Previously we suggested an original interpretation of quantum mechanics. The interpretation supposes that quantum probability amplitudes are a manifestation of self-organization of nature at some deeper level of matter, performed in spatially and temporally distributed manner. Instead of formal description of the concept, the paper shows in detail how it works for basic quantum experiments.
Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, “The Two-State Vector Formalism of Qauntum Mechanics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105101.
View at: Google ScholarA. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 1804–1807, 1982.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNetJ. G. Cramer, “The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 647–687, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNetA. C. Elitzur, S. Dolev, and A. Zeilinger, “Time-Reversed EPR and the Choice of Histories in Quantum Mechanics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205182.
View at: Google ScholarP. V. Kurakin, “Hidden variables and hidden time in quantum theory,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0504089.
View at: Google ScholarP. V. Kurakin and G. G. Malinetskii, “Toy quantum mechanics using hidden variables,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2004, no. 2, pp. 357–361, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNetPavel V. Kurakin and George G. Malinetskii, “A Simple Hypothesis on the Origin and Physical Nature of Quantum Superposition of States,” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505120.
View at: Google ScholarP. V. Kurakin, G. G. Malinetskii, and H. Bloom, “Conversational (dialogue) model of quantum transitions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0504088.
View at: Google Scholar