Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Volume 2017, Article ID 2890814, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2890814
Research Article

Simulation-Based Dynamic Passenger Flow Assignment Modelling for a Schedule-Based Transit Network

1School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, No. 3 Shangyuancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100044, China
2College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, 2600 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Xiangming Yao; nc.ude.utjb@mxoay

Received 7 October 2016; Revised 9 January 2017; Accepted 19 January 2017; Published 13 February 2017

Academic Editor: Ricardo López-Ruiz

Copyright © 2017 Xiangming Yao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. China Association of Metros, “Statistics and analysis report on urban rail transit in 2015,” 2016, http://www.camet.org.cn/.
  2. A. K. Ziliaskopoulos, “Linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem,” Transportation Science, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 37–49, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Ran and D. E. Boyce, “A link-based variational inequality formulation of ideal dynamic user-optimal route choice problem,” Transportation Research Part C, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Ran, D. E. Boyce, and L. J. LeBlanc, “A new class of instantaneous dynamic user-optimal traffic assignment models,” Operations Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 192–202, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. K. Ziliaskopoulos, S. T. Waller, Y. Li, and M. Byram, “Large-scale dynamic traffic assignment: implementation issues and computational analysis,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 585–593, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Balakrishna, Y. Wen, M. Ben-Akiva, and C. Antoniou, “Simulation-based framework for transportation network management in emergencies,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2041, pp. 80–88, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Corman and L. Meng, “A review of online dynamic models and algorithms for railway traffic management,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1274–1284, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J.-D. Schmöcker, A. Fonzone, H. Shimamoto, F. Kurauchi, and M. G. H. Bell, “Frequency-based transit assignment considering seat capacities,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 392–408, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J.-D. Schmöcker, M. G. H. Bell, and F. Kurauchi, “A quasi-dynamic capacity constrained frequency-based transit assignment model,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 925–945, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Kurauchi, M. G. Bell, and J.-D. Schmöcker, “Capacity constrained transit assignment with common lines,” Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 309–327, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and U. Crisalli, “A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks,” Transportation Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 268–285, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  12. A. Nuzzolo, U. Crisalli, and L. Rosati, “A schedule-based assignment model with explicit capacity constraints for congested transit networks,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 16–33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Friedrich, I. Hofsaess, and S. Wekeck, “Timetable-based transit assignment using branch and bound techniques,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1752, pp. 100–107, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. H. Poon, S. C. Wong, and C. O. Tong, “A dynamic schedule-based model for congested transit networks,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 343–368, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. F. Newell, “A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, Part I: general theory,” Transportation Research Part B, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 281–287, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Florian, M. Mahut, and N. Tremblay, “Application of a simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 1381–1392, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  17. W. Y. Szeto and S. C. Wong, “Dynamic traffic assignment: model classifications and recent advances in travel choice principles,” Central European Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. X.-M. Yao, P. Zhao, and D.-D. Yu, “Real-time origin-destination matrices estimation for urban rail transit network based on structural state-space model,” Journal of Central South University, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 4498–4506, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. X. M. Yao, P. Zhao, and D. D. Yu, “Dynamic O-D matrix estimation for urban rail transit network based on averaging strategy,” Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 92–99, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Sundaram, H. N. Koutsopoulos, M. Ben-Akiva, C. Antoniou, and R. Balakrishna, “Simulation-based dynamic traffic assignment for short-term planning applications,” Simulation Modelling Practice & Theory, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 450–462, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. S. Mahmassani, “Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications,” Networks and Spatial Economics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 267–292, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Davidich, F. Geiss, H. G. Mayer, A. Pfaffinger, and C. Royer, “Waiting zones for realistic modelling of pedestrian dynamics: a case study using two major German railway stations as examples,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 37, pp. 210–222, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R.-Y. Guo, “Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck,” Physica A. Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 415, pp. 428–439, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. V. F. Hurdle and B. Son, “Shock wave and cumulative arrival and departure models: partners without conflict,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1776, pp. 159–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Beijing Transportation Research Centre, Annual Report of Beijing Transportation in 2015, 2016, http://www.bjtrc.org.cn/JGJS.aspx?id=5.2&Menu=GZCG.