Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2011, Article ID 724697, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/724697
Research Article

Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Fractal Dimension in Motor Imagery-Based Brain Computer Interface

1Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2School of Computing Science and Engineering, VIT University, Chennai Campus, Vandalor-Kellambakkam Road, Chennai 48, India
3Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, 75450 Malacca, Malaysia

Received 12 July 2011; Accepted 19 October 2011

Academic Editor: Xiaohui Liu

Copyright © 2011 Chu Kiong Loo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Kübler and K. Müller, “An introduction to brain-computer interfacing,” in Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing, G. Dornhege, J. D. R. Millan, T. Hinterberger, D. J. McFarland, and K. Müller, Eds., pp. 1–25, The MIT Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Jeyabalan, A. Samraj, and L. C. Kiong, “Classification of motor imaginary signals for machine commmunication: a novel approach for brain machine interface design,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Acquisition and Processing (ICSAP '09), pp. 34–38, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, Calif, USA, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Pfurtscheller, C. Brunner, A. Schlögl, and F. H. Lopes da Silva, “Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 153–159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. R. Müller-Putz, R. Scherer, G. Pfurtscheller, and R. Rupp, “EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: a step towards clinical practice,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 382, no. 1-2, pp. 169–174, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, A. Schlogl, and K. Lugger, “Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Nakamura, Y. Yamamoto, and I. Muraoka, “Autonomic control of heart rate during physical exercise and fractal dimension of heart rate variability,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 875–881, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. E. Peters, Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  8. R. Boostani and M. H. Moradi, “A new approach in the BCI research based on fractal dimension as feature and Adaboost as classifier,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 212–217, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Phothisonothai and M. Nakagawa, “EEG-based classification of motor imagery tasks using fractal dimension and neural network for brain-computer interface,” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. E91-D, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. J. Katz, “Fractals and the analysis of waveforms,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 145–156, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Higuchi, “Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory,” Physica D, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 277–283, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. H. E. Hurst, “Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs,” American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 116, pp. 770–799, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Rényi, “On a new axiomatic theory of probability,” Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 285–335, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. S. Sabanal and M. Nakagawa, “A study of time-dependent fractal dimensions of vocal sounds,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3226–3238, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Takuya and N. Masahiro, “An application of EEG analyses based on fractal theory to emotion information processing,” IEICE Technical Report, vol. 104, no. 753, pp. 53–58, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Spasić, A. Kalauzi, M. Ćulić, G. Grbić, and L. Martać, “Estimation of parameter kmax in fractal analysis of rat brain activity,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1048, pp. 427–429, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Bashashati, R. K. Ward, G. E. Birch, M. R. Hashemi, and M. A. Khalilzadeh, “Fractal dimension-based EEG biofeedback system,” in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '03), pp. 2220–2223, September 2003. View at Scopus
  18. M. Phothisonothai and M. Nakagawa, “EEG signal classification method based on fractal features and neural network,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS '08), pp. 3880–3883, Vancouver, Canada, August 2008. View at Scopus
  19. R. Esteller, G. Vachtsevanos, J. Echauz, and B. Litt, “Comparison of fractal dimension algorithms using synthetic and experimental data,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '99), pp. 199–202., Orlando, Fla, USA, May-June 1999. View at Scopus