Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 506373, 12 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/506373

## Global Attractivity of a Family of Max-Type Difference Equations

^{1}College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China^{2}Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

Received 20 October 2010; Accepted 13 January 2011

Academic Editor: Ibrahim Yalcinkaya

Copyright © 2011 Xiaofan Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We propose to study a generalized family of max-type difference equations and then prove the global attractivity of a particular case of it under some parameter conditions. Through some numerical results of other cases, we finally pose a generic conjecture.

#### 1. Introduction

The study of max-type difference equations is a hotspot in the area of discrete dynamics because such equations are often closely related to automatic control theory and competitive dynamics. For recent advances in this direction see [1–8] and the references therein.

Motivated by [9], Liu et al. [10] studied the following nonautonomous max-type difference equation: where , , , and , are mappings satisfying the condition , for some fixed . When , , they proved that every positive solution to (1.1) converges to zero if , while if . If and , then each positive solution to (1.1) converges to , for some , except for the case , , where . Note that the behavior of positive solutions to (1.1) for the case , , is still an unsolved open problem as was mentioned in [10].

Here, we propose to investigate the asymptotic behavior of positive solutions to the generalized family of max-type difference equations where , , , and the functions , satisfy the condition for some fixed .

In this paper, we mainly consider the particular case that all are zero, and then obviously (1.2) reduces to the following form: Let be a nonnegative equilibrium point of (1.4), then we have It follows directly from (1.5) that if for all , then (1.4) has the unique nonnegative equilibrium , while if there exists at least one such that , then (1.4) has a zero equilibrium and a unique positive equilibrium .

Finally, the following two beautiful theorems are derived.

Theorem 1.1. *Consider (1.4) with condition (1.3). If for all , then every positive solution to (1.4) converges to the unique nonnegative equilibrium zero.*

Theorem 1.2. *Consider (1.4) with positive initial values and positive and . Let be functions such that for some fixed , there hold
**
If there exists at least one such that , then the unique positive equilibrium of (1.4) is a global attractor.*

#### 2. Preliminary Lemmas

For the purpose of establishing the main results, some auxiliary lemmas are essential.

Lemma 2.1. *Consider the first-order difference equation
**
with positive initial value and positive and . If there exists at least one such that , then
*

*Proof. *Suppose that , which is positive, for some . By making the variable change into (2.1) and then canceling the positive term from the resulting equation, we can derive
Note that for , . Then it follows from (2.3) that
In addition, the following two inequalities hold:
In the following, we are confronted with three possibilities.*Case 1. *If there exists such that , then it follows from (2.4) and (2.5) that holds for all .*Case 2. *If there exists such that , then it follows from (2.5) and (2.6) that
Thus there is a finite limit . By taking the limits on both sides of (2.3) and canceling the positive factor from the resulting equation, we obtain
which implies . Because if , then
leading to a contradiction.*Case 3. *If for all , then it follows from (2.5) and (2.6) that
Therefore, the limit of exists, denoted by . By taking the limits on both sides of (2.3) and canceling the nonzero factor from the resulting equation, there hold
which implies . Because if , then
which is a contradiction.In either of the above three cases, we get , implying .

From Lemma 2.1, we have the following result.

Lemma 2.2. *Consider the -order difference equation
**
with positive initial values and . If there exists at least one such that , then
*

*Proof. *Let be an arbitrary positive solution to (2.13). Apparently we know that the sequence can be divided into subsequences , , which are, respectively, positive solutions to the first-order equation (2.1) with positive initial values . According to Lemma 2.1, we derive for all , which directly lead to .

Lemma 2.3. *Let , , and . Define two sequences and in the following way:
**
Then .*

*Proof. *Observe that
It follows by induction that is increasing and is decreasing. Again by induction we derive and , . Hence there are two finite limits and . By taking limits on both sides of (2.15), we derive
which imply . Therefore .

#### 3. Proofs of Main Theorems

In this section, we are in a position to prove the main theorems presented in Section 1.

*Proof of Theorem 1.1. *Note that for the case , , the behavior of positive solutions to (1.4) is quite simple. In this case, we have that
where . Easily the subsequences , converge to zero, hence the sequence also converges to zero.

For the case , with at least one such that , we can obtain that
In this case, the subsequences , are all positive and nonincreasing, thus they converge, respectively, to some nonnegative limits , .

