Research Article
A Fuzzy Optimization Model for High-Speed Railway Timetable Rescheduling
Table 1
Rescheduling results of different cases.
| Case | R | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | D8 | D9 | D10 | D11 |
| | R1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 368784 | 47.5 | — | 5.38 | Case 1 | R2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 350449 | 31.5 | — | 3.39 | | R3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.86392 | 33.5 | 1 | 178.17 |
| | R1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 860720 | 122.43 | — | 6.22 | Case 2 | R2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 848871 | 109.18 | — | 3.36 | | R3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.89425 | 114.29 | 2 | 142.58 |
| | R1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 34 | 6 | 7969213 | 3052.95 | — | 3.38 | Case 3 | R2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 38 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 7473849 | 2248.26 | — | 3.32 | | R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 25 | 16 | 0 | 0.689117 | 2655.16 | — | 23.13 |
| | R1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 30 | 11 | 9294339 | 3269.32 | — | 3.36 | Case 4 | R2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 37 | 3 | 0 | 8577661 | 2486.32 | — | 3.39 | | R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 39 | 16 | 0 | 0.70606 | 2753.17 | 2 | 76.75 |
| | R1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 24 | 17 | 9367637 | 3305.19 | — | 8.05 | Case 5 | R2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 34 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 8671072 | 2557.32 | — | 7.97 | | R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0.740856 | 2823.34 | 3 | 280.23 |
| | R1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 27 | 15 | 8086249 | 3197.86 | — | 7.74 | Case 6 | R2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 35 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 7588658 | 2397.15 | — | 7.75 | | R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 23 | 15 | 5 | 0.792877 | 2704.43 | 4 | 260.56 |
|
|