Review Article

Anticoagulation Use prior to Common Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Outcomes of the studies.

Author and year of publicationMethods of assessing bleedBleeding outcome (N (%) or mean (range) or mean ± SD)Need hospitalization for bleedingThromboembolic outcome (N (%))Conclusions

Campbell et al., 2000 [31]The difference of mass of sponges used in the procedure was then converted to volume
The outcome was in “milliliters per unit of surgery”: a unit of surgery is a function of the surgical area involved and the risk of hemorrhage
Experimental: 1.4 mL/unit of surgery (0.1–4.5)
Control: 2.2 (0.2–6.3)
Baseline: 1.4 (0.6–2.1)
No statistically significant difference
NoneNot mentioned in the studyOAT: if INR is less than 3, warfarin can be continued in minor procedures, if there is an adequate surgical approach
Local hemostatic agents: not needed when continuing warfarin

Evans et al., 2002 [27]Immediate bleeding: if bleeding continues after 10 minutes of local pressure postprocedurally
Delayed bleeding: if bleeding started > 10 minutes after the procedure
Description of measures needed to interrupt the hemorrhage
Experimental: 15 (26%): 3 (5.2%) immediate and 12 (21%) delayed bleeding
Control: 7 (14%) delayed bleeding
No statistically significant difference ()
Two patients in the anticoagulant group: one needed admission and the other presented to the ER without admissionNot mentioned in the studyOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, warfarin can be continued in dental extractions done in a hospital setting with an increase in mild postprocedural hemorrhage
Number of teeth removed and risk of bleeding: not associated

Erden et al., 2015 [32]Immediate bleeding: this is estimated by the difference of mass of gauze swabs used in the procedure. The outcome in “milligrams”
Early bleeding: this is estimated by the number of additional swabs needed during the first 48 hours
Group A: the amount of bleeding: 2194 ± 1418 mg; the median number of additional swabs used: 2.5; the median bleeding time: 50
Group B: the amount of bleeding: 2950 ± 1694 mg; the median number of additional swabs used: 3; the median bleeding time: 60
Greater immediate bleed in group B ()
Greater early bleed in group B ()
Greater bleeding time in group B ()
NoneNoneOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, warfarin can be continued in dental extractions when patients have prosthetic valves
LMWH bridging: this increases the risk of bleeding
Number of teeth removed and amount of bleeding: positively correlated

Sacco et al., 2007 [28]Mild bleeding: less than 10 minutes of duration
Moderate bleeding: 10 to 20 minutes of duration
Severe bleeding: this needs a new operation or a transfusion
Group A: 10 (15%) mild bleeding
Group B: 6 (9.2%) mild bleeding
No statistically significant difference ()
NoneNoneOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, warfarin can be continued in dental and alveolar procedures
Local hemostatic agents: needed if warfarin is continued
Al-Mubarak et al., 2007 [29]Bleeding assessed by a blinded examiner:
Bleeding is present, if a fresh clot is eliminated without difficulty or if a discharge of blood is seen
Bleeding is absent, if solid clot exists
Group 1: day 1: 12%, day 3: 4%, day 7: 0%
Group 2: day 1: 21%, day 3: 3%, day 7: 0%
Group 3: day 1: 17%, day 3: 3%, day 7: 4%
Group 4: day 1: 29%, day 3: 5%, day 7: 0%
No statistically significant difference, except groups 2 and 4 at day 3 ()
NoneNoneOAT: if INR <3, warfarin can be continued in dental extractions
Local hemostatic agents: needed if warfarin is continued. Suturing should not always be performed
Number of teeth removed and risk of bleeding: not associated
INR levels and postoperative bleeding: positively correlated, but without any clinical significance

Bajkin et al., 2009 [17]Bleeding is noted, when local pressure or further surgeries are needed
Immediate bleeding: bleeding occurring until discharge
Late bleeding: bleeding occurring after discharge
Group A: 8 (7.34%) had bleeding: 6 (75%) immediate and 4 (50%) late bleeding
Group B: 5 (4.76%) had bleeding: 3 (60%) immediate and 3 (60%) late bleeding
No statistically significant difference
NoneNoneOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, VKAs can be continued in dental extractions
Local hemostatic agents: needed if VKAs are continued. Suturing should not always be performed
LMWH bridging: not needed for minor procedures
INR levels and postoperative bleeding: no association
Bleeding increases with local inflammation

Souto et al., 1996 [30]Mild bleeding: hemorrhage ending alone or with mild pressure
Severe bleeding: hemorrhage that requires more advanced methods to stop
Group 0: 85% mild, 15% severe bleeding
Group 1: 50% mild, 50% severe bleeding
Group 2: 64% mild, 36% severe bleeding
Group 3: 83% mild, 17% severe bleeding
Group 4: 69% mild, 31% severe bleeding
Group 5: 96% mild, 4% severe bleeding
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups when compared with group 0
So the risk of a major bleed is the same when reducing acenocoumarol with heparin use and when continuing the same dose with local antifibrinolytic use
Not mentioned in the studyNot mentioned in the studyOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, acenocoumarol can be continued in dental extractions
Local hemostatic agents: antifibrinolytic agent is needed, like tranexamic acid for two days, if acenocoumarol is continued
Heparin and reduced acenocoumarol given together have multiple drawbacks
INR levels and postoperative bleeding associated especially in groups that took reduced acenocoumarol with heparin
Number of teeth removed and risk of bleeding: not associated
Clemm et al., 2016 [33]Immediate bleeding: <24 h after the procedure
Delayed bleeding: >24 h after the procedure
Low severity: mild, controlled by local pressure
Moderate severity: blood clots noticed, controlled by additional hemostatic methods
Severe: bleeding artery noticed, controlled by more advanced methods
Experimental: on VKAs: low (6.7%); on VKAs bridged with LMWH: 1 (12.5%); on antiplatelets: 1 (1.6%); on NOACs: 0 (0%)
Control: 3 (0.6%)
There is a statistically significant difference between the VKA group and the control, where there is an increased risk of mild bleeding ()
Two patients: one in the antiplatelet group and the other in the nonanticoagulated groupNoneOAT: VKAs and NOACs can be continued during implant procedures, if the least invasive method is adopted, with an increase of mild postprocedural bleed in those on VKAs
Implant surgery has a low bleeding risk regardless of the invasiveness of the procedure

Cannon and Dharmar, 2003Immediate bleeding: up until 30 minutes after the procedure
Delayed bleeding: >30 minutes
Description of severity, time, and length
Experimental: 2 (5.7%) minor delayed bleeding
Control: 3 (8.5%) minor delayed bleeding
NoneNoneOAT: if INR is in the therapeutic range, warfarin can be continued in minor procedures
Local hemostatic agents: not needed

Devani et al., 1998 [35]Immediate bleeding: up until 30 minutes after the procedure
Delayed bleeding: >30 minutes
Description of severity, time, and length
Experimental: 1 (3%) minor delayed bleeding
Control: 1 (3.1%) minor delayed bleeding
NoneNoneOAT: if INR is in therapeutic range, warfarin can be continued in dental extractions if no other medications are taken that affect the liver or hemostasis
Local hemostatic agents: needed

VKAs = vitamin K antagonists; NOACs = novel oral anticoagulants; OAT = oral anticoagulation therapy; LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin.