Research Article
A Fuzzy Optimization Model for High-Speed Railway Timetable Rescheduling
Table 2
Comparison of the optimal objectives.
| Case | | | | | | | | | | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Case 1 | 0.860180 | 0.860920 | 0.861390 | 0.862250 | 0.863920 | 0.864470 | 0.865731 | 0.865020 | 0.864170 | Case 2 | 0.889860 | 0.890440 | 0.891050 | 0.892280 | 0.894240 | 0.896030 | 0.895490 | 0.892661 | 0.890040 | Case 3 | 0.671015 | 0.674356 | 0.678921 | 0.684357 | 0.689117 | 0.693258 | 0.698091 | 0.702655 | 0.705186 | Case 4 | 0.697540 | 0.698920 | 0.700130 | 0.702480 | 0.706060 | 0.709138 | 0.712240 | 0.714521 | 0.715390 | Case 5 | 0.730050 | 0.732160 | 0.734875 | 0.737280 | 0.740856 | 0.744030 | 0.747980 | 0.749721 | 0.751060 | Case 6 | 0.779810 | 0.781530 | 0.784010 | 0.787903 | 0.792877 | 0.797460 | 0.801130 | 0.804655 | 0.806515 |
|
|