Modified Function Projective Synchronization of Fractional Order Chaotic Systems with Different Dimensions
The modified function projective synchronization of different dimensional fractional-order chaotic systems with known or unknown parameters is investigated in this paper. Based on the stability theorem of linear fractional-order systems, the adaptive controllers with corresponding parameter update laws for achieving the synchronization are given. The fractional-order chaotic system and hyperchaotic system are applied to achieve synchronization in both reduced order and increased order. The corresponding numerical results coincide with theoretical analysis.
Synchronization has attracted a great deal of interest due to its important applications in ecological systems , physical systems , chemical systems , modeling brain activity, system identification, pattern recognition phenomena and secure communications , and so forth. Since the pioneering work of Pecora and Carroll , various synchronization scenarios have been studied for chaotic systems, including complete synchronization , phase synchronization , lag synchronization , Q-S synchronization , and projective synchronization . As a much more universal synchronization manner, the modified function projective synchronization (MFPS) means that the drive and response systems could be synchronized up to a scaling function matrix, but not a constant matrix. Obviously, the unpredictability of the scaling functions in MFPS can additionally enhance the security of communication [11–13].
In recent years, the study on the nonlinear dynamics and synchronization control of fractional-order chaotic systems has become a hot topic in nonlinear research area. It is demonstrated that many fractional-order differential systems behave chaotically or hyperchaotically, such as the fractional-order Chua circuit , the fractional-order Arneodo system , the fractional-order Chen system , the fractional-order hyperchaotic Lorenz system , the fractional-order hyperchaotic Lü system , and so forth. Studies show that a fractional-order controller can provide better performances than an integer order one and lead to more robust control performance . According to different definitions of the fractional-order differential equation from the integer order differential equation, most of the methods and results of chaos synchronization in the ordinary differential systems cannot be simply extended to the case of the fractional-order systems. Some approaches have been proposed to achieve chaos synchronization in fractional-order chaotic systems, such as active control , adaptive control , a scalar transmitted signal method , sliding mode control , track control  and fuzzy logic constant control , and so forth. From above and the other related literatures, one can see that, like the studies on the synchronization of integer-order chaotic systems, the synchronization in fractional-order chaotic systems is still the dominant one among the various research of fractional-order systems.
At present, many existing schemes focus on synchronization of the fractional-order systems with the same dimension. However, in many real systems, chaos synchronization between different dimensional systems usually occurs, especially in biological and social sciences [26, 27]. Therefore, the synchronization of different dimensional fractional-order systems becomes a meaningful problem. To the best of our knowledge, only a few conclusions focus on the chaos synchronization of fractional-order systems with different dimensions. In [28, 29], Wang et al. advised two methods for hybrid projective synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems with different dimensions. Hybrid projective synchronization is a different projective synchronization mode, in which the scaling factor matrix is not a diagonal matrix and a state variable in drive system can synchronize to multiple variables in response system. The synchronization mode varies from traditional synchronization concept and is devoid of generality in real applications.
In this paper, we discussed the MFPS problem between different dimensional fractional-order chaotic systems with known or unknown parameters. By reduced order or added order, the problem is transformed to the MFPS between identical dimension chaotic systems. Based on adaptive control method and stability theory of fractional-order systems, an effective controller and a parameter update law for MFPS are proposed by rigorous theoretical analysis. Two groups of examples are considered and their numerical simulations are performed. Numerical simulations verify that MFPS really can occur between different dimension fractional systems.
2. A MFPS Scheme in Fractional-Order Chaotic System with Different Dimensions
2.1. The Reduced-Order and Added-Order Schemes
There are several definitions of fractional derivatives. The Caputo derivative is more popular in the real applications, because the inhomogeneous initial conditions are allowed if such conditions are necessary. The Caputo fractional derivative is defined as where is the smallest integer larger than , denotes the Caputo definition of the fractional derivative, is the -order derivative in the usual sense, and stands for gamma function.
Now, consider the fractional-order drive and response systems are described as system (2) and (3), respectively: where , , , and are fractional-order satisfying , and and are two different continuous vector functions. Vector is system parameters of response system.
When and , the drive system is identical to the response system, and this kind of synchronization problem has been well studied. However, when the order of the response system is not equal to that of the drive system, reduced order for the case and added order for the opposite case can be introduced to solve the dimensional diversity.
Case I (the reduced-order scheme when ). When the orders of two systems satisfy the condition (of course ), that is, the order of the drive system is greater than that of the response system, the synchronization can be attained by reducing the order of drive system, in which the controlled response system synchronize to the projection of the drive system. Therefore, we can divide the drive system into two parts. One is the projection: where and . The rest is where , , and and orders satisfy .
In order to unify the order of drive and response system, we can choose arbitrary state variables of drive system to project. Hereby, the possible number of projection (4) is .
Case II (the added-order scheme when ). When the order of the drive system is lower than that of the response system, we can increase the order of drive system and construct an auxiliary state vector with order which is the function of state vector of drive system. Obviously, the defined function may also be constant function. Therefore, we define and , and then we get a new dimension state vector . The drive system is rewritten as follows: where , , , .
After the above transformation, the dimension of drive system (4) or (6) comes the same as response system (3) via reduced order or added order. Thus, the aim of MFPS is to design a suitable controller, which is able to synchronize the state of the transformed drive system and the response system up to different arbitrary scaling functions.
2.2. A MFPS Strategy of Fractional-Order Chaotic Systems
When the parameters in system (3) are uncertain, the controlled response system and a parameter update law are expressed by where are unknown parameters to be estimated and are adaptive controller to be designed.
Definition 1 (MFPS). For the drive system (4) or system (6) and controlled system (7), it is said to be modified function projective synchronization (MFPS) if there exist controller , parameter update law , and a scaling function matrix , such that where is the Euclidean norm, and are continuous bounded functions. , , and are called the MFPS error vector.
Remark 2. It is easy to see that function projective synchronization and modified projective synchronization are the special cases of modified function projective synchronization where and , , respectively.
Next, we will discuss how to choose the controller and the parameter update laws. Let the controller and we choose where is the true values of the “unknown” parameters. For the fractional-order part contained in controller, we can refer to the properties of fractional-order derivative; that is, the derivative is linear operation. Moreover, is a function about and can be regarded as constant for derivative . Therefore, we can obtain , which can be simulated the same as fractional-order system.
Then, response system (7) can be rewritten as
According to Definition 1, we have the error vector as , so we can obtain
Now, vector and parameter update law are chosen as where is an real matrix to be designed and is a real matrix to be designed.
Now the MFPS problem between drive system (4) or system (6) and controlled system (7) has been transformed into the following problem: choose suitable real matrix and such that system (16) is asymptotically stable to zero.
Proof. Suppose that is one of the eigenvalues of matrix and the corresponding nonzero eigenvector is ; that is,
Taking conjugate transpose on both sides of the above equation, one can yield
From (17) multiplied left by plus (18) multiplied right by , we derive that
So, . Because for matrix , it is easy to get that
Since and all are not equal to zero, we can obtain
From (21), we have .
According to the stability theory of fractional-order systems , we can yield that system (16) is asymptotically stable. That is, .
The proof is completed.
Remark 4. Theorem 3 will still apply to the condition that the parameters of response system are known. In this case, and are all real matrix and . The corresponding examples will be illustrated in Section 3.2.
Remark 5. The main difference in the design of the controller between this paper and  is that the controller in  is based on decomposing the drive and response system into linear parts and nonlinear parts, which does not apply to all fractional-order systems. The controller in this paper is general for all fractional-order systems.
3. Illustrative Examples
In this section, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MFPS scheme for different dimension fractional-order chaotic systems, two numerical examples are respectively used to discuss two kinds of cases: the reduced order synchronization with and the increased order synchronization with . These examples include hyperchaotic system drives chaotic system and 3-dimension chaotic system drives 4-dimension chaotic system. And a predictor-corrector scheme  is chosen for the following simulations of the fractional-order differential equations.
3.1. Reduced-Order MFPS with
In this subsection, fractional-order hyperchaotic Lorenz system  as drive and fractional-order Chen system  as response are chosen to obtain the reduced-order MFPS behavior of fractional-order chaotic systems with unknown parameters.
The fractional-order hyperchaotic Lorenz dynamical differential equation can be given by where system parameters are chosen as . The fractional-order system exhibits hyperchaotic behavior for .
In order to investigate the reduced-order MFPS behavior between hyperchaotic Lorenz system and Chen system, we assume that the projection of system (22) is the drive system and it can be presented in the form of
The controlled fractional-order Chen system with uncertain parameters is defined as where . When , the fractional-order Chen system shows chaotic characteristic.
According to the above discussion, we can obtain
Therefore, the possible parameter update law and real matrix are chosen as
Consequently, it is easy to obtain
Obviously, the elements in satisfy conditions (2)-(3) given in Theorem 3. Thus, the MFPS between projected system (23) and response system (24) can be achieved and the uncertain parameters can be exactly estimated. Here, choose scale function vector . The initial conditions are , and initial values of unknown parameters are . The corresponding numerical results are shown in Figures 1-2. Figure 1 displays the error state trajectories of the drive system (23) and response system (24). Figure 2 shows that the estimated values of parameters in system (24) converge to their true values as .
These results show that the MFPS between hyperchaotic system (22) and chaotic system (24) and parameters identification have been achieved with the adaptive control law and the parameter update laws (26).
3.2. Added-Order MFPS with
It is assumed that the fractional-order chaotic Arneodo system  drives the fractional-order hyperchaotic Lü system  with known parameters. The order of Arneodo system is increased to synchronize to 4-dimensional Lü system.
The fractional-order Arneodo system is defined as
When and , the Arneodo system exhibits chaotic behavior.
