Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2015, Article ID 140984, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/140984
Research Article

Modeling and Simulation of Polarization in Internet Group Opinions Based on Cellular Automata

1School of Statistics, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
2School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
3School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received 30 May 2015; Accepted 9 July 2015

Academic Editor: Marko Robnik

Copyright © 2015 Yaofeng Zhang and Renbin Xiao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Stauffer, A. Sousa, and C. Schulze, “Discretized opinion dynamics of the deffuant model on scale-free networks,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 7, no. 3, article 7, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, “Opinion evolution in closed community,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1157–1165, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. J. Tessone, R. Toral, P. Amengual, H. S. Wio, and M. S. Miguel, “Neighborhood models of minority opinion spreading,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 535–544, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 03, no. 1–4, pp. 87–98, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. S. Miguel, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and K. Klemm, “Binary and multivariate stochastic models of consensus formation,” Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 67–73, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Sznajd-Weron, “Dynamical model of ising spins,” Physical Review E, vol. 70, no. 3, Article ID 037104, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Castellano, D. Vilone, and A. Vespignani, “Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small-world networks,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 153–158, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 216–219, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. R. Sunstein, Republic.com, Princeton University Press, 2002.
  11. H. F. Chau, C. Y. Wong, F. K. Chow, and C. H. F. Fung, “Social judgment theory based model on opinion formation, polarization and evolution,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 415, pp. 133–140, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. F. Stoner, A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk [M.S. thesis], Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1961.
  13. N. E. Friedkin, “Social networks in structural equation models,” Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 316–328, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. V. Marsden and N. E. Friedkin, “Network studies of social influence,” Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 127–151, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. N. McCarty, K. T. Poole, and H. Rosenthal, Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2006.
  16. H. X. Xia, H. L. Wang, and Z. G. Xuan, “Opinion dynamics: a multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research,” International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 72–91, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Axelrod, “The dissemination of culture: a model with local convergence and global polarization,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 203–226, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. A. Barbosa and J. F. Fontanari, “Culture-area relation in Axelrod's model for culture dissemination,” Theory in Biosciences, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 205–210, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “Role of dimensionality in Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 327, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “Globalization, polarization and cultural drift,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 321–334, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction,” Physical Review E, vol. 67, no. 2, Article ID 026120, 6 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “Global culture: a noise induced transition in finite systems,” Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 045101, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Flache and M. W. Macy, “What sustains cultural diversity and what undermines it? Axelrod and beyond,” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604201.
  24. L. Leydesdorff, “Technology and culture: the dissemination and the potential 'lock-in' of new technologies,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 3, article 5, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Bhavnani, “Adaptive agents, political institutions and civic traditions in modern Italy,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 6, no. 4, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. C. González-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, and K. Tucci, “Nonequilibrium transition induced by mass media in a model for social influence,” Physical Review E, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 065102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. W. Macy, J. A. Kitts, and A. Flache, “Polarization in dynamic networks: a Hopfield model of emergent structure,” in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, R. Breiger, K. Carley, and P. Pattison, Eds., pp. 162–173, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. Z. P. Li and X. J. Tang, “Polarization and non-positive social influence: a Hopfield model of emergent structure,” International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 15–25, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Z. P. Li and X. J. Tang, “Exogenous covariate and non-positive social influence promote group polarization,” Journal of Management Sciences in China, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 73–81, 2013 (Chinese). View at Google Scholar
  30. J. A. Holyst, K. Kacperski, and F. Schweitzer, “Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation,” Physica A, vol. 285, no. 1-2, pp. 199–210, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. V. Neumann and A. W. Burks, Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1966.
  32. S. Ulam, Sets, Numbers, and Universes, MIT Press, Boston, Mass, USA, 1974. View at MathSciNet
  33. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. M. Mobilia, “Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 028701, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Perc and A. Szolnoki, “Coevolutionary games—a mini review,” BioSystems, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 109–125, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Perc, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, A. Szolnoki, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, “Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review,” Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, vol. 10, no. 80, Article ID 20120997, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. G. Langton, “Studying artificial life with cellular automata,” Physica D, vol. 22, no. 1–3, pp. 120–149, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. W. Hordijk, Dynamics, emergent computation, and evolution in cellular automata [Ph.D. dissertation], University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1999.
  39. S. Wolfram, Cellular Automata and Complexity, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  40. S. Bandini, G. Mauri, and R. Serra, “Cellular automata: from a theoretical parallel computational model to its application to complex systems,” Parallel Computing, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 539–553, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. J. P. Crutchfield and M. Mitchell, “The evolution of emergent computation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 23, pp. 10742–10746, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. P. Crutchfield, “The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 75, no. 1–3, pp. 11–54, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. E. Hanson and J. P. Crutchfield, “Computational mechanics of cellular automata: an example,” Physica D, vol. 103, no. 1–4, pp. 169–189, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. J. H. Holland, Emergence, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  45. C. W. Reynolds, “Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25–34, 1987, Proceedings of the of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '87). View at Google Scholar
  46. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, “Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1226–1229, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. Stauffer, “Difficulty for consensus in simultaneous opinion formation of Sznajd model,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. C. González-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, “Spontaneous ordering against an external field in non-equilibrium systems,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, Article ID 013010, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. C. González-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, “Information feedback and mass media effects in cultural dynamics,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10, no. 3, article 9, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Nowak, J. Szamrej, and B. Latané, “From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact,” Psychological Review, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 362–376, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. A. Pluchino, V. Latora, and A. Rapisarda, “Changing opinions in a changing world: a new perspective in sociophysics,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 515–531, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Szolnoki, Z. Wang, and M. Perc, “Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, article 576, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. Rauhut and J. Lorenz, “The wisdom of crowds in one mind: how individuals can simulate the knowledge of diverse societies to reach better decisions,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 191–197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  54. M. Perc, A. Szolnoki, and G. Szabó, “Restricted connections among distinguished players support cooperation,” Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 78, no. 6, Article ID 066101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and M. Mobilia, “Facilitators on networks reveal optimal interplay between information exchange and reciprocity,” Physical Review E, vol. 89, no. 4, Article ID 042802, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. X. F. Wang and G. R. Chen, “Pinning control of scale-free dynamical networks,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 310, no. 3-4, pp. 521–531, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  57. R. S. Burt, Toward a Structural Theory of Action, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  58. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, “Synchronization in complex networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 93–153, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  59. R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  60. M. Perc and A. Szolnoki, “Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game,” Physical Review E, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 011904, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Perc, “Evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks subject to error and attack,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 11, Article ID 033027, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. Szolnoki and M. Perc, “Resolving social dilemmas on evolving random networks,” EPL, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 30007, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, “Evolutionary games and spatial chaos,” Nature, vol. 359, no. 6398, pp. 826–829, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Szolnoki and M. Perc, “Information sharing promotes prosocial behaviour,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, Article ID 053010, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus