Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2014, Article ID 301282, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/301282
Research Article

Valuing Convertible Bonds Based on LSRQM Method

1School of Economics and Management, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2Press, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
3Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received 11 March 2014; Accepted 23 May 2014; Published 24 June 2014

Academic Editor: Chuangxia Huang

Copyright © 2014 Jian Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Cox, S. A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein, “Option pricing: a simplified approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 229–263, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Ammann, A. Kind, and C. Wilde, “Simulation-based pricing of convertible bonds,” Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 310–331, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. A. Longstaff and E. S. Schwartz, “Valuing American options by simulation: a simple least-squares approach,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 113–147, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Stentoft, “Assessing the Least Squares Monte-Carlo approach to American option valuation,” Review of Derivatives Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 129–168, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. A. Acworth, M. Broadie, and P. Glasserman, “A comparison of some Monte Carlo and quasi Monte Carlo techniques for option pricing,” in Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 1996, pp. 1–18, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Imai and K. S. Tan, “Minimizing effective dimension using linear transformation,” in Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2002, pp. 275–292, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. W. J. Morokoff, “Generating quasi-random paths for stochastic processes,” SIAM Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 765–788, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. B. Moskowitz and R. E. Caflisch, “Smoothness and dimension reduction in quasi-Monte Carlo methods,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 23, no. 8-9, pp. 37–54, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. F. Wen, Z. He, and X. Chen, “Investors' risk preference characteristics and conditional skewness,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 814965, 14 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. A. Jarrow and S. M. Turnbull, “Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk,” Journal of Finance, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 53–85, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. W. Hung and J. Y. Wang, “Pricing convertible bonds subject to default risk,” The Journal of Derivatives, no. 4, pp. 75–87, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. C. Donald and L. Qin, “A tree model for pricing convertible bonds with equity, interest rate, and default risk,” The Journal of Derivatives, no. 2, pp. 25–46, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Liu, J. Xiao, L. Yan, and F. Wen, “Valuing catastrophe bonds involving credit risks,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 563086, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Xu, “A lattice approach for pricing convertible bond asset swaps with market risk and counterparty risk,” Economic Modelling, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2143–2153, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Liu, M. Tao, C. Ma, and F. Wen, “Utility indifference pricing of convertible bonds.,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 429–444, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Litterman and T. Iben, “Corporate bond valuation and the term structure of credit spreads,” Journal of Portfolio Management, pp. 52–64, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Duffie, “Credit swap valuation,” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Andersen and D. Buffum, “Calibration and implementation of convertible bond models,” Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  19. V. Linetsky, “Pricing equity derivatives subject to bankruptcy,” Mathematical Finance, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 255–282, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. P. Carr and V. Linetsky, “A jump to default extended CEV model: an application of Bessel processes,” Finance and Stochastics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 303–330, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. D. Duffie, L. Saita, and K. Wang, “Multi-period corporate default prediction with stochastic covariates,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 635–665, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Liu, L. Yan, and C. Ma, “Pricing options and convertible bonds based on an actuarial approach,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 676148, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. K. Tsiveriotis and C. Femandes, “Valuing convertible bonds with default risk,” Journal of Fixed Income, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. Huang, C. Peng, X. Chen, and F. Wen, “Dynamics analysis of a class of delayed economic model,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 962738, 12 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Lin and X. Wang, “New Brownian bridge construction in quasi-Monte Carlo methods for computational finance,” Journal of Complexity, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 109–133, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. L. Yu, S. Wang, F. Wen, and K. K. Lai, “Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 197, pp. 71–86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. L. Stentoft, “Assessing the least squares Monte-Carlo approach to American option valuation,” Review of Derivatives Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 129–168, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus