. The Canada-wide study included children and adults [62].

A strength of this study is the detailed collection of data which allow for a full appreciation of the various epidemiological and clinical factors in IPD. This strength is also a weakness in that in some areas necessary data were not collected. However what the study does do is allow for the development of a standardized data collection instrument which can be used in all future such studies so that comparisons from study to study can be made. There are also several noteworthy limitations to our study. First and foremost, we do not have detailed immunization data for these patients. Second, comorbidities and complications were based on physician records and not necessarily standardized definitions. For example, serial troponins were not collected on all IPD patients nor were echocardiograms done on all patients. Third, biomarkers and measures of inflammatory response were not routinely collected. Fourth, we did not gather data on the few IPD patients that may not have been admitted to hospital. Last, our cohort, though population based, was drawn from the northern half of one province in Canada and some may be concerned that our results are not generalizable to other jurisdictions or nations.

In conclusion, IPD remains a serious infection in adults. Preventative measures to improve vaccination rates especially in the elderly and groups at higher risk that may be harder to reach as shown in this study are needed [63]. Addressing sociodemographic factors that put individuals at higher risk for IPD is also necessary. A standard set of data should be collected so that comparisons can be made from study to study. Future investigations should focus on further elucidation of the cardiovascular effects of IPD and what can be done to ameliorate these effects.


The funders had no role in the design of the study or data analysis and they have not seen the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Other than the two research grants mentioned in the Acknowledgments, authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

T. J. Marrie and G. J. Tyrrell designed the study, organized the data collection, and had full access to all of the data in the study. Dean T. Eurich conducted all analyses and had full access to the data. T. J. Marrie, G. J. Tyrrell, Dean T. Eurich, and Sumit R. Majumdar wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data, revising the manuscript for intellectual content, and approving the manuscript to be published.


This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from Pfizer, Canada, and Merck Canada Inc. Sumit R. Majumdar holds the Endowed Chair in Patient Health Management supported by the Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry and Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Alberta. Dean T. Eurich is a Canada Research Chair supported by the Government of Canada. The authors wish to thank Ibrahim Quazi and Lilly Yusho for data management and Carol Mangan RN for data collection. They also thank the microbiology staff of hospitals in Northern Alberta for forwarding Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates.


  1. R. Heffron, “The pneumococcus and type incidence in pneumonia,” in Pneumonia by R. Heffron, Introduction by Maxwell Finland. The Biology of Pneumococcus by B. White, New Foreword by Robert Austin, R. Heffron, Ed., pp. 18–89, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, Second Printing, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  2. C. Rodrigo and W. S. Lim, “The relevance of pneumococcal serotypes,” Current Infectious Disease Reports, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 403–411, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. I. Yildirim, K. M. Shea, and S. I. Pelton, “Pneumococcal disease in the era of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine,” Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 679–697, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. R. Griffin, Y. Zhu, M. R. Moore, C. G. Whitney, and C. G. Grijalva, “U.S. hospitalizations for pneumonia after a decade of pneumococcal vaccination,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 369, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Luján, J. Burgos, M. Gallego et al., “Effects of immunocompromise and comorbidities on pneumococcal serotypes causing invasive respiratory infection in adults: implications for vaccine strategies,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 1722–1730, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. W. Rudnick, Z. Liu, A. Shigayeva et al., “Pneumococcal vaccination programs and the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease in Ontario, Canada, 1995–2011,” Vaccine, vol. 31, no. 49, pp. 5863–5871, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. B. Harboe, J. Dalby, D. M. Weinberger et al., “Impact of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in invasive pneumococcal disease—incidence and mortality,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 59, pp. 1066–1073, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  8. Canada Communicable Disease Report, “Case definitions for diseases under national surveillance,” Health Canada, vol. 26, supplement 3, article 51, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. R. Facklam and A. Washington J, “Streptococcus and related catalase-negative gram-positive cocci,” in Manual of Clinical Microbiology, A. Balows, W. J. Hausler Jr., K. L. Herrmann, H. D. Isenberg, and H. J. Shadomy, Eds., pp. 238–257, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA, 5th edition, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  10. “Surveillance and reporting,” View at: Google Scholar
  12. A. St. Maurice, W. Schaffner, M. R. Griffin, N. Halasa, and C. G. Grijalva, “Persistent sex disparities in invasive pneumococcal diseases in the conjugate vaccine era,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 214, no. 5, pp. 792–797, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. J. Marrie and L. Wu, “Factors influencing in-hospital mortality in community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study of patients not initially admitted to the ICU,” Chest, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 1260–1270, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Segal, D. Greenberg, R. Dagan, and S. Ben-Shimol, “Disparities in PCV impact between different ethnic populations cohabiting in the same region: a systematic review of the literature,” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 37, pp. 4371–4377, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. J. Marrie and J. Q. Huang, “Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in Edmonton, Alberta: an emergency department-based study,” Canadian Respiratory Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 139–142, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Moore, R. Link-Gelles, W. Schaffner et al., “Effect of use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children on invasive pneumococcal disease in children and adults in the USA: analysis of multisite, population-based surveillance,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 301–309, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Desai, M. E. Policarpio, K. Wong, J. Gubbay, J. Fediurek, and S. Deeks, “The epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease in older adults from 2007 to 2014 in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study,” CMAJ Open, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. E545–E550, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Q. Huang, P. M. Hooper, and T. J. Marrie, “Factors associated with length of stay in hospital for suspected community-acquired pneumonia,” Canadian Respiratory Journal, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 317–324, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Plevneshi, T. Svoboda, I. Armstrong et al., “Population-based surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease in homeless adults in Toronto,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 9, Article ID e7255, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Mercat, J. Nguyen, and B. Dautzenberg, “An outbreak of pneumococcal pneumonia in two men's shelters,” Chest, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. J. Tyrrell, M. Lovgren, Q. Ibrahim et al., “Epidemic of invasive pneumococcal disease, Western Canada, 2005–2009,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 733–740, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Framework for a healthy Alberta,
  23. J. P. Nuorti, J. C. Butler, M. M. Farley et al., “Cigarette smoking and invasive pneumococcal disease,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 10, pp. 681–689, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. A. Burman, R. Norrby, and B. Trollfors, “Invasive pneumococcal infections: incidence, predisposing factors, and prognosis,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Fernández-Solá, A. Junque, and R. Estruch, “High alcohol intake as a risk and prognostic factor for community-acquired pneumonia,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 155, no. 15, pp. 1649–1654, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. De Roux, M. Cavalcanti, M. A. Marcos et al., “Impact of alcohol abuse in the etiology and severity of community-acquired pneumonia,” Chest, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 1219–1225, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. Saitz, W. A. Ghali, and M. A. Moskowitz, “The impact of alcohol-related diagnoses on pneumonia outcomes,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 157, no. 13, pp. 1446–1452, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Wong, T. J. Marrie, S. Garg, J. D. Kellner, and G. J. Tyrrell, “Welders are at increased risk for invasive pneumococcal disease,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. e796–e799, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. Curcio, A. Cané, and R. Isturiz, “Redefining risk categories for pneumococcal disease in adults: critical analysis of the evidence,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, pp. 30–35, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Shigayeva, W. Rudnick, K. Green et al., “Invasive pneumococcal disease among immunocompromised persons: implications for vaccination programs,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Wong, T. J. Marrie, S. Garg, J. D. Kellner, and G. J. Tyrrell, “Increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in haematological and solid-organ malignancies,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 1804–1810, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. G. Whitney, M. Moore, T. Pilishvill et al., “Use of 13 valent pneumococcal vaccine and 23 valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults with immunocompromising conditions: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on immunization practices,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), vol. 61, no. 40, pp. 816–819, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. C. Tilghman and M. Finland, “Clinical significance of bacteremia in pneumococcic pneumonia,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 602–619, 1937. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Austriam and J. Gold, “Pneumococcal bacteremia with especial reference to bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia,” Annals of internal medicine, vol. 60, pp. 759–776, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. V. L. Yu, C. C. C. Chiou, C. Feldman et al., “An international prospective study of pneumococcal bacteremia: correlation with in vitro resistance, antibiotics administered, and clinical outcome,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 230–237, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. G. Zampieri, M. Park, F. S. Machado, and L. C. P. Azevedo, “Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: not just delirium,” Clinics, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1825–1831, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Hosokawa, N. Gaspard, F. Su, M. Oddo, J.-L. Vincent, and F. S. I. Taccone, “Clinical neurophysiological assessment of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction: a systematic review,” Critical Care, vol. 18, no. 6, article 674, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. A. Eidelman, D. Putterman, C. Putterman, and C. L. Sprung, “The spectrum of septic encephalopathy: definitions, etioloqies, and mortalities,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 275, no. 6, pp. 470–473, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Cumbler, “In-hospital ischemic stroke,” The Neurohospitalist, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 173–181, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. V. Guiraud, M. B. Amor, J.-L. Mas, and E. Touzé, “Triggers of ischemic stroke: a systematic review,” Stroke, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2669–2677, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. S. V. Elkind, C. L. Carty, E. S. O'Meara et al., “Hospitalization for infection and risk of acute ischemic stroke: the Cardiovascular Health Study,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1851–1856, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y.-G. Chen, T.-Y. Lin, W.-Y. Huang, C.-L. Lin, M.-S. Dai, and C.-H. Kao, “Association between pneumococcal pneumonia and venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients: a nationwide population-based study,” Respirology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 799–804, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. D. Stein, A. Beemath, F. Matta et al., “Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: data from PIOPED II,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 871–879, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. F. Tapson, “Acute pulmonary embolism,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 10, pp. 1037–1052, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Barbar, F. Noventa, V. Rossetto et al., “A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2450–2457, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. R. Kahn, W. Lim, A. S. Dunn et al., “Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines,” Chest, vol. 141, no. 2, supplement, pp. e195S–e226S, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. R. E. Greene, “The radiology of pulmonary infection,” in Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders, A. P. Fishman, J. A. Elias, J. A. Fishman, M. A. Grippi, R. M. Senior, and A. I. Pack, Eds., chapter 113, pp. 2017–2029, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  48. A. Pande, S. Nasir, A. M. Rueda et al., “The incidence of necrotizing changes in adults with pneumococcal pneumonia,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Dawar, B. Russell, K. McClean, P. N. Levett, G. J. Tyrrell, and J. Irvine, “A case of necrotizing fasciitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 5 in Saskatchewan,” Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 69–71, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Saraceni and D. Schwed-Lustgarten, “Pneumococcal sepsis-induced purpura fulminans in an asplenic adult patient without disseminated intravascular coagulation,” American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 346, no. 6, pp. 514–516, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. C. T. Carpenter and A. B. Kaiser, “Purpura fulminans in pneumococcal sepsis: case report and review,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 479–483, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. M. Musher, A. M. Rueda, A. S. Kaka, and S. M. Mapara, “The association between pneumococcal pneumonia and acute cardiac events,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 158–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Ramirez, S. Aliberti, M. Mirsaeidi et al., “Acute myocardial infarction in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. N. Soto-Gomez, A. Anzueto, G. W. Waterer, M. I. Restrepo, and E. M. Mortensen, “Pneumonia: an arrhythmogenic disease?” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. O. Brown, B. Mann, G. Gao et al., “Streptococcus pneumoniae translocates into the myocardium and forms unique microlesions that disrupt cardiac function,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID e100438, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Falcone, A. Russo, R. Cangemi et al., “Lower mortality rate in elderly patients with community‐onset pneumonia on treatment with aspirin,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e001595, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. D. T. Eurich, J. J. Johnstone, J. K. Minhas-Sandhu, T. J. Marrie, and S. R. Majumdar, “Pneumococcal vaccination and risk of acute coronary syndromes in patients with pneumonia: population-based cohort study,” Heart, vol. 98, no. 14, pp. 1072–1077, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. T. W. Perry, M. J. V. Pugh, G. W. Waterer et al., “Incidence of cardiovascular events after hospital admission for pneumonia,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 244–251, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. Sato, A. Kuriyama, T. Takada, M. Nasu, and S. K. Luthe, “Prevalence and risk factors of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. A retrospective cohort study,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 39, Article ID e5031, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Shahul, G. Gulati, M. R. Hacker et al., “Detection of myocardial dysfunction in septic shock: a speckle-tracking echocardiography study,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1547–1554, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. F. Sanfilippo, C. Corredor, N. Fletcher et al., “Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1004–1013, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. R. Golden, H. J. Adam, and G. G. Zhanel, “Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada, 2011–2014: characterization of new candidate 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine serotypes 22F and 33F,” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 2527–2530, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. W. W. Williams, P.-J. Lu, A. O'Halloran et al., “Vaccination coverage among adults, excluding influenza vaccination—United States, 2013,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 95–102, 2015. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 T. J. Marrie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.