If we replace in (1.4) by , for an arbitrary fixed and let , we can get
where , . Without loss of generality, assume that , then we obtain that
with some fixed number . Because , then it follows from (3.4) that
Therefore we have
leading to , which is a contradiction. Hence we have that , , and every positive solution to (1.4) converges to zero, if for all .

*Proof of Theorem 1.2. *Suppose that for some . Let be an arbitrary fixed real number with . Define two sequences and in the way shown in (2.15) with .

Let be an arbitrary positive solution to (1.4). Next, we proceed by proving two claims.

*Claim 1. *There exists such that for all .

*Proof. *Note that
Consider the following difference equation:
Let be a positive solution to (3.7) with the initial values , .

Note that the mapping is strictly increasing on the interval . It follows by induction that for all . By Lemma 2.2, we have . Hence there is an integer such that for .

Let . Note that
Consider the difference equation
with , . Note the monotonicity of , it follows by induction that for all . By Lemma 2.2, we get that . Thus there exists an integer such that for all .

Working inductively, we will reach the following claim.

*Claim 2. *For every , there exists such that
for all .

*Proof. *Obviously, the case follows directly from Claim 1. In the following, we proceed by induction. Assume that the assertion is true for . Then it suffices to prove the assertion is also true for .

Note that
Consider the difference equation
with , . Note the monotonicity of , it follows by induction that for all . By Lemma 2.2, we have that . So there is an integer such that for all . Then note that
Consider the following difference equation
with , . By the monotonicity of , it follows by induction that for all . By Lemma 2.2, we have that . So there is an integer such that for all .

From Claim 2, we derive This plus Lemma 2.3 leads to that

#### 4. Simulations and Future Work

In the previous section, we proved the global attractivity of (1.2) when all are zero. In this section, we investigate the dynamic behavior of (1.2) provided that all are not zero. First, it is trivial to confirm that when all are not zero, (1.2) has the following unique positive equilibrium point . In the following, some numerical results are presented.

*Experiment 1. *Consider the first-order difference equation
where and the initial value . (See Figures 1 and 2).

*Experiment 2. *Consider the second-order difference equation
where and the initial values . (See Figures 3 and 4).

*Experiment 3. *Consider the third-order difference equation
where the initial values . (See Figure 5).

Inspired by this work and the results of [10], here we pose the following conjecture.

Conjecture 4.1. *Consider (1.2) with nonnegative and positive and . Let , be functions such that for some fixed , there hold
If for all , then every positive solution to (1.2) converges to the equilibrium point
*

#### Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. CDJXS10181130), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 10771227), and the New Century Excellent Talent Project of China (no. NCET-05-0759).

#### References

- K. S. Berenhaut, J. D. Foley, and S. Stević, “Boundedness character of positive solutions of a max difference equation,”
*Journal of Difference Equations and Applications*, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1193–1199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - G. Ladas, “On the recursive sequence ${x}_{n}=\mathrm{max}\{{A}_{1}/{x}_{n-1},{A}_{2}/{x}_{n-2},\dots ,{A}_{p}/{x}_{n-p}\}$,”
*Journal of Difference Equations and Applications*, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 339–341, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - W. Liu and X. Yang, “Quantitative bounds for positive solutions of a Stević difference equation,”
*Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society*, vol. 2010, Article ID 235808, 14 pages, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Stević, “On the recursive sequence ${x}_{n+1}=\mathrm{max}\{c,{x}_{n}^{p}/{x}_{n-1}^{p}\}$,”
*Applied Mathematics Letters*, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 791–796, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Stević, “Global stability of a difference equation with maximum,”
*Applied Mathematics and Computation*, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 525–529, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Stević, “Boundedness character of a class of difference equations,”
*Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 839–848, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Stević, “Global stability of a max-type difference equation,”
*Applied Mathematics and Computation*, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 354–356, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - I. Szalkai, “On the periodicity of the sequence ${x}_{n+1}=\mathrm{max}\{{A}_{0}/{x}_{n},{A}_{1}/{x}_{n-1},\dots ,{A}_{k}/{x}_{n-k}\}$,”
*Journal of Difference Equations and Applications*, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - B. D. Iričanin, “Dynamics of a class of higher order difference equations,”
*Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society*, vol. 2007, Article ID 73849, 6 pages, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. Liu, X. Yang, and J. Cao, “On global attractivity of a class of nonautonomous difference equations,”
*Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society*, vol. 2010, Article ID 364083, 13 pages, 2010. View at Google Scholar