Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2015, Article ID 394810, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/394810
Research Article

Market Share Delegation in a Bertrand Duopoly: Synchronisation and Multistability

1Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Via Cosimo Ridolfi 10, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2Department of Law, University of Genoa, Via Balbi 30/19, 16126 Genoa, Italy
3Department of Economics and Law, University of Macerata, Via Crescimbeni 20, 62100 Macerata, Italy

Received 21 October 2014; Revised 2 March 2015; Accepted 9 March 2015

Academic Editor: Jinde Cao

Copyright © 2015 Luciano Fanti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. J. Baumol, “On the theory of oligopoly,” Economica, vol. 25, no. 99, pp. 187–198, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. F. Fama and M. C. Jensen, “Separation of ownership and control,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 301–325, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Vickers, “Delegation and the theory of the firm,” The Economic Journal, vol. 95, pp. 138–147, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Fershtman and K. Judd, “Equilibrium incentives in oligopoly,” The American Economic Review, vol. 77, pp. 927–940, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  5. C. Fershtman, “Managerial incentives as a strategic variable in duopolistic environment,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. H. Miller and A. I. Pazgal, “The equivalence of price and quantity competition with delegation,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 284–301, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. H. Miller and A. I. Pazgal, “Relative performance as a strategic commitment mechanism,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 51–68, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. T. Jansen, A. van Lier, and A. van Witteloostuijn, “A note on strategic delegation: the market share case,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 531–539, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Jansen, A. V. Lier, and A. van Witteloostuijn, “On the impact of managerial bonus systems on firm profit and market competition: the cases of pure profit, sales, market share and relative profits compared,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 141–153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Kopel and L. Lambertini, “On price competition with market share delegation contracts,” Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 40–43, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Gray, “Cultural perspectives on the measurement of corporate success,” European Management Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 269–275, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. C. Borkowski, “International managerial performance evaluation: a five country comparison,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 533–555, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Fanti, L. Gori, C. Mammana, and E. Michetti, “Local and global dynamics in a duopoly with price competition and market share delegation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 69, pp. 253–270, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. G.-I. Bischi, L. Stefanini, and L. Gardini, “Synchronization, intermittency and critical curves in a duopoly game,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 559–585, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. G. I. Bischi, L. Gardini, and M. Kopel, “Analysis of global bifurcations in a market share attraction model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 24, no. 5–7, pp. 855–879, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. G.-I. Bischi and F. Lamantia, “Nonlinear duopoly games with positive cost externalities due to spillover effects,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 18, pp. 805–822, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. S. Brianzoni, C. Mammana, and E. Michetti, “Local and global dynamics in a discrete time growth model with nonconcave production function,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2012, Article ID 536570, 22 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. L. Fanti, L. Gori, C. Mammana, and E. Michetti, “The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products: synchronization, intermittency and global dynamics,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 52, pp. 73–86, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. G.-I. Bischi and L. Gardini, “Global properties of symmetric competition models with riddling and blowout phenomena,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 149–160, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Bignami and A. Agliari, “Synchronization and on-off intermittency phenomena in a market model with complementary goods and adaptive expectations,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. C. Mira, L. Gardini, A. Barugola, and J. C. Cathala, Chaotic Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Non-Invertible Maps, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.
  22. G. I. Bischi and M. Kopel, “Multistability and path dependence in a dynamic brand competition model,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 561–576, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus