Review Article

Organized Atrial Tachycardias after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Table 1


Author and yearNumber of patientsNumber of ATs studiedATs amenable to mappingAT change during entrainmentAT change during RFAT successfully ablatedFollowup: persistence in SRFollowup: AT recurrenceRedo procedures for AT recurrence

Paponne et al. 2004 [17]393939/39 (100%)Not reportedNot reported39/39 (100%)39/39 (100%)6/39 (15%) early after ablation0%
Kobza et al. 2004 [20]102019/20 (95%)Not reportedNot reported16/19 (84%)Not reported1/10 (10%)Not reported
Mesas et al. 2004 [16]131412/14 (86%)Not reported1/14 (7%)13/14 (93%)11/13 (85%)1/13 (8%)1/13 (8%)
Gerstenfeld et al. 2004 [33]10109/10 (90%)1/10 (10%)0%9/10 (90%)9/10 (90%)0%0%
Chugh et al. 2005 [18]28>28 (30 reported)28/30 (93%)1/30 (3%): original AT could not be reinducedNot reportedSuccess in 22/28 patients (79%)18/22 (82%)3/22 (14%)3/22 (14%) patients after a successful procedure
Ouyang et al. 2005 [38]211715/17 (88%)Not reportedNot reported14/15 (93%)21/21 (100%)0%0%
Cummings et al. 2005 [34]23 Only PV reisolationPV reisolation onlyNot reportedNot reported100% reisolation success82% of patients9% of patients9% of patients
Jaïs et al. 2006 [64]1414Only a specific type of ATNot reportedNot reported14/14 (100%)11/14 (79%)3/14 (21%)2/14 (14%)
Daoud et al. 2006 [19]91713/17 (76%)Not reportedNot reported16/17 (94%)100% of patients with successful procedure0%0%
Chae et al. 2007 [21]78155155/155 (100%)Not reportedNot reported134/155 (86%)60/78 (77%)18/66 (27%) acute success14/66 (21%)
Patel et al. 2008 [72]174133/41 (80%)7/33 (21%): original AT could not be reinducedNot reported25/41 (61%)13/17(76%)4/17 (24%)2/17 (12%)
Satomi et al. 2008 [36]88Only a specific type of ATNot reportedNot reported8/8 (100%)7/8 (88%)0%0%
Takahashi et al. 2008 [55]9Multiple (>15) ATAll except oneNot reported4/9 (44%), all localized reentriesAll except 38/9 (89%)1/9 (11%)None
Lim et al. 2008 [89]18≥2320 (at least 3 were not stable enough to be mapped)Not reportedNot reported20/20 (100%)Not clearly reported, 79% including AF patientsNot reportedNot reported
Deisenhoffer et al. 2009 [15]165538/55 (69%)Not reportedNot reported23/55 (42%)6/16 (38%)7/16 (44%)5/16 (31%)
Chang et al. 2009 [28]264848/48 (100%)Not reported5/48 (10%)48/48 (100%)20-21/26 (79%)1/26 (19%)1/26 (19%)
Rostock et al. 2010 [57]61133132/133 (99%)5/132 (3,8%)45/61 initial AT (74%)124/133 (93%)50/61 (82%)7/61 (11,5%)5/61 (8%)