The equations of the 4-dimensional fractional-order Lü system are
It has been shown that system (30) will exhibit hyperchaotic behavior when and , , and .
Based on the above method, we construct an auxiliary state variable and its fractional derivative for Arneodo system; the drive system; after adding order can be written as
According to the discussion in Section 2, we can obtain that
Now, we can choose
According to the above theorem, the MFPS between 3-dimensional Arneodo system and 4-dimensional Lü system can be achieved via added order. We have performed some numerical simulations to verify the above theoretical analysis. For example, choose . The corresponding numerical results are shown in Figure 3.
In Figure 3, the initial conditions for drive system (30) and response system (29) are and ,, respectively. From the results in Figure 3, we can see that added-order 3-dimensional system and 4-dimensional system can synchronize up to a scale function matrix.
In summary, the adaptive reduced-order or added-order MFPS of chaotic systems with different dimensions is discussed. When the order of drive system is slightly large, the drive system is order-reduced to synchronize response. If drive system has lower dimension, some auxiliary states are added to increase the dimension of drive system. According to the stability theorems of linear fractional-order systems, an adaptive controller and a parameter update law are presented to synchronize different dimensional systems. It is shown that the response system can not only synchronize with the projection of the drive system but also synchronize with the drive system that includes auxiliary state. This technique has been successfully applied to two examples: fractional-order hyperchaotic Lorenz system drives fractional-order Chen system with unknown parameters; fractional-order Arneodo system drives the fractional-order hyperchaotic Lü system with known parameters.
In this paper, we propose a general method to achieve MFPS of fractional-order chaotic systems even though their dimensions are distinct. The method can be extended to the condition that the derivative orders of drive and response systems are unequal or the fractional-order system with incommensurate orders.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61374178 and 61202085), the Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 201202076), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant no. 20120042120010), and the Ph.D. Startup Foundation of Liaoning Province, China (Grant nos. 20111001, 20121001, and 20121002).
B. Blasius, A. Huppert, and L. Stone, “Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological system,” Nature, vol. 399, pp. 354–359, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Han, C. Kerrer, and Y. Kuramoto, “Dephasing and bursting in coupled neural oscillators,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, pp. 3190–3193, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
K. M. Cuomo and A. V. Oppenheim, “Circuit implementation of synchronized chaos with application to communication,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, pp. 65–68, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, “Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators,” Physics Review Letters, vol. 76, pp. 1804–1807, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
S. Taherionl and Y. C. Lai, “Observability of lag synchronization of coupled chaotic oscillators,” Physical Review E, vol. 59, pp. 6247–6250, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
R. Mainieri and J. Rehacek, “Projective synchronization in three-dimensional chaotic systems,” Physics Review Letters, vol. 82, pp. 3042–3045, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
K. S. Sudheer and M. Sabir, “Switched modified function projective synchronization of hyperchaotic Qi system with uncertain parameters,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 15, pp. 4058–4064, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Chen, L. C. Jiao, J. S. Wu et al., “Projective synchronization with different scale factors in a driven-response complex network and its application in image encryption,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 11, pp. 3045–3058, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
T. T. Hartley, C. F. Lorenzo, and H. K. Qammer, “Chaos in a fractional order Chua's system,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 42, pp. 485–490, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
J. G. Lu, “Chaotic dynamics and synchronization of fractional-order Arneodo's systems,” Chaos Solitons & Fractals, vol. 26, pp. 1125–1133, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
X. Y. Wang and J. M. Song, “Synchronization of the fractional order hyperchaos Lorenz systems with activation feedback control,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14, pp. 3351–3357, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
F. H. Min, Y. Yu, and C. J. Ge, “Circuit implementation and tracking control of the fractional-order hyper-chaotic Lü system,” Acta Physica Sinica, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 1456–1461, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
M. S. Tavazoei, M. Haeri, and N. Nazari., “Analysis of undamped oscillations generated by marginally stable fractional order systems,” Signal Processing, vol. 88, pp. 2971–2978, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Agrawal, M. Srivastava, and S. Das, “Synchronization of fractional order chaotic systems using active control method,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 45, pp. 737–752, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. G. Lu, “Nonlinear observer design to synchronize fractional-order chaotic system via a scaler transmitted signal,” Physica A, vol. 359, pp. 107–118, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
S. Y. Li and Z. M. Ge, “Generalized synchronization of chaotic systems with different orders by fuzzy logic constant controller,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, pp. 2302–2310, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
S. Wang, Y. G. Yu, and M. Diao, “Hybrid projective synchronization of chaotic fractional order systems with different dimensions,” Physica A, vol. 389, pp. 4981–4988, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
S. Wang and Y. G. Yu, “Generalized projective synchronization of fractional order chaotic systems with different dimensions,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 29, no. 2, Article ID 020505, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
D. Matignon, “Stability results of fractional differential equation with applications to control processing,” in Computational Engineering in Systems Applications, pp. 963–968, 1996.View at: Google Scholar