Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 158142, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/158142

## Application of Symbolic Computation in Nonlinear Differential-Difference Equations

^{1}Department of Computer Science, Liaoning Normal University, Liaoning, Dalian 116081, China^{2}Key Laboratory of Mathematics and Mechanization (KLMM), Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100080, China^{3}School of Physics and Electronic Technology, Liaoning Normal University, Liaoning, Dalian 116029, China

Received 18 March 2009; Accepted 12 September 2009

Academic Editor: Yong Zhou

Copyright © 2009 Fuding Xie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

A method is proposed to construct closed-form solutions of nonlinear differential-difference equations. For the variety of nonlinearities, this method only deals with such equations which are written in polynomials in function and its derivative. Some closed-form solutions of Hybrid lattice, Discrete mKdV lattice, and modified Volterra lattice are obtained by using the proposed method. The travelling wave solutions of nonlinear differential-difference equations in polynomial in function tanh are included in these solutions. This implies that the proposed method is more powerful than the one introduced by Baldwin et al. The results obtained in this paper show the validity of the proposal.

#### 1. Introduction

Wadati [1] introduced the following nonlinear differential-difference equation (NDDE): where , , and are constants.

However, (1.1) can be thought as a discrete version of a nonlinear partial differential equation: which can be solved by the inverse scattering method [2].

However, (1.1) obviously includes the following famous NDDEs, namely,

(a) hybrid lattice [3]: (b) discrete mKdV lattice [1, 4]: (c) modified Volterra lattice [5]:The travelling wave solutions of (1.3) in polynomial in function are reported in [3]. Ü. Göktas and W. Hereman [4] investigated the conservations laws of (1.4). However, (1.5) is a very well studied integrable model. It is a bi-Hamiltonian, possesses a Lax pair, recursion operator, local master-symmetry, infinite hierarchy of higher symmetries, and conservation laws [5]. In this study, searching for the closed-form solutions, especially solitary wave solutions and periodic solutions of (1.4) and (1.5), is considered.

In the theory of lattice-soliton, there existed several classical methods to seek for solutions of NDDEs, such as the inverse scattering method [6, 7], bilinear form [8, 9], symmetries [10], and numerical methods [11]. As far as we know, little work is being done to find closed-form solutions of NDDEs by using of symbolic computation. Baldwin et al. [3] recently presented an adaptation of the tanh-method to solve NDDEs. Some analytical (closed-form) solutions of several lattices in polynomial in function have been obtained [3]. Their work may be thought as a breakthrough in solving NDDEs symbolically.

In this study, the method proposed in [3] where tanh-solutions are only considered is firstly generalized, and then is applied to solve (1.1). As a result, a variety of closed-form solutions of (1.1) have been found in terms of trigonometric and Jacobi elliptic functions. The proposed approach allows us to exactly solve NDDEs with the aid of symbolic computation. The solutions presented here not only cover the known one presented by Baldwin et al.[3], but also introduce new solutions for some NDDEs.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: inthe following section, an improved method is proposed and how to obtain the solitary wave solutions and periodic solutions to NDDEs is depicted. Section 3 is devoted to illustrating the application of the proposal in exactly solving (1.1). As a result, some new solitary wave solutions and periodic solutions of Hybrid lattice, discrete mKdV lattice, and modified Volterra lattice have been obtained. The final is conclusions.

#### 2. The Improved Method

To solve NDDEs directly, in this section, one would like to describe the improved method and its algorithm. Suppose the NDDE we study in this work is in the following form

where is a polynomial; is a dependent variable; is a continuous variable; the superscript denotes the order of derivative; , .

To compute the travelling wave solutions of (2.1), we first set and

where and are constants to be determined later and is a constant.

*Step 1. *We assume that the travelling wave solutions of (2.1) we are looking for are in the following frame:
with
where , are all constants to be determined later and a constant.

The degree in (2.3) can be determined by balancing the highest nonlinear term and the highest-order derivative term in (2.1) as in the continuous case.

The functions and in (2.4) satisfy the following equations:

However, (2.5) reveals that can be expressed by .

*Step 2 (to derive and solve the algebraic system). *The following identity is easily obtained in terms of (2.2):
It says the relationship between and . To find the solutions of NDDEs, one also utilizes the following formulae:

If the in (2.3) is replaced by , then expression of in and will be obtained in terms of (2.7).

With the aid of symbolic computation software Maple 8, we substitute into (2.1) and apply the rule

to simplify the expression. Clearing the denominator and collecting the coefficients of and setting them to zero, we can obtain the nonlinear algebraic equations. The values of unknowns will be found by using the Wu's method [12] to solve algebraic system.

*Step 3 (construct and test the exact solutions). *Substitute the values obtained in Step 2 along with (2.2) and (2.4) into (2.3), one can find the solutions of (2.1). To assure the correctness of the solutions, it is necessary to substitute them into the original equation.

