Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017, Article ID 2757939, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2757939
Research Article

An Orderly Untangling Model against Arching Effect in Emergency Evacuation Based on Equilibrium Partition of Crowd

1Hubei Key Laboratory of Construction and Management in Hydropower Engineering, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
2College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
3China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
4Sinohydro Bureau 7 Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Lianghai Jin; moc.qq@59450461

Received 19 March 2017; Revised 2 September 2017; Accepted 17 September 2017; Published 15 November 2017

Academic Editor: Cengiz Çinar

Copyright © 2017 Lianghai Jin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. L. Graham and D. J. Roberts, “Qualitative overview of some important factors affecting the egress of people in hotel fires,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 487–490, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Helbing, “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical Review E Statistical Physics Plasmas Fluids and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 4282–4286, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. R. Parisi and C. O. Dorso, “Microscopic dynamics of pedestrian evacuation,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 354, no. 1–4, pp. 606–618, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Kirchner and A. Schadschneider, “Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 312, no. 1-2, pp. 260–276, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Muramatsu, T. Irie, and T. Nagatani, “Jamming transition in pedestrian counter flow,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 267, no. 3-4, pp. 487–498, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Zhao, L. Yang, and J. Li, “Occupants' behavior of going with the crowd based on cellular automata occupant evacuation model,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 387, no. 14, pp. 3708–3718, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Kirchner, K. Nishinari, and A. Schadschneider, “Friction effects and clogging in a cellular automaton model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 67, no. 5, Article ID 056122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Liu, L. Yang, T. Fang, and J. Li, “Evacuation from a classroom considering the occupant density around exits,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 388, no. 9, pp. 1921–1928, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. P. Hoogendoorn and P. H. L. Bovy, “Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 169–190, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. D. Sime, “An occupant response shelter escape time (ORSET) model,” Safety Science, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 109–125, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Fridolf, D. Nilsson, and H. Frantzich, “Fire evacuation in underground transportation systems: a review of accidents and empirical research,” Fire Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 451–475, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Tofilo, M. Cisek, and K. Lacki, The Study on the Effects of the Counter-Flow on the Evacuation of People from Tall Buildings, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2014.
  14. A. B. A. M. Rangel-Huerta, “Multiagent system applied to the modeling and simulation of pedestrian traffic in counterflow,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 14, no. 3, article 2, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Isobe, T. Adachi, and T. Nagatani, “Experiment and simulation of pedestrian counter flow,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 336, no. 3-4, pp. 638–650, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Cłapa, M. Cisek, P. Tofiło, and M. Dziubiński, “Firefighters ascending and evacuation speeds during counter flow on staircase,” Safety Science, vol. 78, pp. 35–40, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Delin, J. Norén, E. Ronchi, K. Kuklane, A. Halder, and K. Fridolf, “Ascending stair evacuation: walking speed as a function of height,” Fire and Materials, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. J. Fruin, “Designing for pedestrians,” Moving Sidewalks, 1970.
  19. R.-Y. Guo, H.-J. Huang, and S. C. Wong, “Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: experimental and simulation results,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 669–686, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. S. C. Lee and R. L. Hughes, “Exploring trampling and crushing in a crowd,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 575–582, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Papakonstantinou and A. Benardos, “Analysis of the crowd evacuation modeling approaches for the case of urban underground spaces,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 165, pp. 602–609, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus