Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 251942 | 19 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/251942

# The Mathematical Study of Pest Management Strategy

Accepted14 Nov 2012
Published31 Dec 2012

#### Abstract

The theory of impulsive state feedback control is used to establish a mathematical model in the pest management strategy. Then, the qualitative analysis of the mathematical model was provided. Here, a successor function in the geometry theory of differential equations is used to prove the sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the 1-periodic solution. It proved the orbital asymptotic stability of the periodic solution. In addition, numerical analysis is used to discuss the application significance of the mathematical model in the pest management strategy.

#### 1. Introduction

Impulse is an interference in the thing at a short time in the course of its development. It is a method of external control. This kind of method is widely used in biological control, prevention of epidemic, cancer cells of chemotherapeutics, and so on. We use impulsive differential equation to reflect the method of external control. We can use impulsive differential equation to describe some biological phenomena in population ecology. There are mainly two kinds of impulsive differential equation. One kind is fixed times impulsive differential equation, and the other kind is differential system with state impulses. In the recent thirty years, many authors have studied the impulsive differential equation . They obtained some theories of impulsive differential equation; particularly the theory of fixed times impulsive differential equation is widely used in population ecology. Many authors have studied the dynamics of predator-prey models with impulsive control strategies .

Pest management is a focus which people are concerned with. Because the technological revolutions have recently hit the industrial world and the experience and lessons are accumulated, the ideology and strategy of pest management have changed a lot. Pest management changes from chemical control to integrated control. It is fully integrated into the development of agriculture and forestry sustainability.

The study of pest management strategy has good application value and significant agriculture production. In the past few decades, many authors have made a lot of research and discussion it . There are two major methods of pest management. The first is chemical control. It means that the main method to control the amount of pests is spraying insecticide. But its drawback is that it will cause pollution to the environment. In addition, spray insecticide will kill natural enemies and other beneficial organisms. Although this can control pest, it had a negative impact. The second is biological control, which means that the method to control the amount of pests is culturing the natural enemies of pests. Because the biological control can avoid the environmental pollution, many scholars studied biological control. Some people put forward the integrated control method (IPM) by combining chemical control and biological control. Thus we not only can use the fast speed of chemical control, but also can use biological control to avoid the environmental pollution. In the process of pest management, we see culturing the natural enemies of pests or insecticide spraying as an instant action, and this action is not regular. This action is decided by the number of pests; when the amount of pests reached a critical value, we spray insecticide or release the natural enemies of pests at the instant of that time; here, the critical value is called economic threshold or ET. Here, the instant action of culturing the natural enemies of pests or insecticide spraying is impulsive control as we said before, so we use differential system with state impulses to describe integrated control method (IPM) in pest management.

In recent years, the application of differential system with state impulses in integrated pest management has been greatly developed. Tang used differential system with state impulses in pest management [14, 15]. They established a system with state impulses: Here is the densities of the pest, is the densities of natural enemies of the pest, is the critical value of economic, is the growth rate of the pest, is the trapping rate of natural enemies of the pest, is the absorption rate of natural enemies of the pest, is the death rate of natural enemies of the pest, is the rate of killed pest by spraying insecticide, and is the amount of natural enemies of the pest that we released; they are all positive numbers. This system is a spatial model; we can get the explicit solution of it. For system (1.1), the stability and existence of 1-periodic solution and the existence of 2-periodic solution all can be gotten by using comparison principle to transform the system into difference equation.

System (1.1) considered a two-species predator-prey model (Lotka-Volterra) that there is not density dependence for the continuous process of pulse points; this disagrees with practical significance. In order to be closer to the actual, Zeng at [16, 17] made the system (1.1) to be that there is density dependence for the continuous process of pulse points. This can reflect the practical situation; the model is as follows: Here is the density-dependent coefficient of the pest. They use tectonic Lambert- function and comparison principle to get the condition of the existence of 1-periodic solution.

For system (1.2), it did not consider the influence of spraying insecticide on natural enemies. In order to reflect the actual more accurately, we introduced the rate of killed natural enemies by spraying insecticide () at the foundation on system (1.2); then we get the model: The significance of parameters is the same as the aforementioned.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 3 we use the successor function about geometry theory of semicontinuous dynamical systems to get the condition of existence and stability of 1-periodic solution for system (1.3). Section 4 combined with numerical simulations gives the application for system (1.3) in pest management.