*Remark 2.1. *If we set in (2.4), the travelling wave solutions of (2.1) in polynomial in and will be found. If one further requires that , then the polynomial travelling wave solutions in will be obtained. In this sense, we can say that this method covers the one given in [3].

*Remark 2.2. *More important, if the hyperbolic functions in (2.4) are replaced by the trigonometric function, that is,
the periodic solutions to (2.1) will be obtained. While doing so, it is necessary to modify the formulae (2.7) and (2.8) properly.

*Remark 2.3. *We can obviously write (2.4) into the following solitary wave form which have physical relevance:

In what follows, we will apply this method to solve (1.1). As a result, their abundant exact solutions have been derived.

#### 3. Soliton Wave Solutions and Periodic Solutions of (1.1)

By balancing the highest nonlinear term and the highest-order derivative term in (1.1), we have , that is, .

Therefore, the following formal solutions for (1.1) can be assumed:

with as (2.2).

Starting from (2.6), we have

The expressions of and in and are obtained by (2.7), (3.1), and (3.2). Substituting them and (3.1) into (1.1), clearing the denominator, and setting coefficients of the terms to zero give

It is difficult to solve this system by hand. Thus, we fall back on symbolic computation software Maple 8 and Wu's method which is a powerful tool to deal with nonlinear algebraic equations. With the aid of them, we can find the solutions to the above system as follows:

*Case 1. *

*Case 2. *

*Case 3. *

Thus the solitary wave solutions of (1.1) are

where ;

where ;

Similarly, we can also assume that (1.1) possesses the following form solution:

where is a constant to be determined later.

Repeating the above process and properly modifying the formulae (2.7) and (2.8), we can derive the periodic solutions for (1.1) as follows. For brevity, the procedure of seeking for periodic solutions to (1.1) is omitted:

where ;

where ;

If we properly set the parameters , , and , then it is easily to obtain closed-form solutions of Hybrid lattice, discrete mKdV lattice, and modified Volterra lattice, respectively.

In fact, the solution given in [3] for (1.3) is nothing but the solution (3.9). As far as we know, no works have been reported on the closed form solutions of (1.4) and (1.5). Thus, in this sense, these results are novel.

#### 4. Conclusions

A method is proposed to find the solitary wave solutions and periodic solutions for NDDEs. The new closed-form solutions of Hybrid lattice, discrete mKdV lattice, and modified Volterra lattice have been found by using the proposal and symbolic computation. This study reveals that computer algebra plays an important role in exactly solving NDDEs. Meanwhile, it is worthwhile to point out that the proposed method may be applicable to other NDDEs to seek for their travelling wave solutions.

#### Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for his/her valuable suggestions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 10771092).

#### References

- M. Wadati, “Transformation theories for nonlinear discrete systems,”
*Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement*, vol. 59, pp. 36–63, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - M. Wadati, “Wave propagation in nonlinear lattice—I,”
*Journal of the Physical Society of Japan*, vol. 38, pp. 673–680, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet - D. Baldwin, Ü Göktas, and W. Hereman, “Symbolic computation of hyperbolic tangent solutions for nonlinear differential-difference equations,”
*Computer Physics Communications*, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 203–217, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - Ü Göktas and W. Hereman, “Computation of conservation laws for nonlinear lattices,”
*Physica D*, vol. 123, no. 1–4, pp. 425–436, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - V. E. Adler, S. I. Svinolupov, and R. I. Yamilov, “Multi-component Volterra and Toda type integrable equations,”
*Physics Letters A*, vol. 254, no. 1-2, pp. 24–36, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - M. J. Ablowitz and J. F. Ladik, “Nonlinear differential-difference equations,”
*Journal of Mathematical Physics*, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 598–603, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Toda,
*Theory of Nonlinear Lattices*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988. - X.-B. Hu and W.-X. Ma, “Application of Hirota's bilinear formalism to the Toeplitz lattice—some special soliton-like solutions,”
*Physics Letters A*, vol. 293, no. 3-4, pp. 161–165, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - H.-W. Tam and X.-B. Hu, “Soliton solutions and Bäcklund transformation for the Kupershmidt five-field lattice: a bilinear approach,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 987–993, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - S. Y. Lou, “Generalized symmetries and ${W}_{\infty}$ algebras in three-dimensional Toda field theory,”
*Physical Review Letters*, vol. 71, no. 25, pp. 4099–4102, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet - C. E. Elmer and E. S. Van Vleck, “A variant of Newton's method for the computation of traveling waves of bistable differential-difference equations,”
*Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations*, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 493–517, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - W. T. Wu,
*Polynomial Equation-Solving and Its Application, Algorithms and Computation*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994.