Research Article

Comparison of Actual Performance in the Flow and Fraction of Inspired O2 among Different High-Flow Nasal Cannula Devices: A Bench Study

Table 3

Characteristics of the actual-flow in five devices.

DevicesFlow deviation (L/min)Effect of set-FiO2
≤40 L/min45–60 L/min>60 L/min

AIRVO 2−0.2 (−0.8, 0.3)−0.9 (−3.6, 0.1)N/ANo effect at 20 and 25 L/min; effect increase at higher set-flows
Bellavista 1000−0.7 ± 0.848−1.4 (−2.2, −0.3)0.6 (−0.1, 2.2)No specific pattern
TNI softFlow 501.3 (0.8, 2.3)1.2 (0.8, 2)N/AEffect increase at higher set-flows; more obviously than in AIRVO 2
HUMID-BH−1.6 (−2.4, −0.9)−2.7 (−6.7, −1.6)−3.6 (−6.6, −0.8)No specific pattern
OH–70C4.4 (3.9, 5.2)5.7 (5.1, 7.1)5.7 (5, 6.8)No specific pattern

The data are presented as the median (IQR) and mean ± SD. The flow deviation equals the actual-flow minus the corresponding set-flow.