#### 2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1. For the state impulse differential equation Here , , and are lines or curves on the plane, is the pulse set, and is the phase set. We describe a dynamical system made by the solution maps of system (2.1) as a semicontinuous dynamical system, which is denoted as . The initial mapping point is not in the pulse set, ,   is a continuous mapping, , and   is known as pulse mapping.

Definition 2.2. is the semicontinuous dynamical system mapping described by system (2.1) at ; is a mapping in itself. It includes two parts:(1) differential equation The Poincare mapping is the mapping of (2.2) at the initial mapping point ; if , then the semicontinuous dynamical system mapping at the initial mapping point is .(2) If there is a , then ; pulse mapping is and if , then the semicontinuous dynamical system mapping at the initial mapping point is .(3) At the situation of (2), if , and having a made , then (4) For repeated superior surface, ; then we have

Property 1. The mapping of the semi-continuous dynamical system:
(1) ; (2) ; (3) is continuously at initial mapping point .

Definition 2.3. If the periodic solution of system (2.1) does not intersect with pulse set , then is also the periodic solution for system (2.1).

Definition 2.4. When there is a point at phase set and a , make ; it also has ; then is said to be 1-periodic solution.

Definition 2.5. Successor function: let be a coordinate axis defined at , the origin point is intersection point of line with axis, and the positive direction consistent with the positive direction of axis, an arbitrary point , is the coordinate of at , ; if there exists a , making , then is the successor function of point ; here .

Lemma 2.6. The successor function is continuous.
In fact, successor function   is that continuous solution of differential equation compound with continuous functions and is a complex function of two continuous functions, so is continuous.

Lemma 2.7. Let continuous dynamical system be as ; if there are two points and at phase set, making , then there must exist a point between and such that ; thus there must exist 1-periodic solution by point .

Lemma 2.8 (Poincaré’s criterion). The -periodic solution of system is orbitally asymptotically stable if the multiplier satisfies the condition , where Here , , , , , , , are calculated for the point ,

#### 3. The Stability and Existence of 1-Periodic Solution to Pest Management Model with Impulsive State Control

Statement 3.1. At system (1.3), if , then we get Lotka-Volterra predator-prey model: When , system has stable focus . This stable focus is asymptotically stable. When , , , we get system (1.3).

Statement 3.2. The intersection point of pulse set and isoclines is denoted by ; then there exists a trajectory of system that tangency with to , and the phase point of at phase set is denoted by .

Theorem 3.3. When pulse set is , then there exists a point at phase set  ; make , and then system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.

Proof. Let pulse set be , phase set is , the intersection point of pulse set and isoclines is denoted by , is the coordinate of , is the coordinate of , there exists a trajectory at initial point of system, its tangency with at and intersects with at , that pulse to , phase point is , it is called the successor point of . From Definition 2.5, we get the successor faction is of .(i)If , (see Figure 1), there exists a point at , the trajectory over intersects with , the intersection point is denoted by , let , trajectory intersects with at point , that is pulsed to , phase point is , so , so there must exist a point at phase set , it satisfies , that make , from Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.(ii)If , (see Figure 2), then there exists a trajectory which can sufficiently approach trajectory to make the intersection point of trajectory and . It means that point can sufficiently approach point . The trajectory over intersects with at point , that pulse to , phase point is , and point satisfies . That means can sufficiently approach point ; then . At the same time, there exists a point at , the trajectory over intersects with , the intersection point is denoted by , that is pulsed to , phase point is , then . So, there must exist a point at phase set , it satisfy , that makes , from Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution. This completes the proof.

Theorem 3.4. When pulse set is , there exists a point at phase set ; make , and then system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.

Proof. Let pulse set is , phase set be , the intersection point of pulse set and isoclines is denoted by , and there exists a trajectory at initial point of system, its tangency with at and intersects with at , that is pulsed to , phase point is , it is called the successor point of . From Definition 2.5, we get the successor function of . Here, we make the discussion similar to the proof of Theorem 3.3; then we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution whether at (see Figure 3) or at , (see Figure 4). This completes the proof.

Statement 3.5. Let pulse set be (), and phase set is ; we know that trajectory of system tangency with at ; the negative semiorbits of point are denoted by ; here the phase point of at phase set is denoted by .

Theorem 3.6. When the pulse set is and phase set is , (1)if the negative semiorbits of point are , then there exists a point at making . It means that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.(2)The negative semiorbits of point are . If for the first time it intersects with phase set at , the second time it intersects with phase set at , here , when or , there exists a point at phase set , making ; it means that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.

Proof. (1) If the negative semiorbits of point are , there exists a trajectory at initial point of system, that tangency with at and intersects with at , that is pulsed to , phase point is , it is called the successor point of , the successor faction is .(i)If (see Figure 5), there exists a point , the trajectory of system which cross the point intersect with at , it make , the trajectory of system intersect with at point , that is pulse to , phase point is , then , so there must exist a point at phase set , it satisfies , it makes . From Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.(ii)If (see Figure 6), there exists a trajectory which can sufficiently approach trajectory to make the intersection point of trajectory and ; it means that point can sufficiently approach point , the trajectory over intersects with at point , that is pulsed to , phase point is , point satisfies , and that means can sufficiently approach point ; then . At the same time, there exists a point at , the trajectory over intersects with , the intersection point is denoted by , that pulse to , phase point is , and then , so there must exist a point at phase set ; it satisfies , making . From Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.
(2) The negative semiorbits of point are . If for the first time it intersects with phase set at , the second time it intersects with phase set at ; here ; here we consider the phase point of at .(i)If (see Figure 7), then there exists a trajectory which can sufficiently approach trajectory to make the intersection point of trajectory and . It means that point can sufficiently approach point , the trajectory intersect with at point , that pulse to , phase point is , it satisfies ; that means can sufficiently approach point ; then we have , there exists a point at , the trajectory over intersects with , the intersection point is denoted by , that pulse to , phase point is , and then , so there must exist a point at phase set ; it satisfies , making . From Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.(ii)If (see Figure 8), there exists a point , the trajectory of system which crosses the point intersects with at , it makes , the trajectory of system intersects with at point , that pulse to ; phase point is , and then , so there must exist a point at phase set ; it satisfies , making . From Lemma 2.7, we get that system (1.3) has a 1-periodic solution.

Statement 3.7. If , then system (1.3) has no 1-periodic solution.
If , the periodic solution at the right of stable focus under the influence of impulsive control, then it does not have practical significance, so we did not discuss it.

Theorem 3.8. If the condition holds, then the 1-periodic solution which crosses the point of system (1.3) is orbitally asymptotically stable.

Proof. From system (1.3), we have then When , then , so the 1-periodic solution is orbitally asymptotically stable.

Statement 3.9. If , , we get the pest management model of nonpollution; when the economic threshold of system (1.3) is , then , and it is called the key point of the natural enemies of pests. At the time that the number of the natural enemies of pests is less than , we release the natural enemies of pests, so we have the following model: here or means the number of the natural enemies we released at one time; the significance of other parameters is the same as the aforementioned.

Theorem 3.10. If , then the system (3.4) has a 1-periodic solution.
If , then the system (3.4) has a 1-periodic solution or it has for any .

Theorem 3.11. The 1-periodic solution of system (3.4) is orbitally asymptotically stable.

#### 4. Numerical Analysis and Biological Significance

In this part, we use numerical simulation to analyse the dynamical behavior and ecological significance of system (1.3). We fixed the coefficients of the system, then we get system (2.1):

Statement 4.1. If there is no impulse, then system has the unique positive equilibrium (5, 4.5) which is globally asymptotically stable.
Next, we consider the existence of 1-periodic solution for system (4.1) under the different values of pulse set , the parameters , and initial point .
Case 1. , pulse set is , see Figure 9, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 2. , pulse set is , see Figure 10, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 3. , pulse set is , see Figure 11, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 4. , pulse set is , see Figure 12, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 5. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 13, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 6. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 14, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 7. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 15, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 8. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 16, and the system has a 1-periodic solution.
Case 9. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 17, and the system has no 1-periodic solution.
Case 10. , pulse set is , phase set is , see Figure 18, and the system has no 1-periodic solution.

From the numerical analyses, we know that it is better to use comprehensive control including chemistry control and biological technique according to different values of economic threshold to pest. When the pulse set is below or equal to the number of the pests of the system at the equilibrium state without pulse, the system has a 1-periodic solution, which is consistent with the proof of the theorem. When the pulse set is more than the number of the pests of the system at the equilibrium state without pulse and the phase set is less than the number of the pests of the system at the equilibrium state without pulse, the system has a 1-periodic solution, which is consistent with the proof of the theorem. When the pulse set is more than the number of the pests of the system at the equilibrium state without pulse and the phase set is more than the number of the pests of the system at the equilibrium state without pulse, the 1-periodic solution of system may not necessarily exist; we must consider different kinds of the number of the natural enemies we released; then the 1-periodic solution exists and has different periods, which is consistent with the proof of the theorem. So we take different release strategies according to different growth periods of the crop. In order to decide how to control the number of the natural enemies we released, the control strategy with impulsive state needs observing and recording the number of the pests and the natural enemies. In theory, we can predict the cycle time without repeated measurements, which can save a lot of manpower and material resources. The model in this paper is closer to the reality than the model that there is no density dependence for the continuous process of pulse points; it is also closer to the reality than the model that did not consider the influence of natural enemies of spraying insecticide.

#### Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Education Department (JB09078), Minnan Science and Technology Institute and the Young Core Instructor (mkq201006).

1. P. S. Simeonov and D. D. Baĭnov, “Orbital stability of periodic solutions of autonomous systems with impulse effect,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2561–2585, 1988.
2. V. Lakshmikantham, D. Bainov, and P. Simeonov, Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations, World Scientific, Singapore, 1989.
3. D. Baĭnov and P. Simeonov, Impulsive Differential Equations: Periodic Solutions and Applications, vol. 66, Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, UK, 1993.
4. I. M. Stamova, “Vector Lyapunov functions for practical stability of nonlinear impulsive functional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 325, no. 1, pp. 612–623, 2007.
5. Y. Zhang and J. Sun, “Stability of impulsive functional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications A, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 3665–3678, 2008.
6. C. Li, J. Sun, and R. Sun, “Stability analysis of a class of stochastic differential delay equations with nonlinear impulsive effects,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 347, no. 7, pp. 1186–1198, 2010.
7. L. Chen and J. Sun, “Nonlinear boundary value problem of first order impulsive functional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 726–741, 2006.
8. H. Cheng, F. Wang, and T. Zhang, “Multi-state dependent impulsive control for holling i predator-prey model,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2012, Article ID 181752, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
9. Y. Wang and M. Zhao, “Dynamic analysis of an impulsively controlled predator-prey model with Holling type IV functional response,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2012, Article ID 141272, 18 pages, 2012.
10. L. Shen, E. Feng, and Q. Wu, “Impulsive control in microorganisms continuous fermentation,” International Journal of Biomathematics, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
11. C. Li and S. Tang, “The effects of timing of pulse spraying and releasing periods on dynamics of generalized predator-prey model,” International Journal of Biomathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
12. B. Liu, Y. Tian, and B. Kang, “Dynamics on a Holling II predator-prey model with state-dependent impulsive control,” International Journal of Biomathematics, vol. 5, no. 3, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
13. L. Chen, Mathematical Model in the Ecology of Application and Research, Science Press, Beijing, China, 1998.
14. S. Tang and L. Chen, “Density-dependent birth rate, birth pulses and their population dynamic consequences,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 185–199, 2002.
15. S. Tang and L. Chen, “Impulsive semi-dynamical systems with applications in biological management(the doctor degree’s article),” Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
16. G. Zeng, L. Chen, and L. Sun, “Existence of periodic solution of order one of planar impulsive autonomous system,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 466–481, 2006.
17. G. Zeng, “State dependent on impulsive differential equation periodic solution existence and its application in pest management,” Journal of Biomathematics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 652–660, 2007. View at: Google Scholar